Denmark-Hanover and Skaneland wrote:Where I am it's 2 pm. I venture you live in either China, Korea, Vietnam, or that general sea of Asia.
Korea. Thank you for remembering that we exist in East Asia ^^
Advertisement

by Oscalantine » Sat Mar 28, 2015 10:57 am
Denmark-Hanover and Skaneland wrote:Where I am it's 2 pm. I venture you live in either China, Korea, Vietnam, or that general sea of Asia.

by Normandy and Picardy » Sat Mar 28, 2015 10:59 am

by The Flame Dawn » Sat Mar 28, 2015 11:01 am

by G-Tech Corporation » Sat Mar 28, 2015 11:01 am
Oscalantine wrote:G-Tech Corporation wrote:
So the aerial roots attach to other objects and pull the entire tree along? That might work for younger trees, but the fluid pressure required to move a full-fledged tree will be quite impressive.
The point is: are you buying this or do I have to make another excuse? Please cut me some slack. It is 2am and I am in no place to crack my skull for biology which I haven't revisited since high school.
Anyhow, if enough can sprout from "Ents" fast and often enough, it could facilitate as movement. Now, that would be extremely slow... since you literally are growing a new set of roots to push the trees along. However, I feel like it would be fast enough to justify the movement notion while maintaining your logical reasoning that trees tend to be rigid and will break if you move the barks often enough.

by Jute » Sat Mar 28, 2015 11:05 am
G-Tech Corporation wrote:Jute wrote:They walk by removing their and replanting their roots, maybe? This is why it takes them so long to move, but it would have been a beneficial evolutionary trait, since you can find a better place to live that way and aren't bound to it. Especially helpful in cases of dryness, darkness etc.
Which makes sense- subtle turgor pressures often move trees over time anyway, and a stronger presence as well as actively detaching roots would allow a tree to move over time from place to place. They'd have a very hard time moving anywhere near a speed we would think of as walking though.
There you have your explanation. Now let's move on.Italios wrote:Jute's probably some sort of Robin Hood-type outlaw
Carl Sagan, astrophysicist and atheist wrote:"Science is not only compatible with spirituality; it is a profound source of spirituality.
When we recognize our place in an immensity of light-years and in the passage of ages,
when we grasp the intricacy, beauty, and subtlety of life, then that soaring feeling,
that sense of elation and humility combined, is surely spiritual...The notion that science
and spirituality are somehow mutually exclusive does a disservice to both."
"A rejection of all philosophy is in itself philosophy."

by In Gentem Et De Libris Scientiam » Sat Mar 28, 2015 11:05 am

by Oscalantine » Sat Mar 28, 2015 11:07 am
G-Tech Corporation wrote:Oscalantine wrote:
The point is: are you buying this or do I have to make another excuse? Please cut me some slack. It is 2am and I am in no place to crack my skull for biology which I haven't revisited since high school.
Anyhow, if enough can sprout from "Ents" fast and often enough, it could facilitate as movement. Now, that would be extremely slow... since you literally are growing a new set of roots to push the trees along. However, I feel like it would be fast enough to justify the movement notion while maintaining your logical reasoning that trees tend to be rigid and will break if you move the barks often enough.
*shrug*
Doesn't sound like walking, honestly. The fastest plant growth on record is 0.00003 kmph- if the trees are shooting out runners that quickly, fine. Those runners would have to grow for a bit to sustain the force of pulling along a full grown tree trunk however. Does that explain movement? Sure. At that rate, forests could migrate a quarter of a kilometer per year. Even if we make the Ents grow 10x faster than any real plant, that's still a movement rate of 2.5 kilometers every year.

by Jack O Land » Sat Mar 28, 2015 11:07 am

by In Gentem Et De Libris Scientiam » Sat Mar 28, 2015 11:09 am

by In Gentem Et De Libris Scientiam » Sat Mar 28, 2015 11:09 am

by Harkback Union » Sat Mar 28, 2015 11:11 am
Jack O Land wrote:Ah! A map!
I call dibs on Highland VI !
I'm never gonna see you suckers!
About the monastery: Denshu is a monastery in the same sense that the Mines of Moria is an iron mine. I'm relieved to know I can start with it. If you really need me to change the name, for example if there's actually a building called the Monastery available during the medieval era, I can change it to some made-up name, but I think that for the sake of clarity, calling it a monastery when my people are a race of monks (which is okay, right?) makes the most sense.
For my starting attributes, this isn't official, but I think I'm going to go with
Heavy Insulation (obviously)
Hierarchy (I wish more options were available, honestly, or this mechanic were taken out altogether)
and Tunneling Claws.
How should we calculate population? Mine's going to be very small.

by The Flame Dawn » Sat Mar 28, 2015 11:12 am
In Gentem Et De Libris Scientiam wrote:What do you all think is the best strategy?

by Jute » Sat Mar 28, 2015 11:13 am
In Gentem Et De Libris Scientiam wrote:What do you all think is the best strategy?
Italios wrote:Jute's probably some sort of Robin Hood-type outlaw
Carl Sagan, astrophysicist and atheist wrote:"Science is not only compatible with spirituality; it is a profound source of spirituality.
When we recognize our place in an immensity of light-years and in the passage of ages,
when we grasp the intricacy, beauty, and subtlety of life, then that soaring feeling,
that sense of elation and humility combined, is surely spiritual...The notion that science
and spirituality are somehow mutually exclusive does a disservice to both."
"A rejection of all philosophy is in itself philosophy."

