Advertisement

by Wolfenium » Thu Jul 23, 2015 9:21 pm

by Minroz » Fri Jul 24, 2015 3:12 am

by Monfrox » Fri Jul 24, 2015 8:12 am
Xing wrote:Yeah but you also are the best at roleplay. (yay Space Core references) I'm pretty sure a four man tank crew is no problem for someone that had 27 different RP characters going at one time.
The Grey Wolf wrote:Froxy knows how to use a whip, I speak from experience.

by Occupied Deutschland » Fri Jul 24, 2015 9:12 am

by Occupied Deutschland » Fri Jul 24, 2015 12:36 pm

by Latznavia » Fri Jul 24, 2015 2:36 pm


by Agritum » Sat Jul 25, 2015 4:28 am

by Monfrox » Sat Jul 25, 2015 8:32 am
Agritum wrote:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CfeZxrN_db4
This influenced me a lot back when I was writing the OP. Great video.
Xing wrote:Yeah but you also are the best at roleplay. (yay Space Core references) I'm pretty sure a four man tank crew is no problem for someone that had 27 different RP characters going at one time.
The Grey Wolf wrote:Froxy knows how to use a whip, I speak from experience.

by Rupudska » Sat Jul 25, 2015 5:49 pm
Hladgos wrote:Scantly clad women, more like tanks
seem to be blowing up everyones banks
with airstrikes from girls with wings to their knees
which show a bit more than just their panties

by Malshan » Sat Jul 25, 2015 5:51 pm
Rupudska wrote:Hetland 2 wrote:
You catch on quick. That's why I like you. :)
I'm kidding of course you aren't a thing. You're a person.
Dude, don't insult the werefurry.
Rupudska wrote:RP Sample: Let me in, or we take another third of Mexico.
Rupudska wrote:You're NS's Wolfman, therefore your argument is negated due to bias.
"Sarcasm works so much better when you can look down your fire-breathing nose at someone." -Callistan Sairias

by Reverend Norv » Sat Jul 25, 2015 6:36 pm
For really, I think that the poorest he that is in England hath a life to live as the greatest he. And therefore truly, Sir, I think it's clear that every man that is to live under a Government ought first by his own consent to put himself under that Government. And I do think that the poorest man in England is not at all bound in a strict sense to that Government that he hath not had a voice to put himself under.
Col. Thomas Rainsborough, Putney Debates, 1647
A God who let us prove His existence would be an idol.
Dietrich Bonhoeffer

by Nature-Spirits » Sat Jul 25, 2015 9:11 pm
Malshan wrote:Sorry, haven't had the time to post. Makes for an amusing turn of events, however.
So, Agri....just how much damage am I allowed to do to the car? Because we all know Markus isn't going to just let go of it.
EDIT: Also, no. Glad that I'm NOT a werecat. Felines are good for nothing but trouble. >_>

by Agritum » Sun Jul 26, 2015 2:05 am
Malshan wrote:Sorry, haven't had the time to post. Makes for an amusing turn of events, however.
So, Agri....just how much damage am I allowed to do to the car? Because we all know Markus isn't going to just let go of it.
EDIT: Also, no. Glad that I'm NOT a werecat. Felines are good for nothing but trouble. >_>

by Minroz » Sun Jul 26, 2015 3:26 am


by Agritum » Sun Jul 26, 2015 5:25 pm

by Monfrox » Sun Jul 26, 2015 5:31 pm
Agritum wrote:So because I have a inbuilt magnet for right wing cranks and loonies, I discovered the channel of an English speaking Japanese far right nationalist woman who makes stilted, upbeat pop songs about how Japan brought freedom to the co-prosperity sphere, Korea made up the whole comfort women system and other revisionist themes dear to Uyoku Dantai troops. She's got 53k followers.
I'm not going to link of it, because the videos are frankly brain rotting and, since we've actually got Chinese RPers in here, I guess it would be the equivalent of posting Nazi Rock on the Jewish discussion thread.
*Beat*
It's things like these that makes me think MacArthur fucked up.
Xing wrote:Yeah but you also are the best at roleplay. (yay Space Core references) I'm pretty sure a four man tank crew is no problem for someone that had 27 different RP characters going at one time.
The Grey Wolf wrote:Froxy knows how to use a whip, I speak from experience.

