2014-The Real World OOC/Signups [Open]

by **Lithuanian Empire** » Sat Apr 19, 2014 4:30 am

Limborg wrote:The UN court made a decision, this works (as far as i know) like a regular court, meaning that its decision can't be reversed by other "powers"

But the 010A resolution does not conflict with the 012A resolution, so no need there.

by **Limborg** » Sat Apr 19, 2014 4:32 am

Rephesus wrote:
Limborg wrote:The UN court made a decision, this works (as far as i know) like a regular court, meaning that its decision can't be reversed by other "powers"

It can be repealed and changed if the UNGA which authorizes it withdraws it. I doubt this will happen though.

Sure, I'll re-add it and put it to vote.

Lithuanian Empire wrote:
Limborg wrote:The UN court made a decision, this works (as far as i know) like a regular court, meaning that its decision can't be reversed by other "powers"

But the 010A resolution does not conflict with the 012A resolution, so no need there.

Uhmm yes it does.

by **Rephesus** » Sat Apr 19, 2014 4:32 am

Lithuanian Empire wrote:
Limborg wrote:The UN court made a decision, this works (as far as i know) like a regular court, meaning that its decision can't be reversed by other "powers"

But the 010A resolution does not conflict with the 012A resolution, so no need there.

Technically correct, resolution 010A left it to an international court, it did not specify and thus if passed the court would need to make an appeal to the UNGA. Again I doubt it will pass but I think we should give it a shot.

by **Limborg** » Sat Apr 19, 2014 4:37 am

Who are actually the non permanent members now?

So far these have voted:

Iran: Lebanon, Oman
US: Canada
Venezuela: Argentine, Uruguay
Netherlands: Ireland, Monaco
India: Japan, Sri Lanka
France: Netherlands, Monaco
Romania: Hungary, Montenegro
Nepal: Japan, Afghanistan
Norway: Denmark, Sweden
Germany: Sweden, Andorra
Russia: Romania, Hungary
Italy: Ireland, Netherlands
Israel: Netherlands, Norway

by **Luzvimindia** » Sat Apr 19, 2014 5:37 am

Limborg wrote:Who are actually the non permanent members now?

So far these have voted:
Iran: Lebanon, Oman
US: Canada
Venezuela: Argentine, Uruguay
Netherlands: Ireland, Monaco
India: Japan, Sri Lanka
France: Netherlands, Monaco
Romania: Hungary, Montenegro
Nepal: Japan, Afghanistan
Norway: Denmark, Sweden
Germany: Sweden, Andorra
Russia: Romania, Hungary
Italy: Ireland, Netherlands
Israel: Netherlands, Norway

These are the guys who voted for what?

by **Limborg** » Sat Apr 19, 2014 5:40 am

Luzvimindia wrote:
Limborg wrote:Who are actually the non permanent members now?

So far these have voted:
Iran: Lebanon, Oman
US: Canada
Venezuela: Argentine, Uruguay
Netherlands: Ireland, Monaco
India: Japan, Sri Lanka
France: Netherlands, Monaco
Romania: Hungary, Montenegro
Nepal: Japan, Afghanistan
Norway: Denmark, Sweden
Germany: Sweden, Andorra
Russia: Romania, Hungary
Italy: Ireland, Netherlands
Israel: Netherlands, Norway

These are the guys who voted for what?

non permanent members for the security council.

by **Rephesus** » Sat Apr 19, 2014 5:53 am

Do you mind rearranging to show different brackets and who had how many votes?

by **Limborg** » Sat Apr 19, 2014 5:56 am

Rephesus wrote:Do you mind rearranging to show different brackets and who had how many votes?

How do you mean?

Everybody can vote for two nations.

by **Lithuanian Empire** » Sat Apr 19, 2014 6:06 am

Limborg wrote:
Rephesus wrote:Do you mind rearranging to show different brackets and who had how many votes?

How do you mean?

Everybody can vote for two nations.

I think he meant which nations got the most votes.

by **Limborg** » Sat Apr 19, 2014 6:12 am

Lithuanian Empire wrote:
Limborg wrote:
How do you mean?

Everybody can vote for two nations.

I think he meant which nations got the most votes.

Well ther aren't any really.. Everybody can vote for two nations wich can be elected into the security council.
Same rules as before, don't vote on your own and don't vote for a nation that just comes out of the rotation.

I will perhaps change some of the UN stuff in the near future or in a new RP, depends how this one goes in a while.
This will include that the OP's will elect non-permanent members (in the most realistic way possible), this just to speed things up instead of waiting days for people to vote. And i will probably also remove the whole "vote for NPC's" thing.

by **Lithuanian Empire** » Sat Apr 19, 2014 6:14 am

Limborg wrote:
Lithuanian Empire wrote:I think he meant which nations got the most votes.

Well ther aren't any really.. Everybody can vote for two nations wich can be elected into the security council.
Same rules as before, don't vote on your own and don't vote for a nation that just comes out of the rotation.

I will perhaps change some of the UN stuff in the near future or in a new RP, depends how this one goes in a while.
This will include that the OP's will elect non-permanent members (in the most realistic way possible), this just to speed things up instead of waiting days for people to vote. And i will probably also remove the whole "vote for NPC's" thing.