by Turmenista » Sat Mar 28, 2015 11:14 am
Harkback Union wrote:Jack O Land wrote:Ah! A map!
I call dibs on Highland VI !
I'm never gonna see you suckers!
About the monastery: Denshu is a monastery in the same sense that the Mines of Moria is an iron mine. I'm relieved to know I can start with it. If you really need me to change the name, for example if there's actually a building called the Monastery available during the medieval era, I can change it to some made-up name, but I think that for the sake of clarity, calling it a monastery when my people are a race of monks (which is okay, right?) makes the most sense.
For my starting attributes, this isn't official, but I think I'm going to go with
Heavy Insulation (obviously)
Hierarchy (I wish more options were available, honestly, or this mechanic were taken out altogether)
and Tunneling Claws.
How should we calculate population? Mine's going to be very small.
There will be a lot more options for social evolution! Just not at the start.

by The Flame Dawn » Sat Mar 28, 2015 11:14 am
Jute wrote:In Gentem Et De Libris Scientiam wrote:What do you all think is the best strategy?
Varies on your starting location and species, as well as on your civilization.
Harkback, what is that deep purple spot in the map? It seems like it has an "R" on it. Also, the two greens are indistinguishable... or is there only one on the map?

by In Gentem Et De Libris Scientiam » Sat Mar 28, 2015 11:16 am

by Harkback Union » Sat Mar 28, 2015 11:16 am

by Jute » Sat Mar 28, 2015 11:17 am
Italios wrote:Jute's probably some sort of Robin Hood-type outlaw
Carl Sagan, astrophysicist and atheist wrote:"Science is not only compatible with spirituality; it is a profound source of spirituality.
When we recognize our place in an immensity of light-years and in the passage of ages,
when we grasp the intricacy, beauty, and subtlety of life, then that soaring feeling,
that sense of elation and humility combined, is surely spiritual...The notion that science
and spirituality are somehow mutually exclusive does a disservice to both."
"A rejection of all philosophy is in itself philosophy."

by Harkback Union » Sat Mar 28, 2015 11:18 am
In Gentem Et De Libris Scientiam wrote:Order: when 0, -5 knowledge cap.
-1 tech, when tech >kc
Order = or < 30
Region over 1= -3 order.

by The Flame Dawn » Sat Mar 28, 2015 11:19 am

by G-Tech Corporation » Sat Mar 28, 2015 11:19 am
Oscalantine wrote:G-Tech Corporation wrote:
*shrug*
Doesn't sound like walking, honestly. The fastest plant growth on record is 0.00003 kmph- if the trees are shooting out runners that quickly, fine. Those runners would have to grow for a bit to sustain the force of pulling along a full grown tree trunk however. Does that explain movement? Sure. At that rate, forests could migrate a quarter of a kilometer per year. Even if we make the Ents grow 10x faster than any real plant, that's still a movement rate of 2.5 kilometers every year.
When you start throwing numbers at this, I believe that I have made some success in negotiation but made you sour during the progress.
Not going to argue with the logic, but I am going to go on a roll and say that probably will be faster than that. Seriously, we have somewhat decent scientific backing now, couldn't you cut a break on this? Regardless, I don't have time to argue for other's approval from the masses when my own species needs help AND I need my fix of sleep. Going to settle on that and let the dices fall where it may.
G'night folks. And... before I go...
I wish to claim Firelands I ... or did someone already take that? I don't recall any app that I accepted taking firelands, so I am going to go on a whim and say that I do.

by Jute » Sat Mar 28, 2015 11:20 am
The Flame Dawn wrote:
What is the Key for the Map? I am curious because I'm thinking about where to put the Kettu.
Italios wrote:Jute's probably some sort of Robin Hood-type outlaw
Carl Sagan, astrophysicist and atheist wrote:"Science is not only compatible with spirituality; it is a profound source of spirituality.
When we recognize our place in an immensity of light-years and in the passage of ages,
when we grasp the intricacy, beauty, and subtlety of life, then that soaring feeling,
that sense of elation and humility combined, is surely spiritual...The notion that science
and spirituality are somehow mutually exclusive does a disservice to both."
"A rejection of all philosophy is in itself philosophy."

by Jute » Sat Mar 28, 2015 11:21 am
Italios wrote:Jute's probably some sort of Robin Hood-type outlaw
Carl Sagan, astrophysicist and atheist wrote:"Science is not only compatible with spirituality; it is a profound source of spirituality.
When we recognize our place in an immensity of light-years and in the passage of ages,
when we grasp the intricacy, beauty, and subtlety of life, then that soaring feeling,
that sense of elation and humility combined, is surely spiritual...The notion that science
and spirituality are somehow mutually exclusive does a disservice to both."
"A rejection of all philosophy is in itself philosophy."

by Harkback Union » Sat Mar 28, 2015 11:21 am

by Harkback Union » Sat Mar 28, 2015 11:21 am
Jute wrote:Do we need to post our traits here before posting in the IC thread?
Advertisement
Return to Portal to the Multiverse
Users browsing this forum: Britanania
Advertisement