The Nuclear Fist wrote:There's no reason to suggest that a single knight was worth twenty barbarians. Barbarians weren't trained soldiers yes, but they weren't that bad.
There are about forty thousand barbarians near Brinehold, led by Angus the Cael. Angus is wanting to end the siege of Brinehold as quickly and bloodlessly as possible, so he can move against other fronts. A few dozen warbands are being sent to flush any enemies out of the swamps and act as a scouting force for enemy units and supply caravans. The main force, under Angus, is has massed and is about five hours' ride from Brinehold proper, having spent the better part of several weeks raping and pillaging the countryside for supplies and loot.
A force of five thousand cavalry will be traveling ahead of the main warband to scout ahead and destroy any supply caravans and isolated enemy units. The warband will arrive in full force with about three thousand peasants taken captive and marched in front of the warband. Angus will send a messenger to deliver his terms. If they aren't met, the peasants will be slaughtered in front of the gates. Alongside Angus are two small catapults, which will be used to fling to corpses and rocks over the wall. Once the slaughtering has been done, the assault will begin.
Yeesh. Harsh.
Yeah, I don't think that knights would outmatch barbarians that badly either. Even with five hundred cavalry Brinehold's still outnumbered over four to one and most of its soldiers are kind of crappy levy infantry. Knights are incredibly disciplined, so that many of them might at least turn a battle from likely inevitable slaughter to a "maybe we can hold the walls" sort of situation.