Advertisement
by Nightkill the Emperor » Tue Mar 18, 2014 6:19 pm
Nat: Night's always in some bizarre state somewhere between "intoxicated enough to kill a hair metal lead singer" and "annoying Mormon missionary sober".
Swith: It's because you're so awesome. God himself refreshes the screen before he types just to see if Nightkill has written anything while he was off somewhere else.
by G-Tech Corporation » Tue Mar 18, 2014 6:20 pm
Nightkill the Emperor wrote:G-Tech Corporation wrote:
The slide from idealistic freedom movement to corrupt single-party clusterfuck has been souring to observe, even within my lifetime. My family and friends in SA are willing to back parties like the DA merely because "they aren't ANC", rather than any particular merits. That tells you how little faith anyone but the proletariat masses ANC buys with political favors has in people like Zuma to lead SA in the future.
I don't think any one party should be in power too long. It causes problems.
Part of the reason I'm voting out the INC is because they need to shape up, or try to.
I mean, there's many, many other reasons, but that's a part.
There's a lot of similarities between the ANC and INC, in a way.
by Nationstatelandsville » Tue Mar 18, 2014 6:20 pm
by Nightkill the Emperor » Tue Mar 18, 2014 6:23 pm
G-Tech Corporation wrote:Nightkill the Emperor wrote:I don't think any one party should be in power too long. It causes problems.
Part of the reason I'm voting out the INC is because they need to shape up, or try to.
I mean, there's many, many other reasons, but that's a part.
There's a lot of similarities between the ANC and INC, in a way.
Hmm. I hadn't thought of it that way, but it is a fair comparison. Both rode to power on a wave of nationalist sentiment and the success of their respective causes, and have enjoyed limited opposition at best. Complacency breeds contempt, and both need revitalization to transition from mere revolutionary parties to viable political forces that represent progress for their respective countries.
Thankfully, Mandela didn't spawn a dynasty of political leaders, or the ANC would hold on to power far longer than it currently looks set to.
Nat: Night's always in some bizarre state somewhere between "intoxicated enough to kill a hair metal lead singer" and "annoying Mormon missionary sober".
Swith: It's because you're so awesome. God himself refreshes the screen before he types just to see if Nightkill has written anything while he was off somewhere else.
by G-Tech Corporation » Tue Mar 18, 2014 6:28 pm
Nightkill the Emperor wrote:G-Tech Corporation wrote:
Hmm. I hadn't thought of it that way, but it is a fair comparison. Both rode to power on a wave of nationalist sentiment and the success of their respective causes, and have enjoyed limited opposition at best. Complacency breeds contempt, and both need revitalization to transition from mere revolutionary parties to viable political forces that represent progress for their respective countries.
Thankfully, Mandela didn't spawn a dynasty of political leaders, or the ANC would hold on to power far longer than it currently looks set to.
At least the Gandhis/Nehru were decent.
I won't say they're great. They had serious flaws, and I give hardly a shit about Rahul Gandhi who does not impress me. But they weren't god awful.
Really, in India, we haven't had utterly god-awful people at the top, which is fortunate.
by Nationstatelandsville » Tue Mar 18, 2014 6:28 pm
Nightkill the Emperor wrote:G-Tech Corporation wrote:
Hmm. I hadn't thought of it that way, but it is a fair comparison. Both rode to power on a wave of nationalist sentiment and the success of their respective causes, and have enjoyed limited opposition at best. Complacency breeds contempt, and both need revitalization to transition from mere revolutionary parties to viable political forces that represent progress for their respective countries.
Thankfully, Mandela didn't spawn a dynasty of political leaders, or the ANC would hold on to power far longer than it currently looks set to.
At least the Gandhis/Nehru were decent.
I won't say they're great. They had serious flaws, and I give hardly a shit about Rahul Gandhi who does not impress me. But they weren't god awful.
Really, in India, we haven't had utterly god-awful people at the top, which is fortunate.
by Nightkill the Emperor » Tue Mar 18, 2014 6:29 pm
G-Tech Corporation wrote:Nightkill the Emperor wrote:At least the Gandhis/Nehru were decent.
