Iron and Steel; 20th Century AH [RE/Continuation/OOC/OPEN]

[The Peoples East Africa]

Used the same numbers for the adjust model, I got 6.6 this time around

That's certainly smaller. Perhaps multiplying by 10 to get a value out of 100 could be an idea. It doesn't change anything, but makes it sound good.
What country did you use?

I didn't use any one country, rather collected data from countries like Russia and Japan to give it a unique
I guess I should use one country like America or China to check the accuracy?[/quote]
Maybe you try using one of the nations in the RP? Perhaps use Persia or Germany.

[The New Greek Republic]

SHIT I DIdnt MULTIPLY BY THE (RD/RS)

It's 5.28 figure we should round to the tenth so 5.3

[The New Greek Republic]

Maybe you try using one of the nations in the RP? Perhaps use Persia or Germany.

I'd need a country to submit their facts necessary to complete it because the app wouldn't cover everything I think

[The Peoples East Africa]

Maybe you try using one of the nations in the RP? Perhaps use Persia or Germany.

I'd need a country to submit their facts necessary to complete it because the app wouldn't cover everything I think

What about your country?

[The Peoples East Africa]

SHIT I DIdnt MULTIPLY BY THE (RD/RS)

It's 5.28 figure we should round to the tenth so 5.3

It's (RS/RD) not the other way around.

[The New Greek Republic]

SHIT I DIdnt MULTIPLY BY THE (RD/RS)

It's 5.28 figure we should round to the tenth so 5.3

It's (RS/RD) not the other way around.

You know what I mean

I'll do mine right now

[The Peoples East Africa]

It's (RS/RD) not the other way around.

You know what I mean

I'll do mine right now

So that countries demand was greater than its supply?

[The New Greek Republic]

You know what I mean

I'll do mine right now

So that countries demand was greater than its supply?

No the supply was larger than the demand

[The Peoples East Africa]

So that countries demand was greater than its supply?

No the supply was larger than the demand

Which did you multiply by?
(RD/RS), or (RS/RD).

[The New Greek Republic]

No the supply was larger than the demand

Which did you multiply by?
(RD/RS), or (RS/RD).

RD/RS

[The Peoples East Africa]

Which did you multiply by?
(RD/RS), or (RS/RD).

RD/RS

Everything makes sense again! I think. It's the other way around for future reference. I'm pretty sure it is at least.

[The New Greek Republic]

RD/RS

Everything makes sense again! I think. It's the other way around for future reference. I'm pretty sure it is at least.

I used the other way, the RS/RD, in my own country's calculation. I gave myself a 7.1% unemployed rate, minimum wage of 15 cents ($4.29 today) as my basis for the GDP, supply and demand ratio of 8:6, cost of living a 4, income tax rate of 12% and a growth of .4%

I got .6 for Persia so my net economic health would be 6. We wouldn't have any countries come close to 100 because of inflation adjustments so we should do it for a smaller number like 10,15,or 20.

Also we should call this formula the Greek Pea Index

[The Peoples East Africa]

Everything makes sense again! I think. It's the other way around for future reference. I'm pretty sure it is at least.

I used the other way, the RS/RD, in my own country's calculation. I gave myself a 7.1% unemployed rate, minimum wage of 15 cents ($4.29 today) as my basis for the GDP, supply and demand ratio of 8:6, cost of living a 4, income tax rate of 12% and a growth of .4%

I got .6 for Persia so my net economic health would be 6. We wouldn't have any countries come close to 100 because of inflation adjustments so we should do it for a smaller number like 10,15,or 20.

Also we should call this formula the Greek Pea Index

That all sounds good. Maybe you can do Sweden next? Just say any measurements you need.

We can copyright this Index and make millions!

[The New Greek Republic]

I used the other way, the RS/RD, in my own country's calculation. I gave myself a 7.1% unemployed rate, minimum wage of 15 cents ($4.29 today) as my basis for the GDP, supply and demand ratio of 8:6, cost of living a 4, income tax rate of 12% and a growth of .4%

I got .6 for Persia so my net economic health would be 6. We wouldn't have any countries come close to 100 because of inflation adjustments so we should do it for a smaller number like 10,15,or 20.

Also we should call this formula the Greek Pea Index

That all sounds good. Maybe you can do Sweden next? Just say any measurements you need.

We can copyright this Index and make millions!

I need your Resource Supply, Resource Demand scaled out of 10, unemployment rate, minimum wage, cost of living scaled out of 10, income tax rate, and yearly growth rate and I think that's all I need.

[The Peoples East Africa]

That all sounds good. Maybe you can do Sweden next? Just say any measurements you need.

We can copyright this Index and make millions!

