2060: The World of Tommorow. (OOC/PMT/OPEN)

by **New Strausberg** » Thu Apr 10, 2014 1:02 pm

Anyone else weirded out with how nice I'm being about this I am

by **Lunas Legion** » Thu Apr 10, 2014 1:08 pm

New Strausberg wrote:Anyone else weirded out with how nice I'm being about this I am

Not really. You've accepted that against China and Japan you can't hold the Far East, so you've done a strategic retreat and reshuffle of government to prevent Russia being Balkanized.

by **Mishmahig** » Thu Apr 10, 2014 1:16 pm

Lunas Legion wrote:
New Strausberg wrote:Anyone else weirded out with how nice I'm being about this I am

Not really. You've accepted that against China and Japan you can't hold the Far East, so you've done a strategic retreat and reshuffle of government to prevent Russia being Balkanized.

Quite so.

Now, regarding your earlier question, no, I don't think so. OTO, Indonesia, and the SEA nations seem to be in a coalition. Japan's attack would simply draw the other two in, so I'm afraid India's on its own until China makes a move.

by **The Emerald Dragon** » Thu Apr 10, 2014 1:18 pm

Mishmahig wrote:
Lunas Legion wrote:
Not really. You've accepted that against China and Japan you can't hold the Far East, so you've done a strategic retreat and reshuffle of government to prevent Russia being Balkanized.

Quite so.

Now, regarding your earlier question, no, I don't think so. OTO, Indonesia, and the SEA nations seem to be in a coalition. Japan's attack would simply draw the other two in, so I'm afraid India's on its own until China makes a move.

OTO?

by **Mishmahig** » Thu Apr 10, 2014 1:18 pm

The Emerald Dragon wrote:
Mishmahig wrote:
Quite so.

Now, regarding your earlier question, no, I don't think so. OTO, Indonesia, and the SEA nations seem to be in a coalition. Japan's attack would simply draw the other two in, so I'm afraid India's on its own until China makes a move.

OTO?

Oceanic Treaty Organization. Australia.

by **The Emerald Dragon** » Thu Apr 10, 2014 1:21 pm

Mishmahig wrote:
The Emerald Dragon wrote:
OTO?

Oceanic Treaty Organization. Australia.

What about...

OTPNS?

by **Mishmahig** » Thu Apr 10, 2014 1:23 pm

The Emerald Dragon wrote:
Mishmahig wrote:
Oceanic Treaty Organization. Australia.

What about...

OTPNS?

I have no idea what that is, but if it's another 'peacekeeping' force, as soon as it enters Japanese waters, it'll be ordered to turn around and high-tail it out of there.

by **Parhe** » Thu Apr 10, 2014 1:32 pm

I'm in a coalition?

by **Chiata** » Thu Apr 10, 2014 1:36 pm

Anyone want to ally with the Lowland Union? We have Denmark and southern Norway/Sweden.

by **Bredtonia** » Thu Apr 10, 2014 1:37 pm

So the page has gone by, it's apparently 2061 now. Happy new year!

by **Photana** » Thu Apr 10, 2014 1:38 pm

Bermuda situation resolved. The lease that I'm building my space port on is similar to Guantanamo, the in fact that it isn't a 99 year lease, it's one that will be renegotiated whenever either party wants to.

by **Pinebarrensyia** » Thu Apr 10, 2014 1:39 pm

Bredtonia wrote:So the page has gone by, it's apparently 2061 now. Happy new year!

I'll try to get a post up in a bit about my delegation's arrival at the EPTC.

by **Lunas Legion** » Thu Apr 10, 2014 1:40 pm

Mishmahig wrote:
Lunas Legion wrote:
Not really. You've accepted that against China and Japan you can't hold the Far East, so you've done a strategic retreat and reshuffle of government to prevent Russia being Balkanized.

Quite so.

Now, regarding your earlier question, no, I don't think so. OTO, Indonesia, and the SEA nations seem to be in a coalition. Japan's attack would simply draw the other two in, so I'm afraid India's on its own until China makes a move.

