Advertisement

by The Greater Gambia » Sat Aug 06, 2016 12:47 am

by Nazeroth » Sat Aug 06, 2016 2:24 am


by The V O I D » Sat Aug 06, 2016 3:21 am
Plzen wrote:IC post is up!
Oh, yes. The United Nations of Sol does not recognise the Conglomerate as a nation-state and therefore refuses to interact as if they are one.
We are not exactly the most friendly State in the galaxy. Rather the opposite, in fact.

by Plzen » Sat Aug 06, 2016 4:34 am
The V O I D wrote:How come you don't recognize it? It technically is a form of government.

by Plzen » Sat Aug 06, 2016 5:49 am
Dansha wrote:What kind of imports does the UNS even have?
by Dansha » Sat Aug 06, 2016 5:51 am
Plzen wrote:Dansha wrote:What kind of imports does the UNS even have?
Items of cultural and historical significance. Certain types of advanced consumer technology. Small quantities of nanobots.
But those are all secondary, unimportant things. The main imports of the UNS is that we will gladly buy up every scrap of trans-newtonian elements that we can get our hands on, since they are used in just about every high-tech industry within the United Nations, and even strip-mining 30,000 star systems isn't giving us enough...
The Credit Stamp Duty does tend to suppress trade, though, so our trade volume isn't as large as it normally should be.

by Plzen » Sat Aug 06, 2016 5:57 am
Dansha wrote:Plzen wrote:Items of cultural and historical significance. Certain types of advanced consumer technology. Small quantities of nanobots.
But those are all secondary, unimportant things. The main imports of the UNS is that we will gladly buy up every scrap of trans-newtonian elements that we can get our hands on, since they are used in just about every high-tech industry within the United Nations, and even strip-mining 30,000 star systems isn't giving us enough...
The Credit Stamp Duty does tend to suppress trade, though, so our trade volume isn't as large as it normally should be.
Huh. Interesting.

by The V O I D » Sat Aug 06, 2016 6:12 am
Plzen wrote:The V O I D wrote:How come you don't recognize it? It technically is a form of government.
The UNS does recognise it as a country. The United Nations, however, does not recognise the Conglomerate as a state. Key difference.
Unless I'm mistaken (and please tell me if I am), you have essentially described an Anarcho-Capitalist society in which there is one Conglomerate that, due to its size, dominates over a variety of smaller economic interests.
In short, it is not the kind of entity that the United Nations would consider a state with which it can conduct diplomacy.
The United Nations has dealt with enough countries that aren't nation-states in its history to understand that diplomacy with these entities can sometimes be absurdly pointless or frustrating.

by Plzen » Sat Aug 06, 2016 6:16 am
The V O I D wrote:The State is formed up of the largest and most powerful corporations, who elect their CEOs via their individual Boards into a greater Board of Directors. The Board are the legislature, executive and judiciary. The Board can be negotiated with by smaller corporations, other companies, etc.

by Veroxia » Sat Aug 06, 2016 6:21 am
Plzen wrote:The V O I D wrote:The State is formed up of the largest and most powerful corporations, who elect their CEOs via their individual Boards into a greater Board of Directors. The Board are the legislature, executive and judiciary. The Board can be negotiated with by smaller corporations, other companies, etc.
That... is exactly what Anarcho-Capitalism is. A privatised government that exists by and derives its legitimacy from the virtue of its economic activities.

by The V O I D » Sat Aug 06, 2016 6:25 am
Plzen wrote:The V O I D wrote:The State is formed up of the largest and most powerful corporations, who elect their CEOs via their individual Boards into a greater Board of Directors. The Board are the legislature, executive and judiciary. The Board can be negotiated with by smaller corporations, other companies, etc.
That... is exactly what Anarcho-Capitalism is. A privatised government that exists by and derives its legitimacy from the virtue of its economic activities.
Anarcho-Capitalist: Anarcho-capitalism is a political philosophy that advocates the elimination of the state in favor of individual sovereignty, private property, and free markets. Anarcho-capitalists believe that in the absence of statute (law by decree or legislation), society would improve itself through the discipline of the free market (or what its proponents describe as a "voluntary society").
Corporatocracy: Corporatocracy is a term used to refer to an economic and political system controlled by corporations and/or corporate interests.

by Plzen » Sat Aug 06, 2016 6:32 am
Veroxia wrote:Plzen wrote:That... is exactly what Anarcho-Capitalism is. A privatised government that exists by and derives its legitimacy from the virtue of its economic activities.
Plzen, would you be interested in interacting with the Korosians? Perhaps start diplomatic relations or other forms of partnership?
The V O I D wrote:-snip-

by The V O I D » Sat Aug 06, 2016 6:34 am
Plzen wrote:Veroxia wrote:Plzen, would you be interested in interacting with the Korosians? Perhaps start diplomatic relations or other forms of partnership?
Perhaps. What exactly is your proposal?The V O I D wrote:-snip-
Interesting. So you do have a state, and not just a corporation-government.
Still, the point stands. The ruling body of the Conglomerate is still more likely to be viewed as a corporate entity than a nation-state, considering its structure and primary activities.
The legal status of the Conglomerate as far as the United Nations is concerned is going to be some kind of a nationless juristic person. After all, corporations within the UNS also sometimes employ private security, internal bureaucracy, and all those things that are normally reserved for states.

