NationStates

Nancivania wrote:Well...

That jolly good escalated quickly didn't it?

Oh, BTW. I'm occupying Haiti. Is that allowed?

Danceria wrote:Tag for the union of free Arab states.

Beowstyn wrote:

Danceria wrote:Tag for the union of free Arab states.

Perfect

Beowstyn wrote:

Nancivania wrote:Well...

That jolly good escalated quickly didn't it?

Oh, BTW. I'm occupying Haiti. Is that allowed?

Considering Haiti is neutral that is allowed however if you want to annex it you have to tell me so i can see if you have the power to

Monarchy of Japanada wrote:France, want me to support you in Italy?

Danceria wrote:

Nation (from lists): The Union of Arab States
Alliance (goes with nation on list. If neutral, this does not yet apply): World Alliance
Flag (if not fixed): badoop
Government (Republic, Empire, Monarchy, etc.): Constitutional Monarchy/Loose Union of lucky coincidences (but hey, isn't that every super-massive nation-state in Alternate History?)
Allies: Britain? America? Fellow Muslim bros? Anyone...? *cricket chirps*
Reason for entering war: We're Muslim, we has oil, and our Muslim bros in Pakistan got smoked out by those dastardly Japs, we need to end their whole career!
Economy (Capitalist, Communist): Capitalist
Leader: King Faisal bin Hussein bin Ali al-Hashimi, or Faisal I, by the Will of Allah(SWT) and in accordance with the teachings and followers of His Prophet(PBUH), the very King of Iraq, Syria, and Jordan, Shah of Persia, Khan of the Afghans; Sword of Islam, Commander of the Faithful, Defender and Liberator of the Arab Peoples, ect.
Motto: "For One State, Under One God"
Army size (make it realistic): Erm...Might need a little help
Union (If any): We are the Union...Of Arab States...is it that lost in the translation.
RP example (If any): I've been out of action in terms of NS, but I trust these examples will do...

Futrellia wrote:

Monarchy of Japanada wrote:France, want me to support you in Italy?

I would recommend focusing most military strength on homeland defense and pushing into Australasian territory. But if my French Army of 400,000 lose in Italy, my people will be SEVERELY sad and butthurt, which would affect further military action against the New Dominion. If we lose, then yes, we will need help. Lots of it because we just lost 400,000 troops to Italy. ITALY. Shit would be wack, yo.

But if you'd rrreeaallly like to do something else, i'm sure Scandinavia will become a threat in no time. You know what to do.

Futrellia wrote:Also, i found this neat little graph that may help everyone out when it comes to Military numbers and such. At least the listed nations will be helped.

Armies 1914

Beowstyn wrote:

Futrellia wrote:I would recommend focusing most military strength on homeland defense and pushing into Australasian territory. But if my French Army of 400,000 lose in Italy, my people will be SEVERELY sad and butthurt, which would affect further military action against the New Dominion. If we lose, then yes, we will need help. Lots of it because we just lost 400,000 troops to Italy. ITALY. Shit would be wack, yo.

But if you'd rrreeaallly like to do something else, i'm sure Scandinavia will become a threat in no time. You know what to do.

I've always had the idea that Scandinavia will piss off Greenland and in turn the Northern League which will cause MURICA to enter the war officially. That's up to America tho. As far as Italy is concerned I will work that out in the morning. All I can say is Italy is one of the weaker ND members but isn't necessarily easy either as they do have a huge chunk of land in Libya.

Futrellia wrote:

Beowstyn wrote:
I've always had the idea that Scandinavia will piss off Greenland and in turn the Northern League which will cause MURICA to enter the war officially. That's up to America tho. As far as Italy is concerned I will work that out in the morning. All I can say is Italy is one of the weaker ND members but isn't necessarily easy either as they do have a huge chunk of land in Libya.

Perhaps Scandinavia pisses off Greenland before the British engage them. Then while Scandinavia is tasting the edge of a British saber, American cannons can start raining down hellfire across North Africa, the Australasian State and start working on the USSR. Greenland can serve as World Alliance control hub since it's further away from conflict and quite safe in the cold.

