Washington 2016 Political RP [CLOSED] OOC Pt. VI

by **Prolieum** » Sat Jul 01, 2017 8:51 pm

Vaquas wrote:Cal Reed = Correct

It always is interesting arguing from his perspective.

by **Chewion** » Sat Jul 01, 2017 8:56 pm

Prolieum wrote:
Chewion wrote:What to do...

I may have something for you, Carter, specifically, to do after the conviction and first inauguration are completed.

I am considering having Gene Eric backstab Reed to some extent, and will at least partially determine his course from a meeting, or multiple, with colleagues.

Ok. I also just had Gov. Kiser call Reed's transition team.

by **Prolieum** » Sat Jul 01, 2017 8:56 pm

Chewion wrote:
Prolieum wrote:
I may have something for you, Carter, specifically, to do after the conviction and first inauguration are completed.

I am considering having Gene Eric backstab Reed to some extent, and will at least partially determine his course from a meeting, or multiple, with colleagues.

Ok. I also just had Gov. Kiser call Reed's transition team.

Date?

by **Chewion** » Sat Jul 01, 2017 8:58 pm

Prolieum wrote:
Chewion wrote:Ok. I also just had Gov. Kiser call Reed's transition team.

Date?

What do you mean? Whatever the current date is I guess. Have not kept up but last I knew it was late December.

by **Prolieum** » Sat Jul 01, 2017 8:59 pm

Chewion wrote:
Prolieum wrote:
Date?

What do you mean? Whatever the current date is I guess. Have not kept up but last I knew it was late December.

I suppose I will assume it is concurrent with his meeting with Conti, then.

by **Vaquas** » Sat Jul 01, 2017 9:00 pm

Chewy, heads up, Governor Kiser is getting primaried for sure

by **Chewion** » Sat Jul 01, 2017 9:02 pm

Vaquas wrote:Chewy, heads up, Governor Kiser is getting primaried for sure

How? He is super popular in Texas?

by **Vaquas** » Sat Jul 01, 2017 9:03 pm

Chewion wrote:
Vaquas wrote:Chewy, heads up, Governor Kiser is getting primaried for sure

How? He is super popular in Texas?

We'll see.
He's running against a Reed for one.
Blythe may run as well, it'll depend.

by **Vaquas** » Sat Jul 01, 2017 9:04 pm

Conti is making the wrong argument and lowkey straw-manning Reed.

by **Chewion** » Sat Jul 01, 2017 9:05 pm

Vaquas wrote:
Chewion wrote:How? He is super popular in Texas?

We'll see.
He's running against a Reed for one.
Blythe may run as well, it'll depend.

Thanks a lot. One of the only two damn characters I care about in this whole damn RP.

by **The Portland Territory** » Sat Jul 01, 2017 9:08 pm

Wait, I'm gonna be gone all next week. Completely, I'm camping

If there impeachment happens this week, can it please be noted that Egazarian did speak and voted in favor of his impeachment?

by **Prolieum** » Sat Jul 01, 2017 9:11 pm

The Portland Territory wrote:Wait, I'm gonna be gone all next week. Completely, I'm camping

If there impeachment happens this week, can it please be noted that Egazarian did speak and voted in favor of his impeachment?

Certainly.

by **Vaquas** » Sat Jul 01, 2017 9:13 pm

I was not under the impression that Reed was so vehemently Anti-Homosexual as to say Conti's love for his husband is lesser to his for his Wife.

That's interesting.

by **Prolieum** » Sat Jul 01, 2017 9:14 pm

Vaquas wrote:I was not under the impression that Reed was so vehemently Anti-Homosexual as to say Conti's love for his husband is lesser to his for his Wife.

That's interesting.

That is not the reason that he thought that.

by **Vaquas** » Sat Jul 01, 2017 9:16 pm

Prolieum wrote:
Vaquas wrote:I was not under the impression that Reed was so vehemently Anti-Homosexual as to say Conti's love for his husband is lesser to his for his Wife.

That's interesting.

That is not the reason that he thought that.

Ah, I see.

I think.

by **Prolieum** » Sat Jul 01, 2017 9:17 pm

Vaquas wrote:
Prolieum wrote:
That is not the reason that he thought that.

Ah, I see.

I think.

Perhaps. You can telegram your guess, or state it publicly, it is not exactly a secret.

by **The Portland Territory** » Sat Jul 01, 2017 9:19 pm

Prolieum wrote:
The Portland Territory wrote:Wait, I'm gonna be gone all next week. Completely, I'm camping

If there impeachment happens this week, can it please be noted that Egazarian did speak and voted in favor of his impeachment?

Certainly.

Thank you very much.

by **Vaquas** » Sat Jul 01, 2017 9:20 pm

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WK_jkPhrddc

Why the hell is everyone having a stroke over this Ad

by **Argentarino** » Sat Jul 01, 2017 9:23 pm

Vaquas wrote:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WK_jkPhrddc

Why the hell is everyone having a stroke over this Ad

I'm assuming this is the new NRA ad?

It can be interpreted as pitting an "us vs them" narrative between NRA members and the liberal/progressive "other". Especially in light of the Congressional baseball practice shooting, I think it's a poor message. The base of the base of their membership is all for the ad, but a lot of NRA members feel uncomfortable about it.

by **Vaquas** » Sat Jul 01, 2017 9:33 pm

Argentarino wrote:
Vaquas wrote:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WK_jkPhrddc

Why the hell is everyone having a stroke over this Ad

I'm assuming this is the new NRA ad?

It can be interpreted as pitting an "us vs them" narrative between NRA members and the liberal/progressive "other". Especially in light of the Congressional baseball practice shooting, I think it's a poor message. The base of the base of their membership is all for the ad, but a lot of NRA members feel uncomfortable about it.

This is ironic on several levels to me, but I understand the sentiment nonetheless.

by **Prolieum** » Sat Jul 01, 2017 10:17 pm

Shall I assume that Conti left, or do you intend to make a parting post?

by **Prolieum** » Sat Jul 01, 2017 10:21 pm

Given the final line, I will move forward with the assumption that he left.

by **Chewion** » Sat Jul 01, 2017 10:22 pm

Prolieum wrote:Given the final line, I will move forward with the assumption that he left.

Good. Now time for Kiser and Reed to speak.

by **Argentarino** » Sat Jul 01, 2017 10:22 pm

Prolieum wrote:Given the final line, I will move forward with the assumption that he left.

Yep that's a fair assumption! I didn't want to waste space by throwing in a one liner.

by **Prolieum** » Sat Jul 01, 2017 10:24 pm

Argentarino wrote:
Prolieum wrote:Given the final line, I will move forward with the assumption that he left.

Yep that's a fair assumption! I didn't want to waste space by throwing in a one liner.

Sensible.

Washington 2016 Political RP [CLOSED] OOC Pt. VI

Who is online