2016: A World Divided (Reboot/OOC/Many Nations available!)

by **Chiata** » Wed Dec 31, 2014 8:53 am

Dear Darfur,

The DRC doesn't take acts of chemical terrorism kindly.

Sincerely, the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd Army Divisions.

by **The Greater Gambia** » Wed Dec 31, 2014 9:03 am

Where did they say they were going to bomb you?

by **Zatak** » Wed Dec 31, 2014 9:06 am

When I drew up plans to do a bombing.... but later said screw it I aint wasting my time here....

by **The Greater Gambia** » Wed Dec 31, 2014 9:09 am

Just so we're clear,biological weapons like anthrax are way worse than chemical weapons, right? I'm thinking of having the AFP denounce them.

by **Zatak** » Wed Dec 31, 2014 9:11 am

The Greater Gambia wrote:Just so we're clear,biological weapons like anthrax are way worse than chemical weapons, right? I'm thinking of having the AFP denounce them.

The WFA approves.... you should too.

by **The Greater Gambia** » Wed Dec 31, 2014 9:13 am

ZATAK wrote:
The Greater Gambia wrote:Just so we're clear,biological weapons like anthrax are way worse than chemical weapons, right? I'm thinking of having the AFP denounce them.

The WFA approves.... you should too.

But biological weapons can spread horribly, chemical weaponsatleast stay within a certain area to an extent.

by **Zatak** » Wed Dec 31, 2014 9:15 am

The Greater Gambia wrote:
ZATAK wrote:The WFA approves.... you should too.

But biological weapons can spread horribly, chemical weaponsatleast stay within a certain area to an extent.

If you did not notice we care little for how far it spreads just the effect again going back to the three gorges dam...

by **Elepis** » Wed Dec 31, 2014 9:34 am

what has happened?

by **Elepis** » Wed Dec 31, 2014 10:25 am

phase two of Osman is almost complete, soon IS Iraq will be cut off from IS Syria

by **Chiata** » Wed Dec 31, 2014 10:37 am

Anthrax is a chemical weapon and is not contagious. It is a poisonous substance that is oderless and appears as a white powder in large quantities. It causes irritation of the skin and eyes along with difficulty breathing. When absorbed through the respitory system, it usually causes death. While if absorbed through the skin or eyes, you have a better chance of living. Darfur posted a while back about one of their members stealing a chemical weapon and then placing it in the Kinshasa gov building, which is how the incident took place. The DRC would like everyone to condemn the action. The bombing did little to help Darfur's cause and will hurt them more than it helped as the DRC has sent 50,000 troops into Sudan compared to 30,000 Darfur.

by **Protector Galactics** » Wed Dec 31, 2014 11:20 am

Elepis wrote:what has happened?

The new China has declared itself a nation. There was a terrorist attack in Sudan. I think. And Turkey continues bombing Isis

by **Zatak** » Wed Dec 31, 2014 11:29 am

Protector Galactics wrote:
Elepis wrote:what has happened?

The new China has declared itself a nation. There was a terrorist attack in Sudan. I think. And Turkey continues bombing Isis

India invited the nations of Asia-Pacific and the US to a meeting and wargames in two months time.... except China...

by **Elepis** » Wed Dec 31, 2014 11:37 am

thank you

also, DRC, seeing as your military was beaten by Rwanda in the late 90's. How do expect to fight the battle hardened Darfur fighters?

by **Protector Galactics** » Wed Dec 31, 2014 11:42 am

*Comes in a big ship with nukes and 18 inch cannons.*
Aww why not?

by **Chiata** » Wed Dec 31, 2014 12:11 pm

Elepis wrote:thank you

also, DRC, seeing as your military was beaten by Rwanda in the late 90's. How do expect to fight the battle hardened Darfur fighters?

