International Warfare [OOC/CONCLUDED][CN SPONSORED]

[Gamer Eric]

I am really afraid this RP will become more and more sectary due to its too heavy emphasis on techology, basically excluding people like me who have not so much interests in technology and giving a lot of advantages to people who are actually interested in it.

I will not resign, as I do not want my Empire to collapse, but... well... I think the ship should land.

I can kinda see where you're coming from, this RP has kind of gotten close to the end of it's life, though for me it's more because two factions which are friendly to each other dominate world politics, and at this point there are, like, six or so nations that have "blobbed" and taken up a large number of starting countries. (You, the URE, Fenezuela, the NAC, Persia, and Scandinavia (to an extent))

well remember that we have gotten out of WWIII not too long ago, so the outcome winner will have the most influence over the world

[The Canadian North-West]

I can kinda see where you're coming from, this RP has kind of gotten close to the end of it's life, though for me it's more because two factions which are friendly to each other dominate world politics, and at this point there are, like, six or so nations that have "blobbed" and taken up a large number of starting countries. (You, the URE, Fenezuela, the NAC, Persia, and Scandinavia (to an extent))

well remember that we have gotten out of WWIII not too long ago, so the outcome winner will have the most influence over the world

Yeah, but I would've expected the PCE and the IDF to act more like how the Allies and the Comintern acted after WWII than what happened. I mean, I understand that this is not going to work out 100% like it should, and they were close even before the war, but it just feels a little... odd.

[Atrilan]

I am really afraid this RP will become more and more sectary due to its too heavy emphasis on techology, basically excluding people like me who have not so much interests in technology and giving a lot of advantages to people who are actually interested in it.

I will not resign, as I do not want my Empire to collapse, but... well... I think the ship should land.

I can kinda see where you're coming from, this RP has kind of gotten close to the end of it's life, though for me it's more because two factions which are friendly to each other dominate world politics, and at this point there are, like, six or so nations that have "blobbed" and taken up a large number of starting countries. (You, the URE, Fenezuela, the NAC, Persia, and Scandinavia (to an extent))

Eh, if it dies than it dies. There are a few other ideas I have anyways. I can get how having a few dominating nations is irritating as a secondary power, but I think a roleplay like this has to have an emphasis on technology.

[Entitaria]

I am really afraid this RP will become more and more sectary due to its too heavy emphasis on techology, basically excluding people like me who have not so much interests in technology and giving a lot of advantages to people who are actually interested in it.

I will not resign, as I do not want my Empire to collapse, but... well... I think the ship should land.

I can kinda see where you're coming from, this RP has kind of gotten close to the end of it's life, though for me it's more because two factions which are friendly to each other dominate world politics, and at this point there are, like, six or so nations that have "blobbed" and taken up a large number of starting countries. (You, the URE, Fenezuela, the NAC, Persia, and Scandinavia (to an extent))

Main reason I'm pushing nations into the KCZ.

[Greater Slavic Union]

I can kinda see where you're coming from, this RP has kind of gotten close to the end of it's life, though for me it's more because two factions which are friendly to each other dominate world politics, and at this point there are, like, six or so nations that have "blobbed" and taken up a large number of starting countries. (You, the URE, Fenezuela, the NAC, Persia, and Scandinavia (to an extent))

Eh, if it dies than it dies. There are a few other ideas I have anyways. I can get how having a few dominating nations is irritating as a secondary power, but I think a roleplay like this has to have an emphasis on technology.

Why should it have it? That SEVERELY gives an advantage to some, while giving a huge disadvantage to others. It makes the RP unfair and sectary.

[Atrilan]

Eh, if it dies than it dies. There are a few other ideas I have anyways. I can get how having a few dominating nations is irritating as a secondary power, but I think a roleplay like this has to have an emphasis on technology.

Why should it have it? That SEVERELY gives an advantage to some, while giving a huge disadvantage to others. It makes the RP unfair and sectary.

I'm not sure what you mean by sectary, doesn't make sense with the context. Anyways, in a post-modern game, technology is going to, inevitably, be a central point.

[Greater Slavic Union]

Why should it have it? That SEVERELY gives an advantage to some, while giving a huge disadvantage to others. It makes the RP unfair and sectary.

I'm not sure what you mean by sectary, doesn't make sense with the context. Anyways, in a post-modern game, technology is going to, inevitably, be a central point.

I mean that it will not be accessible for a very large part of the RP community.

Yes, it is, but I would suggest you to take a look at your last post with the eye of a technologically-average one like most of RP'ers are.

[Entitaria]

I'm not sure what you mean by sectary, doesn't make sense with the context. Anyways, in a post-modern game, technology is going to, inevitably, be a central point.

I mean that it will not be accessible for a very large part of the RP community.

Yes, it is, but I would suggest you to take a look at your last post with the eye of a technologically-average one like most of RP'ers are.

Well... Don't a lot of RPs have that? This game is very specific, but a good community has grown about people who fit the bill. I think the tech focus helps, not hinders. If it wasn't a focus, it would be dominated by population. Unlike population, you can focus and improve tech.

[Greater Slavic Union]

I mean that it will not be accessible for a very large part of the RP community.

Yes, it is, but I would suggest you to take a look at your last post with the eye of a technologically-average one like most of RP'ers are.