by Plzen » Sat Aug 06, 2016 6:42 am
The V O I D wrote:It's a state, that just so happens to basically be controlled by corporations and corporate interests in a more direct manner.
I see; still, though, the Conglomerate might take offense to your disacknowledgement.

by The V O I D » Sat Aug 06, 2016 6:44 am
Plzen wrote:The V O I D wrote:It's a state, that just so happens to basically be controlled by corporations and corporate interests in a more direct manner.
I see; still, though, the Conglomerate might take offense to your disacknowledgement.
Heh. The current Liberal administration is relatively friendly to corporations, but "relatively" is a pretty important word.
Now, I plan on going down the same route with my 36th General Elections as I did on the first IC thread. That means a solid victory for the Social Democrats. So you can expect whatever conveniences you currently have in the UNS to start disappearing very quickly after the next elections.

by Veroxia » Sat Aug 06, 2016 6:44 am

by Plzen » Sat Aug 06, 2016 6:52 am
The V O I D wrote:Plzen wrote:Heh. The current Liberal administration is relatively friendly to corporations, but "relatively" is a pretty important word.
Now, I plan on going down the same route with my 36th General Elections as I did on the first IC thread. That means a solid victory for the Social Democrats. So you can expect whatever conveniences you currently have in the UNS to start disappearing very quickly after the next elections.
I bet that the various corporations from the Conglomerate operating within the UNS are going to all use the most amount of money they legally can to try and fund the Liberal campaign, just to ensure the Social Democrats have to fight for every piece of convenience they wish to take away from the Conglomerate.

by Plzen » Sat Aug 06, 2016 6:55 am
Veroxia wrote:Plzen wrote:Perhaps. What exactly is your proposal?
- Establishing an embassy in the UNS, in exchange with allowing the UNS to do the same.
- Establishment of trade routes; with our exports possibly ranging from certain metals, radioactive material, etc. In exchange for other valuable elements such as magnesium or other valuable resource.
- Possible establishment of a non-aggression treaty, or other specialized treaty regarding our armed forces.

by The V O I D » Sat Aug 06, 2016 6:59 am
Plzen wrote:The V O I D wrote:
I bet that the various corporations from the Conglomerate operating within the UNS are going to all use the most amount of money they legally can to try and fund the Liberal campaign, just to ensure the Social Democrats have to fight for every piece of convenience they wish to take away from the Conglomerate.
Correct. Practically every major corporation in the United Nations of Sol sends as much donations as is legally possible to the Liberal Party. Some - mostly military subcontractors and construction companies - support the Charterists instead.
The corporations are not a very powerful force in UNS politics, though. The Liberal Party primarily derives its support from rimworld individualists that wants to see regulations on controlled substances and weapons loosened, and the cultural conservatives that opposes the Social Democrats' policy of encouraging emigration from Sol System.

by Plzen » Sat Aug 06, 2016 7:07 am
The V O I D wrote:So, yeah. Sounds like the Charterists, Social Democrats and Liberals are all going to be fighting for every single law they want passed because they'll be roughly equal in power.

by The V O I D » Sat Aug 06, 2016 7:10 am
Plzen wrote:The V O I D wrote:So, yeah. Sounds like the Charterists, Social Democrats and Liberals are all going to be fighting for every single law they want passed because they'll be roughly equal in power.
It is extremely rare for one party to gain a majority of seats in the United Nations General Assembly, because not only are the three main parties relatively evenly matched, they also have to split the votes with a variety of small parties. The last time it happened was almost a hundred years ago.
More likely, a government is formed either by two of the main parties deciding to co-operate, or the largest of the three main parties allying with a bunch of the minor parties.

by Plzen » Sat Aug 06, 2016 7:20 am
The V O I D wrote:Yeah. That might happen. I feel like if anyone's going to ally, it's going to be the Liberals and Charterists; or, perhaps, but unlikely, the Liberals and the Social Democrats.
Go one way, and you're slowly leaning toward a pro-corporate, pro-military government that wants to grow in military and corporate/economic strength. Go the other, and you're neutral towards corporations, leaning anti-corporate, and you're expansionist due to encouraging emigration to outer systems and colonization outward.

by Taigawa » Sat Aug 06, 2016 9:05 am
Shadowwell wrote:So a few things:
Would anyone mind me including their race/Empire/whatever into my Races history, concerning the Fall of the Race?
Does anyone want a group of Mercenary Psionics to be on their side in the IC?
Would it be alright if my race had once been equivalent to an Ancient Empire, before their Fall?
Alert Status
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] Alert Status: 1- Total War Declared- Use of WMDs is authorized
Advertisement
Return to Portal to the Multiverse
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement