Advertisement
by The Free Territory of Makhnovia » Sat Jul 21, 2018 9:29 pm
by Tallahassee News Station » Mon Jul 23, 2018 5:35 am
With three different special elections for Senate currently ongoing there is a lot more excitement in an off year than usual, and even though both of the special elections that have their primaries this month in Connecticut and Oklahoma already more or less had the results known going in, the elections still set us up to see what the race will be like in the coming months when the general election comes.
In Connecticut two tight three way races on both the Republican and Democratic sides faded away quietly on the Republican side and dramatically on the Democratic one. For the Republicans moderate Representative William Brennan faced off against newly politically involved NBA Hall of Famer Carter Roberts and firearms manufacturer and Tea Party favorite Jaffson Ruger. Ruger though already facing a tough race was turned on by the Tea Party after surprising comments in the debate hinting at a willingness for major gun control efforts and expanding Winstoncare culminating in an attempt to engage Senator VIllanueva de Pena on Twitter which ended poorly for the magnate. Ruger would mostly withdraw from the campaign after the drop in support. Brennan and Roberts were more evenly matched with Roberts held as a slight winner in their debate but Brennan who was trailing by a thin margin would drop out as Roberts began to pile up Republican endorsements from leaving him as the presumptive nominee which the vote confirmed with Roberts cruising to an easy victory.
On the Democratic side Natalia Aquilas was an intriguing entry in the race but failing to show for the debate hurt her chances badly and her dropping out made it a two man show and an intense one between former Ambassador Sadan Singh and Mayor "Old Dan" Schmidt. The two were within one or two percentage points consistently in their two debates and many rallies with Schmidt first taking the lead and then Singh in a race that neither side could pull away in and was expected to come down to the wire until Singh made the sudden and shocking announcement that he was dropping out of the race in order to run for the Progressive nomination in a move that shook the fault lines between the two left wing parties once again. Singh was still on the ballot for the Democratic primary but voters there overwhelmingly chose the still in the running Schmidt while Singh took the Progressive primary.
In Oklahoma Gene Eric, the former Senator of the seat and President Pro Tempore before the suicide of Albert Winston and tangled line of secession led to him being the second shortest serving President in American history easily won the Republican primary without an opponent challenging him for the seat. On the other side of the aisle the Democratic nominee also faced very little trouble in winning a convincing primary victory but has a much harder job in the general election. The race has been rated as a solid Republican seat across the board by polling agencies with Oklahoma one of the deepest red states in the nation with turnout in an off date election favoring Republicans and Eric having a long incumbency to draw on.
In an election on the side for something other than Congress, former Pennsylvania Governor Norris Vilseck was officially elected as Chairman of the DNC with no major opponent stepping up to challenge him after spending the last few months as the interim leader waiting for the election. Vilseck was the former head of the Democratic Governors Association and is considered a major figure in left wing politics, named in the past as the most liberal Governor in America. His appointment and no election has been seen as a shift in that leftward direction for the party following the tenure of Michael Harrison, who is generally considered to be a more centrist pragmatist official. The former interim chair appointed Vilseck to the spot and now serves as deputy chair.
And finally one of the oddest races this year so far for Mayor of Los Angeles had its votes counted. Incumbent Mayor and rare Republican Taylor Cox was trying to take reelection over several odd instances including a Black Friday party going wrong and a pool incident with his main competition being former Governor and current talk show host Scotty Marlowe. The race between the two was a strange one highlighted by a back and forth debate on the Anita Flores show to the confusion and amusement of many watchers, but they would not be the main two in the election. Only just before the election though Cox announced he was dropping out to prepare to run for Governor of California while Marlowe had disappeared form the celebrity scene and the campaign scene over the last months leaving many to wonder where their candidate was.
When the dust cleared at the polling places Cox's dropout was more than enough to sink his bid, but it was a Progressive-backed candidate in the officially nonpartisan elections that gained the most, surging past Marlowe and Cox to take a plurality of the vote. With a majority needed to win outright however that sends the Progressive and Marlowe, who took second place, into a runoff election between the two alone to be held in late May. Despite finishing in second Marlowe is leaned towards as the favorite with his connections and experience in state but without stepping up his campaign he might not make it past the new challenger who has the chance to make a big win for Walton's Progressives, taking over the Mayorship of the second biggest city in America and tightening their grip on the West Coast.