I need your Resource Supply, Resource Demand scaled out of 10, unemployment rate, minimum wage, cost of living scaled out of 10, income tax rate, and yearly growth rate and I think that's all I need.

RS:RD is 4:3. Unemployment is 4.3%. Minimum wage is 30 cents. Cost of Living is 6. Income tax rate is 25%. Yearly growth is 2.2%

[The New Greek Republic]

I need your Resource Supply, Resource Demand scaled out of 10, unemployment rate, minimum wage, cost of living scaled out of 10, income tax rate, and yearly growth rate and I think that's all I need.

RS:RD is 4:3. Unemployment is 4.3%. Minimum wage is 30 cents. Cost of Living is 6. Income tax rate is 25%. Yearly growth is 2.2%

Sorry, I forgot about inflation, what's your inflation rate?

[The Peoples East Africa]

RS:RD is 4:3. Unemployment is 4.3%. Minimum wage is 30 cents. Cost of Living is 6. Income tax rate is 25%. Yearly growth is 2.2%

Sorry, I forgot about inflation, what's your inflation rate?

1%

[The New Greek Republic]

I got a 6.9, let us round it up to the whole number 7, which is a whole point better than mine. Bastard.

I was thinking we could categorize as such;
1-2; very poor economy
3-4; improved economy
5-6; stable, okay economy
7-8; very good economy
9-10; strong, excellent economy

I think we need to multiply it by .5 when countries are in war. Or some type of of weighted calculation for when their in war.

[The Peoples East Africa]

I got a 6.9, let us round it up to the whole number 7, which is a whole point better than mine. Bastard.

I think we need to multiply it by .5 when countries are in war. Or some type of of weighted calculation for when their in war.

Maybe multiply by .9, and then for every extra country they're at war with, make it .8, .7, .6, and so on.

[The Peoples East Africa]

I got a 6.9, let us round it up to the whole number 7, which is a whole point better than mine. Bastard.

I was thinking we could categorize as such;
1-2; very poor economy
3-4; improved economy
5-6; stable, okay economy
7-8; very good economy
9-10; strong, excellent economy

I think we need to multiply it by .5 when countries are in war. Or some type of of weighted calculation for when their in war.

Sounds like a good ranking. Hopefully no countries go above it.

[The New Greek Republic]

Maybe multiply by .9, and then for every extra country they're at war with, make it .8, .7, .6, and so on.

Sounds goods

I got a 6.9, let us round it up to the whole number 7, which is a whole point better than mine. Bastard.

I was thinking we could categorize as such;
1-2; very poor economy
3-4; improved economy
5-6; stable, okay economy
7-8; very good economy
9-10; strong, excellent economy

I think we need to multiply it by .5 when countries are in war. Or some type of of weighted calculation for when their in war.

Sounds like a good ranking. Hopefully no countries go above it.

Of they do we'll just add the 10+ category which we can determine if it happens.

GUYS WE HAVE SUCCESSFULLY CREATED ECONOMIC FORMULA AFTER LITERALLY 3 PAGES OF ME AND PEA TALKING

[Soviet Chernarus]

Maybe multiply by .9, and then for every extra country they're at war with, make it .8, .7, .6, and so on.

Sounds goods

Sounds like a good ranking. Hopefully no countries go above it.

Of they do we'll just add the 10+ category which we can determine if it happens.

GUYS WE HAVE SUCCESSFULLY CREATED ECONOMIC FORMULA AFTER LITERALLY 3 PAGES OF ME AND PEA TALKING

Grats

[The Peoples East Africa]

Maybe multiply by .9, and then for every extra country they're at war with, make it .8, .7, .6, and so on.

Sounds goods

Sounds like a good ranking. Hopefully no countries go above it.

Of they do we'll just add the 10+ category which we can determine if it happens.

GUYS WE HAVE SUCCESSFULLY CREATED ECONOMIC FORMULA AFTER LITERALLY 3 PAGES OF ME AND PEA TALKING

Should we create another thread for people to upload their stats so we can give back rankings?

[The New Greek Republic]

Sounds goods



Of they do we'll just add the 10+ category which we can determine if it happens.

GUYS WE HAVE SUCCESSFULLY CREATED ECONOMIC FORMULA AFTER LITERALLY 3 PAGES OF ME AND PEA TALKING

Should we create another thread for people to upload their stats so we can give back rankings?

Maybe, let's ask Soviet!

Should we soviet?

[Soviet Chernarus]

Should we create another thread for people to upload their stats so we can give back rankings?

Maybe, let's ask Soviet!

Should we soviet?

Why not do it in the Archive? We can post our stats here, and we'll put the rankings and such in the Archive. I'll even make a spot in the Index for rankings.