Wars of Man: Cold War: 1943(OOC Open)

by **Of The Rnclave** » Mon Dec 22, 2014 9:03 pm

Pimps Inc wrote:
Of The Rnclave wrote:
In a letter? To another nation?

Yea
Its INFORMATION that is biased or not impartial.

Guess I'll test my atom bomb on our border

by **Pimps Inc** » Mon Dec 22, 2014 9:03 pm

Of The Rnclave wrote:
Australian Antarctica wrote:Commie-Ass way of saying Communism. Freakin Reds...

Yeah

*Shies away due to being a hard line Christian Democratic Socialist*

Only the gov is Socialist but people don't really care about ideologies.

by **Of The Rnclave** » Mon Dec 22, 2014 9:03 pm

Australian Antarctica wrote:
Of The Rnclave wrote:
Yeah

*Shies away due to being a hard line Christian Democratic Socialist*

Oxymoron right there *redneck accent* GET BACK HERE! Night! Y'all have a good night now y'hear?

It's an actual thing though

And Night!

by **Of The Rnclave** » Mon Dec 22, 2014 9:04 pm

Pimps Inc wrote:
Of The Rnclave wrote:
Yeah

*Shies away due to being a hard line Christian Democratic Socialist*

Only the gov is Socialist but people don't really care about ideologies.

I'm the black sheep in my Familly, because there all hard line right wing republicans, and I'm just over here being a socialist

by **Marsisian** » Mon Dec 22, 2014 9:04 pm

Of The Rnclave wrote:
Australian Antarctica wrote:Commie-Ass way of saying Communism. Freakin Reds...

Yeah

*Shies away due to being a hard line Christian Democratic Socialist*

*walks toward Rnclave with a broken beer bottle*

by **Pimps Inc** » Mon Dec 22, 2014 9:04 pm

Of The Rnclave wrote:
Pimps Inc wrote:Yea
Its INFORMATION that is biased or not impartial.

Guess I'll test my atom bomb on our border

and when they come to me for an explanation,i'll say

"Who has Einstein?America.That's right.Get him....."

by **Of The Rnclave** » Mon Dec 22, 2014 9:06 pm

Pimps Inc wrote:
Of The Rnclave wrote:
Guess I'll test my atom bomb on our border

and when they come to me for an explanation,i'll say

"Who has Einstein?America.That's right.Get him....."

I said near the border, a flex of muscle if you will

by **Of The Rnclave** » Mon Dec 22, 2014 9:07 pm

Marsisian wrote:
Of The Rnclave wrote:
Yeah

*Shies away due to being a hard line Christian Democratic Socialist*

*walks toward Rnclave with a broken beer bottle*

*Pulls out sickle* For Marx!!

by **Pimps Inc** » Mon Dec 22, 2014 9:09 pm

Of The Rnclave wrote:
Pimps Inc wrote:and when they come to me for an explanation,i'll say

"Who has Einstein?America.That's right.Get him....."

I said near the border, a flex of muscle if you will

I'll bring out Pancho Villa.
BTW,could I have it so Villa and Zapata were never assassinated?

Of The Rnclave wrote:
Marsisian wrote:*walks toward Rnclave with a broken beer bottle*

*Pulls out sickle* For Marx!!

*Pulls out Sombrero and revolver*
For Villa!

by **Australian Antarctica** » Mon Dec 22, 2014 9:10 pm

Of The Rnclave wrote:
Marsisian wrote:*walks toward Rnclave with a broken beer bottle*

*Pulls out sickle* For Marx!!

*shoots with M16* FOR COLT AND MURICA YOU COMMIE SOB POS!!!

by **Of The Rnclave** » Mon Dec 22, 2014 9:10 pm

Pimps Inc wrote:
Of The Rnclave wrote:
I said near the border, a flex of muscle if you will

I'll bring out Pancho Villa.
BTW,could I have it so Villa and Zapata were never assassinated?

Of The Rnclave wrote:
*Pulls out sickle* For Marx!!

*Pulls out Sombrero and revolver*
For Villa!

Can you explain to me what happens if they weren't? I'll probably let you, but I wanna know what I'm getting into

by **Of The Rnclave** » Mon Dec 22, 2014 9:10 pm

Australian Antarctica wrote:
Of The Rnclave wrote:
*Pulls out sickle* For Marx!!

*shoots with M16* FOR COLT AND MURICA YOU COMMIE SOB POS!!!

*Uses the power of Marxs beard* For the Proletariat!

by **Marsisian** » Mon Dec 22, 2014 9:11 pm

Of The Rnclave wrote:
Marsisian wrote:*walks toward Rnclave with a broken beer bottle*

*Pulls out sickle* For Marx!!

*pulls out Thompson submachine gun*

FOR JOHN BROWNING AND 'MERICA!

by **Australian Antarctica** » Mon Dec 22, 2014 9:13 pm

Marsisian wrote:
Of The Rnclave wrote:
*Pulls out sickle* For Marx!!

*pulls out Thompson submachine gun*

FOR JOHN BROWNING AND 'MERICA!

MURICA man hug. :hug:

by **Of The Rnclave** » Mon Dec 22, 2014 9:15 pm

Here it is! The essay I edited and redid for myself against my Econ teacher, shut her up quick! It's quite long so beware!

Why Socialism?

It is not about going further to socialism, it is about going further into what America use to be about. It is not about welfare programs, it is about building your nation.

Let us look at reality, education has been cut nearly every year for several decades, and yet we wonder why we are falling so quickly in literacy rates. Yet when people say we should give more money to education you hear NO, SOCIALISM!!!! GOVERNMENT INDOCTRINATION!!!

Government indoctrination to wish to educate people, more money to allow for more teachers, which would allow for smaller class sizes which is said by ALL accounts, left and right to be an ideal learning environment

Well socialism is not really that "far left"... depends upon what type of socialism you are referring to, universal socialism which can be equated with communism is very far left where as national socialism which is a nice misnomer for fascism is very far right. Hitler was a smart man, he knew if he had said he wanted a fascist government the socialist party which had the workers would never go for that.

Now sir, here is my idea, you may not like this part but please read it and think about it before just saying NO, THAT IS EVIL GOVERNMENT CONTROL OF THE PEOPLE.

I think the government should have control or rather should cover education [12+4] and health care. At first sight you might say, no that is too much control.

But my reasoning for this is simple. If you have people who can be educated for "free" all the way to High school + 4 years of college, on top of health care you are creating a society of intelligent and healthy people. Now you might say, what is the plus side to allowing the government this [well for me, I do not see the government as our "enemy", the government is made up of people whom we, the citizens elect]

Think of it, if you have a society of highly intelligent and healthy people that alone would cut down health care cost. If you have a society of college educated people that are able to and be more "work ready" that would cut down unemployment.

But you might say, what is the cost benefit of the government paying for all of this, it is not cost effective. In fact, it is. As I said to you before, it is not about affording, it is about prioritizing.

We spend billions in waste on our defense. Did you know we have over 100K soldiers in places where there is little to no chance of them fighting? We have over 50K soldiers in Germany alone, … where there is little chance of war with them, I am pretty sure, on this issue at least, that Hitler is dead, we got him… time to bring them in.

Well back to the cost benefit. The money that we would spend on their education and health care would be peanuts, an investment compared to the revenue taken from taxes after they have graduated and find a job.

Now, with more college educated entrepreneurs that will be starting businesses, employing people, which would in turn spend money elsewhere.. which would mean other markets growing.. which would cut not only our unemployment cost but also our unemployment percentages.

Now.. with more people employed, educated and healthy this of course cuts down on our medical costs that we are wasting now..

Now here is the part I believe you will like…

With more people employed, more revenue going in than going out, building a stable economy… doing the jobs that America use to do, bringing us back to our place in the world as far as the dollar going up, unemployment going down, literacy and education rates going up, mathematical rates going up….

With more people employed and bringing in more revenue, more than what we shell out THIS IS THE TIME when you can cut taxes, this is when you say, our society is doing great and we are economically stable, and now we can cut taxes. You do not cut taxes during a recession which non-partisan economic experts agree that is the least effective job producing thing that we can do.

by **Marsisian** » Mon Dec 22, 2014 9:16 pm

Australian Antarctica wrote:
Marsisian wrote:*pulls out Thompson submachine gun*

FOR JOHN BROWNING AND 'MERICA!

MURICA man hug.

by **Pimps Inc** » Mon Dec 22, 2014 9:16 pm

Of The Rnclave wrote:
Pimps Inc wrote:I'll bring out Pancho Villa.
BTW,could I have it so Villa and Zapata were never assassinated?

*Pulls out Sombrero and revolver*
For Villa!

Can you explain to me what happens if they weren't? I'll probably let you, but I wanna know what I'm getting into

Zapata or Villa could become president and it would also mean the early origins of the CIA would have failed to kill them.

by **Of The Rnclave** » Mon Dec 22, 2014 9:17 pm

Pimps Inc wrote:
Of The Rnclave wrote:
Can you explain to me what happens if they weren't? I'll probably let you, but I wanna know what I'm getting into

Zapata or Villa could become president and it would also mean the early origins of the CIA would have failed to kill them.