by Latvijas Otra Republika » Mon Jul 23, 2018 7:07 am
Lenny Lotto @Lennyslottomachine @jeffersoniandemocracy I do believe in perhaps investigating some of this, maybe. But I don't believe in investigating a folk of seagulls! #IwantToBelive #GiveAnX-FilesRebootToMarloweSoHeStops #JustBirds #Woke RETWEETSFAVORITE |
by Tumblrena » Mon Jul 23, 2018 10:33 am
Ellen Walton
@AmericanProgress
A meaningful victory in Los Angeles not just for the Progressive Party but for a better future for all Americans. The people are making their voice heard and they are saying that the time for Progressive leadership is now.
by Bruke » Mon Jul 23, 2018 11:20 am
by Main Nation Ministry » Mon Jul 23, 2018 12:28 pm
by Velahor » Mon Jul 23, 2018 4:58 pm
by Bruke » Mon Jul 23, 2018 6:16 pm
by Velahor » Mon Jul 23, 2018 7:44 pm
Dear Mr. President,
Best wishes, I hope you are holding up well. I wanted to let you know that I am extremely proud to call you my President, you’ve done an outstanding job and returned the dignity and boldness to the office that it deserves.
It has come to my attention that POMA may end up crossing your desk. From my perspective, it is absolutely imperative that you do not sign that bill.
As a constitutional law professor and a longtime public servant, I see that this legislation is very problematic and it would be a shame to see a man of your integrity allow POMA to be a dark mark on your presidency.
Now, I’m against POMA as a whole, but I’m setting biases aside for this advice, as the matter at hand is much greater than gay marriage and state’s rights.
You cannot sign POMA if you want to continue to have a successful presidency. The constitutional nullification crisis it presents would set a dangerous precedent for the future, eliminating the oversight that the Supreme Court has involving the constitutionality of legislation. Without that oversight, we open up the possibility of Democrats or Progressives in the near future conducting a full-blown assault on our Constitution. All it would take is a complicit executive and legislative branch, as the Supreme Court would not have enough power to reverse unconstitutional actions. Even if you find putting marriage into the hands of the states to be a good thing, POMA is, to invoke an old saying, a way to win the battle but lose the war. If Congressional nullification becomes the norm, our Republic is under grave danger.
Additional to the Constitutional issues is the matter of optics. Public perception and timing are key to a successful term as an executive, they are ultimately the reason why I have been elected as Montana’s Governor four times even while facing enormous challenges. Even if POMA was one of your key policy positions, you would be a fool to sign it at this time. The press and the people will see it as reactionary, as a punishment of LGBTQ people for what happened to de Peña. If you were to sign it, it gives off the image that you believe that all LGBTQ people deserve to be punished for what happened at the rally. It would look like you’re capitalizing on public fear after that attack. You seem to be the kind of man more concerned with results than optics, which is noble, but your legacy is worth considering here. Would you rather be a reactionary president, or a staunch defender of the Constitution and of individual liberty?
I’ve seen your courage as President, being able to cope with major tragedies that affect you personally within weeks of your inauguration, and getting more of your campaign promises fulfilled within weeks than many do in their whole first year. Good job, but now is the time to show a little backbone with your own party. Now is the time to prove that you believe in our Constitution and our legal system, that you trust our Supreme Court to make the right decisions involving the constitutionality of legislation. Presidents only get a few defining moments; now is your chance to man up and prove that you’re not a lap dog to the Amaras’es of the world, but that you’re a leader who will do the right thing over the party-sponsored thing.
These are just my suggestions, I’m not trying to be a backseat driver, I just want you to be aware of the implications of signing POMA.
You may be wondering why this would be of such concern to me, why I would write you to voice my opposition. My reasons are simple: I’m quite the old man, I know that I have 20 years tops to make this world a better place before I’m called home. When you get to this age, your perspective really changes. From my view, shredding our Constitution so a few states can refuse to give gay couples a piece of paper that says they’re married seems pretty absurd. That’s not to say that marriage isn’t a big deal, and I understand that the sanctity of marriage is a worthy cause to care about, and in my own faith, I have at times struggled with viewing this through a purely political lens.
But back to what I was saying, I am in the late stages of a long and blessed life. These final years are my time to make an impact on our country that lasts long beyond my passing. And I deeply care that our Constitution’s integrity is preserved for generations to come.
That’s why I’m asking you to not sign POMA. I care about the Constitution, and the authority of the Supreme Court in these matters. I believe that you have similar priorities. Don’t win a battle that will make you lose the war. The Constitution is worth more than that, and if you sign POMA, you lay the groundwork for the dismantling of our nation by leftists and those who would prefer we take the path of tyranny over the liberty that has served us well since the beginning. If you sign it, you may as well walk into the National Archives Building, pull our founding documents off the wall, and burn them to ashes.
