Advertisement

by Sanabel » Tue Aug 04, 2015 2:38 am

by Suekiva » Tue Aug 04, 2015 5:39 am
Sanabel wrote:The sad thing is that:
IRL both armies sucked balls, and would in this instance. Look at Gallipoli for instance. The Ottomans beat the Aussies and Brits because of their overwhelming numbers, and that is after getting rekt HARD by the aforementioned party.
So, despite their lack of numbers, Persia has the advantage, most certainly. They have the mountains, safe from land movement and air raids. On the other hand, I think they can have their flatlands and isolated places like the Caucuses easily taken by Ottoman forces. Most likely, they will also lose their naval capabilities.
Now, I see you all bickering about the Ottomans. Remember, they still have Gulf ports. They probably have ships there already, plus a lot in the Indian Ocean. That said, I think they will not be able to easily resupply or reinforce those numbers. However, I still think, since overwhelming numbers dont decide the outcome of naval battles, that the Ottomans still have naval superiority.

by Sanabel » Tue Aug 04, 2015 6:02 am
Suekiva wrote:Sanabel wrote:The sad thing is that:
IRL both armies sucked balls, and would in this instance. Look at Gallipoli for instance. The Ottomans beat the Aussies and Brits because of their overwhelming numbers, and that is after getting rekt HARD by the aforementioned party.
So, despite their lack of numbers, Persia has the advantage, most certainly. They have the mountains, safe from land movement and air raids. On the other hand, I think they can have their flatlands and isolated places like the Caucuses easily taken by Ottoman forces. Most likely, they will also lose their naval capabilities.
Now, I see you all bickering about the Ottomans. Remember, they still have Gulf ports. They probably have ships there already, plus a lot in the Indian Ocean. That said, I think they will not be able to easily resupply or reinforce those numbers. However, I still think, since overwhelming numbers dont decide the outcome of naval battles, that the Ottomans still have naval superiority.
Kosovo says he has a "small fleet in Kuwait".

by Sanabel » Tue Aug 04, 2015 6:02 am
Sanabel wrote:Probably around 20,000 Marines in the area from the Army.
Currently within the Gulf, there are probably a very large number of escort ships, a couple corvettes, a couple light destroyers, an ironclad or two, and a very close by dreadnought. If need be, I can easily call in more from my Indian Ocean Fleet. The ships are already very close by anyway, to protect my main shipping routes. I could easily get more of each, plus some heavy destroyers. We don't have a huge military presence there(yet), because we had no reason to have one.
While small, it is all 11/10 top notch, over all probably better than both the Ottoman and Persian navies in terms of tech and quality. Size? Probably not.

by The New Greek Republic » Tue Aug 04, 2015 6:08 am
Sanabel wrote:So, despite their lack of numbers, Persia has the advantage, most certainly. They have the mountains, safe from land movement and air raids. On the other hand, I think they can have their flatlands and isolated places like the Caucuses easily taken by Ottoman forces. Most likely, they will also lose their naval capabilities.
Sanabel wrote:Now, I see you all bickering about the Ottomans. Remember, they still have Gulf ports. They probably have ships there already, plus a lot in the Indian Ocean. That said, I think they will not be able to easily resupply or reinforce those numbers. However, I still think, since overwhelming numbers dont decide the outcome of naval battles, that the Ottomans still have naval superiority.
Sanabel wrote: I control the Holy See with its transvestite pope who identifies as an ogre.

by Sanabel » Tue Aug 04, 2015 6:13 am
The New Greek Republic wrote:Sanabel wrote:So, despite their lack of numbers, Persia has the advantage, most certainly. They have the mountains, safe from land movement and air raids. On the other hand, I think they can have their flatlands and isolated places like the Caucuses easily taken by Ottoman forces. Most likely, they will also lose their naval capabilities.
But like, he controls the entirety of the Persian Caucuses. I don't have any Caucasus I don't think, if I do it's not flatland.Sanabel wrote:Now, I see you all bickering about the Ottomans. Remember, they still have Gulf ports. They probably have ships there already, plus a lot in the Indian Ocean. That said, I think they will not be able to easily resupply or reinforce those numbers. However, I still think, since overwhelming numbers dont decide the outcome of naval battles, that the Ottomans still have naval superiority.
He has a, quote, "small Kuwait fleet"
I'm not trying to weasel my way out of a war here, I just wanna make that clear, but there are issues I'm trying to solve.

by Sanabel » Tue Aug 04, 2015 6:13 am
Suekiva wrote:I'd say that Kosovo's main fleet would take 2 months to reach the Persian Gulf, accounting for time spent resupplying.

