Harbertia wrote:We should ask Pinki3. To my mind the house of commons would offer a lot more corruption then the house of Lords. I think the reason it doesn't exist is due to a theme of Elitism, which really isn't that bad of a concept (Elitism in the Victorian sense which involved noble obligation to the people, and use of wealth, and education to better the world though financing of colonial, and missionary projects). I know England has a history of greedy commoners attempting to take power. In my mind I feel the Republican movement is an extension of that. Though I'd like to not speak real world politics, and instead focus on how this district is going to be governed. I personally favor the permanent seats for nobility in a two house parliamentary legislature where only lords can hold the Prime Minister's office.
Ah, I understand. Although the House of Commons of the early 19th Century was a bastion of elitism, it was controlled by moneyed interests. Due to corruption, especially rotten boroughs and property requirements for voting, the elites were firmly in control of it. We could replicate and enhance that. I'd prefer to have a corrupt House of Commons and use your suggestion about the House of Lords.
On a related note, you'll notice I included vampires as common in Velborough, I figured the elites would favor immortality, to continue their rule indefinitely.



GLORIOUS! 