Wars of Man: Cold War: 1943(OOC Open)

by **Elepis** » Tue Dec 23, 2014 10:00 am

Of The Rnclave wrote:
Elepis wrote:
Unless you are in RL America, then a few hundred kings, and many millions of brainwashed serfs!

No, it's Huey Longs speech, I'm making a very liberal USC,nut not socialist

Come on, be socialist

Of The Rnclave wrote:
Pimps Inc wrote:Castro may be still alive and a thing.Also,if we could convert more South American countries,starting with Panama.....

The USSR would have control of the Canal.

Panama is a USC state

revolution?

by **Elepis** » Tue Dec 23, 2014 10:01 am

We need a map

by **Pimps Inc** » Tue Dec 23, 2014 10:01 am

Of The Rnclave wrote:
Pimps Inc wrote:Castro may be still alive and a thing.Also,if we could convert more South American countries,starting with Panama.....

The USSR would have control of the Canal.

Panama is a USC state

Wut?

Your app said it was a satellite or protectorate or something.Plus,still:REVOLUTION!

by **Fascist Republic Of Bermuda** » Tue Dec 23, 2014 10:04 am

Elepis wrote:
Of The Rnclave wrote:
No, it's Huey Longs speech, I'm making a very liberal USC,nut not socialist

Come on, be socialist

Of The Rnclave wrote:
Panama is a USC state

revolution?

Don't let your sickle get too big. Rnclave is probably ready to Vietnam Panama up.

by **Pimps Inc** » Tue Dec 23, 2014 10:05 am

Fascist Republic Of Bermuda wrote:
Elepis wrote:
Come on, be socialist

revolution?

Don't let your sickle get too big. Rnclave is probably ready to Vietnam Panama up.

So what?
He'll lose many men,be hated be his people,and then be forced to pull out and ill be ready to make sure the country becomes Red.

by **Of The Rnclave** » Tue Dec 23, 2014 10:06 am

Elepis wrote:We need a map

I have one made, I can post it later today, and it became a state in 1921, when tons of USC settlers and business men went there to capitalize on new workers for industry, it's the most industrious non mainland USC state

by **Of The Rnclave** » Tue Dec 23, 2014 10:07 am

Pimps Inc wrote:
Fascist Republic Of Bermuda wrote:Don't let your sickle get too big. Rnclave is probably ready to Vietnam Panama up.

So what?
He'll lose many men,be hated be his people,and then be forced to pull out and ill be ready to make sure the country becomes Red.

I'll be ready to succeed this time, full mainland invasion of Panama and several atomic detonations if need be

by **Pimps Inc** » Tue Dec 23, 2014 10:08 am

Of The Rnclave wrote:
Pimps Inc wrote:So what?
He'll lose many men,be hated be his people,and then be forced to pull out and ill be ready to make sure the country becomes Red.

I'll be ready to succeed this time, full mainland invasion of Panama and several atomic detonations if need be

You will nuke Panama?
Even then,if you invade Panama,you will be doomed to a Vietnam War.

by **Fascist Republic Of Bermuda** » Tue Dec 23, 2014 10:09 am

Of The Rnclave wrote:
Pimps Inc wrote:So what?
He'll lose many men,be hated be his people,and then be forced to pull out and ill be ready to make sure the country becomes Red.

I'll be ready to succeed this time, full mainland invasion of Panama and several atomic detonations if need be

Wait a minute... I recognize that plan! Rnclave, have you been reading about MacArthur?

by **Of The Rnclave** » Tue Dec 23, 2014 10:15 am

Pimps Inc wrote:
Of The Rnclave wrote:
I'll be ready to succeed this time, full mainland invasion of Panama and several atomic detonations if need be

You will nuke Panama?
Even then,if you invade Panama,you will be doomed to a Vietnam War.

That's actually a problem too. Nuclear taboo formed because the USA and USSR built and pointed so many missiles and bombs at each other, the longer they went without using them, the worse it seemed when they came close to using them, but say if the USA used one to save the French in Vietnam, it wouldn't have seemed so taboo and it might be common today to use nukes in combat, if there was a today

by **Of The Rnclave** » Tue Dec 23, 2014 10:16 am

Fascist Republic Of Bermuda wrote:
Of The Rnclave wrote:
I'll be ready to succeed this time, full mainland invasion of Panama and several atomic detonations if need be

Wait a minute... I recognize that plan! Rnclave, have you been reading about MacArthur?

If I remember right, his response to the Chinese right?mi honestly got this plan from Alternate history hub

by **Elepis** » Tue Dec 23, 2014 10:17 am

Of The Rnclave wrote:
Pimps Inc wrote:You will nuke Panama?
Even then,if you invade Panama,you will be doomed to a Vietnam War.

That's actually a problem too. Nuclear taboo formed because the USA and USSR built and pointed so many missiles and bombs at each other, the longer they went without using them, the worse it seemed when they came close to using them, but say if the USA used one to save the French in Vietnam, it wouldn't have seemed so taboo and it might be common today to use nukes in combat, if there was a today

No, it would still be taboo because MILLIONS OF INNOCENTS WOULD DIE!

can we have a rule on no nukes please?

by **Pimps Inc** » Tue Dec 23, 2014 10:17 am

Of The Rnclave wrote:
Pimps Inc wrote:You will nuke Panama?
Even then,if you invade Panama,you will be doomed to a Vietnam War.

