Washington (CLOSED) US Political RP 2016; OOC Pt. III

by **Uttland** » Sun Jan 22, 2017 7:40 pm

Sanabel wrote:Stephens is my favorite. Remember, he loses the 2020 election by a 96% margin in the popular vote, coming in second place, according to my projection.

That's pretty accurate.

by **Sanabel** » Sun Jan 22, 2017 7:45 pm

Uttland wrote:
Sanabel wrote:Stephens is my favorite. Remember, he loses the 2020 election by a 96% margin in the popular vote, coming in second place, according to my projection.

That's pretty accurate.

In that same projection, Donald Johnson wins in the largest landslide since George Washington.

by **The Portland Territory** » Sun Jan 22, 2017 7:46 pm

Actually, can I have a small briefing on the policies of Watton (green candidate) please, likewise for Danders too

by **Uttland** » Sun Jan 22, 2017 7:46 pm

Sanabel wrote:
Uttland wrote:That's pretty accurate.

In that same projection, Donald Johnson wins in the largest landslide since George Washington.

So, he just gets elected unanimously?

by **Sanabel** » Sun Jan 22, 2017 7:47 pm

Uttland wrote:
Sanabel wrote:In that same projection, Donald Johnson wins in the largest landslide since George Washington.

So, he just gets elected unanimously?

He wins almost 98% of the popular vote, and the entirety of the EC.

by **Uttland** » Sun Jan 22, 2017 7:54 pm

Sanabel wrote:
Uttland wrote:So, he just gets elected unanimously?

He wins almost 98% of the popular vote, and the entirety of the EC.

Makes sense.

by **Uttland** » Sun Jan 22, 2017 8:09 pm

Anyways, au revior, for the night.

by **Democratic Peoples republic of Kelvinsi** » Sun Jan 22, 2017 9:14 pm

That amnesty pledge is gonna make the headlines, and it will be very unpopular.

by **Terrelis** » Sun Jan 22, 2017 9:15 pm

Democratic Peoples republic of Kelvinsi wrote:That amnesty pledge is gonna make the headlines, and it will be very unpopular.

Amnesty pledge?

by **Democratic Peoples republic of Kelvinsi** » Sun Jan 22, 2017 9:17 pm

Terrelis wrote:
Democratic Peoples republic of Kelvinsi wrote:That amnesty pledge is gonna make the headlines, and it will be very unpopular.

Amnesty pledge?

The way that you framed it sounded like you were hinting at general amnesty.

by **Democratic Peoples republic of Kelvinsi** » Sun Jan 22, 2017 9:18 pm

Terrelis wrote:Hope that families will no longer be divided because they are deemed “illegal”; there is no such thing as an illegal human being we are people not property.

Here is the quote

http://www.gallup.com/poll/4852/america ... rants.aspx

Here are the polls

by **Terrelis** » Sun Jan 22, 2017 9:19 pm

Democratic Peoples republic of Kelvinsi wrote:
Terrelis wrote:Amnesty pledge?

The way that you framed it sounded like you were hinting at general amnesty.

I wasn't hinting at anything.

by **Democratic Peoples republic of Kelvinsi** » Sun Jan 22, 2017 9:20 pm

Terrelis wrote:
Democratic Peoples republic of Kelvinsi wrote:The way that you framed it sounded like you were hinting at general amnesty.

I wasn't hinting at anything.

I know, but that sounded like you were hinting at general amnesty. Overall, it was very fluffy with no policies, but it was a solid speech not gonna lie

6/10.

by **Terrelis** » Sun Jan 22, 2017 9:21 pm

Democratic Peoples republic of Kelvinsi wrote:
Terrelis wrote:Hope that families will no longer be divided because they are deemed “illegal”; there is no such thing as an illegal human being we are people not property.

Here is the quote

http://www.gallup.com/poll/4852/america ... rants.aspx

Here are the polls

This is from 2001...

by **Terrelis** » Sun Jan 22, 2017 9:23 pm

Democratic Peoples republic of Kelvinsi wrote:
Terrelis wrote:I wasn't hinting at anything.

I know, but that sounded like you were hinting at general amnesty. Overall, it was very fluffy with no policies, but it was a solid speech not gonna lie

6/10.

I wanted it to be more inspire/ignite the people rather than just spewing policies. He'll be doing enough of that while he's campaigning in Hawaii.

by **Uttland** » Mon Jan 23, 2017 2:22 pm

What is the current date? And when was the Spanish train attacks?

by **Tectonix** » Mon Jan 23, 2017 2:26 pm

Okay, I'm back. Debate may be on and off, though.

by **Uttland** » Mon Jan 23, 2017 2:32 pm

Seriously, when is the Schlang-Spicy Latina porno gonna start?

by **Canton Empire** » Mon Jan 23, 2017 3:11 pm

Uttland wrote:Seriously, when is the Schlang-Spicy Latina porno gonna start?

Not soon enough.

by **Uttland** » Mon Jan 23, 2017 3:29 pm

Canton Empire wrote:
Uttland wrote:Seriously, when is the Schlang-Spicy Latina porno gonna start?

Not soon enough.

Indeed.

by **Meelducan** » Mon Jan 23, 2017 3:40 pm

I'll have Nilap's speech up soon, I got delayed.

by **Uttland** » Mon Jan 23, 2017 3:43 pm

Meelducan wrote:I'll have Nilap's speech up soon, I got delayed.

Giddy!

by **Meelducan** » Mon Jan 23, 2017 3:45 pm

Uttland wrote:
Meelducan wrote:I'll have Nilap's speech up soon, I got delayed.

Giddy!

I've managed to fit in a Sarah Palin quote too!

by **Uttland** » Mon Jan 23, 2017 3:46 pm

Meelducan wrote:
Uttland wrote:Giddy!

I've managed to fit in a Sarah Palin quote too!

I'm even more excited!

by **The Peoples East Africa** » Mon Jan 23, 2017 4:20 pm

Back from holidays. Did much go down in the last 30 pages/since Friday?

Washington (CLOSED) US Political RP 2016; OOC Pt. III

Who is online