Caerylan wrote:http://chapelcomic.com/comic/11.png
heh
-Wtf happened to China?
-Wtf happened to Germany?
-Wtf happened to Russia?
-Resurgent Austria-Hungary?
(This is me btw)
Advertisement

by Caltarania » Mon Sep 21, 2015 9:54 am
Caerylan wrote:http://chapelcomic.com/comic/11.png
heh
-Wtf happened to China?
-Wtf happened to Germany?
-Wtf happened to Russia?
-Resurgent Austria-Hungary?

by Elepis » Mon Sep 21, 2015 10:04 am
Caerylan wrote:http://chapelcomic.com/comic/11.png
heh
-Wtf happened to China?
-Wtf happened to Germany?
-Wtf happened to Russia?
-Resurgent Austria-Hungary?

by Caltarania » Mon Sep 21, 2015 10:08 am
Elepis wrote:Caerylan wrote:http://chapelcomic.com/comic/11.png
heh
-Wtf happened to China?
-Wtf happened to Germany?
-Wtf happened to Russia?
-Resurgent Austria-Hungary?
where are the Black (anarchist) and Green (IDK) faction in Russia?
Looks fun though
PS: I think the Red part of Germany is this;
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bavarian_Council_Republic

by Finland SSR » Mon Sep 21, 2015 10:10 am
Elepis wrote:where are the Black (anarchist) and Green (IDK) faction in Russia?

by Liecthenbourg » Mon Sep 21, 2015 10:10 am
Caltarania wrote:Elepis wrote:
where are the Black (anarchist) and Green (IDK) faction in Russia?
Looks fun though
PS: I think the Red part of Germany is this;
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bavarian_Council_Republic
GODDAMN IT.
ALL I WANT. IS TO RP. A GODDAMN UNCHANGED. WEIMAR REPUBLIC. IN AN INTERWAR RP.
;-;

by Elepis » Mon Sep 21, 2015 10:12 am
Caltarania wrote:Elepis wrote:
where are the Black (anarchist) and Green (IDK) faction in Russia?
Looks fun though
PS: I think the Red part of Germany is this;
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bavarian_Council_Republic
GODDAMN IT.
ALL I WANT. IS TO RP. A GODDAMN UNCHANGED. WEIMAR REPUBLIC. IN AN INTERWAR RP.
;-;

by Elepis » Mon Sep 21, 2015 10:13 am

by Caltarania » Mon Sep 21, 2015 10:20 am
Elepis wrote:Finland SSR wrote:Batka's army was doomed anyway and the Greens are everywhere, but irrelevant because they are basically just armed peasant revolts.
Well, they lasted just as long (approx) as the Whites and were a lot more interesting.
I would like to play them.
I agree about the Greens though
One could argue the White's were doomed

by Liecthenbourg » Mon Sep 21, 2015 10:21 am

by Caltarania » Mon Sep 21, 2015 10:22 am

by Elepis » Mon Sep 21, 2015 10:22 am

by Finland SSR » Mon Sep 21, 2015 10:24 am
Elepis wrote:Finland SSR wrote:Batka's army was doomed anyway and the Greens are everywhere, but irrelevant because they are basically just armed peasant revolts.
Well, they lasted just as long (approx) as the Whites and were a lot more interesting.
I would like to play them.
I agree about the Greens though
One could argue the White's were doomed

by Elepis » Mon Sep 21, 2015 10:28 am
Finland SSR wrote:Elepis wrote:
Well, they lasted just as long (approx) as the Whites and were a lot more interesting.
I would like to play them.
I agree about the Greens though
One could argue the White's were doomed
Nay. The Whites could win. Denikin wins Battle of Orel at summer 1919, takes Moscow, thus Petrograd is unguarded and Yudenich easily captures it, BOOM, Whites win.
I study this period of history at university. In fact, I might play as the Whites.

by Caltarania » Mon Sep 21, 2015 10:31 am
Elepis wrote:Finland SSR wrote:Nay. The Whites could win. Denikin wins Battle of Orel at summer 1919, takes Moscow, thus Petrograd is unguarded and Yudenich easily captures it, BOOM, Whites win.
I study this period of history at university. In fact, I might play as the Whites.
However they were hated in the west so if they did win and somehow take the large cities, they would face rebellions and get kicked out again.
The Russian proletariat were't just going to accept the Czar's again after getting a taste of revolution

by Finland SSR » Mon Sep 21, 2015 10:33 am
Elepis wrote:Finland SSR wrote:Nay. The Whites could win. Denikin wins Battle of Orel at summer 1919, takes Moscow, thus Petrograd is unguarded and Yudenich easily captures it, BOOM, Whites win.
I study this period of history at university. In fact, I might play as the Whites.
However they were hated in the west so if they did win and somehow take the large cities, they would face rebellions and get kicked out again.
The Russian proletariat were't just going to accept the Czar's again after getting a taste of revolution

by Elepis » Mon Sep 21, 2015 10:35 am
Caltarania wrote:Elepis wrote:
However they were hated in the west so if they did win and somehow take the large cities, they would face rebellions and get kicked out again.
The Russian proletariat were't just going to accept the Czar's again after getting a taste of revolution
Tbf, I reckon that the Whites would make a compromise deal and institute some form of republican government, with themselves likely holding some sort of influence over it, mind you.