Good lord, the battles have just started and it's already starting to look like a one sided war. Maybe that's just because there's been like three WA responses and only one ND response. Lol.

Monarchy of Japanada wrote:

Futrellia wrote:
Perhaps Scandinavia pisses off Greenland before the British engage them. Then while Scandinavia is tasting the edge of a British saber, American cannons can start raining down hellfire across North Africa, the Australasian State and start working on the USSR. Greenland can serve as World Alliance control hub since it's further away from conflict and quite safe in the cold.

Good lord, the battles have just started and it's already starting to look like a one sided war. Maybe that's just because there's been like three WA responses and only one ND response. Lol.

the Australasian State will be crushed by the British before the Americans even join the war.

Futrellia wrote:

Beowstyn wrote:
I've always had the idea that Scandinavia will piss off Greenland and in turn the Northern League which will cause MURICA to enter the war officially. That's up to America tho. As far as Italy is concerned I will work that out in the morning. All I can say is Italy is one of the weaker ND members but isn't necessarily easy either as they do have a huge chunk of land in Libya.

Perhaps Scandinavia pisses off Greenland before the British engage them. Then while Scandinavia is tasting the edge of a British saber, American cannons can start raining down hellfire across North Africa, the Australasian State and start working on the USSR. Greenland can serve as World Alliance control hub since it's further away from conflict and quite safe in the cold.

Good lord, the battles have just started and it's already starting to look like a one sided war. Maybe that's just because there's been like three WA responses and only one ND response. Lol.

Beowstyn wrote:

Futrellia wrote:
Perhaps Scandinavia pisses off Greenland before the British engage them. Then while Scandinavia is tasting the edge of a British saber, American cannons can start raining down hellfire across North Africa, the Australasian State and start working on the USSR. Greenland can serve as World Alliance control hub since it's further away from conflict and quite safe in the cold.

Good lord, the battles have just started and it's already starting to look like a one sided war. Maybe that's just because there's been like three WA responses and only one ND response. Lol.

Yes I feel you're right. It's also likely biased lol. However East Asia is back and said they'd get to being the USSR whenever they could. Not to mention we still got the Greater Asian State protecting Australasia so there's at least 2 big powers fighting. It seems one sided simply because there are more but keep in mind the two giants of the war make up like a quarter of the world's landmass lmao

Phoenix2012 wrote:Well this puts me in a bad situation. Assuming that the US had not been warned of the attacks by GB and France (since nobody in the ic sent anything to me), it's going to make the US very hesitant to lend any aid unless something like Pearl Harbor happens. As it stands, it looks to the US like GB and France are provoking war, which only further distances the US from wanting to join.

Also: can we have a meeting for the Washington naval conference?

All WA members will be invited of course, and perhaps some neutral ones as well

Phoenix2012 wrote:Well this puts me in a bad situation. Assuming that the US had not been warned of the attacks by GB and France (since nobody in the ic sent anything to me), it's going to make the US very hesitant to lend any aid unless something like Pearl Harbor happens. As it stands, it looks to the US like GB and France are provoking war, which only further distances the US from wanting to join.

Also: can we have a meeting for the Washington naval conference?

All WA members will be invited of course, and perhaps some neutral ones as well

Asturies-Llion wrote:Is Moldova part of my territory?

Futrellia wrote:

Phoenix2012 wrote:Well this puts me in a bad situation. Assuming that the US had not been warned of the attacks by GB and France (since nobody in the ic sent anything to me), it's going to make the US very hesitant to lend any aid unless something like Pearl Harbor happens. As it stands, it looks to the US like GB and France are provoking war, which only further distances the US from wanting to join.

Also: can we have a meeting for the Washington naval conference?

All WA members will be invited of course, and perhaps some neutral ones as well

But the New Dominion attacked first? At Papua New Guinea. How is that the WA provoking war? I'm attacking because my allies are being attacked. What does that say about the U.S?