A Strange New World: 2017 World RP- Signup Now (OOC/Open)

by **Greater Liverpool** » Fri Jan 13, 2017 3:17 pm

British Empire Strikes Back wrote:
Greater Liverpool wrote:
I am sorry I can't agree with these terms France should not be gaining any land really because they do not really have a reason do so. Do remember you guys are liberal democracies you can't take large land masses it doesn't make sense. This is modern day not Victorian times

What about if they gain the farthest northwest province in pink, and they can pay you for it?

Actually can he have the North-East province in pink one for free

by **Newne Carriebean7** » Fri Jan 13, 2017 3:23 pm

British Empire Strikes Back wrote:
Newne Carriebean7 wrote:0_0...
um....
kim jong un's married already!
*tosses May out of helicopter*

She is much better looking than his wife! Or he could become a polygamist and become FLDS?

Or she could marry Vito?

Um...

this..
compared to this...

and Vito, well he's um, a bit of a nut case, but I'm sure the new president of the USROK would like to marry her!

by **British Empire Strikes Back** » Fri Jan 13, 2017 3:27 pm

Greater Liverpool wrote:
British Empire Strikes Back wrote:What about if they gain the farthest northwest province in pink, and they can pay you for it?

Actually can he have the North-East province in pink one for free

I meant northeast, sorry for the typo.

I think he will approve of that and we can finally just end this fucking war and get back to doing what we want to do (I invade the Maldives, you make a Latin Union, etc).

by **British Empire Strikes Back** » Fri Jan 13, 2017 4:26 pm

I need to reply to Carrie soon.

by **Krugeristan** » Fri Jan 13, 2017 5:07 pm

"A painting of toast."

Thank you, Carrie, for making me never look at toast the same way again.

by **Newne Carriebean7** » Fri Jan 13, 2017 5:17 pm

Krugeristan wrote:"A painting of toast."

Thank you, Carrie, for making me never look at toast the same way again.

you're welcome, now you can never look at toast and sandwiches, soon you'll run out of options! :rofl:

by **Waztaskio** » Fri Jan 13, 2017 5:35 pm

Greater Liverpool wrote:
Waztaskio wrote:I think the OP and you need a neutral party to determine the outcomes of your engagements and if they're god modded or not. Having the OP self OP a conflict he's in is a conflict of interest.

I will agree with that but it is not just the engagements it is the whole war, I feel like I never got the chance to react for example I think my government would have caught wind of a motion going through parliament which declared war on them but instead he said the motion won and invaded in the same post. This is the problem I got no warning of what was happening but he just decided to take the reins and decided what happened.

Alright. You may wanna see if another co-op or someone you and BESB trust to do so, can do it. I would do it myself, but my schedule is going to be quite unpredictable to do the mediating. If however, you both really want me to. I will do my best, as I'm struggling to even get started on my next USA post.

by **British Empire Strikes Back** » Fri Jan 13, 2017 5:55 pm

Waztaskio wrote:
Greater Liverpool wrote:
I will agree with that but it is not just the engagements it is the whole war, I feel like I never got the chance to react for example I think my government would have caught wind of a motion going through parliament which declared war on them but instead he said the motion won and invaded in the same post. This is the problem I got no warning of what was happening but he just decided to take the reins and decided what happened.

Alright. You may wanna see if another co-op or someone you and BESB trust to do so, can do it. I would do it myself, but my schedule is going to be quite unpredictable to do the mediating. If however, you both really want me to. I will do my best, as I'm struggling to even get started on my next USA post.

Thank you for the offer Waz, but I think Liverpool and I have come to an agreement to just end the war, thanks for all your help though.

by **British Empire Strikes Back** » Fri Jan 13, 2017 5:55 pm

Newne Carriebean7 wrote:
Krugeristan wrote:"A painting of toast."

Thank you, Carrie, for making me never look at toast the same way again.

you're welcome, now you can never look at toast and sandwiches, soon you'll run out of options!

What will you do next...

by **British Empire Strikes Back** » Fri Jan 13, 2017 6:02 pm

Made a new post!