Thank you for taking the time to read this, I wish you the greatest luck as our nation’s leader.
For liberty,
Governor Douglas W. Stephens
by Greater Arab State » Tue Jul 24, 2018 2:14 am
Velahor wrote:Somewhere in the air between Virginia and Colorado
The speakers on the plane turned on.
“This is your Captain speaking, we have reached crushing altitude. Thank you for flying United, and I’d like to give a special welcome to our Loyalty Club members. We will be landing in Denver in 3 hours, feel free to move about the cabin at this time, but there is some turbulence so please keep your seatbelt fastened while in your seat.”
The officer looks at Kramer and gives him his food and then uncuffs him.
“You can eat now sir. Don’t try any funny business, you can’t run away when you’re on a plane,” remarks the officer.
by Prolieum » Tue Jul 24, 2018 8:15 am
To Governor Douglas Stephens,
Good day, Governor. I will get right into business, and I won't keep your attention for more than a minute or two. As you well know, us oilmen have a new tax put on us, and it does not look like one that we are going to be able to handle without some trouble. I know that law that did this is beyond you control, but I do not believe that a response to it is.
My proposition is a simple one. We, producers in Montana, shoulder the taxes of the state, and now this tax from the federal government. If you want to help us shoulder the cost of the federal tax, what I propose is an exemption from the state tax. You hear more clever words and intelligent language every day, but my suggestion is no more complex than that.
You and I both know how crucial our industry is to this state. The consideration is yours.
Sincerely,
"We are the Canadian Borg. Resistance would be impolite. Please wait to be assimilated. Pour l'assimilation en Francais, appuyer le numero deux."
by The Orion Islands » Tue Jul 24, 2018 2:29 pm
by The Free Territory of Makhnovia » Tue Jul 24, 2018 2:36 pm
by Velahor » Tue Jul 24, 2018 5:48 pm
Dear Mr. Reed,
Thank you for taking the time to speak with me about this, I’ve had several others express interest in eliminating our drilling taxes as well. I also wanted to take the time to express my condolences involving your father; your family is in my prayers.
In an ideal situation, I would just eliminate the oil and natural gas taxes completely. While we might still keep that goal in mind, I don’t know if the legislature can come to a consensus on that, considering the revenue they bring in for the state. I do know for certain that I can get a steep reduction together on the oil and gas taxes, maybe completely phasing them out over a few years’ span. I love the idea of slashing those taxes to nothing or near nothing, it would be big for business, and would keep oilmen like yourself on their feet.
I tell you what, I’ll get in contact with my people, maybe talk to your state Senator, and we will get a bill onto the floor that will offset the hurt brought on by the Dudley Tax. I suppose a few options come to mind. We could do the phase-out plan like I mentioned, or we could do a tax exemption for the exact value of the Dudley Tax. How that would work would be that oil producers like yourself would get a tax write-off for the exact value of the Dudley Tax. Let me know which of these yourself and others in your business would prefer.
You’re going to have to help me in one way though. While changing the state tax rates is our state’s business and no one else’s, I have a feeling that we could see a little backlash from Cal’s administration considering how much they supported the tax. I don’t know how you’d do it, but if you can find a way to keep them off our back, it will help this go smoothly and keep guys like you in business.
I’m looking forward to your response. Stay safe out there in this winter weather.
For liberty,
Governor Douglas Stephens
by Velahor » Tue Jul 24, 2018 6:01 pm
Greater Arab State wrote:Velahor wrote:Somewhere in the air between Virginia and Colorado
The speakers on the plane turned on.
“This is your Captain speaking, we have reached crushing altitude. Thank you for flying United, and I’d like to give a special welcome to our Loyalty Club members. We will be landing in Denver in 3 hours, feel free to move about the cabin at this time, but there is some turbulence so please keep your seatbelt fastened while in your seat.”
The officer looks at Kramer and gives him his food and then uncuffs him.
“You can eat now sir. Don’t try any funny business, you can’t run away when you’re on a plane,” remarks the officer.
Somewhere in the air between Virginia and Colorado
"I can assure you that that thought has not entered my mind sir." Kramer said as he proceeded to start drinking.
by Greater Arab State » Wed Jul 25, 2018 1:41 am
Velahor wrote:Greater Arab State wrote:Somewhere in the air between Virginia and Colorado
"I can assure you that that thought has not entered my mind sir." Kramer said as he proceeded to start drinking.
Hours later...
After a few bathroom breaks, a couple of long flights, and an uneventful day, the last flight lands in Bozeman, and Kramer is transferred to a pair of mostly silent officers driving him to Dillon for booking.
When they enter the county detention center, the officers give him another opportunity to call his lawyer, and inform him that his bail hearing is set for tomorrow.
by Korea of the South » Wed Jul 25, 2018 3:42 am
by The Free Territory of Makhnovia » Wed Jul 25, 2018 2:22 pm
Dear Ella
My husband, daughter and myself are planning a short trip to Shenandoah this weekend at it would mean a lot to us if you'd join us for a day to go horseback riding and hiking with us. We will meet at Skyland resort stables and proceed towards Buzzars rock from there. Let me know if you're interested.
Love, Theresa.
by Dentali » Wed Jul 25, 2018 10:22 pm
Congresswoman, I have been eager to work with you for some time and have been searching for an appropriate topic, I think I have been successful in my search.
For some time I have been looking into the issue of paid family leave, rhetorically I support the idea of giving individuals time off to care for their families but I am also aware guaranteeing such would put us at odds with members of our own party and raise costs for employers, as well as other issues. As such I have been researching potential alternatives to relieve the problem in a way more palatable to the party.
I read a recent poll by the Rockefell Foundation which asked what “would need to change in order for working parents to evenly balance their job or business, their marriage, and their children?” the answer “more flexible work hours/schedules” won by a mile compared to “more paid time off” and other options. Other studies have shown that nearly 9 of 10 “opt-out” moms left work due to limited workplace flexibility.
I have been looking into what legislation we could sponsor in order to assist workplace flexibility and have found a number of options. While flexible working arrangements occur naturally we have regulation such as the Fair Labor Standards act which doesn't allow workers to bank overtime for future time off instead of standard time and a half. Oddly government workers are exempt from this rule but not the private sector.
This of course would be a first step, the next would be finding a way to lower childcare costs, with daycare loosening child-to-staff ratios by just one child reduced care prices by as much as 20 percent. But for now lets focus on the flexible work schedules, I fell like we will have an easier time convincing our colleagues that is a good idea.
If you are interested lets chat in person and write up an outline for legislation.
Sincerely,
Congressman Glen Anderson
by Vaquas » Thu Jul 26, 2018 1:52 pm
by Vaquas » Thu Jul 26, 2018 2:16 pm
Dentali wrote:Handwritten Letter from Congressman Glen Anderson to Congressman Amelia YangCongresswoman, I have been eager to work with you for some time and have been searching for an appropriate topic, I think I have been successful in my search.
For some time I have been looking into the issue of paid family leave, rhetorically I support the idea of giving individuals time off to care for their families but I am also aware guaranteeing such would put us at odds with members of our own party and raise costs for employers, as well as other issues. As such I have been researching potential alternatives to relieve the problem in a way more palatable to the party.
I read a recent poll by the Rockefell Foundation which asked what “would need to change in order for working parents to evenly balance their job or business, their marriage, and their children?” the answer “more flexible work hours/schedules” won by a mile compared to “more paid time off” and other options. Other studies have shown that nearly 9 of 10 “opt-out” moms left work due to limited workplace flexibility.
I have been looking into what legislation we could sponsor in order to assist workplace flexibility and have found a number of options. While flexible working arrangements occur naturally we have regulation such as the Fair Labor Standards act which doesn't allow workers to bank overtime for future time off instead of standard time and a half. Oddly government workers are exempt from this rule but not the private sector.
This of course would be a first step, the next would be finding a way to lower childcare costs, with daycare loosening child-to-staff ratios by just one child reduced care prices by as much as 20 percent. But for now lets focus on the flexible work schedules, I feel like we will have an easier time convincing our colleagues that is a good idea.
If you are interested lets chat in person and write up an outline for legislation.
Sincerely,
Congressman Glen Anderson
Congressman,
I am glad that you have taken an interest in this very important issue, one which is crucial to me and should be of the utmost importance to all who care about the family unit and the maintainance of a functional work-life balance. It is unfortunate that some others in the party do not view the issue in the same light as you or I, but just as the Dudley Tax was leveled for the common good across party lines, I believe this too can be worked on in a manner that transcends political boundaries.
I am very interested in seeing what we can come up with together, and I hope that you will see it fit to include the President in the crafting of this legislation. Come see me in my office after session, I would love to start working with you as soon as possible.
- Dr. Amelia Yang
by Tumblrena » Thu Jul 26, 2018 2:19 pm
by Vaquas » Thu Jul 26, 2018 2:25 pm
by Tumblrena » Thu Jul 26, 2018 2:31 pm
Advertisement
Return to Portal to the Multiverse
Users browsing this forum: Lazarian
Advertisement