Thirded.
Advertisement

by Olimpiada » Tue Nov 01, 2016 9:34 pm
Toishima wrote:Please shrink that image.Relikai wrote:Interesting. Although for imperial designs, do they suffer from the same weakness as forward-firing designs, with most guns pointed towards the tip of the arrow, as well as the shape with more surface area facing the front than the rear ?
*Weakness*, in this sense that Rebel ships like the Mon-Calamansi ships being about to put out a balanced array of fire on a near 360-degree field of fire.
I replace a lot of the "phantom" weapons which are not visible on the images with similarly invisible turreted weapons in the side trenches and sides of the superstructure for a wider field, though the heaviest weapons (intended for long-range fighting), the beam lasers, are projected out of the upper superstructure, aiming forward only. Since the shape and sizes are identical, all shape-based problems remain.
However, to compensate for this I slap on even more guns, essentially by duplicating the dorsal weapons on the ventral surface (I also did this with my Yamato ships), so there is indeed an almost complete sphere of fire available, except for the very rear of the ships (the engines and behind the tower). Mass-numbers of all-range handwavium-fuelled macross-spiralling missiles would probably be used to deal with targets there.
Mon-Calamansi? ;P

by Toishima » Tue Nov 01, 2016 9:46 pm

by Anowa » Tue Nov 01, 2016 9:48 pm
Toishima wrote:My god, you guys are too used to people trying to sneak in overpowered things =P
I was speaking purely in an OOC form there. Many weapons of the Imperial Star Destroyers are not visible from their models - see how in the movies, lasers and such seem to fire from spots on the hull which have no turrets or any form of firing port - thus making them 'invisible' due to size. If my Senmetsus were armed with the amount of weapons visible on the Imperial Star Destroyer's model, the only weapons they would have would be the turreted turbolasers (560mm railguns on my version). Thus, more weapons are needed, which also cannot be seen on the models, thus also making them 'invisible' - ICly these weapons would of course be visible and targetable, and I even listed them on the wiki page which I linked to in my post.
Seriously. It makes no sense for there to have invisible weapons, since if such technology exists then why not make the whole ship invisible?

by Toishima » Tue Nov 01, 2016 9:50 pm
Anowa wrote:Fine. I guess I'm just paranoid with all my experience with people who stuff gigaton scale machineguns on their ships.

by Olimpiada » Tue Nov 01, 2016 9:52 pm
Toishima wrote:Anowa wrote:Fine. I guess I'm just paranoid with all my experience with people who stuff gigaton scale machineguns on their ships.
You'll find me far more trustworthy than the others in that respect; I enjoy being a lower-tech, underdog-type nation (that can still pull its weight), after all. I don't even have energy shields!

by Ella2 6 » Tue Nov 01, 2016 11:25 pm
Theyra wrote:So one else want to interact or have a reason to go to the outer arm?
The Hierophancy wrote:Zjaum wrote:Anyone interested with allying with the Sovereignty? We're a rapidly-growing power in the galaxy.
We are NOT interested in joining a mega-alliance, like the Concordat or the Divine Pact. However, we do want close friends as we make grand expansions in the galaxy. We are not an offensive nation, but we are an expanding nation.
When the divine pact has 3 members and is considered a mega alliance <3

by Zjaum » Tue Nov 01, 2016 11:34 pm
Toishima wrote:Anowa wrote:Fine. I guess I'm just paranoid with all my experience with people who stuff gigaton scale machineguns on their ships.
You'll find me far more trustworthy than the others in that respect; I enjoy being a lower-tech, underdog-type nation (that can still pull its weight), after all. I don't even have energy shields!