I won't say they're great. They had serious flaws, and I give hardly a shit about Rahul Gandhi who does not impress me. But they weren't god awful.
Really, in India, we haven't had utterly god-awful people at the top, which is fortunate.
I'm not going to lie; they had a problem with corruption. But at least your leaders tend to realize that in order for corruption to be profitable, there have to be funds to skim. In SA the politicians couldn't give a farthing about sanity, economic growth, healthcare, science, crime, etc. as long as their base is taken care of with free beer and only a little bit of vote buying while they milk the few funds their state does have in to their personal coffers.
Nat: Night's always in some bizarre state somewhere between "intoxicated enough to kill a hair metal lead singer" and "annoying Mormon missionary sober".
Swith: It's because you're so awesome. God himself refreshes the screen before he types just to see if Nightkill has written anything while he was off somewhere else.
by Zarkenis Ultima » Tue Mar 18, 2014 6:31 pm
Nightkill the Emperor wrote:A PM I like is Gulzarilal Nanda, who had two terms.
Mind, these terms were thirteen days each and separated by two years. So he couldn't fuck up.
by Nightkill the Emperor » Tue Mar 18, 2014 6:32 pm
Nat: Night's always in some bizarre state somewhere between "intoxicated enough to kill a hair metal lead singer" and "annoying Mormon missionary sober".
Swith: It's because you're so awesome. God himself refreshes the screen before he types just to see if Nightkill has written anything while he was off somewhere else.
by G-Tech Corporation » Tue Mar 18, 2014 6:33 pm
by Nationstatelandsville » Tue Mar 18, 2014 6:35 pm
by Nightkill the Emperor » Tue Mar 18, 2014 6:36 pm
Nationstatelandsville wrote:Nightkill the Emperor wrote:At least the Gandhis/Nehru were decent.
I won't say they're great. They had serious flaws, and I give hardly a shit about Rahul Gandhi who does not impress me. But they weren't god awful.
Really, in India, we haven't had utterly god-awful people at the top, which is fortunate.
Wikipedia chose to summarize the Nehru-Gandhi family with this picture.
I'm very sorry for that, India.
Nat: Night's always in some bizarre state somewhere between "intoxicated enough to kill a hair metal lead singer" and "annoying Mormon missionary sober".
Swith: It's because you're so awesome. God himself refreshes the screen before he types just to see if Nightkill has written anything while he was off somewhere else.
by Nightkill the Emperor » Tue Mar 18, 2014 6:36 pm
Nationstatelandsville wrote:
The United States of America brings you President Zachary Taylor, March 1849 to July 1850.
See, Taylor was at a Fourth of July (Independence Day) celebration; being July in America, things were quite nice, and they had a pleasant picnic. Taylor had some cherries; he decided he quite liked them.
So, when the festivities were over, he went home and had some cherries with a glass of milk. And some more. And some more. And some more. And more, and more, and more.
Within the month, Taylor had died of what can best be described as a fatal stomach ache.
Nat: Night's always in some bizarre state somewhere between "intoxicated enough to kill a hair metal lead singer" and "annoying Mormon missionary sober".
Swith: It's because you're so awesome. God himself refreshes the screen before he types just to see if Nightkill has written anything while he was off somewhere else.
by Nightkill the Emperor » Tue Mar 18, 2014 6:38 pm
Nat: Night's always in some bizarre state somewhere between "intoxicated enough to kill a hair metal lead singer" and "annoying Mormon missionary sober".
Swith: It's because you're so awesome. God himself refreshes the screen before he types just to see if Nightkill has written anything while he was off somewhere else.
by Zarkenis Ultima » Tue Mar 18, 2014 6:40 pm
by G-Tech Corporation » Tue Mar 18, 2014 6:43 pm
Nightkill the Emperor wrote:http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/UsefulNotes/ZacharyTaylor
The idiot, dying like that.
He actually seems like he would have been very competent.
by Nationstatelandsville » Tue Mar 18, 2014 6:43 pm
Nightkill the Emperor wrote:Nationstatelandsville wrote:The United States of America brings you President Zachary Taylor, March 1849 to July 1850.
