Washington (US Political RP; 2016 ; OOC ; OPEN!)

[Federal States of Xathuecia]

I stand corrected. Still, I feel it is off. It would be like the day we have the NY primary, I get a chance to just spam rallies.

I'm fine with it but it just feels off. And would he just be able to do one rally or would he get to act as if he was here the whole time by getting to do more rallies. And how many rallies could he do? So many concerns.

I don't get your concerns. He has the same IC period to have rallies that everyone else does.

It's like this:

Danders held (I think) 2 rallies in Wisconsin.

Beaumont held 2 rallies too and a listening tour.

But if we allow Murray to get a chance, since we focused on other states, would get just get that day to spam out those rallies? Like if he does two, doesn't it hurt us as he did them sooner? Or be unfair to us as he could hold three or even five rallies in the state and we couldn't do a thing to fight that because technically we are already past the Wisconsin primary ICly.

[Federal States of Xathuecia]

I am.

I hate to say but tough luck. Carrollton gets high numbers by being online and doing many rallies. Danders does a few. I do listening tours to make up for those periods of absence. Even Pro. is on a tight schedule. Idk what to do or say.

Are you drunk?

How so?

[Tallahassee News Station]

I don't get your concerns. He has the same IC period to have rallies that everyone else does.

It's like this:

Danders held (I think) 2 rallies in Wisconsin.

Beaumont held 2 rallies too and a listening tour.

But if we allow Murray to get a chance, since we focused on other states, would get just get that day to spam out those rallies? Like if he does two, doesn't it hurt us as he did them sooner? Or be unfair to us as he could hold three or even five rallies in the state and we couldn't do a thing to fight that because technically we are already past the Wisconsin primary ICly.

Everyone gets to hold as many rallies as is realistic within the IC timeframe. That doesn't change at all. We are just changing the OOC date.

We are not past Wisconsin ICly for the Democrats at least.

[Jovuistan]

So, this guy passing by my house was blasting "REAL N A! REAL N A!" at max volume in their car.

[Tallahassee News Station]

So, this guy passing by my house was blasting "REAL N A! REAL N A!" at max volume in their car.

Would Larson like a TNS interview?

[Jovuistan]

So, this guy passing by my house was blasting "REAL N A! REAL N A!" at max volume in their car.

Would Larson like a TNS interview?

Sure, but he'll probably be escorted out by the end.

[Federal States of Xathuecia]

We'll do it Sunday. I'm just getting a brain fart every minute. But Murray of course will have until that night and that night we'll do the primary.

[Tallahassee News Station]

Would Larson like a TNS interview?

Sure, but he'll probably be escorted out by the end.

This was actually a setup for me to say "Well, too bad sucker" but now I feel like that is mean.

[Federal States of Xathuecia]

Beaumont's debate will be after the Northeast votes to ensure he doesn't get pulled down. So it will have a strong impact on the rest of the Midwest as well as the Northern central states and Cali.

[Democratic Peoples republic of Kelvinsi]

I don't get your concerns. He has the same IC period to have rallies that everyone else does.

It's like this:

Danders held (I think) 2 rallies in Wisconsin.

Beaumont held 2 rallies too and a listening tour.

But if we allow Murray to get a chance, since we focused on other states, would get just get that day to spam out those rallies? Like if he does two, doesn't it hurt us as he did them sooner? Or be unfair to us as he could hold three or even five rallies in the state and we couldn't do a thing to fight that because technically we are already past the Wisconsin primary ICly.

Danders held zero rallies in Wisconsin, he was in NY, WY and PA.

[Jovuistan]

Beaumont's debate will be after the Northeast votes to ensure he doesn't get pulled down. So it will have a strong impact on the rest of the Midwest as well as the Northern central states and Cali.

That is if Larson's offensive statements don't end up filling all of the headlines.

[Tallahassee News Station]

Beaumont's debate will be after the Northeast votes to ensure he doesn't get pulled down. So it will have a strong impact on the rest of the Midwest as well as the Northern central states and Cali.

So very little effect overall then. If he wants it to really be important it should be beforehand. But I can understand Beaumont personally not wanting that. It is a smart move on his part. The DNC though will. So the Democratic debate would be before the Northeast.

[Tallahassee News Station]

Beaumont's debate will be after the Northeast votes to ensure he doesn't get pulled down. So it will have a strong impact on the rest of the Midwest as well as the Northern central states and Cali.

That is if Larson's offensive statements don't end up filling all of the headlines.

Reed will just knock him out again.

[Jovuistan]

That is if Larson's offensive statements don't end up filling all of the headlines.

Reed will just knock him out again.

More ammo for me, then.

[Federal States of Xathuecia]

Beaumont's debate will be after the Northeast votes to ensure he doesn't get pulled down. So it will have a strong impact on the rest of the Midwest as well as the Northern central states and Cali.

So very little effect overall then. If he wants it to really be important it should be beforehand. But I can understand Beaumont personally not wanting that. It is a smart move on his part. The DNC though will. So the Democratic debate would be before the Northeast.

No. We are not having a Democratic Debate. I have been argued on this and I believe it to be fair to handle a Republican one first and foremost.

[Tallahassee News Station]

So very little effect overall then. If he wants it to really be important it should be beforehand. But I can understand Beaumont personally not wanting that. It is a smart move on his part. The DNC though will. So the Democratic debate would be before the Northeast.

No. We are not having a Democratic Debate. I have been argued on this and I believe it to be fair to handle a Republican one first and foremost.

The RNC would never agree to hold a Republican debate.

[Federal States of Xathuecia]

No. We are not having a Democratic Debate. I have been argued on this and I believe it to be fair to handle a Republican one first and foremost.

The RNC would never agree to hold a Republican debate.

Well, the RNC technically publishes a schedule of debates before the primary season and already has them prepared. So we are having one.

[Tallahassee News Station]

The RNC would never agree to hold a Republican debate.

Well, the RNC technically publishes a schedule of debates before the primary season and already has them prepared. So we are having one.

Which we haven't done. And debates can be cancelled.

[Federal States of Xathuecia]

Well, the RNC technically publishes a schedule of debates before the primary season and already has them prepared. So we are having one.

Which we haven't done. And debates can be cancelled.

We haven't created a schedule but it can easily be canonized that we did. And why would they cancel the debate?

[Tallahassee News Station]

Which we haven't done. And debates can be cancelled.

We haven't created a schedule but it can easily be canonized that we did. And why would they cancel the debate?

Because all but one candidate has been mathematically eliminated. A debate would only weaken the likely nominee and increase the chances of a contested convention.

[The Portland Territory]

So, this guy passing by my house was blasting "REAL N A! REAL N A!" at max volume in their car.

I'm 100% n a, n a n a a n a, I'm 200%!

[Federal States of Xathuecia]

We haven't created a schedule but it can easily be canonized that we did. And why would they cancel the debate?

Because all but one candidate has been mathematically eliminated. A debate would only weaken the likely nominee and increase the chances of a contested convention.

But RNC debates are the only debates. A network could hold one. DIN could hold one.

[Democratic Peoples republic of Kelvinsi]

A DIN debate... I need to prepare unfair questions for everyone.

[The Portland Territory]

Because all but one candidate has been mathematically eliminated. A debate would only weaken the likely nominee and increase the chances of a contested convention.

But RNC debates are the only debates. A network could hold one. DIN could hold one.

I'd like that. Plus we were promised a debate before the Mississippi Redo, so I think it's only fair

[Democratic Peoples republic of Kelvinsi]

Debate tmr, at Gary, Indiana, hosted by DIN, all proceeds go to charity.