by Caltarania » Mon Sep 21, 2015 10:36 am
Finland SSR wrote:Elepis wrote:
However they were hated in the west so if they did win and somehow take the large cities, they would face rebellions and get kicked out again.
The Russian proletariat were't just going to accept the Czar's again after getting a taste of revolution
Thr Russian Proletariat also completely despised War Communism, as well as any kind of war. Besides, the next Tsar in line, Nicholas III, was a heavy supporter of democracy, and it's safe to say that it wouldn't have been an absolute monarchy.
The Russians also despised war, and the Bolsheviks were all about war and marching to Western Europe. The Whites could have done a few easy ideological decisions to push most of the peasants to their side.

by Finland SSR » Mon Sep 21, 2015 10:38 am
Elepis wrote:Caltarania wrote:
Tbf, I reckon that the Whites would make a compromise deal and institute some form of republican government, with themselves likely holding some sort of influence over it, mind you.
However, the Russian's (at least in the industrial western cities) didn't want a bourgeois republic and that is why they rose in revolt in October.
I guess if the White government was not in WW1 there might not be a rebellion immediately but there would be vast, vast discontent

by Elepis » Mon Sep 21, 2015 10:38 am
Finland SSR wrote:Elepis wrote:
However they were hated in the west so if they did win and somehow take the large cities, they would face rebellions and get kicked out again.
The Russian proletariat were't just going to accept the Czar's again after getting a taste of revolution
Thr Russian Proletariat also completely despised War Communism, as well as any kind of war. Besides, the next Tsar in line, Nicholas III, was a heavy supporter of democracy, and it's safe to say that it wouldn't have been an absolute monarchy.
The Russians also despised war, and the Bolsheviks were all about war and marching to Western Europe. The Whites could have done a few easy ideological decisions to push most of the peasants to their side.

by Finland SSR » Mon Sep 21, 2015 10:39 am
Caltarania wrote:Finland SSR wrote:Thr Russian Proletariat also completely despised War Communism, as well as any kind of war. Besides, the next Tsar in line, Nicholas III, was a heavy supporter of democracy, and it's safe to say that it wouldn't have been an absolute monarchy.
The Russians also despised war, and the Bolsheviks were all about war and marching to Western Europe. The Whites could have done a few easy ideological decisions to push most of the peasants to their side.
Not really. The whole reason that the October Revolution took place was on a message of ending the First World War. They wanted to encourage planned Communist revolutions across Europe, but they were ideologically opposed to wars of the conventional type as it would essentially be a war between the proletariat, as opposed to a war against the bourgeois.

by Finland SSR » Mon Sep 21, 2015 10:42 am
Elepis wrote:Finland SSR wrote:Thr Russian Proletariat also completely despised War Communism, as well as any kind of war. Besides, the next Tsar in line, Nicholas III, was a heavy supporter of democracy, and it's safe to say that it wouldn't have been an absolute monarchy.
The Russians also despised war, and the Bolsheviks were all about war and marching to Western Europe. The Whites could have done a few easy ideological decisions to push most of the peasants to their side.
So the Russian people who fought for the Red Army despised the Red Army? Yes, there was conscription, however there was a large loyal contingent as well.
The Russian people despised the Whites more than the Reds, why would they back the Whites? The peasants support the Reds because they offered Bread and Land, would the White's (upper-middle class landowners) be willing to give the peasants the land they wanted or the factory workers the concessions they wanted

by Caltarania » Mon Sep 21, 2015 10:43 am
Finland SSR wrote:Caltarania wrote:
Not really. The whole reason that the October Revolution took place was on a message of ending the First World War. They wanted to encourage planned Communist revolutions across Europe, but they were ideologically opposed to wars of the conventional type as it would essentially be a war between the proletariat, as opposed to a war against the bourgeois.
Tell that to Tukhachevsky and the summer march to Warsaw.

by Elepis » Mon Sep 21, 2015 10:43 am
Finland SSR wrote:Elepis wrote:
However, the Russian's (at least in the industrial western cities) didn't want a bourgeois republic and that is why they rose in revolt in October.
I guess if the White government was not in WW1 there might not be a rebellion immediately but there would be vast, vast discontent
There was no "revolt" in October. It was a coup.
And the majority of the Russian people didn' support the Bolsheviks. They were a minor party for a reason. Plus, their overly oppressive policies, troikas and WAR COMMUNISM pushed discontent.
There wa no support for revolution, nor there was one.

by Elepis » Mon Sep 21, 2015 10:43 am
Finland SSR wrote:Caltarania wrote:
Not really. The whole reason that the October Revolution took place was on a message of ending the First World War. They wanted to encourage planned Communist revolutions across Europe, but they were ideologically opposed to wars of the conventional type as it would essentially be a war between the proletariat, as opposed to a war against the bourgeois.
Tell that to Tukhachevsky and the summer march to Warsaw.

by Finland SSR » Mon Sep 21, 2015 10:44 am
Advertisement
Return to Portal to the Multiverse
Users browsing this forum: Benuty, Google [Bot], Newne Carriebean7, Oflia, The corporate states of Astavar, The Empire of Tau
Advertisement