But it'd still be "Zhong guo"
Advertisement

by Greater Orensta » Wed Aug 10, 2016 1:00 pm

by Greater Slavic Union » Wed Aug 10, 2016 1:03 pm
Nations United for Conquest wrote:Yeah I'll get my support for you, we'll make the push from the south on the Romanian-Ukraine boarder in my next post
Conservative Republic Of Huang wrote:Greater Slavic Union wrote:
What you wrote is in "Traditional Chinese", you can wrtie China in this way: 中國 but it is the way the taiwanese write it, in traditional chinese. Not in the standard simplified chinese.
Hong Kong, and Macau (I think) also use traditional Chinese. As for the spoken languages, there are many differences, with quite a few not mutually intelligible.
by Conservative Republic Of Huang » Wed Aug 10, 2016 1:15 pm
Greater Slavic Union wrote:Nations United for Conquest wrote:Yeah I'll get my support for you, we'll make the push from the south on the Romanian-Ukraine boarder in my next post
ok.Greater Orensta wrote:But it'd still be "Zhong guo"
You're rightConservative Republic Of Huang wrote:Hong Kong, and Macau (I think) also use traditional Chinese. As for the spoken languages, there are many differences, with quite a few not mutually intelligible.
Actually, the taiwanese have a much better pronounce. I had, as conversation teacher, a taiwanese. Then, we started to have yet another woman, but from Beijing.

by Frinalia » Wed Aug 10, 2016 1:17 pm
Gamer Eric wrote:Hey russia, i like the concept of the carrier/battleship but i dont really see it working.....acording to the 3D design of it, there is no real way for aircraft to get back and land on the ship except from the front, and that can be a VERY massive weak point for it, as for the railguns you better only be firing one at a time since with THAT many guns that ship is more than likely gonna list to the other side if a volley goes off. Just letting you know

by Frinalia » Wed Aug 10, 2016 1:35 pm
Arbakovana-Venezia wrote:Waitwaitwait. I'm not even going to have it ready by 2040. I know how expensive and advanced it is. It's just a way of showing off how crap my government is and how high it's ambitions are.

by Greater Slavic Union » Wed Aug 10, 2016 1:38 pm

by Greater Orensta » Wed Aug 10, 2016 2:06 pm

by Greater Slavic Union » Wed Aug 10, 2016 2:29 pm
Greater Orensta wrote:I've updated my military equipment
http://www.nationstates.net/nation=grea ... /id=675964





by Greater Orensta » Wed Aug 10, 2016 2:38 pm
Greater Slavic Union wrote:Greater Orensta wrote:I've updated my military equipment
http://www.nationstates.net/nation=grea ... /id=675964
I do not why, but I feel my equipment is cooler and better...Knife Ma-33:
Sniper Rifle Zastava M91:
Anti Materiel Rifle M93:
Assault Rifle (élite/veteran units) AK-12U:
Assault Rifle (non-élite/non-veteran units) CZ 805 BREN:
Pistol PP-2000 (Army and Police):

by Gamer Eric » Wed Aug 10, 2016 3:07 pm
Frinalia wrote:Gamer Eric wrote:Hey russia, i like the concept of the carrier/battleship but i dont really see it working.....acording to the 3D design of it, there is no real way for aircraft to get back and land on the ship except from the front, and that can be a VERY massive weak point for it, as for the railguns you better only be firing one at a time since with THAT many guns that ship is more than likely gonna list to the other side if a volley goes off. Just letting you know
Thanks. I'm definitely gonna add changes such as a landing area now that you brought that up. That open space at the front is where I'm gonna have my Phoenix jets, but I haven't added them yet. The Phoenix jets are a VTOL hybrid with standard jets, so they can land pretty much wherever.
About the number of railguns, I mentioned in the railgun itself design/overview that if mounted on a ship, it would make the ship rock. Also, the sheer number of railguns would counteract the slow reload/cooldown of the rails.

by Frinalia » Wed Aug 10, 2016 4:42 pm
Gamer Eric wrote:VTOL planes i can understand, as for the railguns it can cause problems IE: energy consumption, my current railgun design only features a 1 barrel gun on my battleships and it only has 3 of them, so that carrier has gotta be big to carry the amount of energy needed to fire said railgun's

by Atrilan » Wed Aug 10, 2016 5:35 pm
National Information
Leader - Antrinoxa Program
Capital - Avlose
Population - 73,892,891
Currency - Credit (₡)
Roleplay Information
2024: The Long Peace - People's Republic of China

by Greater Slavic Union » Wed Aug 10, 2016 5:37 pm
Atrilan wrote:Things are slowing down... Entitaria, you may need to pull something.

by Arbakovana-Venezia » Wed Aug 10, 2016 5:44 pm
Atrilan wrote:Things are slowing down... Entitaria, you may need to pull something.

by Greater Slavic Union » Wed Aug 10, 2016 5:53 pm

by Greater Slavic Union » Wed Aug 10, 2016 5:59 pm

by The Canadian North-West » Wed Aug 10, 2016 6:01 pm
Friedrich Nietzsche wrote:He who fights with monsters might take care lest he thereby become a monster.
And if you gaze for long into an abyss, the abyss gazes also into you.

by Greater Slavic Union » Wed Aug 10, 2016 6:06 pm

by Greater Slavic Union » Wed Aug 10, 2016 8:28 pm

by Swedish Allied States » Thu Aug 11, 2016 2:11 am

by Arbakovana-Venezia » Thu Aug 11, 2016 4:58 am
The Canadian North-West wrote:I'm actually in the middle of writing a post right now, with a push back against Venezuelan advances into my provinces in Panama.

by Atrilan » Thu Aug 11, 2016 7:37 am
Arvenia wrote:Rome, Italy
The ASM has committed to send the rocket Caesar to Mars in October this year. There would be then expeditions to Luna, Saturn and Jupiter. The Italian government has spent 45% of it's economy on the space program.
National Information
Leader - Antrinoxa Program
Capital - Avlose
Population - 73,892,891
Currency - Credit (₡)
Roleplay Information
2024: The Long Peace - People's Republic of China

by Arvenia » Thu Aug 11, 2016 7:44 am
Atrilan wrote:Arvenia wrote:Rome, Italy
The ASM has committed to send the rocket Caesar to Mars in October this year. There would be then expeditions to Luna, Saturn and Jupiter. The Italian government has spent 45% of it's economy on the space program.
Trust me, I would LOVE to do this. But 45% is an awful move, you are basically shooting yourself in the foot and then sticking a rod filled with every disease known to man in it. Your economy is shit as is, this would kill you. Also, it took me three years to make a mars base and, according to the IE, I have the highest science. There is no way you could do it in four months.
TOTALLY DIDN'T WRITE THIS AT SCHOOL, HEH...

by Atrilan » Thu Aug 11, 2016 7:45 am
Arvenia wrote:Atrilan wrote:Trust me, I would LOVE to do this. But 45% is an awful move, you are basically shooting yourself in the foot and then sticking a rod filled with every disease known to man in it. Your economy is shit as is, this would kill you. Also, it took me three years to make a mars base and, according to the IE, I have the highest science. There is no way you could do it in four months.
TOTALLY DIDN'T WRITE THIS AT SCHOOL, HEH...
The ASI would scrap it financially if you wished for it. I thought Italy was rich like IRL.
National Information
Leader - Antrinoxa Program
Capital - Avlose
Population - 73,892,891
Currency - Credit (₡)
Roleplay Information
2024: The Long Peace - People's Republic of China
Advertisement
Return to Portal to the Multiverse
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement