I think my family descriptions are vastly to inconsistent for that to work, but you're welcome to try.
Advertisement
by Reverend Norv » Mon Jul 14, 2014 7:07 pm
For really, I think that the poorest he that is in England hath a life to live as the greatest he. And therefore truly, Sir, I think it's clear that every man that is to live under a Government ought first by his own consent to put himself under that Government. And I do think that the poorest man in England is not at all bound in a strict sense to that Government that he hath not had a voice to put himself under.
Col. Thomas Rainsborough, Putney Debates, 1647
A God who let us prove His existence would be an idol.
Dietrich Bonhoeffer
by Nude East Ireland » Mon Jul 14, 2014 7:09 pm
by Nationstatelandsville » Mon Jul 14, 2014 7:11 pm
by Reverend Norv » Mon Jul 14, 2014 7:13 pm
For really, I think that the poorest he that is in England hath a life to live as the greatest he. And therefore truly, Sir, I think it's clear that every man that is to live under a Government ought first by his own consent to put himself under that Government. And I do think that the poorest man in England is not at all bound in a strict sense to that Government that he hath not had a voice to put himself under.
Col. Thomas Rainsborough, Putney Debates, 1647
A God who let us prove His existence would be an idol.
Dietrich Bonhoeffer
by Nationstatelandsville » Mon Jul 14, 2014 7:14 pm
Reverend Norv wrote:Ah, but Hamish is Duff's second cousin four times removed, which means Hamish is four generations up the family tree from Duff.
But actually, screw it. If two people are fourth cousins, then I'm not even going to try to figure this out. "Distant relation" just became a legitimate family category. I come from a vast Scots-Irish clan in southern Indiana, and God knows that it's the only way I could ever remember most of my kin at Thanksgiving.
by Nude East Ireland » Mon Jul 14, 2014 7:16 pm
Reverend Norv wrote:Ah, but Hamish is Duff's second cousin four times removed, which means Hamish is four generations up the family tree from Duff.
But actually, screw it. If two people are fourth cousins, then I'm not even going to try to figure this out. "Distant relation" just became a legitimate family category. I come from a vast Scots-Irish clan in southern Indiana, and God knows that it's the only way I could ever remember most of my kin at Thanksgiving.
by The Grey Wolf » Mon Jul 14, 2014 7:17 pm
by Nationstatelandsville » Mon Jul 14, 2014 7:19 pm
The Grey Wolf wrote:I think we can all learn a lesson from Robert's story - no matter how buxom a lass is, she ain't worth getting into a fight over. Else you might end up killing someone and be chased off an island by Richard Nixon's ancestors.
Nude East Ireland wrote:
I'd say he aged gingerly.
Which does not mean "relating to a ginger or flock of gingers".Reverend Norv wrote:Ah, but Hamish is Duff's second cousin four times removed, which means Hamish is four generations up the family tree from Duff.
But actually, screw it. If two people are fourth cousins, then I'm not even going to try to figure this out. "Distant relation" just became a legitimate family category. I come from a vast Scots-Irish clan in southern Indiana, and God knows that it's the only way I could ever remember most of my kin at Thanksgiving.
There comes a point when every family tree just says "Fuck this, he's just your kinsman". That's the Crusader Kings 2 way.
by Reverend Norv » Mon Jul 14, 2014 7:19 pm
The Grey Wolf wrote:I think we can all learn a lesson from Robert's story - no matter how buxom a lass is, she ain't worth getting into a fight over. Else you might end up killing someone and be chased off an island by Richard Nixon's ancestors.
For really, I think that the poorest he that is in England hath a life to live as the greatest he. And therefore truly, Sir, I think it's clear that every man that is to live under a Government ought first by his own consent to put himself under that Government. And I do think that the poorest man in England is not at all bound in a strict sense to that Government that he hath not had a voice to put himself under.
Col. Thomas Rainsborough, Putney Debates, 1647
A God who let us prove His existence would be an idol.
Dietrich Bonhoeffer
by Nude East Ireland » Mon Jul 14, 2014 7:20 pm
The Grey Wolf wrote:Richard Nixon's ancestors.
by The Grey Wolf » Mon Jul 14, 2014 7:22 pm
Reverend Norv wrote:Ah, but Hamish is Duff's second cousin four times removed, which means Hamish is four generations up the family tree from Duff.
