Ooooooh and there goes any chance of ever profiting off of each other.
Too had, I have most of the local forests and quarries.
Advertisement

by Relikai » Sun Oct 05, 2014 7:57 pm

by Relikai » Sun Oct 05, 2014 8:01 pm


by Reatra » Sun Oct 05, 2014 8:04 pm
Relikai wrote:Reatra wrote:
Antagonism? What have I done IC to be antagonistic?
Whatever remains in that 25% pop which remained in the conquered lands are stirring trouble in the provinces, thus put down.
Your offensive against other tribes and forceful brainwashing reaches the Emperor who sees you as a threat. <- Take that with a pinch of pride that you're actually seen as a threat

by The Orson Empire » Sun Oct 05, 2014 8:19 pm
Bujahla wrote:The Orson Empire wrote:I'd rather not have my nation break up right now, seeing as I have just introduce a new regime that is very stable and is popular among the people.
Eve still, if mine breaks up, then there are other nation's that need to break up as well, such as Relikai's nation in northern China.
Don't worry. It'll be in like at least 200 CE. Probs more like 300 CE. Every great empire gets to last a little bit.

by The Orson Empire » Sun Oct 05, 2014 8:21 pm
Relikai wrote:The Orson Empire wrote:I'd rather not have my nation break up right now, seeing as I have just introduce a new regime that is very stable and is popular among the people.
Eve still, if mine breaks up, then there are other nation's that need to break up as well, such as Relikai's nation in northern China.
No idea why you're looking at me, I'm not the one who tripled my size since the start of the RP.
I reached my size in 80AD, Orson happily mapped out from
http://i.imgur.com/WizrSgF.png
to
http://i.imgur.com/HjbnGuD.png
so I dont know whats your case for non-overextension and having grudges against my nation when it started out big and a x2 doesnt hurt the political structure much over 80 years and detailed events.

by Relikai » Sun Oct 05, 2014 8:22 pm
The Orson Empire wrote:Relikai wrote:
No idea why you're looking at me, I'm not the one who tripled my size since the start of the RP.
I reached my size in 80AD, Orson happily mapped out from
http://i.imgur.com/WizrSgF.png
to
http://i.imgur.com/HjbnGuD.png
so I dont know whats your case for non-overextension and having grudges against my nation when it started out big and a x2 doesnt hurt the political structure much over 80 years and detailed events.
I don't have a grudge against you. Sorry if I seemed to single you out.

by Alleniana » Sun Oct 05, 2014 11:34 pm
Bujahla wrote:The Orson Empire wrote:What do you mean by border map?
Notice the difference between the map in the OP vs the updated map that Finland made? The one in the OP has black borders on it instead of the dark grey. I'll put up a pole later asking if people like the black style or grey style more.
Forty Twoania wrote:Neo-Assyrian Empire wrote:Before I get to posting, what's gone on so far? Who are the great powers of each continent as of now?
For Europe, I would say Kanensos is the number one since they have the largest navy, expanding colonies and almost every other Mediterranean country claims to be descendant from Kanensian settlers.


by Sasutary Island » Mon Oct 06, 2014 2:58 am

by Alleniana » Mon Oct 06, 2014 3:19 am
Sasutary Island wrote:Whoahoho, Orson better get some plague and famine.

by Sasutary Island » Mon Oct 06, 2014 3:35 am
Alleniana wrote:Sasutary Island wrote:Whoahoho, Orson better get some plague and famine.
Random events =/= Overexpansion troubles
If the current rate of expansion is sustained, though, then overexpansion troubles will be forthcoming. I assume the current rate won't be, though, since he said he planned to unite India and then do some sorta stuff.

by Finland SSR » Mon Oct 06, 2014 3:38 am


by Tuub » Mon Oct 06, 2014 1:47 pm

by Alleniana » Mon Oct 06, 2014 2:07 pm
Sasutary Island wrote:Alleniana wrote:Random events =/= Overexpansion troubles
If the current rate of expansion is sustained, though, then overexpansion troubles will be forthcoming. I assume the current rate won't be, though, since he said he planned to unite India and then do some sorta stuff.
Hue, then maybe i should unite all of Indonesia, Singapore and Malaysia under my banner. Not a bad idea muhahaha

by Bujahla » Mon Oct 06, 2014 3:22 pm
*Huzzah he lives!*
Nah, son. Britain was all like "yo, why my colonies be all uppity an' shit?!" And Lord Durham laid it straight: "they be wantin' legislation with representation, dawg."

by The Orson Empire » Mon Oct 06, 2014 4:04 pm
Bujahla wrote:So IRL East-West trade was biggest in 200 BCE to 200 CE and again in the 1200s. So we should probably establish canon that the two China's trade with Cornuia and then to the persia and then to Kanensian.

by Bujahla » Mon Oct 06, 2014 5:06 pm
The Orson Empire wrote:Bujahla wrote:So IRL East-West trade was biggest in 200 BCE to 200 CE and again in the 1200s. So we should probably establish canon that the two China's trade with Cornuia and then to the persia and then to Kanensian.
So does this mean that Corrunia is in the middle of the Silk Road, since goods from the west and the east pass through my nation?
*Huzzah he lives!*
Nah, son. Britain was all like "yo, why my colonies be all uppity an' shit?!" And Lord Durham laid it straight: "they be wantin' legislation with representation, dawg."

by Kryskov » Mon Oct 06, 2014 5:15 pm
Bujahla wrote:So IRL East-West trade was biggest in 200 BCE to 200 CE and again in the 1200s. So we should probably establish canon that the two China's trade with Cornuia and then to the persia and then to Kanensian.

by Reatra » Mon Oct 06, 2014 5:55 pm

by Relikai » Mon Oct 06, 2014 6:00 pm
Reatra wrote:I think I'll be the more trading China. I'll have the bigger navy, and while Rel has the overland routes, I have the silk (most if it) and we hate each other, plus the naval routes will soon be more well known than the overland.

by Reatra » Mon Oct 06, 2014 6:08 pm
Relikai wrote:Reatra wrote:I think I'll be the more trading China. I'll have the bigger navy, and while Rel has the overland routes, I have the silk (most if it) and we hate each other, plus the naval routes will soon be more well known than the overland.
Basically the above for sea, since he is barred from the overland routes, and have the slightly bigger navy before I eclipse him in my next IC build-up.
Anyway he's the more trading cos I'm richer internally, while I'm the more centralized warlike whose next target is already being planned out.

by Relikai » Mon Oct 06, 2014 6:15 pm
Reatra wrote:Relikai wrote:
Basically the above for sea, since he is barred from the overland routes, and have the slightly bigger navy before I eclipse him in my next IC build-up.
Anyway he's the more trading cos I'm richer internally, while I'm the more centralized warlike whose next target is already being planned out.
That was confusing.
I honestly have no idea if you meant me or you. Also, if you meant yourself, I have WAY more trees and forests and a much more naval focus, therefore I will definitely keep the naval edge for the foreseeable future.
Also, I have nearly as many people as you and the much more defensible terrain.


by Tuub » Mon Oct 06, 2014 7:06 pm

by The Orson Empire » Mon Oct 06, 2014 7:24 pm
Advertisement
Return to Portal to the Multiverse
Users browsing this forum: Faal Lot Himdah, Finsternia, G-Tech Corporation, Ukcross
Advertisement