Washington 2016 Political RP [CLOSED] OOC Pt. V

[Avagra]

Time for a decision. Is it worth the risk to counter-fire?

No.

[Prolieum]

THEY ARE COORDINATING. IT SEEMS THEY WILL FIRE AT THE SAME TIME.

Our shield man is down to 120ish and between A & E, I've got some 300ish

I've got a reserve shieldman, hold off and let him take it.

[Uttland]

Hold on; new faction is attacking. Tread carefully.

[Prolieum]

Do not target the new one.

[United City States of Oceania]

Time for a decision. Is it worth the risk to counter-fire?

DO IT!

[Uttland]

Do not target the new one.

You sure?

[Prolieum]

Well, we completely wrecked their revenge scheme, but I'm not certain we can do it a second time.

[United City States of Oceania]

Did they fire?

[Uttland]

Did they fire?

We destroyed their missies.

[Uttland]

Well, we completely wrecked their revenge scheme, but I'm not certain we can do it a second time.

I think we could, if it's not large scale.

[The Central Shadow Nation]

Build up.

[Prolieum]

Well, we completely wrecked their revenge scheme, but I'm not certain we can do it a second time.

I think we could, if it's not large scale.

They may fire late at night/early in the morning, when we do not have defenders active.

We could wait to see if they intend to attack again, but that would require allowing them to build back up, hence the question.

[Avagra]

I think we could, if it's not large scale.

They may fire late at night/early in the morning, when we do not have defenders active.

We could wait to see if they intend to attack again, but that would require allowing them to build back up, hence the question.

Do we have enough for an effective counterstrike?

[Uttland]

I think we could, if it's not large scale.

They may fire late at night/early in the morning, when we do not have defenders active.

We could wait to see if they intend to attack again, but that would require allowing them to build back up, hence the question.

Which is why we should destroy them NOW.

[United City States of Oceania]

When I get court marshaled, will it be a fair trial?

[Prolieum]

They may fire late at night/early in the morning, when we do not have defenders active.

We could wait to see if they intend to attack again, but that would require allowing them to build back up, hence the question.

Which is why we should destroy them NOW.

Which will risk bringing the region down on our heads.

[Uttland]

Build up.

Yes.

[Avagra]

When I get court marshaled, will it be a fair trial?

We will make it so.

Do you have an attorney? No? We will provide one.

[Uttland]

Which is why we should destroy them NOW.

Which will risk bringing the region down on our heads.

Same if we sit around and wait for their second counter strike.

[United City States of Oceania]

Which is why we should destroy them NOW.

Which will risk bringing the region down on our heads.

I say you go for it.
Fire everything.
Don't be cowards!

[United City States of Oceania]

When I get court marshaled, will it be a fair trial?

We will make it so.

Do you have an attorney? No? We will provide one.

Got hundreds of them over at the Department of Justice.

[Prolieum]

We have sufficient missiles to destroy them, though it depends on whether the region attempts to shield them.

Uttland, you are in favor. Others?

[United City States of Oceania]

We have sufficient missiles to destroy them, though it depends on whether the region attempts to shield them.

Uttland, you are in favor. Others?

I am in favor.

[Avagra]

We have sufficient missiles to destroy them, though it depends on whether the region attempts to shield them.

Uttland, you are in favor. Others?

Abstain.

[Prolieum]

Ignore Tokugawa.