You Italy?
And sorry, everyone, if I take a while to reply to messages - I'm on my phone.
Do you guys think the Greater Greece alternate history is realistic? It must at least be as believable as independant California, right?
Advertisement

by Archegnum » Thu May 21, 2015 2:45 pm

by ApplePieistan » Thu May 21, 2015 2:46 pm

by Nivok Baves » Thu May 21, 2015 2:47 pm

by ApplePieistan » Thu May 21, 2015 2:48 pm

by ApplePieistan » Thu May 21, 2015 2:49 pm

by Nivok Baves » Thu May 21, 2015 2:50 pm

by ApplePieistan » Thu May 21, 2015 2:51 pm

by Nivok Baves » Thu May 21, 2015 2:52 pm

by Archegnum » Thu May 21, 2015 2:53 pm
Nivok Baves wrote:Australian Antarctica wrote:I really hate being called a silly yank y'know. None of you guys are better than us, and none of us are better than you, stop acting like you are.
You guys can call us Tommies, Limies if you want. And I never suggested one was better than the other, it was just banter bruv


by Nivok Baves » Thu May 21, 2015 2:55 pm
Archegnum wrote:Nivok Baves wrote:
You guys can call us Tommies, Limies if you want. And I never suggested one was better than the other, it was just banter bruv
I agree. Anglo-American teasing is an essential part of any forum thread. Even better when we have our mutual friends the Canadians, Australians and New Zealanders with us!
You call us stuffy and old fashioned, we call you upstart colonials. It's just a fact of life

by ApplePieistan » Thu May 21, 2015 2:55 pm

by Nivok Baves » Thu May 21, 2015 2:57 pm
ApplePieistan wrote:Nivok Baves wrote:Some of them do, mainly used when the it's a big day for the Royal Family such as Trooping the Colour, Jubilees, etc, etc. Otherwise no, but I guess that's why we don't have so many police brutality cases
Well, our cops need them to fight ISIS every time they attack Texas.

by ApplePieistan » Thu May 21, 2015 2:58 pm

by Archegnum » Thu May 21, 2015 2:59 pm
ApplePieistan wrote:Archegnum wrote:
You Italy?
And sorry, everyone, if I take a while to reply to messages - I'm on my phone.
Do you guys think the Greater Greece alternate history is realistic? It must at least be as believable as independant California, right?
I am indeed Italy. What else could I interest you in? Could I give you Djibouti?


by Nivok Baves » Thu May 21, 2015 2:59 pm

by ApplePieistan » Thu May 21, 2015 3:06 pm

by Archegnum » Thu May 21, 2015 3:13 pm

by Marsisian » Thu May 21, 2015 3:16 pm
Alsheb wrote:NS Name: Alsheb
Nation Name: Provisional Government of Free India, commonly known as Free India or Azad Hind (the Hindi translation)
Head of State: Subhas Chandra Bose
Head of Government: Subhas Chandra Bose
Flag:(Image)
Claims: (Image)
Government Form: Semi-Socialist Dominant-Party Republic
Ideology: Indian nationalism, Anti-imperialism, Marxism, Left-wing nationalism
Foreign Policy: Generally positive towards Japan and some of the other Axis countries due to its animosity towards Great Britain. However Azad Hind also has a lot of sympathy towards the Socialist bloc led by the USSR, due to India's Socialist ideology. Azad Hind especially hates the old colonial powers such as the British and the French.
Civil Freedoms /10: 8
Political Freedoms /10: 4
Economic "Freedoms" /10: 3
Military Name: Indian National Army
Military Size: 750,000
Description of Your Nation's Economy:
Description of Your Nation's Government: Free India is dominated by the Indian National Congress, a coalition of several progressive, Socialist, anti-imperialist and Indian nationalist political parties and organisations. While the INC is not the only legal party in the country, it is by far the dominant force in the political scene of India. In fact, there are several bans in place on organisations that operate on a strictly ethnic nationalist, racist or religious fundamentalist basis. This means certain Hindu nationalist organisations such as the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS), are outlawed.
Alternate History: The Provisional Government of Free India was founded in December 1939, not long after the Second World War had broken out officially, with the Allied British and French facing off against the Axis of Germany, Italy and Japan. Anti-British and anticolonial sentiment, which had already been on the rise in the British Raj for decades, only increase further now that the old colonial British Empire was involved in what promised to become a long and heavy war. The Japanese Empire, always keen on dismantling foreign colonial presence in Asia, made use of the occassion to send agents to India in order to coordinate anti-British resistance groups.
Supported by Japan, a group of independence activists led by Subhas Chandra Bose, chairman of the All India Forward Bloc, proclaimed the Provisional Government of Free India in Kolkata, West Bengal. The rebellion quickly spread to other parts of India, and ensured the de facto independence of much of eastern India, including the provinces of West Bengal, Assam, Meghalaya, Odissa and Jharkand.
RP Sample:
Pax Per Bellum
540: Judgement of Britain
1821: Raise the Tricolour (as OP)