by Agritum » Sun Jul 26, 2015 5:32 pm
Monfrox wrote:Agritum wrote:So because I have a inbuilt magnet for right wing cranks and loonies, I discovered the channel of an English speaking Japanese far right nationalist woman who makes stilted, upbeat pop songs about how Japan brought freedom to the co-prosperity sphere, Korea made up the whole comfort women system and other revisionist themes dear to Uyoku Dantai troops. She's got 53k followers.
I'm not going to link of it, because the videos are frankly brain rotting and, since we've actually got Chinese RPers in here, I guess it would be the equivalent of posting Nazi Rock on the Jewish discussion thread.
*Beat*
It's things like these that makes me think MacArthur fucked up.
You mean aside from wanting to invade China up through Korea and not listening to anyone but Truman?

by Wolfenium » Sun Jul 26, 2015 6:01 pm
Agritum wrote:So because I have a inbuilt magnet for right wing cranks and loonies, I discovered the channel of an English speaking Japanese far right nationalist woman who makes stilted, upbeat pop songs about how Japan brought freedom to the co-prosperity sphere, Korea made up the whole comfort women system and other revisionist themes dear to Uyoku Dantai troops. She's got 53k followers.
I'm not going to link of it, because the videos are frankly brain rotting and, since we've actually got Chinese RPers in here, I guess it would be the equivalent of posting Nazi Rock on the Jewish discussion thread.
*Beat*
It's things like these that makes me think MacArthur fucked up.

by Reverend Norv » Sun Jul 26, 2015 6:40 pm
For really, I think that the poorest he that is in England hath a life to live as the greatest he. And therefore truly, Sir, I think it's clear that every man that is to live under a Government ought first by his own consent to put himself under that Government. And I do think that the poorest man in England is not at all bound in a strict sense to that Government that he hath not had a voice to put himself under.
Col. Thomas Rainsborough, Putney Debates, 1647
A God who let us prove His existence would be an idol.
Dietrich Bonhoeffer

by Rupudska » Sun Jul 26, 2015 6:49 pm
Reverend Norv wrote:Agritum wrote:He took the Renegade option when dealing with the Hirohito dilemma, I'd say.
Ordinarily, no one is a bigger fan of killing monarchs than I am. In my view, the only good crowned head is a decapitated one.
*nods at flag*
But in this particular case, allowing Hirohito to remain on the throne saved hundreds of thousands - maybe millions - of lives. Hirohito honored his bargain: he renounced his divinity and helped Japan transition to genuine democracy. And as a result, true right-wing cranks are on the political margins of Japan, and the country has remained a democracy - however flawed - for generations.
Had MacArthur killed Hirohito, he would have created a martyr for the militarist cause, and even if democratic forces had won the inevitable civil war, Japan would be a deeply divided country in which militarism retained intense emotional and political appeal. Realistically, there is no good outcome foreseeable from the emperor's death.
So in this particular case, I have to say that it was better to let the emperor live. Whether Japan should still have an emperor - that is a completely different question.
I am inclined to think that Truman chickened out in another way, though. With the benefit of hindsight, we should have chased Stalin out of eastern Europe in 1945. It was a unique opportunity: we had nearly as many troops as the USSR, way more airpower, and exclusive control of the atomic bomb. Letting Hirohito live brought peace to Japan. Letting Stalin keep Eastern Europe brought slavery to a hundred million people. It was by far the bigger mistake.
Hladgos wrote:Scantly clad women, more like tanks
seem to be blowing up everyones banks
with airstrikes from girls with wings to their knees
which show a bit more than just their panties