See, Taylor was at a Fourth of July (Independence Day) celebration; being July in America, things were quite nice, and they had a pleasant picnic. Taylor had some cherries; he decided he quite liked them.
So, when the festivities were over, he went home and had some cherries with a glass of milk. And some more. And some more. And some more. And more, and more, and more.
Within the month, Taylor had died of what can best be described as a fatal stomach ache.
by Nightkill the Emperor » Tue Mar 18, 2014 6:45 pm
Nationstatelandsville wrote:Nightkill the Emperor wrote:
The even better story is of William Henry Harrison, Taylor's predecessor by nine years.
Harrison was inaugurated on March 4, 1841; he was a forgetful type, it would seem, as he had misplaced his coat that particular day. The weather, of course, was atrocious - bitterly wet, bone-soaking wet. Harrison promptly said "fuck it" and delivered his inaugural address anyways; outside. What followed was what I understand to be one of the longest inaugural addresses in American history.
By March's end, Harrison was ill with a bad cold. (No small nuisance in the 1840's.) His doctors, being the finest medical minds of their times, promptly loaded him up with opium and castor oil, then stuck leeches all over him, 'cause fuck it, why not? As such, Harrison was went from "really sick" to "really dead" in the matter of a week.
He died, specifically, on April 4, 1841.
Nat: Night's always in some bizarre state somewhere between "intoxicated enough to kill a hair metal lead singer" and "annoying Mormon missionary sober".
Swith: It's because you're so awesome. God himself refreshes the screen before he types just to see if Nightkill has written anything while he was off somewhere else.
by Nude East Ireland » Tue Mar 18, 2014 6:45 pm
Nationstatelandsville wrote:I know Kevin just typed up a thing on William Henry Harrison, but I'll do it and post before him anyways.
by Nightkill the Emperor » Tue Mar 18, 2014 6:47 pm
Nat: Night's always in some bizarre state somewhere between "intoxicated enough to kill a hair metal lead singer" and "annoying Mormon missionary sober".
Swith: It's because you're so awesome. God himself refreshes the screen before he types just to see if Nightkill has written anything while he was off somewhere else.
by Nationstatelandsville » Tue Mar 18, 2014 6:50 pm
Nightkill the Emperor wrote:Nationstatelandsville wrote:The even better story is of William Henry Harrison, Taylor's predecessor by nine years.
Harrison was inaugurated on March 4, 1841; he was a forgetful type, it would seem, as he had misplaced his coat that particular day. The weather, of course, was atrocious - bitterly wet, bone-soaking wet. Harrison promptly said "fuck it" and delivered his inaugural address anyways; outside. What followed was what I understand to be one of the longest inaugural addresses in American history.
By March's end, Harrison was ill with a bad cold. (No small nuisance in the 1840's.) His doctors, being the finest medical minds of their times, promptly loaded him up with opium and castor oil, then stuck leeches all over him, 'cause fuck it, why not? As such, Harrison was went from "really sick" to "really dead" in the matter of a week.
He died, specifically, on April 4, 1841.
April 4?
Well, isn't that a fun coincidence.
by Nationstatelandsville » Tue Mar 18, 2014 6:52 pm
by Nude East Ireland » Tue Mar 18, 2014 6:54 pm
by Nightkill the Emperor » Tue Mar 18, 2014 6:56 pm
Nude East Ireland wrote:Speaking of 19th century American politicians, John C. Calhoun looks like Doc Brown on meth.
Seriously, who would elect that guy?
Nat: Night's always in some bizarre state somewhere between "intoxicated enough to kill a hair metal lead singer" and "annoying Mormon missionary sober".
Swith: It's because you're so awesome. God himself refreshes the screen before he types just to see if Nightkill has written anything while he was off somewhere else.
by Nationstatelandsville » Tue Mar 18, 2014 6:57 pm
Nude East Ireland wrote:Speaking of 19th century American politicians, John C. Calhoun looks like Doc Brown on meth.
Seriously, who would elect that guy?
Advertisement
Return to Portal to the Multiverse
Users browsing this forum: Majestic-12 [Bot]
Advertisement