Wars of Man: Cold War: 1943(OOC Open)

by **Soviet Chernarus** » Sun Dec 21, 2014 3:48 pm

Elepis wrote:
Licata wrote:
Trotsky wouldn't have been able to stop a thirteen million man army from doing what it wants.

The white house could stop a multi-million man army from doing it

Also, I lived in Russia for 3 years and I can assure you raping, murder is not in their nature.

Oh, the americans comitted war crimes like rape, pillaging, etc. even if no one talks about it.

by **Marsisian** » Sun Dec 21, 2014 3:48 pm

Elepis wrote:
Marsisian wrote:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_war_crimes

Even though Trotsky is in power, they still would have done war crimes.

why?

One man cannot stop one of the largest armies known in history from doing what they think is suitable revenge.

by **Licata** » Sun Dec 21, 2014 3:48 pm

Soviet Chernarus wrote:
Elepis wrote:
The white house could stop a multi-million man army from doing it

Also, I lived in Russia for 3 years and I can assure you raping, murder is not in their nature.

Oh, the americans comitted war crimes like rape, pillaging, etc. even if no one talks about it.

Aye, all parties did. But the Soviets did it in mass.

by **Elepis** » Sun Dec 21, 2014 3:49 pm

Marsisian wrote:
Elepis wrote:
why?

One man cannot stop one of the largest armies known in history from doing what they think is suitable revenge.

Ah, in this the Nazi's never got to Moscow or Stalingrad, they were stopped at Minsk, so they were not as blood thirsty

by **Licata** » Sun Dec 21, 2014 3:50 pm

Elepis wrote:
Marsisian wrote:One man cannot stop one of the largest armies known in history from doing what they think is suitable revenge.

Ah, in this the Nazi's never got to Moscow or Stalingrad, they were stopped at Minsk, so they were not as blood thirsty

Still, they lost family. Rape, murder, and theft would be rampant.

by **Elepis** » Sun Dec 21, 2014 3:50 pm

Soviet Chernarus wrote:
Elepis wrote:
The white house could stop a multi-million man army from doing it

Also, I lived in Russia for 3 years and I can assure you raping, murder is not in their nature.

Oh, the americans comitted war crimes like rape, pillaging, etc. even if no one talks about it.

Not as much as USSR though

Also, Alaska is

A. Historically Russian so they will not mind too much
B. They have massive autonomy

by **Australian Antarctica** » Sun Dec 21, 2014 3:51 pm

Elepis wrote:
Marsisian wrote:One man cannot stop one of the largest armies known in history from doing what they think is suitable revenge.

Ah, in this the Nazi's never got to Moscow or Stalingrad, they were stopped at Minsk, so they were not as blood thirsty

He is right.

by **Elepis** » Sun Dec 21, 2014 3:51 pm

Licata wrote:
Elepis wrote:
Ah, in this the Nazi's never got to Moscow or Stalingrad, they were stopped at Minsk, so they were not as blood thirsty

Still, they lost family. Rape, murder, and theft would be rampant.

not as much though. Only Belarus and Ukraine

by **Marsisian** » Sun Dec 21, 2014 3:52 pm

Australian, please respond to the uprising.

by **Australian Antarctica** » Sun Dec 21, 2014 3:53 pm

Marsisian wrote:Australian, please respond to the uprising.

Oh yeah, forgot. I have a lot on my plate.

by **Marsisian** » Sun Dec 21, 2014 3:54 pm

Australian Antarctica wrote:
Marsisian wrote:Australian, please respond to the uprising.

Oh yeah, forgot. I have a lot on my plate.

Yep. Looks like what you have on your plate is pretty big. You're going to have trouble getting that in, you know?

by **Soviet Chernarus** » Sun Dec 21, 2014 3:55 pm

Elepis wrote:
Soviet Chernarus wrote:Oh, the americans comitted war crimes like rape, pillaging, etc. even if no one talks about it.

