Western Pacific Territories wrote:Danceria wrote:1) Sure, but what's in it for us? and 2) With all due pleasure! We're doing that already with job reforms.
Perhaps the "African Frontier" will occur (a highly unlikely scenario in which America and other First World Nations invest in African countries for cheap labor rather than deal with China, unlikely due to my ignorance of international economics)
To answer your question:
Not much really. South Africa has a new white government (it's back!) and the nation is currently on the warpath and trying to conquer the Southern half (heheheheh) of Africa, they've already conquered Namibia and their targets include nations like for example, both of the Congos, Botswana, Mozambique, Malawi, Rwanda and Bulundi, I'm not sure in that particular one, and more. I'd assume that the American government would be extremely opposed to this South Africa and would more likely drone strike it than let it into NATO. It's defense minister is about to let me, Sinaloa Federation (the cartel) buy millions of hectares to grow drugs on. Once the buy is approved we'll only be growing in Mexico for easier transport.
Once the deal is approved Sinaloa Federation has millions of hectares to grow drugs on the Mexican government can't burn down, which means we're going to be pumping more drugs into America. And those drugs are going to be higher quality, since our growing facilities will be for the large part permanent buildings where we can refine the quality, which means Americans will be more attracted to our drugs.
It's not in your interests to be friendly to South Africa, they'll just go full imperialist on Africa again and you'll find it easier to just kill than negotiate.
We won't try to fight you as long as you use more of your profits towards public projects. I have a $3 billion desalination plant planned in 2017 once you pay for Mexico City's transition to electric buses. Things like that.


