Advertisement

by New Kvenland » Fri Feb 27, 2015 5:21 pm

by Alleniana » Fri Feb 27, 2015 5:56 pm
Sveltlana wrote:Of The Rnclave wrote:
My plan is to get 120,000 men there, to end the war and begin rebuilding. Then I'm going to invest heavily in Russian markets and move industry here, as well as fund rebuilding
yus
yus
never mind that russia will become slightly authoritarian
and then full on steroid depleting viipuri eating poland invading fascist
Caltarania wrote:The New Lowlands wrote:already impossibru
also, people saying Germoney should stay capitalist for balance
china isn't falling apart
the Whites are winning
columbards are actually doing stuff
the socialists are at a massive disadvantage
That's exactly my point. I mean if we look at the traditional Great Powers [+ China]:
Capitalist: Columbia, the UK, Germany,China,Japan,Austria [Hue].
Socialist: France, Italy
Civil War: Russia [Whites be winning, though]
Senkaku wrote:Of The Rnclave wrote:I'm sending a naval detachment to Russia to secure my port, what woukd be an okay mix of ships and their numbers?
Not 120,000?
Think about what other powers are sending (besides Hannover, who I'm going to kneecap if he proceeds with this LSD-fueled fantasy about 75,000 British soldiers going anywhere right now). Japan is close and directly affected and has limited logistical issues, they sent like 20,000 I believe. China has offered to send a lot, but they haven't done anything yet and any soldiers they did send might not even make it to the front (and if they did they'd be useless as fuck, probably). Britain should probably be capped at 5-10,000, because of logistical issues and public war weariness. You have even bigger logistical issues, so I'd say maybe 10,000 men. They'd probably have to be sent to Vladivostok rather than Archangelsk as well because of increased issues with feeding them, clothing them, etc. Vladivostok will just be easier.
Fortunagen wrote:Allen response to mi letter pls
by The Industrial States of Columbia » Fri Feb 27, 2015 6:09 pm
Alleniana wrote:Snip

by The Grand Republic of Hannover » Fri Feb 27, 2015 6:17 pm


by Alleniana » Fri Feb 27, 2015 8:20 pm
New Kvenland wrote:This is definitely going out on a limb, but does anyone here speak Finnish? I was going to semi-incorporate it into my post, and I just need two phrases...
New Kvenland wrote:This is definitely going out on a limb, but does anyone here speak Finnish? I was going to semi-incorporate it into my post, and I just need two phrases...

by The New Lowlands » Sat Feb 28, 2015 12:41 am

by Alleniana » Sat Feb 28, 2015 12:45 am
The New Lowlands wrote:still confused as to why Netherlands is rebuilding if they were either on the German side or not in it at all, but you make a good point, Allen.
March 1913: German offensives in the Western front destroy Benelux armies in a matter of weeks.

by The New Lowlands » Sat Feb 28, 2015 12:51 am
Alleniana wrote:The New Lowlands wrote:still confused as to why Netherlands is rebuilding if they were either on the German side or not in it at all, but you make a good point, Allen.March 1913: German offensives in the Western front destroy Benelux armies in a matter of weeks.
I assumed that meant Netherlands, Belgium and Luxembourg as Benelux conventionally refers to, but I do admit that Netherlands having been involved doesn't make the most sense.

by Alleniana » Sat Feb 28, 2015 1:07 am
The New Lowlands wrote:Alleniana wrote:
I assumed that meant Netherlands, Belgium and Luxembourg as Benelux conventionally refers to, but I do admit that Netherlands having been involved doesn't make the most sense.
Yeah, that's kind of the point. According to the history blurb, Germany lost the Rheinland (and therefore the whole war) in 1916 or something. :/

by Caltarania » Sat Feb 28, 2015 2:49 am
Alleniana wrote:Caltarania wrote:That's exactly my point. I mean if we look at the traditional Great Powers [+ China]:
Capitalist: Columbia, the UK, Germany,China,Japan,Austria [Hue].
Socialist: France, Italy
Civil War: Russia [Whites be winning, though]
Yes, the socialists are at a disadvantage, but not in mainland Europe. If Germany goes socialist, there's no major continental powers to stop the United Socialist States of Europe. A map of socialists vs capitalists in Europe: http://i.imgur.com/azB1voO.png The Balkans being shit, you can imagine if Germany went commie, or even just Russia.
Alleniana wrote:The New Lowlands wrote:Yeah, that's kind of the point. According to the history blurb, Germany lost the Rheinland (and therefore the whole war) in 1916 or something. :/
Eh, we can work around it. Factbooks should be primary source of info.
edit: BTW, http://i.imgur.com/NprMLW8.png is a map with many errors corrected (dozens of random dots/slightly-larger-than-dots, Poland-related retcon corrections, etc.)

by Alleniana » Sat Feb 28, 2015 3:21 am
Caltarania wrote:Alleniana wrote:Yes, the socialists are at a disadvantage, but not in mainland Europe. If Germany goes socialist, there's no major continental powers to stop the United Socialist States of Europe. A map of socialists vs capitalists in Europe: http://i.imgur.com/azB1voO.png The Balkans being shit, you can imagine if Germany went commie, or even just Russia.
The Socialists really have no power in Europe barring France. For the last time, Spain is about to enter a civil war, and Italy is... well. Italy.
That map shows an even Europe, but that map isn't exactly showing the whole picture. Spain isn't technically even aligned yet, for one, and secondly when they do decide to align they'll have to waste all their manpower fighting a civil war... not that Spain is really relevant anyway.
I still maintain that Germany going socialist adds balance, because even if literally all of Europe falls to socialism, Columbia would still be able to roll over it.
Alleniana wrote:Eh, we can work around it. Factbooks should be primary source of info.
edit: BTW, http://i.imgur.com/NprMLW8.png is a map with many errors corrected (dozens of random dots/slightly-larger-than-dots, Poland-related retcon corrections, etc.)
Taiwan should be Japanese.

