Washington (US Political RP; 2016 ; OOC ; OPEN!)

by **Imperial Esplanade** » Thu Sep 29, 2016 7:57 pm

I sincerely hope Kirk makes a comeback, or at least some other comedian jumps on-board.

by **Federal States of Xathuecia** » Thu Sep 29, 2016 8:00 pm

Okay, let's clear something up. I'll allow new characters and you can 'dump' old ones. But you are still gonna have to keep new ones. And those old ones will still exist but just not as vocal. And Carrollton cannot be dumped if you are the nominee. So important characters /your main character cannot be dumped. Dumped characters would probably be controlled by me unless you want to use them.

by **Democratic Peoples republic of Kelvinsi** » Thu Sep 29, 2016 8:01 pm

Rodham has nothing to do, but I will keep him around until the convention. Drumpf and Danders are my main characters.

by **Imperial Esplanade** » Thu Sep 29, 2016 8:02 pm

Federal States of Xathuecia wrote:Okay, let's clear something up. I'll allow new characters and you can 'dump' old ones. But you are still gonna have to keep new ones. And those old ones will still exist but just not as vocal. And Carrollton cannot be dumped if you are the nominee. So important characters /your main character cannot be dumped. Dumped characters would probably be controlled by me unless you want to use them.

I meant for the reboot, but if that's not possible that is fine with me.

by **The Boras** » Thu Sep 29, 2016 8:39 pm

I most likely will not make any new characters. Only change is I'll use my Hawaiian Japanese guy.

by **Terrelis** » Thu Sep 29, 2016 9:15 pm

Anyone have any town hall questions for Murray? Preferably ones that would be asked in New York, Maryland, and Wisconsin.

by **Imperial Esplanade** » Thu Sep 29, 2016 10:31 pm

Terrelis wrote:Anyone have any town hall questions for Murray? Preferably ones that would be asked in New York, Maryland, and Wisconsin.

- With all due respect, Governor Murray, why are you still running for President? Every single other candidate is ahead of you, and some by exponential margins. You have no serious chance at the nomination, so are you just simply running to force a contested convention?

- Governor, what are your tax plans for our country? Have you released any official tax policies yet?

- What are your positions on NAFTA and TPP?

- Governor Murray, have you released your tax returns yet? If not, when will you?

by **The Boras** » Fri Sep 30, 2016 1:57 am

what's the current delegate count for the Republicans right now?

by **The Portland Territory** » Fri Sep 30, 2016 3:29 am

The Boras wrote:what's the current delegate count for the Republicans right now?

Federal States of Xathuecia wrote:Republican Pledged Delegate Count

Reed-810
Egazarian-391
Gonzalez-289
Garestaer-65

by **Prolieum** » Fri Sep 30, 2016 3:36 am

I desperately envy the amount of free time you guys have.

by **Prolieum** » Fri Sep 30, 2016 3:38 am

All right, we have Wisconsin results now. That is good.

by **Prolieum** » Fri Sep 30, 2016 3:45 am

That Saturday would be March twenty-fifth.

by **Prolieum** » Fri Sep 30, 2016 3:46 am

I can only assume that Larson is referring to funk legend George Clinton, which is odd, since he did divorce his wife.

by **Prolieum** » Fri Sep 30, 2016 3:47 am

Mild suggestion-let's try not to shake up the system that has made this RP last far longer than the other iterations.

by **Prolieum** » Fri Sep 30, 2016 3:49 am

Reed will not be attending the DIN debate.

I will hopefully be able to have my next post have Kuznetsov awaken, whenever I get that up.

Fare thee well.

by **Prolieum** » Fri Sep 30, 2016 3:50 am

This is going to be the beginning of that whole major shift in Reed's campaign that I commented on earlier.

by **The Boras** » Fri Sep 30, 2016 4:29 am

Woo oh boy! Poll forecasting was not as easy as I thought it was. Spent 2 hours on one state and had to sacrifice some parts of my intended model to save time.

by **Tallahassee News Station** » Fri Sep 30, 2016 4:33 am

The Boras wrote:what's the current delegate count for the Republicans right now?

Reed-846
Egazarian-391
Gonzalez-295
Garestaer-65
Wilson-28
Hutchinson-15
Drumpf-7
Anderson-1

The ones Port gave were before Wisconsin.

by **Tallahassee News Station** » Fri Sep 30, 2016 4:38 am

That's going to be the new quote to be harped on, I bet.

by **Imperial Esplanade** » Fri Sep 30, 2016 4:48 am

Tallahassee News Station wrote:That's going to be the new quote to be harped on, I bet.

With all due respect, that's such a lame thing to target someone over, given it's context.

In fact, it might even give Carrollton some reason to genuinely suspect TNS is biased since it passes over headlining major policy proposals in favor of a lame quote taken out of context. That's not even something juicy. :lol:

by **Tallahassee News Station** » Fri Sep 30, 2016 5:49 am

Imperial Esplanade wrote:
Tallahassee News Station wrote:That's going to be the new quote to be harped on, I bet.

With all due respect, that's such a lame thing to target someone over, given it's context.

In fact, it might even give Carrollton some reason to genuinely suspect TNS is biased since it passes over headlining major policy proposals in favor of a lame quote taken out of context. That's not even something juicy.

News stations commenting on unfortunate wording is what news stations do. Elections always have those situations where certain wording is capitalized on. See "Look at my African American", "What difference, at this point, does it make", "I have the best words", or if you want a direct something "Not as widespread". We could name a dozen more. The modern American media loves going after verbal missteps, you know that.

by **Imperial Esplanade** » Fri Sep 30, 2016 6:08 am

Tallahassee News Station wrote:
Imperial Esplanade wrote:
With all due respect, that's such a lame thing to target someone over, given it's context.

In fact, it might even give Carrollton some reason to genuinely suspect TNS is biased since it passes over headlining major policy proposals in favor of a lame quote taken out of context. That's not even something juicy.

News stations commenting on unfortunate wording is what news stations do. Elections always have those situations where certain wording is capitalized on. See "Look at my African American", "What difference, at this point, does it make", "I have the best words", or if you want a direct something "Not as widespread". We could name a dozen more. The modern American media loves going after verbal missteps, you know that.

Oh no, I'm not disagreeing with you there. I'm just saying that this particular one is quite... stretching it. That's all.

by **The Portland Territory** » Fri Sep 30, 2016 6:11 am

Wait, if Reed isn't attending, will Gonzalez? If this is the case, I think that we should also invite some other 3rd party candidates

by **Tallahassee News Station** » Fri Sep 30, 2016 6:38 am

Imperial Esplanade wrote:
Tallahassee News Station wrote:
News stations commenting on unfortunate wording is what news stations do. Elections always have those situations where certain wording is capitalized on. See "Look at my African American", "What difference, at this point, does it make", "I have the best words", or if you want a direct something "Not as widespread". We could name a dozen more. The modern American media loves going after verbal missteps, you know that.

Oh no, I'm not disagreeing with you there. I'm just saying that this particular one is quite... stretching it. That's all.

Depends on the audience I guess. Most things are like that.

by **Tallahassee News Station** » Fri Sep 30, 2016 6:43 am

The Portland Territory wrote:Wait, if Reed isn't attending, will Gonzalez? If this is the case, I think that we should also invite some other 3rd party candidates

The epic showdown, tonight on DIN. Senator Egazarian faces his strongest opponent ever, Mr. Matteos Egazarian.

Washington (US Political RP; 2016 ; OOC ; OPEN!)

When day should the New Hampshire Republican Debate be?

Who is online