That's actually a problem too. Nuclear taboo formed because the USA and USSR built and pointed so many missiles and bombs at each other, the longer they went without using them, the worse it seemed when they came close to using them, but say if the USA used one to save the French in Vietnam, it wouldn't have seemed so taboo and it might be common today to use nukes in combat, if there was a today

No........

You're just gonna end up with millions of dead Panamanians and a bigger Canal.......a canal the size of Panama.......

by **Elepis** » Tue Dec 23, 2014 10:19 am

Pimps Inc wrote:
Of The Rnclave wrote:
That's actually a problem too. Nuclear taboo formed because the USA and USSR built and pointed so many missiles and bombs at each other, the longer they went without using them, the worse it seemed when they came close to using them, but say if the USA used one to save the French in Vietnam, it wouldn't have seemed so taboo and it might be common today to use nukes in combat, if there was a today

No........

You're just gonna end up with millions of dead Panamanians and a bigger Canal.......a canal the size of Panama.......

And a massively angry world. Many were angry after Hiroshima and that had a sort of just cause

by **Of The Rnclave** » Tue Dec 23, 2014 10:27 am

Elepis wrote:
Pimps Inc wrote:No........

You're just gonna end up with millions of dead Panamanians and a bigger Canal.......a canal the size of Panama.......

And a massively angry world. Many were angry after Hiroshima and that had a sort of just cause

Hiroshimaa and Nagasaki were technically just tests of the atom bombs effectiveness

by **Pimps Inc** » Tue Dec 23, 2014 10:30 am

Of The Rnclave wrote:
Elepis wrote:
And a massively angry world. Many were angry after Hiroshima and that had a sort of just cause

Hiroshimaa and Nagasaki were technically just tests of the atom bombs effectiveness

People were still angry.......

by **Elepis** » Tue Dec 23, 2014 10:36 am

Of The Rnclave wrote:
Elepis wrote:
And a massively angry world. Many were angry after Hiroshima and that had a sort of just cause

Hiroshimaa and Nagasaki were technically just tests of the atom bombs effectiveness

and millions of people died. That is like Auschwitz was just a test of Zyklon B gas

by **Of The Rnclave** » Tue Dec 23, 2014 10:38 am

Elepis wrote:
Of The Rnclave wrote:
Hiroshimaa and Nagasaki were technically just tests of the atom bombs effectiveness

and millions of people died. That is like Auschwitz was just a test of Zyklon B gas

No they didn't, only like 300,000 died, I think

by **Elepis** » Tue Dec 23, 2014 10:40 am

Of The Rnclave wrote:
Elepis wrote:
and millions of people died. That is like Auschwitz was just a test of Zyklon B gas

No they didn't, only like 300,000 died, I think

oh yeah, still an awful lot and people were still very angry

by **Pimps Inc** » Tue Dec 23, 2014 10:40 am

Of The Rnclave wrote:
Elepis wrote:
and millions of people died. That is like Auschwitz was just a test of Zyklon B gas

No they didn't, only like 300,000 died, I think

Plus radioactivity poisoning and people who survived are forever scarred both mentally and physically.

by **Of The Rnclave** » Tue Dec 23, 2014 10:42 am

Elepis wrote:
Of The Rnclave wrote:
No they didn't, only like 300,000 died, I think

oh yeah, still an awful lot and people were still very angry

As would be expected

by **Fascist Republic Of Bermuda** » Tue Dec 23, 2014 10:47 am

Of The Rnclave wrote:
Fascist Republic Of Bermuda wrote:Wait a minute... I recognize that plan! Rnclave, have you been reading about MacArthur?

If I remember right, his response to the Chinese right?mi honestly got this plan from Alternate history hub

T'was his response to Chinese intervention in Korea. Unsurprisingly, it also got him fired.

by **Of The Rnclave** » Tue Dec 23, 2014 10:55 am

Fascist Republic Of Bermuda wrote:
Of The Rnclave wrote:
If I remember right, his response to the Chinese right?mi honestly got this plan from Alternate history hub

T'was his response to Chinese intervention in Korea. Unsurprisingly, it also got him fired.

Meh, Huey Long will be my replacement for Roosevelt, so maybe he won't be fired

by **Elepis** » Tue Dec 23, 2014 12:19 pm

My plan for war in Europe:

UK plan:

He has 85,000 men to try and beat me. 85,000 is around one army (the British 8th Army has around 120,000 men).

I have 9 armies so around 9 times more men

PS. My plan uses half the units the Soviets has allotted for attacking Europe in the 50's, 60's & 70's. The men I have allotted for a possible war are from the Group of Soviet Forces in Germany, IRL, the Soviets also planned to use Northern Group of Forces. So I can muster twice my planned strength and thus have 18 times more than the UK

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seven_Days_to_the_River_Rhine

by **Elepis** » Tue Dec 23, 2014 1:41 pm

night people

Wars of Man: Cold War: 1943(OOC Open)

Random Events?

Who is online