From: Demetrius Chandler
To: Atticus Marlowe
I'll come on by
Chandler
Advertisement

by Tallahassee News Station » Sun Apr 29, 2018 1:31 pm
From: Demetrius Chandler
To: Atticus Marlowe
I'll come on by
Chandler

by Greater Arab State » Sun Apr 29, 2018 1:32 pm
The Portland Territory wrote:Greater Arab State wrote:"Well for the most part they are ideological differences Senator but I'm a tolerant person regarding ideological differences until they pardon traitors and put American coal miners out of work and on welfare."
I see. I shall continue, but allow me to say two things. One, for sake of confidentiality, I shall not repeat any of this to anyone without your consent. Two, it all has a purpose. So, now answer me this, truthfully: What is the future of the Republican Party, to you?

by The Portland Territory » Sun Apr 29, 2018 1:35 pm
Greater Arab State wrote:The Portland Territory wrote:I see. I shall continue, but allow me to say two things. One, for sake of confidentiality, I shall not repeat any of this to anyone without your consent. Two, it all has a purpose. So, now answer me this, truthfully: What is the future of the Republican Party, to you?
"Well to me the future of the Republican Party is one that represents the interest of concerned, blue and white collar patriots, stops their jobs from going to abusers of basic human rights such as the PRC and fights illegal immigration."

by Greater Arab State » Sun Apr 29, 2018 1:37 pm
The Portland Territory wrote:Greater Arab State wrote:"Well to me the future of the Republican Party is one that represents the interest of concerned, blue and white collar patriots, stops their jobs from going to abusers of basic human rights such as the PRC and fights illegal immigration."
Is there potential for it splitting up into various factions, as the Democratic and Libertarian Parties did?

by The Portland Territory » Sun Apr 29, 2018 1:43 pm
Greater Arab State wrote:The Portland Territory wrote:Is there potential for it splitting up into various factions, as the Democratic and Libertarian Parties did?
"I would say no. The Republican Party is what is probably the most resilient party in America history. Since 1856 only 1 Republican candidate to my knowledge has ran against the parties nominee after being defeated in the primaries. To me this show how resilient the Grand Old Party truly is.

by Greater Arab State » Sun Apr 29, 2018 1:46 pm
The Portland Territory wrote:Greater Arab State wrote:"I would say no. The Republican Party is what is probably the most resilient party in America history. Since 1856 only 1 Republican candidate to my knowledge has ran against the parties nominee after being defeated in the primaries. To me this show how resilient the Grand Old Party truly is.
I see. If this is the case then, such resilience, is it truly required that you challenge the incumbent?

by The Portland Territory » Sun Apr 29, 2018 1:51 pm
Greater Arab State wrote:The Portland Territory wrote:I see. If this is the case then, such resilience, is it truly required that you challenge the incumbent?
"Yes it is Senator because if we do not challenge the incumbent we risk the safety and employment of the American people being ground into dust by the current administration and it's congressional allies."

by Greater Arab State » Sun Apr 29, 2018 2:01 pm
The Portland Territory wrote:Greater Arab State wrote:"Yes it is Senator because if we do not challenge the incumbent we risk the safety and employment of the American people being ground into dust by the current administration and it's congressional allies."
Hmm........
*Egazarian just stared into his eyes, noticing every movement in his face. what were his emotions? was he fearful of losing my support? or confident enough that he's on my side?*
Do you believe you are qualified for the job?

by The Portland Territory » Sun Apr 29, 2018 2:03 pm
Greater Arab State wrote:The Portland Territory wrote:Hmm........
*Egazarian just stared into his eyes, noticing every movement in his face. what were his emotions? was he fearful of losing my support? or confident enough that he's on my side?*
Do you believe you are qualified for the job?
Kramer straightened his gaze so that it was parallel to Egazarian's eyes and began.
"Yes I would. I served in the CIA from 1965-1990 in which I gained experience in how to protect this nation from countries which seen the United States as an enemy, I have served in both the House and Senate for a total of 26 years during which I have served on the select comitee on Intelligence therefore proving that I have the experience and necessary qualifications for the office of President.

by Bruke » Sun Apr 29, 2018 2:11 pm

by Greater Arab State » Sun Apr 29, 2018 2:13 pm
The Portland Territory wrote:Greater Arab State wrote:Kramer straightened his gaze so that it was parallel to Egazarian's eyes and began.
"Yes I would. I served in the CIA from 1965-1990 in which I gained experience in how to protect this nation from countries which seen the United States as an enemy, I have served in both the House and Senate for a total of 26 years during which I have served on the select comitee on Intelligence therefore proving that I have the experience and necessary qualifications for the office of President.
Well then, very well. With no implied rudeness, the fun times are over now, Senator.
Senator Kramer, where have you called me down to visit you?