Drat. Guess I'll just have to clog the Himilayas with bodies then.

by **Chiata** » Thu Apr 10, 2014 1:41 pm

Photana wrote:Bermuda situation resolved. The lease that I'm building my space port on is similar to Guantanamo, the in fact that it isn't a 99 year lease, it's one that will be renegotiated whenever either party wants to.

Have I been accepted? I can't find anything.

by **Parhe** » Thu Apr 10, 2014 1:42 pm

Parhe wrote:Could my borders be updated to this?

As note this was my claim. Must be updated on map.

by **Lunas Legion** » Thu Apr 10, 2014 1:43 pm

Parhe wrote:
Parhe wrote:Could my borders be updated to this?

As note this was my claim. Must be updated on map.

So I get Bangladesh? Well, I guess this means you're less of a problem now that I have all the Ganges.

by **Parhe** » Thu Apr 10, 2014 1:45 pm

Lunas Legion wrote:
Parhe wrote:As note this was my claim. Must be updated on map.

So I get Bangladesh? Well, I guess this means you're less of a problem now that I have all the Ganges.

I suppose. I only claimed the "more Eastern" parts of India that would connect the government to Bhutan. I have no need for an overpopulated flood plain, especially. with climate change [Partly why I moved the capital inland.].

by **Vredlandia** » Thu Apr 10, 2014 1:46 pm

Chiata wrote:Anyone want to ally with the Lowland Union? We have Denmark and southern Norway/Sweden.

I'd be honored to ally with my technocratic neighbour.

by **Photana** » Thu Apr 10, 2014 1:46 pm

I see Sen is pursuing the policy of "China must grow larger."
Hopefully Japan and China killinate each other before major space colonization tech becomes commonplace, or we will have giant space wars on multiple worlds and the Asteroid belt, where I'm going to be, with a city on Ceres and mining colonies all over the belt.

@Chia
You are good.

by **Chiata** » Thu Apr 10, 2014 1:47 pm

Vredlandia wrote:
Chiata wrote:Anyone want to ally with the Lowland Union? We have Denmark and southern Norway/Sweden.

I'd be honored to ally with my technocratic neighbour.

Are you Germany?

by **Parhe** » Thu Apr 10, 2014 1:48 pm

Photana wrote:I see Sen is pursuing the policy of "China must grow larger."
Hopefully Japan and China killinate each other before major space colonization tech becomes commonplace, or we will have giant space wars on multiple worlds and the Asteroid belt, where I'm going to be, with a city on Ceres and mining colonies all over the belt.

@Chia
You are good.

Japan no pass Malacca or Thai Canal D:<

My WiFi is going to go out soon, anywhere from an hour to a day, and since my phone's internet alone is spotty I won't be doing anything.

by **Mishmahig** » Thu Apr 10, 2014 1:48 pm

Photana wrote:I see Sen is pursuing the policy of "China must grow larger."
Hopefully Japan and China killinate each other before major space colonization tech becomes commonplace, or we will have giant space wars on multiple worlds and the Asteroid belt, where I'm going to be, with a city on Ceres and mining colonies all over the belt.

@Chia
You are good.

Why do you want a third Sino-Japanese war?

by **Vredlandia** » Thu Apr 10, 2014 1:49 pm

Chiata wrote:
Vredlandia wrote:
I'd be honored to ally with my technocratic neighbour.

Are you Germany?

Germany/Netherlands, to your service.

by **Bredtonia** » Thu Apr 10, 2014 1:53 pm

Mishmahig wrote:
Photana wrote:I see Sen is pursuing the policy of "China must grow larger."
Hopefully Japan and China killinate each other before major space colonization tech becomes commonplace, or we will have giant space wars on multiple worlds and the Asteroid belt, where I'm going to be, with a city on Ceres and mining colonies all over the belt.

@Chia
You are good.

Why do you want a third Sino-Japanese war?

He's supported everyone who vaguely sounds like they might war with another player.

by **Chiata** » Thu Apr 10, 2014 1:53 pm

Vredlandia wrote:
Chiata wrote:
Are you Germany?

Germany/Netherlands, to your service.

Want to help me defend the Finland?