by Marsisian » Thu May 21, 2015 3:18 pm
Of The Rnclave wrote:Australian Antarctica wrote:That is still more believable than Patton, who was friends with MacArthur...
It's alternate history, and Patton was part of the AEF, who was only 12,000 strong and was dealt several crushing losses, breaking his spirit and making him into a more bitter man

by Australian Antarctica » Thu May 21, 2015 3:21 pm
Deramen wrote:Cause if anything im a MOTHERFUCKING T-REX!

by Nivok Baves » Thu May 21, 2015 3:23 pm

by ApplePieistan » Thu May 21, 2015 3:24 pm
Archegnum wrote:Nivok Baves wrote:That too, we have to make money somehow. Nuclear Weapons aren't cheap!
But we need them to maintain our seat on the UN Security Council and avoid being reliant on the French for a European nuclear deterrent. It's bad enough that they have a good carrier and we don't (though we are scheduled to have 2 even better ones by 2017 - eat that, frogs!)
Anyway, gtg now. I might read the posts on here for a bit, but I probably won't comment again tonight. Could someone point the OP in the direction of my app while I'm gone please?
And you Yanks claim American Football isn't sissy? You wear ruddy armour! We Brits fight like men in rugby, and that's coming from someobe who isn't even a huge fan!

by Nivok Baves » Thu May 21, 2015 3:25 pm
Archegnum wrote:Nivok Baves wrote:That too, we have to make money somehow. Nuclear Weapons aren't cheap!
But we need them to maintain our seat on the UN Security Council and avoid being reliant on the French for a European nuclear deterrent. It's bad enough that they have a good carrier and we don't (though we are scheduled to have 2 even better ones by 2017 - eat that, frogs!)
Anyway, gtg now. I might read the posts on here for a bit, but I probably won't comment again tonight. Could someone point the OP in the direction of my app while I'm gone please?
And you Yanks claim American Football isn't sissy? You wear ruddy armour! We Brits fight like men in rugby, and that's coming from someobe who isn't even a huge fan!

by Nivok Baves » Thu May 21, 2015 3:29 pm
ApplePieistan wrote:Archegnum wrote:
But we need them to maintain our seat on the UN Security Council and avoid being reliant on the French for a European nuclear deterrent. It's bad enough that they have a good carrier and we don't (though we are scheduled to have 2 even better ones by 2017 - eat that, frogs!)
Anyway, gtg now. I might read the posts on here for a bit, but I probably won't comment again tonight. Could someone point the OP in the direction of my app while I'm gone please?
And you Yanks claim American Football isn't sissy? You wear ruddy armour! We Brits fight like men in rugby, and that's coming from someobe who isn't even a huge fan!
Do you have any idea how many aircraft carriers we have? Also, the only reason we wear the armor we do is because before we wore armor, a lot people died from playing the game because football players slam into each other as hard as cars.

by ApplePieistan » Thu May 21, 2015 3:33 pm
Nivok Baves wrote:Archegnum wrote:
But we need them to maintain our seat on the UN Security Council and avoid being reliant on the French for a European nuclear deterrent. It's bad enough that they have a good carrier and we don't (though we are scheduled to have 2 even better ones by 2017 - eat that, frogs!)
Anyway, gtg now. I might read the posts on here for a bit, but I probably won't comment again tonight. Could someone point the OP in the direction of my app while I'm gone please?
And you Yanks claim American Football isn't sissy? You wear ruddy armour! We Brits fight like men in rugby, and that's coming from someobe who isn't even a huge fan!
We don't need nukes to keep our permanent member seat in the UN Security Council since we were one of the main victors in WW2 and it's basically written into the UN Charter. The main reason we need the nukes is for deterrence.
Advertisement
Return to Portal to the Multiverse
Users browsing this forum: Audunia, Beutarch, Segmentia, The Epic Notepad of GrangerAirstrike
Advertisement