I will work on some more serious posts soon.

by **Rygondria** » Fri Jan 13, 2017 9:46 pm

How far back can you go when changing history of a nation ?

by **The Tricolour** » Sat Jan 14, 2017 4:51 am

Greater Liverpool wrote:
British Empire Strikes Back wrote:How about you both jointly administer the Basque Country or Catalonia?

I am sorry I can't agree with these terms France should not be gaining any land really because they do not really have a reason do so. Do remember you guys are liberal democracies you can't take large land masses it doesn't make sense. This is modern day not Victorian times

Well, it seems pretty clear that the governments of Britain and France are interested in gaining their former colonies. I don't need a lot of land, just some kind of territorial expansion.

by **Waztaskio** » Sat Jan 14, 2017 6:17 am

Who exactly is all attending the Syrian and Ukraine talks? I invited who I wanted, but who actually is coming?

by **South Mauristan** » Sat Jan 14, 2017 6:25 am

Waztaskio wrote:Who exactly is all attending the Syrian and Ukraine talks? I invited who I wanted, but who actually is coming?

I'm coming even though I wasn't invited

by **Pacificora** » Sat Jan 14, 2017 6:27 am

Waztaskio wrote:Who exactly is all attending the Syrian and Ukraine talks? I invited who I wanted, but who actually is coming?

Would I possibly be able to come? I have interests in how this Syrian discussion ends up.

by **Waztaskio** » Sat Jan 14, 2017 6:32 am

Pacificora wrote:
Waztaskio wrote:Who exactly is all attending the Syrian and Ukraine talks? I invited who I wanted, but who actually is coming?

Would I possibly be able to come? I have interests in how this Syrian discussion ends up.

What country are you?

by **Pacificora** » Sat Jan 14, 2017 6:42 am

Waztaskio wrote:
Pacificora wrote:Would I possibly be able to come? I have interests in how this Syrian discussion ends up.

What country are you?

A transparent, democratic Egypt friendly towards the US and U.K.

by **Greater Liverpool** » Sat Jan 14, 2017 6:59 am

Also BESB can the peace treaty also include that Iberian troops are allowed to enter Morocco to arrest people over the illegal blockade of Ceutra

by **Waztaskio** » Sat Jan 14, 2017 7:19 am

Pacificora wrote:
Waztaskio wrote:What country are you?

A transparent, democratic Egypt friendly towards the US and U.K.

Um. Depends if Syria wants to bring you. Or the Arab League is invited I guess.

by **Fascist Republic Of Bermuda** » Sat Jan 14, 2017 7:32 am

Waztaskio wrote:Who exactly is all attending the Syrian and Ukraine talks? I invited who I wanted, but who actually is coming?

Russia obviously. We proposed the thing!

by **Monarchy of Japanada** » Sat Jan 14, 2017 8:13 am

Why does S. Africa hate Canada?

by **Police state of France** » Sat Jan 14, 2017 8:21 am

Monarchy of Japanada wrote:Why does S. Africa hate Canada?

Because of Trudeau and because Quebec is awesome.

by **Monarchy of Japanada** » Sat Jan 14, 2017 8:23 am

Police state of France wrote:
Monarchy of Japanada wrote:Why does S. Africa hate Canada?

Because of Trudeau and because Quebec is awesome.

Most people in Quebec don't want independence y'know..

by **British Empire Strikes Back** » Sat Jan 14, 2017 8:29 am

Police state of France wrote:
Monarchy of Japanada wrote:Why does S. Africa hate Canada?

Because of Trudeau and because Quebec is awesome.

Great post!

But one thing, South Africa had a State President always, and a Vice-State President from 1981-1984. Also, did you keep the six nukes or so that South Africa had during apartheid or no?

by **British Empire Strikes Back** » Sat Jan 14, 2017 8:30 am

Monarchy of Japanada wrote:
Police state of France wrote:Because of Trudeau and because Quebec is awesome.

Most people in Quebec don't want independence y'know..

But not by a wide margin.

A Strange New World: 2017 World RP- Signup Now (OOC/Open)

Who Should Win The Drinking Contest?

Who is online