by Alleniana » Sat Feb 28, 2015 4:50 am
The New Lowlands wrote:Wait, does Germany own Belize? :u

by Bujahla » Sat Feb 28, 2015 8:36 am
*Huzzah he lives!*
Nah, son. Britain was all like "yo, why my colonies be all uppity an' shit?!" And Lord Durham laid it straight: "they be wantin' legislation with representation, dawg."

by Kryskov » Sat Feb 28, 2015 9:08 am
Alleniana wrote:The New Lowlands wrote:Wait, does Germany own Belize? :u
No, slightly different shade.
However, pending my realisation about Silesia, and fixing yet another random dot, this time in Lorraine, newer map
http://i.imgur.com/LNAdmHH.png
edit: Neo, Krys, you ok with this? Poland has gotten another province of Russia and Germany has gained 2 provinces of Silesia and 2 provinces of Prussia, 3 from Poland and 1 from Austria, reason being that a retcon was agreed upon about Prussia because Poland owning Prussia is silly, and because Silesia was originally meant to be entirely German but I got it wrong and recommended the wrong provinces to Svet.

by Neo-Assyrian Empire » Sat Feb 28, 2015 9:15 am
Alleniana wrote:The New Lowlands wrote:Wait, does Germany own Belize? :u
No, slightly different shade.
However, pending my realisation about Silesia, and fixing yet another random dot, this time in Lorraine, newer map
http://i.imgur.com/LNAdmHH.png
edit: Neo, Krys, you ok with this? Poland has gotten another province of Russia and Germany has gained 2 provinces of Silesia and 2 provinces of Prussia, 3 from Poland and 1 from Austria, reason being that a retcon was agreed upon about Prussia because Poland owning Prussia is silly, and because Silesia was originally meant to be entirely German but I got it wrong and recommended the wrong provinces to Svet.
General Information
<G> Is the national currency. <G> 1 = $1.6
Political Compass: Economic Left/Right: 1
Libertarian/Authoritarian: -.31
Veni, Vidi, Vici
|[=-=X|X=-=]|
Currently RPing As
Nobody
;~;
|[=-=X|X=-=]|

by Bujahla » Sat Feb 28, 2015 9:47 am
*Huzzah he lives!*
Nah, son. Britain was all like "yo, why my colonies be all uppity an' shit?!" And Lord Durham laid it straight: "they be wantin' legislation with representation, dawg."

by Kryskov » Sat Feb 28, 2015 9:52 am
Bujahla wrote:But for real, any ideas on how to assault Algeria?

by Kargintina » Sat Feb 28, 2015 9:54 am
Bujahla wrote:But for real, any ideas on how to assault Algeria?

by Bujahla » Sat Feb 28, 2015 10:00 am
*Huzzah he lives!*
Nah, son. Britain was all like "yo, why my colonies be all uppity an' shit?!" And Lord Durham laid it straight: "they be wantin' legislation with representation, dawg."

by Great Confederacy of Commonwealth States » Sat Feb 28, 2015 10:04 am
Bujahla wrote:Kryskov wrote:The trouble with Algeria is that it lacks a significant industrial base to have workers revolt in (correct me if I'm wrong, I'm just speculating). I mean, I don't find nomadic Berbers particularly socialist.
I'm thinking of seizing back the Third Republics naval assessts in the north of the country. After that launch a blockade on Algeria and force the Third Republic into submission. Perhaps use Algerians to attack the Third Republics in return for increased representation after the colonies are taken back.

by Kryskov » Sat Feb 28, 2015 10:06 am
Bujahla wrote:Kryskov wrote:The trouble with Algeria is that it lacks a significant industrial base to have workers revolt in (correct me if I'm wrong, I'm just speculating). I mean, I don't find nomadic Berbers particularly socialist.
I'm thinking of seizing back the Third Republics naval assessts in the north of the country. After that launch a blockade on Algeria and force the Third Republic into submission. Perhaps use Algerians to attack the Third Republics in return for increased representation after the colonies are taken back.

by Bujahla » Sat Feb 28, 2015 10:20 am
Great Confederacy Of Commonwealth States wrote:Bujahla wrote:
I'm thinking of seizing back the Third Republics naval assessts in the north of the country. After that launch a blockade on Algeria and force the Third Republic into submission. Perhaps use Algerians to attack the Third Republics in return for increased representation after the colonies are taken back.
Blockading Algeria won't give you that much... After all, they mainly live off land routes from Egypt to Sub-Saharan Africa. Caravans are their shtick, not naval trade. And you can promise whatever you want, but those Algerians will probably put up their own monarchy before they helped the socialist likes fo you.
Kryskov wrote:Bujahla wrote:
I'm thinking of seizing back the Third Republics naval assessts in the north of the country. After that launch a blockade on Algeria and force the Third Republic into submission. Perhaps use Algerians to attack the Third Republics in return for increased representation after the colonies are taken back.
I assume you would blockade the Ivory Coast as well?
Could work, but I doubt the Third Republic would be facing opposition from Algerians, considering that the nation practically is Algeria now. I would expect much of the 3rd Republic, after a while, to be composed of Algerians, so I would actually put them in the "anti-Socialist" category.
*Huzzah he lives!*
Nah, son. Britain was all like "yo, why my colonies be all uppity an' shit?!" And Lord Durham laid it straight: "they be wantin' legislation with representation, dawg."
Advertisement
Return to Portal to the Multiverse
Users browsing this forum: Faal Lot Himdah, Finsternia, G-Tech Corporation, Imperialisium, Ukcross
Advertisement