Breckenridge vs the AFVC
Advertisement

by Utopian Islands » Thu Mar 31, 2016 2:55 pm

by Indian Empire » Thu Mar 31, 2016 2:57 pm

by Indian Empire » Thu Mar 31, 2016 2:58 pm

by Acumenian Empire » Thu Mar 31, 2016 2:59 pm

by Neo-Chicago » Thu Mar 31, 2016 3:03 pm
Democratic peoples republic of Kelvinsi wrote:If cross takes SC, I think everyone will drop out including myself, since there is not stopping him. But he probably is not going to since he did not even bother to show up.

by Southern Babylonia » Thu Mar 31, 2016 3:04 pm
Indian Empire wrote:Also, what about a democratic debate before Nevada?

by Neo-Chicago » Thu Mar 31, 2016 3:06 pm

by Hillary Clinton 2016-2024 » Thu Mar 31, 2016 3:06 pm

by Krugeristan » Thu Mar 31, 2016 3:07 pm

by Hillary Clinton 2016-2024 » Thu Mar 31, 2016 3:07 pm

by Prolieum » Thu Mar 31, 2016 3:10 pm
Neo-Chicago wrote:Democratic peoples republic of Kelvinsi wrote:If cross takes SC, I think everyone will drop out including myself, since there is not stopping him. But he probably is not going to since he did not even bother to show up.
Admittedly, part of the reason that I didn't show up there was because of that. Landslide victories aren't fun.
"We are the Canadian Borg. Resistance would be impolite. Please wait to be assimilated. Pour l'assimilation en Francais, appuyer le numero deux."

by TURTLESHROOM II » Thu Mar 31, 2016 3:12 pm
Ice States abruptly severs all diplomatic relations with TurtleShroom, Ministry of Foreign Affairs baffled -|- Constitutional Eminent Domain amendment ratified, chimeras to be reimbursed in Skillets -|- Official Civil War death count "ten times higher than initially reported", new bodies still found

by Krugeristan » Thu Mar 31, 2016 3:15 pm
Prolieum wrote:Neo-Chicago wrote:Admittedly, part of the reason that I didn't show up there was because of that. Landslide victories aren't fun.
With Haven down, it gets tricky. Eberhardt needs a win early to solidify himself as a strong candidate, and S.C. has that Christian, Conservative base, hence the effort here. Scalise has been doing well enough, a victory here would help imply a top-2 bit, but he can take a loss. For Williams, he is definitely going to hold on until Super Tuesday regardless-winning S.C. could help, but it is the other southern votes that matter. Breckenridge is in an odd situation, his votes are going to start coming in later in the primary season, so S.C. could be needed to give supporters a reason to hang on, or it could be simply a place where he makes a bit of a showing just to keep going-I think the latter, especially because the voter base is going to be rather hostile to him. Kiser-I really do not know about. He nailed New Hampshire almost without showing, which was weird-he is the wild card. Garestaer exists. Probably. Too much time on the email to really campaign at all.

by Prolieum » Thu Mar 31, 2016 3:17 pm
Krugeristan wrote:Prolieum wrote:
With Haven down, it gets tricky. Eberhardt needs a win early to solidify himself as a strong candidate, and S.C. has that Christian, Conservative base, hence the effort here. Scalise has been doing well enough, a victory here would help imply a top-2 bit, but he can take a loss. For Williams, he is definitely going to hold on until Super Tuesday regardless-winning S.C. could help, but it is the other southern votes that matter. Breckenridge is in an odd situation, his votes are going to start coming in later in the primary season, so S.C. could be needed to give supporters a reason to hang on, or it could be simply a place where he makes a bit of a showing just to keep going-I think the latter, especially because the voter base is going to be rather hostile to him. Kiser-I really do not know about. He nailed New Hampshire almost without showing, which was weird-he is the wild card. Garestaer exists. Probably. Too much time on the email to really campaign at all.
Well, Garestaer got shot at one of his rallies. He just posted a YouTube video, and is making an appearance on Sean Hannity's show tonight.
"We are the Canadian Borg. Resistance would be impolite. Please wait to be assimilated. Pour l'assimilation en Francais, appuyer le numero deux."