by The Moscow Metro Red Line » Tue Nov 01, 2016 11:35 pm

by Zjaum » Wed Nov 02, 2016 12:14 am

by Relikai » Wed Nov 02, 2016 6:13 am

by Democratic East-Asia » Wed Nov 02, 2016 6:34 am
Pan Asia Broadcasting Channel: "We will achieve communism in 20 years." - Chairman Wei Yenwu, Central Government | Automation of industries threatens millions of jobs, says economic advisors
by Imperial Idaho » Wed Nov 02, 2016 6:44 am
I'm from the land of Coeur D'alene Idaho.
By Ballot or by Bullet, the Pub Party will win. The Pub Legacy Edition.Ifreann wrote:The Romans placated the people with panem et circenses, bread and circuses. We will placate our people with dank space weed and hyper-HD vidya.Tysoania wrote:You remind me of a mobster who gets things cleared out of the way.
Next up on the Sopranos...
Imperial "Slick" Idaho, the fixer.Bralia wrote:Oh my fucking god. Do it again, guys, you both chose the number 7.

by Democratic East-Asia » Wed Nov 02, 2016 6:47 am
Pan Asia Broadcasting Channel: "We will achieve communism in 20 years." - Chairman Wei Yenwu, Central Government | Automation of industries threatens millions of jobs, says economic advisors
by Toishima » Wed Nov 02, 2016 6:48 am

by Lunas Legion » Wed Nov 02, 2016 6:56 am

by Imperial Idaho » Wed Nov 02, 2016 6:59 am
I'm from the land of Coeur D'alene Idaho.
By Ballot or by Bullet, the Pub Party will win. The Pub Legacy Edition.Ifreann wrote:The Romans placated the people with panem et circenses, bread and circuses. We will placate our people with dank space weed and hyper-HD vidya.Tysoania wrote:You remind me of a mobster who gets things cleared out of the way.
Next up on the Sopranos...
Imperial "Slick" Idaho, the fixer.Bralia wrote:Oh my fucking god. Do it again, guys, you both chose the number 7.

by Seinlo » Wed Nov 02, 2016 10:02 am

by Tagali Federation » Wed Nov 02, 2016 10:03 am
Seinlo wrote:I looked at the OOC and was surprised to see that thos argument was being handled the way it was. I think I want to join. Is there anything I should know before I do, such as being limited on what nation tier I can pick (if that's in the OoC already, I apologize. I haven't read it all, yet, and am still going through it)?

by Seinlo » Wed Nov 02, 2016 10:07 am
Tagali Federation wrote:Seinlo wrote:I looked at the OOC and was surprised to see that thos argument was being handled the way it was. I think I want to join. Is there anything I should know before I do, such as being limited on what nation tier I can pick (if that's in the OoC already, I apologize. I haven't read it all, yet, and am still going through it)?
Eh, any tier's fine, just stay below lower tier 1.

by Olimpiada » Wed Nov 02, 2016 10:07 am
Seinlo wrote:I looked at the OOC and was surprised to see that thos argument was being handled the way it was. I think I want to join. Is there anything I should know before I do, such as being limited on what nation tier I can pick (if that's in the OoC already, I apologize. I haven't read it all, yet, and am still going through it)?

by Anowa » Wed Nov 02, 2016 10:22 am
Olimpiada wrote:Seinlo wrote:I looked at the OOC and was surprised to see that thos argument was being handled the way it was. I think I want to join. Is there anything I should know before I do, such as being limited on what nation tier I can pick (if that's in the OoC already, I apologize. I haven't read it all, yet, and am still going through it)?
I honestly wouldn't advise reading it all. Basically, you have to be something other than human, don't go for high tier 1, keep all fuckery about "my nation is stronger" on the discord.

by Olimpiada » Wed Nov 02, 2016 10:26 am
Anowa wrote:Olimpiada wrote:I honestly wouldn't advise reading it all. Basically, you have to be something other than human, don't go for high tier 1, keep all fuckery about "my nation is stronger" on the discord.
You're suggesting not to read the OOC... where the rules are... and where the applications are... and where the guides to the RP are...
You're fucking serious aren't you.
Advertisement
Return to Portal to the Multiverse
Users browsing this forum: Arrhidaeus, Bentus, Nantoraka, Naval Monte, Ovstylap, The Epic Notepad of GrangerAirstrike
Advertisement