Washington (CLOSED) US Political RP 2016; OOC Pt. III

by **Imperial Esplanade** » Tue Dec 27, 2016 10:25 pm

Meelducan wrote:He might claim Donald Johnson and her are having an affair.

I may or may not have vomited at the thought of that. :lol:

by **Meelducan** » Tue Dec 27, 2016 10:26 pm

Imperial Esplanade wrote:
Meelducan wrote:He might claim Donald Johnson and her are having an affair.

I may or may not have vomited at the thought of that.

You could say he "embraced" her

by **Imperial Esplanade** » Tue Dec 27, 2016 10:27 pm

Meelducan wrote:
Imperial Esplanade wrote:
I may or may not have vomited at the thought of that.

You could say he "embraced" her

TNS might have Senator Stacey 'like' that tweet.

by **Uttland** » Tue Dec 27, 2016 10:28 pm

Imperial Esplanade wrote:
Meelducan wrote:He might claim Donald Johnson and her are having an affair.

I may or may not have vomited at the thought of that.

Like I already have it written out in my mind, like:

"I know you like the 'Embrace' of Johnson, Senator Carrollton."

by **Meelducan** » Tue Dec 27, 2016 10:30 pm

Uttland wrote:
Imperial Esplanade wrote:
I may or may not have vomited at the thought of that.

Like I already have it written out in my mind, like:

"I know you like the 'Embrace' of Johnson, Senator Carrollton."

Mind if I use that?

by **Uttland** » Tue Dec 27, 2016 10:31 pm

Meelducan wrote:
Uttland wrote:Like I already have it written out in my mind, like:

"I know you like the 'Embrace' of Johnson, Senator Carrollton."

Mind if I use that?

No problem. Go ahead.

by **Canton Empire** » Tue Dec 27, 2016 10:34 pm

Secretary Wright for VP!

by **Uttland** » Tue Dec 27, 2016 10:39 pm

OH MY GOD, HE ACTUALLY DID IT!

by **Meelducan** » Tue Dec 27, 2016 10:45 pm

I think Nilap should stop

by **Uttland** » Tue Dec 27, 2016 10:46 pm

Meelducan wrote:I think Nilap should stop

It's too deep...just keep going!

by **Argentarino** » Tue Dec 27, 2016 10:47 pm

Meelducan wrote:I think Nilap should stop

If you want to avoid a motion for censure for dishonorable conduct, I would suggest Nilap drop the phone.

by **Uttland** » Tue Dec 27, 2016 10:49 pm

Argentarino wrote:
Meelducan wrote:I think Nilap should stop

If you want to avoid a motion for censure for dishonorable conduct, I would suggest Nilap drop the phone.

I mean, he's going to lose his seat regardless. I mean, he can try and save his reputation by stopping.

by **Argentarino** » Tue Dec 27, 2016 10:52 pm

Uttland wrote:
Argentarino wrote:If you want to avoid a motion for censure for dishonorable conduct, I would suggest Nilap drop the phone.

I mean, he's going to lose his seat regardless. I mean, he can try and save his reputation by stopping.

He just kept digging. *prepares draft censure motion*

As a note, censure does not equal expulsion. To be censured is to be condemned.

by **Democratic Peoples republic of Kelvinsi** » Tue Dec 27, 2016 10:52 pm

Uttland wrote:
Argentarino wrote:If you want to avoid a motion for censure for dishonorable conduct, I would suggest Nilap drop the phone.

I mean, he's going to lose his seat regardless. I mean, he can try and save his reputation by stopping.

Lebloc is seen as someone who is less racist than Nilap at this point.

by **Imperial Esplanade** » Tue Dec 27, 2016 10:53 pm

Democratic Peoples republic of Kelvinsi wrote:
Uttland wrote:I mean, he's going to lose his seat regardless. I mean, he can try and save his reputation by stopping.

Lebloc is seen as someone who is less racist than Nilap at this point.

LeBloc has a chance now!

by **Argentarino** » Tue Dec 27, 2016 10:53 pm

Imperial Esplanade wrote:
Democratic Peoples republic of Kelvinsi wrote:Lebloc is seen as someone who is less racist than Nilap at this point.

LeBloc has a chance now!

Sweet Mary, Mother of God...

by **Uttland** » Tue Dec 27, 2016 10:54 pm

Democratic Peoples republic of Kelvinsi wrote:
Uttland wrote:I mean, he's going to lose his seat regardless. I mean, he can try and save his reputation by stopping.

Lebloc is seen as someone who is less racist than Nilap at this point.

Who's LeBloc?

EDIT: Read the application, sweet mother...

by **Imperial Esplanade** » Tue Dec 27, 2016 10:54 pm

Argentarino wrote:
Imperial Esplanade wrote:LeBloc has a chance now!

Sweet Mary, Mother of God...

I'm definitely going to create an app for an Alaskan Democratic candidate. :lol:

by **Argentarino** » Tue Dec 27, 2016 10:56 pm

Imperial Esplanade wrote:
Argentarino wrote:Sweet Mary, Mother of God...

I'm definitely going to create an app for an Alaskan Democratic candidate.

Yes, please do, I think I'd lose it if LeBloc *vomit* wins the election there.

by **Argentarino** » Tue Dec 27, 2016 10:58 pm

You heard it here folks: honor and integrity, respect for colleagues you may disagree with = liberal bullcrap.

by **Uttland** » Tue Dec 27, 2016 11:01 pm

Argentarino wrote:
Imperial Esplanade wrote:
I'm definitely going to create an app for an Alaskan Democratic candidate.

Yes, please do, I think I'd lose it if LeBloc *vomit* wins the election there.

I mean, it would be fun. Horrifying, but fun.

by **Imperial Esplanade** » Tue Dec 27, 2016 11:05 pm

Carrollton is finished Tweeting about it for the night.

by **Meelducan** » Tue Dec 27, 2016 11:12 pm

I can see a motion for censure of Nilap.

by **Uttland** » Tue Dec 27, 2016 11:13 pm

Meelducan wrote:I can see a motion for censure of Nilap.

It's going to happen.

by **Imperial Esplanade** » Tue Dec 27, 2016 11:13 pm

Meelducan wrote:I can see a motion for censure of Nilap.

Only if he presses on. Conti gave him a warning, one he ought to consider taking.

Washington (CLOSED) US Political RP 2016; OOC Pt. III

Who is online