by Reverend Norv » Sun Jul 26, 2015 7:13 pm
Rupudska wrote:Reverend Norv wrote:
Ordinarily, no one is a bigger fan of killing monarchs than I am. In my view, the only good crowned head is a decapitated one.
*nods at flag*
But in this particular case, allowing Hirohito to remain on the throne saved hundreds of thousands - maybe millions - of lives. Hirohito honored his bargain: he renounced his divinity and helped Japan transition to genuine democracy. And as a result, true right-wing cranks are on the political margins of Japan, and the country has remained a democracy - however flawed - for generations.
Had MacArthur killed Hirohito, he would have created a martyr for the militarist cause, and even if democratic forces had won the inevitable civil war, Japan would be a deeply divided country in which militarism retained intense emotional and political appeal. Realistically, there is no good outcome foreseeable from the emperor's death.
So in this particular case, I have to say that it was better to let the emperor live. Whether Japan should still have an emperor - that is a completely different question.
I am inclined to think that Truman chickened out in another way, though. With the benefit of hindsight, we should have chased Stalin out of eastern Europe in 1945. It was a unique opportunity: we had nearly as many troops as the USSR, way more airpower, and exclusive control of the atomic bomb. Letting Hirohito live brought peace to Japan. Letting Stalin keep Eastern Europe brought slavery to a hundred million people. It was by far the bigger mistake.
Well due to Japan's lack of a military on paper, the Emperor is little more than a figurehead. And anti-war sentiment has been deeply ingrained into Japanese culture, to the point where the remnants of those right-wing cranks are now fringe groups at best.
And as for going after Stalin, the problem is that we likely would have had to do it largely alone. Europe was (quite justifiably) sick of war, and the UK and France in particular were in no position to help. China was too busy violently tearing itself apart to be of any use, and even if we were to convince Japan to help then and there, they were in no economic or industrial position to help either.
For really, I think that the poorest he that is in England hath a life to live as the greatest he. And therefore truly, Sir, I think it's clear that every man that is to live under a Government ought first by his own consent to put himself under that Government. And I do think that the poorest man in England is not at all bound in a strict sense to that Government that he hath not had a voice to put himself under.
Col. Thomas Rainsborough, Putney Debates, 1647
A God who let us prove His existence would be an idol.
Dietrich Bonhoeffer

by Occupied Deutschland » Sun Jul 26, 2015 7:57 pm
Reverend Norv wrote:Rupudska wrote:
Well due to Japan's lack of a military on paper, the Emperor is little more than a figurehead. And anti-war sentiment has been deeply ingrained into Japanese culture, to the point where the remnants of those right-wing cranks are now fringe groups at best.
And as for going after Stalin, the problem is that we likely would have had to do it largely alone. Europe was (quite justifiably) sick of war, and the UK and France in particular were in no position to help. China was too busy violently tearing itself apart to be of any use, and even if we were to convince Japan to help then and there, they were in no economic or industrial position to help either.
Sure. But here's the thing: with all that, 1945 was still the best moment to go after Stalin. We had an enormous wartime army, most of which was already forward-deployed in Germany. Wait even a year, and half those troops are mustered out of wartime service and back in civilian life on the wrong side of the Atlantic. The Soviet Union was still devastated by war, which meant we could outproduce them in armor and aircraft. Wait even a year, and the Soviets get to move the rest of their factories from the Urals back to the Russian heartland. And most importantly, we were the sole possessors of the atomic bomb, and the Soviets knew that we were willing to use it. By 1949, Stalin had a bomb of his own, and a conventional offensive in Europe was off the table.
The point is this: knowing what we now know about Soviet rule in Eastern Europe, it seems clear that there was a moral imperative to keep Stalin behind the USSR's prewar frontiers. And the only moment when we could realistically have done that was in 1945, immediately after Germany's surrender. Truman let the opportunity go by. I continue to believe that this was a mistake.
Advertisement
Return to Portal to the Multiverse
Users browsing this forum: Bagiyagaram, Lazarian
Advertisement