Advertisement

by Oseamar » Mon Feb 03, 2014 10:39 pm

by Seljuq Kyiv » Mon Feb 03, 2014 10:40 pm
Oseamar wrote:i noticed but when i saw the Northern German Confederation had a similar name i skipped a generation but i will edit it.

by Oseamar » Mon Feb 03, 2014 10:43 pm
Population (The Confederation): 30,000,000
Standing Military and Reserves: 1,00,000
Maximum Conscription (Native): 1,9600,000
Country and Territories: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Map-NDB.svg
Head of State: His Majesty, the King of Prussia, Wilhelm Friedrich Ludwig
Head of Government: Chancellor Otto von Bismarck
Government Style: Authoritarian Democracy
Primary Weapon: Dreyse Needle-Gun-(1870) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dreyse_needle_gun Mauser Model 1871-(Starting in 1871) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mauser_Model_1871
Secondary Weapon: Unknown
Standard Artillery: Krupp C64 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C64_%28field_gun%29
Main Naval Vessels: 7 Ironclads-(1870) 10 Ironclads-(1871)
Additional Reading: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prussian_a ... cteristics

by Alleniana » Mon Feb 03, 2014 10:43 pm
Of the Quendi wrote:Seljuq Kyiv wrote:Louis-Napoleon was with Prussia, but I imagine Spain now has a Hohenzollern king.
What Prince Leopold? I don't think anyone will want him to be king of Spain. Then even Amadeo is better.Alleniana wrote:Indeed. I imagine Chile, being able to supply many of the things that Europe needs during the opposite seasons such as cattle, sheep and wheat, would have faired decently, though rapidly rising exports of the same from Australia and New Zealand may negate a fair portion of that. In addition, copper and some other produces might help, though as a whole Chile will be quite negatively impacted, as a smaller economy that can't rely on industry to hold itself afloat. A railway into which the savings of the times before the Depression began was pitched would be a great boost if completed though...
*nudges Europeans to invest*
In addition, when Boliviawar is ended, nitre will be basically a miracle, and Australia's increasing dominance in wheat will matter a lot less, while i'll be able to compete better with the vast plains of Patagonia for sheep/cattle grazing.In the late 1870s the economic situation in Chile deteriorated. Chilean wheat exports were outcompeted by production in Canada, Russia and Argentina and Chilean copper was largely replaced in international markets by copper from the United States and Spain.[19] Income from silver mining in Chile also dropped.[19] Anibal Pinto president of Chile by 1878 expressed his concerns the following way:[19]
“ If a new mining discovery or some novelty of that sort does not commes to improve the actual situation the crisis that has long been felt will worsen ”
—Anibal Pinto, president of Chile, 1878.
This "mining discovery" came, according to historians Gabriel Salazar and Julio Pinto, into existence through the conquest of Bolivian and Peruvian lands in the War of the Pacific.[19] It has been argued that economic situation and the view of new wealth in the nitrate was the true reason for the Chilean elite to go into war with its neighbors.[19]
Another response to the economic crisis, according to Jorge Pinto Rodríguez, was the new pulse of conquest of indigenous lands that took place in Araucanía in the 1870s.
Wikipedia's entry on Chile in the Long Depression. Since you have so much of Patagonia you can probably, at least partially, dodge the wheat bullet but since the price of grain fell to a third from 1867 to 1894 (and in this RP it will probably fall even more as I am increasing Russian grain production in Asia even faster than in RL) it will presumably still be keenly felt.
*nudges US and Europe to invest in Russia*Alleniana wrote:Are any Europeans willing to invest in a trans-Chilean railroad? It's just over half done.
Tsk, no matter what, I offer better terms for people willing to invest in the Trans-Siberian Railroad, the Trans-Aral Railroad and in time the Trans-Caspian Railroad. Everything you build you own, and all natural resources within a two hundred kilometers distance on both sides of any railroad are yours to extract.
[/quote]Dangelia wrote:Ottoman Empire, Italy, Spain, France, Japan, China, Southern Germany, Austria-Hungary, Persia, (and if you wait a while, some states in the Balkans and Middle East after the dissolution of the Ottoman Empire)
Lesser Tartary wrote:Everyone leave Belgium alone! We just want to live quietly without all of you pesky Germanics or Iberians meddling in our affairs.
The Grand Republic of Hannover wrote:After the defeat of Argentina, I don't think it should be considered a secondary power any longer. It barely holds the status of independent state.
Zumreed wrote:Glory to Seljuq, First of His Name, OP of the 1875 RP, Co-Op of the 1870's thread, King of the Egyptians and the Kebabs.