Pacho Villa? Whoever is your favorite may survive, but the other dies

by **Australian Antarctica** » Mon Dec 22, 2014 9:20 pm

Of The Rnclave wrote:Here it is! The essay I edited and redid for myself against my Econ teacher, shut her up quick! It's quite long so beware!

Why Socialism?

It is not about going further to socialism, it is about going further into what America use to be about. It is not about welfare programs, it is about building your nation.

Let us look at reality, education has been cut nearly every year for several decades, and yet we wonder why we are falling so quickly in literacy rates. Yet when people say we should give more money to education you hear NO, SOCIALISM!!!! GOVERNMENT INDOCTRINATION!!!

Government indoctrination to wish to educate people, more money to allow for more teachers, which would allow for smaller class sizes which is said by ALL accounts, left and right to be an ideal learning environment

Well socialism is not really that "far left"... depends upon what type of socialism you are referring to, universal socialism which can be equated with communism is very far left where as national socialism which is a nice misnomer for fascism is very far right. Hitler was a smart man, he knew if he had said he wanted a fascist government the socialist party which had the workers would never go for that.

Now sir, here is my idea, you may not like this part but please read it and think about it before just saying NO, THAT IS EVIL GOVERNMENT CONTROL OF THE PEOPLE.

I think the government should have control or rather should cover education [12+4] and health care. At first sight you might say, no that is too much control.

But my reasoning for this is simple. If you have people who can be educated for "free" all the way to High school + 4 years of college, on top of health care you are creating a society of intelligent and healthy people. Now you might say, what is the plus side to allowing the government this [well for me, I do not see the government as our "enemy", the government is made up of people whom we, the citizens elect]

Think of it, if you have a society of highly intelligent and healthy people that alone would cut down health care cost. If you have a society of college educated people that are able to and be more "work ready" that would cut down unemployment.

But you might say, what is the cost benefit of the government paying for all of this, it is not cost effective. In fact, it is. As I said to you before, it is not about affording, it is about prioritizing.

We spend billions in waste on our defense. Did you know we have over 100K soldiers in places where there is little to no chance of them fighting? We have over 50K soldiers in Germany alone, … where there is little chance of war with them, I am pretty sure, on this issue at least, that Hitler is dead, we got him… time to bring them in.

Well back to the cost benefit. The money that we would spend on their education and health care would be peanuts, an investment compared to the revenue taken from taxes after they have graduated and find a job.

Now, with more college educated entrepreneurs that will be starting businesses, employing people, which would in turn spend money elsewhere.. which would mean other markets growing.. which would cut not only our unemployment cost but also our unemployment percentages.

Now.. with more people employed, educated and healthy this of course cuts down on our medical costs that we are wasting now..

Now here is the part I believe you will like…

With more people employed, more revenue going in than going out, building a stable economy… doing the jobs that America use to do, bringing us back to our place in the world as far as the dollar going up, unemployment going down, literacy and education rates going up, mathematical rates going up….

With more people employed and bringing in more revenue, more than what we shell out THIS IS THE TIME when you can cut taxes, this is when you say, our society is doing great and we are economically stable, and now we can cut taxes. You do not cut taxes during a recession which non-partisan economic experts agree that is the least effective job producing thing that we can do.

You make some valid points, of which I agree with. Nonetheless, I can shoot them all down, I won't because I am on my phone

by **Pimps Inc** » Mon Dec 22, 2014 9:20 pm

Of The Rnclave wrote:
Pimps Inc wrote:Zapata or Villa could become president and it would also mean the early origins of the CIA would have failed to kill them.

Pacho Villa? Whoever is your favorite may survive, but the other dies

Pancho Villa was the only one to have had an attempt on his life by the US.
Zapata was killed by two Mexican generals.I can save him myself.....

by **Of The Rnclave** » Mon Dec 22, 2014 9:22 pm

Australian Antarctica wrote:
Of The Rnclave wrote:Here it is! The essay I edited and redid for myself against my Econ teacher, shut her up quick! It's quite long so beware!

Why Socialism?

It is not about going further to socialism, it is about going further into what America use to be about. It is not about welfare programs, it is about building your nation.

Let us look at reality, education has been cut nearly every year for several decades, and yet we wonder why we are falling so quickly in literacy rates. Yet when people say we should give more money to education you hear NO, SOCIALISM!!!! GOVERNMENT INDOCTRINATION!!!

Government indoctrination to wish to educate people, more money to allow for more teachers, which would allow for smaller class sizes which is said by ALL accounts, left and right to be an ideal learning environment

Well socialism is not really that "far left"... depends upon what type of socialism you are referring to, universal socialism which can be equated with communism is very far left where as national socialism which is a nice misnomer for fascism is very far right. Hitler was a smart man, he knew if he had said he wanted a fascist government the socialist party which had the workers would never go for that.