Well... Don't a lot of RPs have that? This game is very specific, but a good community has grown about people who fit the bill. I think the tech focus helps, not hinders. If it wasn't a focus, it would be dominated by population. Unlike population, you can focus and improve tech.

I agree that tech should be a focus, but it has grown to be way too important in this RP

[Entitaria]

Well... Don't a lot of RPs have that? This game is very specific, but a good community has grown about people who fit the bill. I think the tech focus helps, not hinders. If it wasn't a focus, it would be dominated by population. Unlike population, you can focus and improve tech.

I agree that tech should be a focus, but it has grown to be way too important in this RP

No idea how to fix it. I mean, I have some stuff written down about some things I wanted to talk to Zack and Pac about., one of them is about slowing tech advancement as you become further from the mean.

[Greater Slavic Union]

I agree that tech should be a focus, but it has grown to be way too important in this RP

No idea how to fix it. I mean, I have some stuff written down about some things I wanted to talk to Zack and Pac about., one of them is about slowing tech advancement as you become further from the mean.

I'd say that when we reach 2055 we should HALT tech advancement, unless all of us agree on a certain tech to be discovered. We have already reached, and in certain cases breached, the forseenable future and capabilities of technology.

[Atrilan]

No idea how to fix it. I mean, I have some stuff written down about some things I wanted to talk to Zack and Pac about., one of them is about slowing tech advancement as you become further from the mean.

I'd say that when we reach 2055 we should HALT tech advancement, unless all of us agree on a certain tech to be discovered. We have already reached, and in certain cases breached, the forseenable future and capabilities of technology.

Halting seems a bit... Radical. I think the idea of slowing those ahead is better, with steady advancement.

[Granis]

Ah, ok, this is a bit embarrassing. When I said we would join the NAC, it was because I'd forgotten the name of the big multi country alliance it was part of, and for some reason thought that the NAC was said alliance. If I were to edit my post to replace 'join' with 'ally with', would you be able to edit the post about Australasia's citizens getting kisses that we were becoming part of the NAC?

Of course, you don't have to, and sorry for being a pain if you don't want to.

[Greater Slavic Union]

I'd say that when we reach 2055 we should HALT tech advancement, unless all of us agree on a certain tech to be discovered. We have already reached, and in certain cases breached, the forseenable future and capabilities of technology.

Halting seems a bit... Radical. I think the idea of slowing those ahead is better, with steady advancement.

Halting, unless we all agree on a certian tech on which we all should have a certain degree of knowledge, which could and should be acquired via sharing of sources as well as debate, for example.

[Atrilan]

Halting seems a bit... Radical. I think the idea of slowing those ahead is better, with steady advancement.

Halting, unless we all agree on a certian tech on which we all should have a certain degree of knowledge, which could and should be acquired via sharing of sources as well as debate, for example.

Still quite drastic and would have the same issues, it devolving into a battle of populations.

[Entitaria]

Ah, ok, this is a bit embarrassing. When I said we would join the NAC, it was because I'd forgotten the name of the big multi country alliance it was part of, and for some reason thought that the NAC was said alliance. If I were to edit my post to replace 'join' with 'ally with', would you be able to edit the post about Australasia's citizens getting kisses that we were becoming part of the NAC?

Of course, you don't have to, and sorry for being a pain if you don't want to.

Sure, I'll edit it after I get home from work. Its the PCE by the way

[Greater Slavic Union]

Halting, unless we all agree on a certian tech on which we all should have a certain degree of knowledge, which could and should be acquired via sharing of sources as well as debate, for example.

Still quite drastic and would have the same issues, it devolving into a battle of populations.

I think that having the whole group sharing their sources and being equally educated on a certain topic would not be an issue: it would be a boost for the RP

[Atrilan]

Still quite drastic and would have the same issues, it devolving into a battle of populations.

I think that having the whole group sharing their sources and being equally educated on a certain topic would not be an issue: it would be a boost for the RP

Now I do agree with that aspect, sharing sources to be equally educated.

[Granis]

Ah, ok, this is a bit embarrassing. When I said we would join the NAC, it was because I'd forgotten the name of the big multi country alliance it was part of, and for some reason thought that the NAC was said alliance. If I were to edit my post to replace 'join' with 'ally with', would you be able to edit the post about Australasia's citizens getting kisses that we were becoming part of the NAC?

Of course, you don't have to, and sorry for being a pain if you don't want to.

Sure, I'll edit it after I get home from work. Its the PCE by the way

Thanks.

[Entitaria]

Sure, I'll edit it after I get home from work. Its the PCE by the way

Thanks.

Fuck now I don't know what to put

[The New Telengana Rajj]

Thanks.

Fuck now I don't know what to put

Its ION not PCE

[Entitaria]

Fuck now I don't know what to put

Its ION not PCE

" the big multi country alliance it was part of"
That spells PCE.

[The New Telengana Rajj]

Its ION not PCE

" the big multi country alliance it was part of"
That spells PCE.

No Paci was asking Granis to join ION for trade.

[Granis]

" the big multi country alliance it was part of"
That spells PCE.

No Paci was asking Granis to join ION for trade.

No, Entitaria was right. I thought the NAC was the PCE, that ION was a project by the PCE, and that Paci was asking me to join both groups.

[The New Telengana Rajj]

No Paci was asking Granis to join ION for trade.

No, Entitaria was right. I thought the NAC was the PCE, that ION was a project by the PCE, and that Paci was asking me to join both groups.

Oh ok.