by Zumreed » Mon Feb 03, 2014 11:18 pm

by Alleniana » Mon Feb 03, 2014 11:25 pm
Zumreed wrote:Glory to Arztotzka.
That should be a goal of ours. Release Belarus and make it Arztotzka.

by Zumreed » Mon Feb 03, 2014 11:35 pm

by Seljuq Kyiv » Tue Feb 04, 2014 12:29 am

by Alleniana » Tue Feb 04, 2014 12:51 am


by Alleniana » Tue Feb 04, 2014 3:35 am


by Seljuq Kyiv » Tue Feb 04, 2014 3:47 am

by Alleniana » Tue Feb 04, 2014 3:50 am

by Of the Quendi » Tue Feb 04, 2014 3:57 am
Phoenix2012 wrote:Well, I thought that in the 4 years, relations would have improved...but apparently not
Lunas Legion wrote:Persia? With the Ottos collapsing, it's a good time to be them.
Aldelxane wrote:Persia..... In 1875 it wasn't exactly a Persian Empire or anything near to it, so I'd have to be allowed some AH for it to work. Would I be allowed to have reasonable AH using the point of departure of 1870?
The Grand Republic of Hannover wrote:After the defeat of Argentina, I don't think it should be considered a secondary power any longer. It barely holds the status of independent state.
Aldelxane wrote:Probably not going to work then, not exactly what I had in mind. (Assumed I would only be fighting the collapsing Ottomans. To make it viable, I would have to have a coup de'etat and get a better Shah, however Britain would probably destroy the nation while it was still trying to solidify itself.)
Alleniana wrote:Dayum, that's good. Can Chile build any? I'll just build a 5 metre section and set up a sign or something![]()

by Alleniana » Tue Feb 04, 2014 4:07 am
Lunas Legion wrote:Persia? With the Ottos collapsing, it's a good time to be them.
Aldelxane wrote:Persia..... In 1875 it wasn't exactly a Persian Empire or anything near to it, so I'd have to be allowed some AH for it to work. Would I be allowed to have reasonable AH using the point of departure of 1870?
The Grand Republic of Hannover wrote:After the defeat of Argentina, I don't think it should be considered a secondary power any longer. It barely holds the status of independent state.
Aldelxane wrote:Probably not going to work then, not exactly what I had in mind. (Assumed I would only be fighting the collapsing Ottomans. To make it viable, I would have to have a coup de'etat and get a better Shah, however Britain would probably destroy the nation while it was still trying to solidify itself.)
Alleniana wrote:Dayum, that's good. Can Chile build any? I'll just build a 5 metre section and set up a sign or something![]()

by The Star Corporation » Tue Feb 04, 2014 5:03 am
Seljuq Kyiv wrote:The Tarantara Dominion wrote:But SERIOUSLY, could someone update the map to include a largely expanded Portugal?
The reason the map did not include Portugal's new possessions was because they were not recognised OOCly. They were illegitimate gains through godmodding and time warping, and they shall remain unrecognised since you have failed to edit in time.Aldelxane wrote:Italy seems a force truly evil in this. According to all of the other players the Ottomans are sinking fast, it could be interesting to try to be the genius Sultan that saves the Empire, but it probably wouldn't work. Spain is a possibility, but seems likely to become just another ordinary every day European Empire with nothing unique about it. I honestly need more information....
Spain's king is yet to be decided, but has captured Korea and Morocco. The current Regency is on the precipice of deciding upon republicanism or monarchism. Carlists in certain regions.Aldelxane wrote:Wouldn't it be more productive to RP a rebel faction then......
Anyhow, can I have summaries of Spain, Italy, and the Ottoman Empire so far?
Italy is bound in the Coalition of Milan with Mexico, Italy, Chile, the Ottoman Empire, and Colombia (not as unrealistic as the YSGAP, however). Has shown interest in Somalia. Has purchased Suez shares for an exorbitant amount and little gain, and still is denied access through Suez. Intent on sailing through Cape of Good Hope to reach its destination. Basically the butt monkey five years ago.
The Ottomans tried intervening in the Netherlands War by sending a fleet to Acheh, but were beaten to it by Austria. Hoping to limit a two war front to just one in the Balkans, made Armenia independent (with horrid results.) After being promised Algeria by Egypt, gave them independence and most of Syria. Algeria in turn was ceded by Egypt to Austria as per an earlier treaty, and Egypt threatened war for Dayr al Zor following Bedouin raids at the border.