by Uttland » Sun Apr 29, 2018 2:13 pm
Politicial Views: Moderate free market and social liberal with some select conservative and social democratic leanings/views. Anti-populist. Aspirational wonk. 8values and Political Compass results + more detailed politics/views
Favorite Books: The Wind-Up Bird Chronicle, by Haruki Murakami, Crime and Punishment by Fyodor Dostoyevsky, One Hundred Years of Solitude by Gabriel Garcia Marquez

by The Portland Territory » Sun Apr 29, 2018 2:15 pm
Greater Arab State wrote:The Portland Territory wrote:Well then, very well. With no implied rudeness, the fun times are over now, Senator.
Senator Kramer, where have you called me down to visit you?
"I have called you here today to offer you the chance to run with me against Reed. I have specifically chosen you because firstly you were the runner up in the primaries which means that you have valuable experience campaigning. Secondly we are similiar in terms of immigration and social policy. Finally you made comments during the primaries about wanting to stop Reed. By accepting this you would be by throwing him off the ticket for the general election.

by Greater Arab State » Sun Apr 29, 2018 2:16 pm
The Portland Territory wrote:Greater Arab State wrote:"I have called you here today to offer you the chance to run with me against Reed. I have specifically chosen you because firstly you were the runner up in the primaries which means that you have valuable experience campaigning. Secondly we are similiar in terms of immigration and social policy. Finally you made comments during the primaries about wanting to stop Reed. By accepting this you would be by throwing him off the ticket for the general election.
We may discuss this part later, I'll explain my process soon. Senator, have you talked to anyone else about your presidential run? Specifically in aiding you?

by Tallahassee News Station » Sun Apr 29, 2018 2:29 pm
Uttland wrote:Dirksen Senate Office Building Hearing Room, Washington D.C.Lane closed her eyes for second after listening to Stacey and Breckinridge. “Fine, you have my consent to put my name on the bill,” she replied somewhat reluctantly, but not too much.

by The Portland Territory » Sun Apr 29, 2018 2:34 pm
Greater Arab State wrote:The Portland Territory wrote:We may discuss this part later, I'll explain my process soon. Senator, have you talked to anyone else about your presidential run? Specifically in aiding you?
"Not yet as I thought to ask you first but I am hoping to speak to some other people in the near future."

by Greater Arab State » Sun Apr 29, 2018 2:36 pm

by The Portland Territory » Sun Apr 29, 2018 2:37 pm

by Greater Arab State » Sun Apr 29, 2018 2:39 pm
The Portland Territory wrote:Greater Arab State wrote:"Well I plan on financing the grand majority of the campaigns using my own wealth with additional funds coming from organisations that have endorsed me for my House and Senate runs."
Those organizations who have financed you in the past, they financed you as a Republican. Will these same organizations finance you as the man who might bring the Party down?
by Vaquas » Sun Apr 29, 2018 2:39 pm
Tallahassee News Station wrote:Uttland wrote:Dirksen Senate Office Building Hearing Room, Washington D.C.Lane closed her eyes for second after listening to Stacey and Breckinridge. “Fine, you have my consent to put my name on the bill,” she replied somewhat reluctantly, but not too much.
"Looks like all of us here think the database'd work, old RNC chair included. Think you'll come on Senator?" Stacey asked Fowler.

by The Portland Territory » Sun Apr 29, 2018 2:41 pm
Greater Arab State wrote:The Portland Territory wrote:Those organizations who have financed you in the past, they financed you as a Republican. Will these same organizations finance you as the man who might bring the Party down?
"Well that scenario is very unlikely given the reasons I have mentioned before but I am most certain that they will continue to back me."

by Uttland » Sun Apr 29, 2018 2:42 pm
Politicial Views: Moderate free market and social liberal with some select conservative and social democratic leanings/views. Anti-populist. Aspirational wonk. 8values and Political Compass results + more detailed politics/views
Favorite Books: The Wind-Up Bird Chronicle, by Haruki Murakami, Crime and Punishment by Fyodor Dostoyevsky, One Hundred Years of Solitude by Gabriel Garcia Marquez

by Greater Arab State » Sun Apr 29, 2018 2:45 pm
The Portland Territory wrote:Greater Arab State wrote:"Well that scenario is very unlikely given the reasons I have mentioned before but I am most certain that they will continue to back me."
I see. Senator Kramer, you have declared your candidacy quite very early on. Do you acknowledge the there’s a possibility, from now until 2019, that President Reed turns this nation around, for the good. What shall happen then, in regards to your candidacy?

by The Portland Territory » Sun Apr 29, 2018 2:48 pm
Greater Arab State wrote:The Portland Territory wrote:I see. Senator Kramer, you have declared your candidacy quite very early on. Do you acknowledge the there’s a possibility, from now until 2019, that President Reed turns this nation around, for the good. What shall happen then, in regards to your candidacy?
"I acknowledge that and if the American people feel satisfied and safe regarding immigration and if President Reed where to repeal the Dudley tax I may consider withdrawing my candidacy. But for the most part I believe that the United States will not have any significant change in two years.

by Greater Arab State » Sun Apr 29, 2018 3:02 pm
The Portland Territory wrote:Greater Arab State wrote:"I acknowledge that and if the American people feel satisfied and safe regarding immigration and if President Reed where to repeal the Dudley tax I may consider withdrawing my candidacy. But for the most part I believe that the United States will not have any significant change in two years.
If the people feel satisfied......... What are the current polls regarding the Predient’s approval rating?
Advertisement
Return to Portal to the Multiverse
Users browsing this forum: Lunas Legion, Segmentia, The Empire of Tau
Advertisement