by Neo-Chicago » Thu Mar 31, 2016 3:18 pm

by Krugeristan » Thu Mar 31, 2016 3:19 pm

by Prolieum » Thu Mar 31, 2016 3:20 pm
"We are the Canadian Borg. Resistance would be impolite. Please wait to be assimilated. Pour l'assimilation en Francais, appuyer le numero deux."

by Prolieum » Thu Mar 31, 2016 3:20 pm
"We are the Canadian Borg. Resistance would be impolite. Please wait to be assimilated. Pour l'assimilation en Francais, appuyer le numero deux."

by Chewion » Thu Mar 31, 2016 3:21 pm

by Prolieum » Thu Mar 31, 2016 3:54 pm
"We are the Canadian Borg. Resistance would be impolite. Please wait to be assimilated. Pour l'assimilation en Francais, appuyer le numero deux."

by Pantorrum » Thu Mar 31, 2016 3:55 pm
Prolieum wrote:Oh, look, someone else implying Eberhardt is homosexual. So surprised. Did not see coming.

by Prolieum » Thu Mar 31, 2016 4:00 pm
"We are the Canadian Borg. Resistance would be impolite. Please wait to be assimilated. Pour l'assimilation en Francais, appuyer le numero deux."

by Pantorrum » Thu Mar 31, 2016 4:02 pm
Prolieum wrote:Pantorrum wrote:
Of course he isn't, right? Could you tell me about that situation real quick so I know the nature of these accusations?
He is heterosexual, but still single, and very Christian. Basically, the AFVC ran an add attacking Rep. Fokker of being homosexual, and Eberhardt went after them for gossiping (Fokker is also heterosexual) they then (since they used Eberhardt's profile picture for Fokker) recycled the ad to go after Eberhardt, and spammed it every other page or so. Eberhardt eventually sued for libel, which is still in court-but in the debate, the moderator asked about the ad, and Eberhardt's homosexuality, implications there, then, in his next question, made a grammar error that made it sound the same. (He said "What is your position of Eberhardt as a homosexual candidate) without the comma needed to separate the clauses. Cross then implied he was homosexual in his response, and Breckenridge might have, I cannot recall, but now Gaerester is doing the same. It was kinda funny, and I suppose it remains mildly amusing, but it seems there is a nationwide conspiracy to prove that he is not heterosexual.


by TURTLESHROOM II » Thu Mar 31, 2016 4:03 pm
Ice States abruptly severs all diplomatic relations with TurtleShroom, Ministry of Foreign Affairs baffled -|- Constitutional Eminent Domain amendment ratified, chimeras to be reimbursed in Skillets -|- Official Civil War death count "ten times higher than initially reported", new bodies still found

by Neo-Chicago » Thu Mar 31, 2016 4:04 pm
Prolieum wrote:Pantorrum wrote:
Of course he isn't, right? Could you tell me about that situation real quick so I know the nature of these accusations?
He is heterosexual, but still single, and very Christian. Basically, the AFVC ran an add attacking Rep. Fokker of being homosexual, and Eberhardt went after them for gossiping (Fokker is also heterosexual) they then (since they used Eberhardt's profile picture for Fokker) recycled the ad to go after Eberhardt, and spammed it every other page or so. Eberhardt eventually sued for libel, which is still in court-but in the debate, the moderator asked about the ad, and Eberhardt's homosexuality, implications there, then, in his next question, made a grammar error that made it sound the same. (He said "What is your position of Eberhardt as a homosexual candidate) without the comma needed to separate the clauses. Cross then implied he was homosexual in his response, and Breckenridge might have, I cannot recall, but now Gaerester is doing the same. It was kinda funny, and I suppose it remains mildly amusing, but it seems there is a nationwide conspiracy to prove that he is not heterosexual.
Advertisement
Return to Portal to the Multiverse
Users browsing this forum: Drachen, Dragos Bee, Novovaritsya, The United Empire of Exucular, The Vooperian Union
Advertisement