But actually, screw it. If two people are fourth cousins, then I'm not even going to try to figure this out. "Distant relation" just became a legitimate family category. I come from a vast Scots-Irish clan in southern Indiana, and God knows that it's the only way I could ever remember most of my kin at Thanksgiving.
by Nude East Ireland » Mon Jul 14, 2014 7:24 pm
Zeinbrad wrote:I guess I'll be a regular old raider guy. I can't think of much else.
by Reverend Norv » Mon Jul 14, 2014 7:26 pm
For really, I think that the poorest he that is in England hath a life to live as the greatest he. And therefore truly, Sir, I think it's clear that every man that is to live under a Government ought first by his own consent to put himself under that Government. And I do think that the poorest man in England is not at all bound in a strict sense to that Government that he hath not had a voice to put himself under.
Col. Thomas Rainsborough, Putney Debates, 1647
A God who let us prove His existence would be an idol.
Dietrich Bonhoeffer
by Nationstatelandsville » Mon Jul 14, 2014 7:27 pm
by Zeinbrad » Mon Jul 14, 2014 7:32 pm
by Reverend Norv » Mon Jul 14, 2014 7:33 pm
For really, I think that the poorest he that is in England hath a life to live as the greatest he. And therefore truly, Sir, I think it's clear that every man that is to live under a Government ought first by his own consent to put himself under that Government. And I do think that the poorest man in England is not at all bound in a strict sense to that Government that he hath not had a voice to put himself under.
Col. Thomas Rainsborough, Putney Debates, 1647
A God who let us prove His existence would be an idol.
Dietrich Bonhoeffer
by Nude East Ireland » Mon Jul 14, 2014 7:35 pm
Reverend Norv wrote:I think "Fither" was suggested as a nickname, Zein.
by Zeinbrad » Mon Jul 14, 2014 7:37 pm
Reverend Norv wrote:I think "Fither" was suggested as a nickname, Zein.
by Nationstatelandsville » Mon Jul 14, 2014 7:42 pm
by Reverend Norv » Mon Jul 14, 2014 7:44 pm
For really, I think that the poorest he that is in England hath a life to live as the greatest he. And therefore truly, Sir, I think it's clear that every man that is to live under a Government ought first by his own consent to put himself under that Government. And I do think that the poorest man in England is not at all bound in a strict sense to that Government that he hath not had a voice to put himself under.
Col. Thomas Rainsborough, Putney Debates, 1647
A God who let us prove His existence would be an idol.
Dietrich Bonhoeffer
by Reverend Norv » Mon Jul 14, 2014 7:44 pm
For really, I think that the poorest he that is in England hath a life to live as the greatest he. And therefore truly, Sir, I think it's clear that every man that is to live under a Government ought first by his own consent to put himself under that Government. And I do think that the poorest man in England is not at all bound in a strict sense to that Government that he hath not had a voice to put himself under.
Col. Thomas Rainsborough, Putney Debates, 1647
A God who let us prove His existence would be an idol.
Dietrich Bonhoeffer
by Zeinbrad » Mon Jul 14, 2014 7:46 pm
Reverend Norv wrote:
Yes. Which might be a nickname if a man, say, had lots of children.
Anyway, the Character Relationships are updated. Take a look, and let me know if you see anything that disagrees with you.
by Reverend Norv » Mon Jul 14, 2014 7:47 pm
For really, I think that the poorest he that is in England hath a life to live as the greatest he. And therefore truly, Sir, I think it's clear that every man that is to live under a Government ought first by his own consent to put himself under that Government. And I do think that the poorest man in England is not at all bound in a strict sense to that Government that he hath not had a voice to put himself under.
Col. Thomas Rainsborough, Putney Debates, 1647
A God who let us prove His existence would be an idol.
Dietrich Bonhoeffer
by The Grey Wolf » Mon Jul 14, 2014 7:51 pm
Reverend Norv wrote:Zeinbrad wrote:So priest that has a lot of children?
Ha! Well, Catholic priests along the Border did get up to a good deal of mischief, it is true; they didn't care overmuch for rules made in Rome. But look, Zein: it is your character. Make a character that you feel comfortable RPing, that you can understand and for which you are willing to do the research. That is the only advice I can give you.
Advertisement
Return to Portal to the Multiverse
Users browsing this forum: G-Tech Corporation, Herador, Reverend Norv, Shohun, The Orson Empire, Theyra
Advertisement