Not as much as USSR though

Also, Alaska is

A. Historically Russian so they will not mind too much
B. They have massive autonomy

Even if something's "historically [insert country]", it does not mean the people think of it that way. There will still be people who will resist

by **Australian Antarctica** » Sun Dec 21, 2014 3:57 pm

Marsisian wrote:
Australian Antarctica wrote:Oh yeah, forgot. I have a lot on my plate.

Yep. Looks like what you have on your plate is pretty big. You're going to have trouble getting that in, you know?

That just don't sound right...

by **Elepis** » Sun Dec 21, 2014 3:57 pm

Soviet Chernarus wrote:
Elepis wrote:
Not as much as USSR though

Also, Alaska is

A. Historically Russian so they will not mind too much
B. They have massive autonomy

Even if something's "historically [insert country]", it does not mean the people think of it that way. There will still be people who will resist

yes but they are religiously & culturally very Russian, so they will like living under Russia more than say, Italy or France

by **Australian Antarctica** » Sun Dec 21, 2014 3:59 pm

Elepis wrote:
Soviet Chernarus wrote:
Even if something's "historically [insert country]", it does not mean the people think of it that way. There will still be people who will resist

yes but they are religiously & culturally very Russian, so they will like living under Russia more than say, Italy or France

But they were used to the old Russia, not the soviet union. And they also got used to american 'rule' therefore, your argument is invalid.

by **Elepis** » Sun Dec 21, 2014 4:01 pm

Australian Antarctica wrote:
Elepis wrote:
yes but they are religiously & culturally very Russian, so they will like living under Russia more than say, Italy or France

But they were used to the old Russia, not the soviet union. And they also got used to american 'rule' therefore, your argument is invalid.

Why is their no resistance to Canada?

by **Marsisian** » Sun Dec 21, 2014 4:01 pm

Australian Antarctica wrote:
Marsisian wrote:Yep. Looks like what you have on your plate is pretty big. You're going to have trouble getting that in, you know?

That just don't sound right...

What do you mean? I was just saying that what you have on your plate is big and you are definitely going to have trouble pushing that in.

by **Australian Antarctica** » Sun Dec 21, 2014 4:03 pm

Marsisian wrote:
Australian Antarctica wrote:That just don't sound right...

What do you mean? I was just saying that what you have on your plate is big and you are definitely going to have trouble pushing that in.

Push what in?

by **Licata** » Sun Dec 21, 2014 4:03 pm

Elepis wrote:
Australian Antarctica wrote:But they were used to the old Russia, not the soviet union. And they also got used to american 'rule' therefore, your argument is invalid.

Why is their no resistance to Canada?

What has Canada ever done? They'd probably protest. most probably wouldn't notice for a long time.

by **Marsisian** » Sun Dec 21, 2014 4:04 pm

Australian Antarctica wrote:
Marsisian wrote:What do you mean? I was just saying that what you have on your plate is big and you are definitely going to have trouble pushing that in.

Push what in?

Push the big thing you have on your plate in.

by **Licata** » Sun Dec 21, 2014 4:05 pm

It's still 1943, right? So we all have old technology. German tanks are still new.

by **Australian Antarctica** » Sun Dec 21, 2014 4:05 pm

Marsisian wrote:
Australian Antarctica wrote:Push what in?

Push the big thing you have on your plate in.

....no.....No....NO

by **Of The Rnclave** » Sun Dec 21, 2014 4:06 pm

Map edit done, I will post updated version tommorow

by **Marsisian** » Sun Dec 21, 2014 4:06 pm

Licata wrote:It's still 1943, right? So we all have old technology. German tanks are still new.

Yeah, slightly old tanks from the late 1930s and early 1940s, like Panzer IIIs and Panzer IVs.

by **Australian Antarctica** » Sun Dec 21, 2014 4:06 pm

Licata wrote:It's still 1943, right? So we all have old technology. German tanks are still new.

Yeah, your point is? Our tanks would still have been taken care of while the rebel's are probably rusty and old.

Wars of Man: Cold War: 1943(OOC Open)

Random Events?

Who is online