Wars of Man:Turning Point: 1960(OOC OPEN)

by **Kisinger** » Thu Nov 13, 2014 6:33 pm

Brazil... The UN doesn't condone war and shouldn't ever... Unlike now how it goes on "peacekeeping operations"

by **The Greater Gambia** » Thu Nov 13, 2014 6:33 pm

Lingria wrote:
The Greater Gambia wrote:
GET AHOLD OF YOURELF!(Slaps Lingria around a bit)

HARDER I WANT TO FEEL IT!!

(stops slapping Lingria around, slowly backs away and washes hands)

by **Akksum** » Thu Nov 13, 2014 6:34 pm

Kisinger wrote:Brazil... The UN doesn't condone war and shouldn't ever... Unlike now how it goes on "peacekeeping operations"

You see what I'm doing though. Its a war file, that's all. We're going to pass it into the war file, and put down rules of the war. aka NO F***ING NUKES!

by **Lingria** » Thu Nov 13, 2014 6:35 pm

The Greater Gambia wrote:
Lingria wrote:HARDER I WANT TO FEEL IT!!

(stops slapping Lingria around, slowly backs away and washes hands)

That'll teach people to touch my lush skin *Touches Scandanavian white skin*

by **UnitedEastEurope** » Thu Nov 13, 2014 6:35 pm

I have posted a message to the UP and the Brazilian empire in the European IC.

by **Akksum** » Thu Nov 13, 2014 6:36 pm

Lingria wrote:
The Greater Gambia wrote:
(stops slapping Lingria around, slowly backs away and washes hands)

That'll teach people to touch my lush skin *Touches Scandanavian white skin*

*Slaps.* NO! STOP!

by **Australian Antarctica** » Thu Nov 13, 2014 6:36 pm

No body likes Canada.

I'm lookin' at you West Germany>

by **UnitedEastEurope** » Thu Nov 13, 2014 6:37 pm

Australian Antarctica wrote:No body likes Canada.
I'm lookin' at you West Germany>

What I do

by **The Greater Gambia** » Thu Nov 13, 2014 6:37 pm

UnitedEastEurope wrote:
Australian Antarctica wrote:No body likes Canada.
I'm lookin' at you West Germany>

What I do

We cool

by **Australian Antarctica** » Thu Nov 13, 2014 6:37 pm

UnitedEastEurope wrote:
Australian Antarctica wrote:No body likes Canada.
I'm lookin' at you West Germany>

What I do

You Don't form an Alliance with me.

by **Kargintina** » Thu Nov 13, 2014 6:37 pm

Post will probably go up tomorrow.

by **UnitedEastEurope** » Thu Nov 13, 2014 6:38 pm

Australian Antarctica wrote:
UnitedEastEurope wrote:What I do

You Don't form an Alliance with me.

You haven't asked. And are you against communism? If so thn I'll gladly form an alliance

by **Australian Antarctica** » Thu Nov 13, 2014 6:38 pm

UnitedEastEurope wrote:
Australian Antarctica wrote:You Don't form an Alliance with me.

You haven't asked. And are you against communism? If so thn I'll gladly form an alliance

I invaded a Communist nation so... Yeah.

by **Lingria** » Thu Nov 13, 2014 6:39 pm

Akksum wrote:
Lingria wrote:That'll teach people to touch my lush skin *Touches Scandanavian white skin*

*Slaps.* NO! STOP!

;-; Stahp it that hurts;-;

by **Akksum** » Thu Nov 13, 2014 6:41 pm

the cost of a destroyer now... 1.94b dollars.......

by **Pimps Inc** » Thu Nov 13, 2014 6:42 pm

Wait,the US has Baja California?!

What!

by **UnitedEastEurope** » Thu Nov 13, 2014 6:42 pm

Australian Antarctica wrote:
UnitedEastEurope wrote:You haven't asked. And are you against communism? If so thn I'll gladly form an alliance

I invaded a Communist nation so... Yeah.

Ok just send a message requesting one and I'll accept also would u form a trade agreement as I need oil.

by **Australian Antarctica** » Thu Nov 13, 2014 6:43 pm

UnitedEastEurope wrote:
Australian Antarctica wrote:I invaded a Communist nation so... Yeah.

Ok just send a message requesting one and I'll accept also would u form a trade agreement as I need oil.

You send one to me, I am to lazy right now.

by **Lingria** » Thu Nov 13, 2014 6:44 pm

Akksum wrote:the cost of a destroyer now... 1.94b dollars.......

Nope fuck that have fun Scandinavia

by **Akksum** » Thu Nov 13, 2014 6:45 pm

Lingria wrote:
Akksum wrote:the cost of a destroyer now... 1.94b dollars.......

Nope fuck that have fun Scandinavia

XD, just like yep. Your fucked XD

by **Pimps Inc** » Thu Nov 13, 2014 6:45 pm

As for the destroyer being....destroyed:I feel like that too convenient.In order to have a good RP,an RPer must say his/her casualties not the attacker.That means that the RPer must also be willing to lose and not try to win by being unreasonable in their casualties.Be reasonable,please?

by **Australian Antarctica** » Thu Nov 13, 2014 6:46 pm

Pimps Inc wrote:As for the destroyer being....destroyed:I feel like that too convenient.In order to have a good RP,an RPer must say his/her casualties not the attacker.That means that the RPer must also be willing to lose and not try to win by being unreasonable in their casualties.Be reasonable,please?

And that is why you are the Co-Op! I say my own casualties, you should too.

by **UnitedEastEurope** » Thu Nov 13, 2014 6:47 pm

Pimps Inc wrote:As for the destroyer being....destroyed:I feel like that too convenient.In order to have a good RP,an RPer must say his/her casualties not the attacker.That means that the RPer must also be willing to lose and not try to win by being unreasonable in their casualties.Be reasonable,please?

Agreed, and this guy is a pro RPer.

by **Akksum** » Thu Nov 13, 2014 6:49 pm

UnitedEastEurope wrote:
Pimps Inc wrote:As for the destroyer being....destroyed:I feel like that too convenient.In order to have a good RP,an RPer must say his/her casualties not the attacker.That means that the RPer must also be willing to lose and not try to win by being unreasonable in their casualties.Be reasonable,please?

Agreed, and this guy is a pro RPer.

I'm tired, and I modified the post. XD

by **Pimps Inc** » Thu Nov 13, 2014 6:51 pm

Please.Im no professional.There are better out there in NS but I do think I am a decent one.

Now that is out of the way:Why is Baja California part of the US?

Wars of Man:Turning Point: 1960(OOC OPEN)

Who is online