by The New Greek Republic » Tue Aug 04, 2015 6:23 am
Sanabel wrote: I control the Holy See with its transvestite pope who identifies as an ogre.

by Sanabel » Tue Aug 04, 2015 6:36 am
The New Greek Republic wrote:Also, my army is attrocious, I have a fairly large fighting force which is funded fairly well. Along with modern weapons for the time. The only thing I've got that is a problem are a lot of my troops are undertrained, which is to change because of the Military Cooperation Agreement between me and Hungary.

by Sanabel » Tue Aug 04, 2015 6:39 am

by The New Greek Republic » Tue Aug 04, 2015 6:41 am
SECP wrote:So how is time being passed in the IC, 1 page= 1 month type of thing?
Sanabel wrote:Think about this.
There is no way Persia's military in terms of quality is even near the Ottomans.
And the Ottomans lost millions more than the Brits and co. during the middle eastern theater of ww1. By the transitive property, your military isn't even close to European ones. Yet.
Sanabel wrote: I control the Holy See with its transvestite pope who identifies as an ogre.

by Sanabel » Tue Aug 04, 2015 6:44 am
The New Greek Republic wrote:SECP wrote:So how is time being passed in the IC, 1 page= 1 month type of thing?
4pages=1month
I don't like itSanabel wrote:Think about this.
There is no way Persia's military in terms of quality is even near the Ottomans.
And the Ottomans lost millions more than the Brits and co. during the middle eastern theater of ww1. By the transitive property, your military isn't even close to European ones. Yet.
Well it's what I had in my app and nobody rebutted so.

by Sanabel » Tue Aug 04, 2015 6:47 am
The New Greek Republic wrote:SECP wrote:So how is time being passed in the IC, 1 page= 1 month type of thing?
4pages=1month
I don't like itSanabel wrote:Think about this.
There is no way Persia's military in terms of quality is even near the Ottomans.
And the Ottomans lost millions more than the Brits and co. during the middle eastern theater of ww1. By the transitive property, your military isn't even close to European ones. Yet.
Well it's what I had in my app and nobody rebutted so.

by The New Greek Republic » Tue Aug 04, 2015 7:07 am
Sanabel wrote:Also, explain how on Earth you are successfully occupying Afghanistan?
That would consume much of your military's time, id imagine.
Sanabel wrote: I control the Holy See with its transvestite pope who identifies as an ogre.

by Sanabel » Tue Aug 04, 2015 7:16 am
The New Greek Republic wrote:Sanabel wrote:Also, explain how on Earth you are successfully occupying Afghanistan?
That would consume much of your military's time, id imagine.
It's been apart of Persia for awhile, since the first I&S and historically. Especially since I've listened to my people and I've given them whatever I could, I became a republic, I tried to pass more social policies, and if they wanted autonomy I'd probably give it to them. I don't think there'd be a whole lot of anti-government sentiment thanks to the fact I listen to the people.


by Sanabel » Tue Aug 04, 2015 7:50 am
SECP wrote:Hey got a Q. If your in a defensive pact does that mean if one person gets invaded the other helps?

by The New Greek Republic » Tue Aug 04, 2015 8:24 am
Sanabel wrote: I control the Holy See with its transvestite pope who identifies as an ogre.
by New Decius » Tue Aug 04, 2015 8:32 am
Suekiva wrote:Sanabel wrote:The sad thing is that:
IRL both armies sucked balls, and would in this instance. Look at Gallipoli for instance. The Ottomans beat the Aussies and Brits because of their overwhelming numbers, and that is after getting rekt HARD by the aforementioned party.
So, despite their lack of numbers, Persia has the advantage, most certainly. They have the mountains, safe from land movement and air raids. On the other hand, I think they can have their flatlands and isolated places like the Caucuses easily taken by Ottoman forces. Most likely, they will also lose their naval capabilities.
Now, I see you all bickering about the Ottomans. Remember, they still have Gulf ports. They probably have ships there already, plus a lot in the Indian Ocean. That said, I think they will not be able to easily resupply or reinforce those numbers. However, I still think, since overwhelming numbers dont decide the outcome of naval battles, that the Ottomans still have naval superiority.
Kosovo says he has a "small fleet in Kuwait".

by Sanabel » Tue Aug 04, 2015 8:45 am

by Sanabel » Tue Aug 04, 2015 8:52 am
Advertisement
Return to Portal to the Multiverse
Users browsing this forum: Bentus, Corpoterra, G-Tech Corporation, Kandex, Novas Arcanum, Nuxipal, Segmentia, Turkducken
Advertisement