by Jamessonia » Tue Feb 04, 2014 5:05 am
The Star Corporation wrote:Seljuq Kyiv wrote:
The reason the map did not include Portugal's new possessions was because they were not recognised OOCly. They were illegitimate gains through godmodding and time warping, and they shall remain unrecognised since you have failed to edit in time.
Spain's king is yet to be decided, but has captured Korea and Morocco. The current Regency is on the precipice of deciding upon republicanism or monarchism. Carlists in certain regions.
Italy is bound in the Coalition of Milan with Mexico, Italy, Chile, the Ottoman Empire, and Colombia (not as unrealistic as the YSGAP, however). Has shown interest in Somalia. Has purchased Suez shares for an exorbitant amount and little gain, and still is denied access through Suez. Intent on sailing through Cape of Good Hope to reach its destination. Basically the butt monkey five years ago.
The Ottomans tried intervening in the Netherlands War by sending a fleet to Acheh, but were beaten to it by Austria. Hoping to limit a two war front to just one in the Balkans, made Armenia independent (with horrid results.) After being promised Algeria by Egypt, gave them independence and most of Syria. Algeria in turn was ceded by Egypt to Austria as per an earlier treaty, and Egypt threatened war for Dayr al Zor following Bedouin raids at the border.
Actually, several people PM'ed me about the expansion and said they wanted to plot an alliance with me.
Have fun with your bias and favortism. ((Also known as picking favorites, which happen to include yourself.))

by Aldelxane » Tue Feb 04, 2014 5:23 am
Lunas Legion wrote:Persia? With the Ottos collapsing, it's a good time to be them.
Aldelxane wrote:Persia..... In 1875 it wasn't exactly a Persian Empire or anything near to it, so I'd have to be allowed some AH for it to work. Would I be allowed to have reasonable AH using the point of departure of 1870?
The Grand Republic of Hannover wrote:After the defeat of Argentina, I don't think it should be considered a secondary power any longer. It barely holds the status of independent state.
Aldelxane wrote:Probably not going to work then, not exactly what I had in mind. (Assumed I would only be fighting the collapsing Ottomans. To make it viable, I would have to have a coup de'etat and get a better Shah, however Britain would probably destroy the nation while it was still trying to solidify itself.)
Alleniana wrote:Dayum, that's good. Can Chile build any? I'll just build a 5 metre section and set up a sign or something![]()

by Kryskov » Tue Feb 04, 2014 5:56 am
Of the Quendi wrote:Russia is a year or two from Ashgabat and is already extending into Afghanistan. When/if the Ottomans fall Persia will be surrounded by Russia on both sides. Ironically it may well be in Persia's interest to keep the Ottomans strong.

by The Grand Republic of Hannover » Tue Feb 04, 2014 5:57 am
Of the Quendi wrote:When was Argentina ever a secondary power anyway (secondary = middle right?)

by Zumreed » Tue Feb 04, 2014 8:12 am


by Of the Quendi » Tue Feb 04, 2014 8:14 am
Kryskov wrote:Uh...we can split Afghanistan?

by The Time Alliance » Tue Feb 04, 2014 8:18 am
The Star Corporation wrote:Seljuq Kyiv wrote:
The reason the map did not include Portugal's new possessions was because they were not recognised OOCly. They were illegitimate gains through godmodding and time warping, and they shall remain unrecognised since you have failed to edit in time.
Spain's king is yet to be decided, but has captured Korea and Morocco. The current Regency is on the precipice of deciding upon republicanism or monarchism. Carlists in certain regions.
Italy is bound in the Coalition of Milan with Mexico, Italy, Chile, the Ottoman Empire, and Colombia (not as unrealistic as the YSGAP, however). Has shown interest in Somalia. Has purchased Suez shares for an exorbitant amount and little gain, and still is denied access through Suez. Intent on sailing through Cape of Good Hope to reach its destination. Basically the butt monkey five years ago.
The Ottomans tried intervening in the Netherlands War by sending a fleet to Acheh, but were beaten to it by Austria. Hoping to limit a two war front to just one in the Balkans, made Armenia independent (with horrid results.) After being promised Algeria by Egypt, gave them independence and most of Syria. Algeria in turn was ceded by Egypt to Austria as per an earlier treaty, and Egypt threatened war for Dayr al Zor following Bedouin raids at the border.
Actually, several people PM'ed me about the expansion and said they wanted to plot an alliance with me.
Have fun with your bias and favortism. ((Also known as picking favorites, which happen to include yourself.))

by Seljuq Kyiv » Tue Feb 04, 2014 8:42 am
The Time Alliance wrote:The Star Corporation wrote:
Actually, several people PM'ed me about the expansion and said they wanted to plot an alliance with me.
Have fun with your bias and favortism. ((Also known as picking favorites, which happen to include yourself.))
Much Favoritism
Many Biased
Such unfairness

by The Time Alliance » Tue Feb 04, 2014 8:59 am
Advertisement
Return to Portal to the Multiverse
Users browsing this forum: Arrhidaeus, Great Confederacy of Commonwealth States, Olthenia, Pentapolitan Kyrene
Advertisement