Now sir, here is my idea, you may not like this part but please read it and think about it before just saying NO, THAT IS EVIL GOVERNMENT CONTROL OF THE PEOPLE.

I think the government should have control or rather should cover education [12+4] and health care. At first sight you might say, no that is too much control.

But my reasoning for this is simple. If you have people who can be educated for "free" all the way to High school + 4 years of college, on top of health care you are creating a society of intelligent and healthy people. Now you might say, what is the plus side to allowing the government this [well for me, I do not see the government as our "enemy", the government is made up of people whom we, the citizens elect]

Think of it, if you have a society of highly intelligent and healthy people that alone would cut down health care cost. If you have a society of college educated people that are able to and be more "work ready" that would cut down unemployment.

But you might say, what is the cost benefit of the government paying for all of this, it is not cost effective. In fact, it is. As I said to you before, it is not about affording, it is about prioritizing.

We spend billions in waste on our defense. Did you know we have over 100K soldiers in places where there is little to no chance of them fighting? We have over 50K soldiers in Germany alone, … where there is little chance of war with them, I am pretty sure, on this issue at least, that Hitler is dead, we got him… time to bring them in.

Well back to the cost benefit. The money that we would spend on their education and health care would be peanuts, an investment compared to the revenue taken from taxes after they have graduated and find a job.

Now, with more college educated entrepreneurs that will be starting businesses, employing people, which would in turn spend money elsewhere.. which would mean other markets growing.. which would cut not only our unemployment cost but also our unemployment percentages.

Now.. with more people employed, educated and healthy this of course cuts down on our medical costs that we are wasting now..

Now here is the part I believe you will like…

With more people employed, more revenue going in than going out, building a stable economy… doing the jobs that America use to do, bringing us back to our place in the world as far as the dollar going up, unemployment going down, literacy and education rates going up, mathematical rates going up….

With more people employed and bringing in more revenue, more than what we shell out THIS IS THE TIME when you can cut taxes, this is when you say, our society is doing great and we are economically stable, and now we can cut taxes. You do not cut taxes during a recession which non-partisan economic experts agree that is the least effective job producing thing that we can do.

You make some valid points, of which I agree with. Nonetheless, I can shoot them all down, I won't because I am on my phone

It was a sort of, you get a day to prepare an argument, then you can present it, so I did, and she sent me to the office for winning

by **Australian Antarctica** » Mon Dec 22, 2014 9:23 pm

Of The Rnclave wrote:
Australian Antarctica wrote:You make some valid points, of which I agree with. Nonetheless, I can shoot them all down, I won't because I am on my phone

It was a sort of, you get a day to prepare an argument, then you can present it, so I did, and she sent me to the office for winning

Were you in trouble or being congratulated?

by **Of The Rnclave** » Mon Dec 22, 2014 9:27 pm

Australian Antarctica wrote:
Of The Rnclave wrote:
It was a sort of, you get a day to prepare an argument, then you can present it, so I did, and she sent me to the office for winning

Were you in trouble or being congratulated?

Trouble, I got sent to the office,mast there until class was over, then never spoke of it again, it was damn weird my friend, she just went silent while I presented, I walked around the classroom giving examples and reading it, when it was done, she called the office, told me to go in a low calm voice, and so we went

by **Australian Antarctica** » Mon Dec 22, 2014 9:30 pm

Of The Rnclave wrote:
Australian Antarctica wrote:Were you in trouble or being congratulated?

Trouble, I got sent to the office,mast there until class was over, then never spoke of it again, it was damn weird my friend, she just went silent while I presented, I walked around the classroom giving examples and reading it, when it was done, she called the office, told me to go in a low calm voice, and so we went

Well, I am torn. You were partially in the wrong and so was your teacher. You presented a biased paper and your teacher infringed on your first amendment rights.

by **Of The Rnclave** » Mon Dec 22, 2014 9:32 pm

Australian Antarctica wrote:
Of The Rnclave wrote:
Trouble, I got sent to the office,mast there until class was over, then never spoke of it again, it was damn weird my friend, she just went silent while I presented, I walked around the classroom giving examples and reading it, when it was done, she called the office, told me to go in a low calm voice, and so we went

Well, I am torn. You were partially in the wrong and so was your teacher. You presented a biased paper and your teacher infringed on your first amendment rights.

Meh, I got a bunch of cheers and shit when I walked back into my third hour classroom, and everyone calls me Lenin now

This all has me in the mood to present a second paper for her and my class, to show her up again

Wars of Man: Cold War: 1943(OOC Open)

Random Events?

Who is online