I think I meant which nations gained the most votes from others to be elected to the Security Council.

by **Limborg** » Sat Apr 19, 2014 6:36 am

Lithuanian Empire wrote:
Limborg wrote:
Well ther aren't any really.. Everybody can vote for two nations wich can be elected into the security council.
Same rules as before, don't vote on your own and don't vote for a nation that just comes out of the rotation.

I will perhaps change some of the UN stuff in the near future or in a new RP, depends how this one goes in a while.
This will include that the OP's will elect non-permanent members (in the most realistic way possible), this just to speed things up instead of waiting days for people to vote. And i will probably also remove the whole "vote for NPC's" thing.

I think I meant which nations gained the most votes from others to be elected to the Security Council.

You can see that in the above list i posted.

by **Alouite** » Sat Apr 19, 2014 7:29 am

Limborg wrote:Who are actually the non permanent members now?

So far these have voted:
Iran: Lebanon, Oman
US: Canada
Venezuela: Argentine, Uruguay
Netherlands: Ireland, Monaco
India: Japan, Sri Lanka
France: Netherlands, Monaco
Romania: Hungary, Montenegro
Nepal: Japan, Afghanistan
Norway: Denmark, Sweden
Germany: Sweden, Andorra
Russia: Romania, Hungary
Italy: Ireland, Netherlands
Israel: Netherlands, Norway

Sweden wants Austria and Poland's votes.

by **Rephesus** » Sat Apr 19, 2014 7:31 am

Looks to me like West Europe is Netherlands and Monaco

by **Luzvimindia** » Sat Apr 19, 2014 7:34 am

Wait, do we choose the nations that will represent our region in the UNSC? Or are these just players taking control of NPC votes?

by **Limborg** » Sat Apr 19, 2014 7:37 am

Luzvimindia wrote:Wait, do we choose the nations that will represent our region in the UNSC? Or are these just players taking control of NPC votes?

first one

by **Tribenicha** » Sat Apr 19, 2014 7:37 am

Rephesus wrote:Looks to me like West Europe is Netherlands and Monaco

Wait? Did I win?

Oh... well then...

by **Alouite** » Sat Apr 19, 2014 7:39 am

Limborg wrote:
Luzvimindia wrote:Wait, do we choose the nations that will represent our region in the UNSC? Or are these just players taking control of NPC votes?

first one

Wait so nations chose to keep the US, Russia and China as the nations making security decisions? Damn fools.

by **Limborg** » Sat Apr 19, 2014 7:40 am

Alouite wrote:
Limborg wrote:Who are actually the non permanent members now?

So far these have voted:
Iran: Lebanon, Oman
US: Canada
Venezuela: Argentine, Uruguay
Netherlands: Ireland, Monaco
India: Japan, Sri Lanka
France: Netherlands, Monaco
Romania: Hungary, Montenegro
Nepal: Japan, Afghanistan
Norway: Denmark, Sweden
Germany: Sweden, Andorra
Russia: Romania, Hungary
Italy: Ireland, Netherlands
Israel: Netherlands, Norway

Sweden wants Austria and Poland's votes.

Poland is eastern europe if i'm correct.
Anyhow, excluding your vote, this is what we have now:

Lebanon 1
Oman 1
Canada 1
Argentine 1
Uruguay 1
Ireland 2
Monaco 2
Hungary 2
Montenegro 1
Japan 1
Afghanistan 1
Denmark 1
Sweden 2
Andorra 1
Romania 1
Netherlands 3
Norway 1

by **Phillippanoa** » Sat Apr 19, 2014 7:40 am

Alouite wrote:
Limborg wrote:
first one

Wait so nations chose to keep the US, Russia and China as the nations making security decisions? Damn fools.

No, those are just still the permanent members...

Norway tried to change that, but people were against it...

by **Great Nepal** » Sat Apr 19, 2014 7:41 am

Alouite wrote:
Limborg wrote:
first one

Wait so nations chose to keep the US, Russia and China as the nations making security decisions? Damn fools.

They are permanent members; cant be voted out.

by **Limborg** » Sat Apr 19, 2014 7:41 am

Alouite wrote:
Limborg wrote:
first one

Wait so nations chose to keep the US, Russia and China as the nations making security decisions? Damn fools.

They are still the permanent members...

by **Rephesus** » Sat Apr 19, 2014 7:41 am

Alouite wrote:
Limborg wrote:
first one

Wait so nations chose to keep the US, Russia and China as the nations making security decisions? Damn fools.

You don't vote for P5 members, you vote for temporary members. The P5 are allowed to vote for other members.

by **Tribenicha** » Sat Apr 19, 2014 7:42 am

Limborg wrote:Anyhow, excluding your vote, this is what we have now:
Lebanon 1
Oman 1
Canada 1
Argentine 1
Uruguay 1
Ireland 2
Monaco 2
Hungary 2
Montenegro 1
Japan 1
Afghanistan 1
Denmark 1
Sweden 2
Andorra 1
Romania 1
Netherlands 3
Norway 1

Glorious day!

by **Phillippanoa** » Sat Apr 19, 2014 7:43 am

Limborg wrote:
They are still the permanent members...

Rephesus wrote:
You don't vote for P5 members, you vote for temporary members. The P5 are allowed to vote for other members.

Great Nepal wrote:They are permanent members; cant be voted out.

that's basically what I just said...

2014-The Real World OOC/Signups [Open]

Who is online