Girls und Panzer: Ride the Tiger (OOC, CLOSED)

by **Ulvenes** » Mon Mar 02, 2015 5:43 pm

It's not that I don't use it, I can't afford it. Especially for 27 tanks.. (bought the M6A2E1 today. It's like the American KV-2 with an anti-tank gun)

by **Rynagria** » Mon Mar 02, 2015 5:50 pm

Ulvenes wrote:It's not that I don't use it, I can't afford it. Especially for 27 tanks.. (bought the M6A2E1 today. It's like the American KV-2 with an anti-tank gun)

You don't have the buy for all of them...

Just buy them for your higher Tier tanks and just don't have a lot of them, I would say like 8-12 shells be enough.

You should be able to make most back off...... I think. That's what I do in my Tier VII games, just in case I meet an IS-3, E-75, T-54, etc. when I'm in my T20, IS, and Jagdpanther.

by **Ulvenes** » Mon Mar 02, 2015 6:11 pm

I have very few tanks that aren't in those tiers.

by **Rynagria** » Mon Mar 02, 2015 7:21 pm

Ulvenes wrote:I have very few tanks that aren't in those tiers.

Give 'em to tank destroyer then?

by **Ulvenes** » Mon Mar 02, 2015 7:24 pm

My tank destroyers nine times out of ten have the ability and accuracy to pen most anything they fight against, it's just a lot of the time when I use them I'll fire, and the shot will miss the weak spot by an inch, so I'll adjust, and it'll do it again and I just end up walking the gun up and up and up and all the while taking rounds.

Very unlucky happenstance.

by **Rynagria** » Mon Mar 02, 2015 7:26 pm

Ulvenes wrote:My tank destroyers nine times out of ten have the ability and accuracy to pen most anything they fight against, it's just a lot of the time when I use them I'll fire, and the shot will miss the weak spot by an inch, so I'll adjust, and it'll do it again and I just end up walking the gun up and up and up and all the while taking rounds.

Very unlucky happenstance.

Well then.....

I don't know what to say.

by **Ulvenes** » Mon Mar 02, 2015 8:10 pm

I'm usually speechless myself.

by **Rynagria** » Mon Mar 02, 2015 8:41 pm

Ulvenes wrote:I'm usually speechless myself.

Hmm.......

Canadian tanks.

by **Ulvenes** » Mon Mar 02, 2015 8:44 pm

Ram II.

by **Rynagria** » Mon Mar 02, 2015 9:14 pm

Ulvenes wrote:Ram II.

Grizzly I.

by **Ulvenes** » Mon Mar 02, 2015 9:15 pm

Is that in WoT?

by **Rynagria** » Mon Mar 02, 2015 9:22 pm

Ulvenes wrote:Is that in WoT?

I don't think so.....

If it were, it wouldn't be that different from the Sherman, since that's what it was.

Well other than being Canadian, of course.

by **Ulvenes** » Mon Mar 02, 2015 9:24 pm

I was just saying there was a Canadian tank in WoT.

by **Rynagria** » Mon Mar 02, 2015 9:27 pm

Ulvenes wrote:I was just saying there was a Canadian tank in WoT.

That wasn't the Ram or the Sexton tanks?

by **Ulvenes** » Mon Mar 02, 2015 9:30 pm

Sexton was British. Just built on Canadian M3 Lee and M4 chassis.

by **Rynagria** » Mon Mar 02, 2015 9:36 pm

Ulvenes wrote:Sexton was British. Just built on Canadian M3 Lee and M4 chassis.

Really?

I thought they were made by Canadians, but the British simply said that they were going to use them...

Kinda like what they did with the M7 Priest.

by **Ulvenes** » Mon Mar 02, 2015 9:38 pm

Naw. They were Canadian built tanks, but modified by the British.

What? The Priest was American built and used by Americans.

by **Rynagria** » Mon Mar 02, 2015 9:50 pm

Ulvenes wrote:Naw. They were Canadian built tanks, but modified by the British.

What? The Priest was American built and used by Americans.

Not only by Americans.

The British used them in N. Africa and the Italy Campaign.

by **Ulvenes** » Mon Mar 02, 2015 9:52 pm

Cause they knew their own shit wasn't good enough.

Kidding

by **Rynagria** » Mon Mar 02, 2015 9:56 pm

Ulvenes wrote:Cause they knew their own shit wasn't good enough.
Kidding

Not would have been offended at all, even if one of my favorite WWII tank was the Churchill Mk. III.

Well, they went to the extremes of both ends for WWII, and after Dunkirk, they really didn't have a choice. Their artillery was good, but their tanks were extremely lacking, even the famous Firefly.

by **Ulvenes** » Mon Mar 02, 2015 10:01 pm

I'm not worried about offending you cause I know you wouldn't have been offended, it just seems to be that there has been an influx of random people chiming in so I didn't want some Anglophobe to come in and start on about "British tanks stronk!"

by **Rynagria** » Mon Mar 02, 2015 10:03 pm

Ulvenes wrote:I'm not worried about offending you cause I know you wouldn't have been offended, it just seems to be that there has been an influx of random people chiming in so I didn't want some Anglophobe to come in and start on about "British tanks stronk!"

They were never that good to begin with...... Everyone relied on Uncle Sam to provide them that at least or Canada.

Except for Russia, they had good tanks with relatively shitty crew at the beginning.

by **Ulvenes** » Mon Mar 02, 2015 10:06 pm

Actually a large number of US vehicles were shipped to the Russia in the lend-lease program.

This is actually seen fairly well in CoH2(not best reference obviously but mer). The standard half track for the Soviets is the M5 half-track, which can be upgrade with a .50 quad mount.

by **Rynagria** » Mon Mar 02, 2015 10:08 pm

Ulvenes wrote:Actually a large number of US vehicles were shipped to the Russia in the lend-lease program.

This is actually seen fairly well in CoH2(not best reference obviously but mer). The standard half track for the Soviets is the M5 half-track, which can be upgrade with a .50 quad mount.

Well yeah, everyone received something from America, but I meant in terms of domestic designs.

The soviets just needed the equipment more than anything.

by **Ulvenes** » Mon Mar 02, 2015 10:09 pm

Darn Commies, needing our Liberating stuffs.

Girls und Panzer: Ride the Tiger (OOC, CLOSED)

Who is online