It's 2016, so I assume that my military has gotten a lot better. Also, the DRC troops are fighting along with the entire army of Sudan. The DRC troops alone outnumber the Darfur (50k against 30k) and the DRC troops are also heavily experienced because of almost constant civil war since the 90s.

by **Marsisian** » Wed Dec 31, 2014 1:33 pm

Chiata wrote:Anthrax is a chemical weapon and is not contagious. It is a poisonous substance that is oderless and appears as a white powder in large quantities. It causes irritation of the skin and eyes along with difficulty breathing. When absorbed through the respitory system, it usually causes death. While if absorbed through the skin or eyes, you have a better chance of living. Darfur posted a while back about one of their members stealing a chemical weapon and then placing it in the Kinshasa gov building, which is how the incident took place. The DRC would like everyone to condemn the action. The bombing did little to help Darfur's cause and will hurt them more than it helped as the DRC has sent 50,000 troops into Sudan compared to 30,000 Darfur.

I could give them a better version of tabun gas if they wanted.

by **Marsisian** » Wed Dec 31, 2014 1:34 pm

Of The Rnclave wrote:
Marsisian wrote:His industry is fine. He has an air force and a good chunk of AA defenses, they'd shred your bombers considering they're bombing important industrial centers.

No he doesn't, his Air Force was almost entirely knocked out with the EMP, but he won't accept that

YOU CAN'T KNOCK OUT 2,800 AIRCRAFT.

by **Licata** » Wed Dec 31, 2014 1:38 pm

Marsisian wrote:
Of The Rnclave wrote:
No he doesn't, his Air Force was almost entirely knocked out with the EMP, but he won't accept that

YOU CAN'T KNOCK OUT 2,800 AIRCRAFT.

They were shitty, outdated copies of Russian planes. People say otherwise, however their most numerous air craft was copied from a Russian jet produced in 59.

by **Marsisian** » Wed Dec 31, 2014 1:39 pm

Licata wrote:
Marsisian wrote:YOU CAN'T KNOCK OUT 2,800 AIRCRAFT.

They were shitty, outdated copies of Russian planes. People say otherwise, however their most numerous air craft was copied from a Russian jet produced in 59.

The MiG-15 has a 37mm gun. The largest gun mounted on a US aircraft right now is 30mm. That's on the Thunderbolt and that probably went out of service in this RP.

by **Licata** » Wed Dec 31, 2014 1:42 pm

Marsisian wrote:
Licata wrote:
They were shitty, outdated copies of Russian planes. People say otherwise, however their most numerous air craft was copied from a Russian jet produced in 59.

The MiG-15 has a 37mm gun. The largest gun mounted on a US aircraft right now is 30mm. That's on the Thunderbolt and that probably went out of service in this RP.

Guns aren't used in air to air combat. Missiles took their place. The US fields more strategically capable aircraft.

by **Marsisian** » Wed Dec 31, 2014 1:44 pm

Licata wrote:
Marsisian wrote:The MiG-15 has a 37mm gun. The largest gun mounted on a US aircraft right now is 30mm. That's on the Thunderbolt and that probably went out of service in this RP.

Guns aren't used in air to air combat. Missiles took their place. The US fields more strategically capable aircraft.

Just saying, if they get close enough then they can deliver tremendous punch.

by **Zatak** » Wed Dec 31, 2014 1:46 pm

Marsisian wrote:
Licata wrote:
Guns aren't used in air to air combat. Missiles took their place. The US fields more strategically capable aircraft.

Just saying, if they get close enough then they can deliver tremendous punch.

I guess it depends on how much planes were taken out on the air and how many were taken out when grounded....

by **Licata** » Wed Dec 31, 2014 1:46 pm

Marsisian wrote:
Licata wrote:
Guns aren't used in air to air combat. Missiles took their place. The US fields more strategically capable aircraft.

Just saying, if they get close enough then they can deliver tremendous punch.

One shot from any cannon can take out a jet. The thing is that the US' arsenal is designed to prevent that. Their missiles are designed to take out targets from long range.

by **Licata** » Wed Dec 31, 2014 1:47 pm

ZATAK wrote:
Marsisian wrote:Just saying, if they get close enough then they can deliver tremendous punch.

I guess it depends on how much planes were taken out on the air and how many were taken out when grounded....

In WW2 most of Poland's planes were killed on the ground.

by **Zatak** » Wed Dec 31, 2014 1:49 pm

Licata wrote:
ZATAK wrote:I guess it depends on how much planes were taken out on the air and how many were taken out when grounded....

In WW2 most of Poland's planes were killed on the ground.

That was WW2 this is now....

2016: A World Divided (Reboot/OOC/Many Nations available!)

Black Market system?

Who is online