NATION

PASSWORD

(Open) OOC 1875 REAL-WORLD RP

For all of your non-NationStates related roleplaying needs!

Advertisement

Remove ads

Restart or Defibrillate?

Restart!
9
47%
De fibrillate!
10
53%
 
Total votes : 19

User avatar
Baja California y Sonora
Minister
 
Posts: 3050
Founded: Oct 04, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Baja California y Sonora » Fri Feb 07, 2014 7:35 pm

So much talk about me.

User avatar
Alleniana
Post Czar
 
Posts: 42864
Founded: Dec 23, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Alleniana » Fri Feb 07, 2014 7:43 pm

Baja California y Sonora wrote:So much talk about me.

Indeed.
*pokes about NI*

Anyway, are you still interested in Milan Pact's military facets? I certainly am not.

User avatar
Baja California y Sonora
Minister
 
Posts: 3050
Founded: Oct 04, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Baja California y Sonora » Fri Feb 07, 2014 7:50 pm

Alleniana wrote:
Baja California y Sonora wrote:So much talk about me.

Indeed.
*pokes about NI*

Anyway, are you still interested in Milan Pact's military facets? I certainly am not.

Not really, I care more for the trade.
But of course military support is welcomed though not required.

User avatar
Alleniana
Post Czar
 
Posts: 42864
Founded: Dec 23, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Alleniana » Fri Feb 07, 2014 7:51 pm

Baja California y Sonora wrote:
Alleniana wrote:Indeed.
*pokes about NI*

Anyway, are you still interested in Milan Pact's military facets? I certainly am not.

Not really, I care more for the trade.
But of course military support is welcomed though not required.

Thing is, Italy and Ottomans could drag us into annoying European conflicts; that's my biggest concern. On the other hand, they can't help a lot.

User avatar
Baja California y Sonora
Minister
 
Posts: 3050
Founded: Oct 04, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Baja California y Sonora » Fri Feb 07, 2014 7:54 pm

Alleniana wrote:
Baja California y Sonora wrote:Not really, I care more for the trade.
But of course military support is welcomed though not required.

Thing is, Italy and Ottomans could drag us into annoying European conflicts; that's my biggest concern. On the other hand, they can't help a lot.

They're weak.
Colbat never made a treaty to which be signed of, so I can easily make one that only states trade and absolute no military involved.

User avatar
Alleniana
Post Czar
 
Posts: 42864
Founded: Dec 23, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Alleniana » Fri Feb 07, 2014 8:13 pm

Baja California y Sonora wrote:
Alleniana wrote:Thing is, Italy and Ottomans could drag us into annoying European conflicts; that's my biggest concern. On the other hand, they can't help a lot.

They're weak.
Colbat never made a treaty to which be signed of, so I can easily make one that only states trade and absolute no military involved.

Oh, I see.

In that case, I don't mind at all. No probs Hannover. I'm very content with a purely trade agreement. Exceedingly content.

User avatar
The Grand Republic of Hannover
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14847
Founded: Jan 26, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The Grand Republic of Hannover » Fri Feb 07, 2014 8:19 pm

Alleniana wrote:
Baja California y Sonora wrote:They're weak.
Colbat never made a treaty to which be signed of, so I can easily make one that only states trade and absolute no military involved.

Oh, I see.

In that case, I don't mind at all. No probs Hannover. I'm very content with a purely trade agreement. Exceedingly content.


Alright, that works :)
NSG - Independent. Senator Daniel Krumholz
1870 Real-World RP - Colombia
2014 RP - Colombia
Marsisian Communist Revolution - Hannover
1913 RP - Great Britain


You may also contact me at Here

User avatar
Baja California y Sonora
Minister
 
Posts: 3050
Founded: Oct 04, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Baja California y Sonora » Fri Feb 07, 2014 8:20 pm

The Grand Republic of Hannover wrote:
Alleniana wrote:Oh, I see.

In that case, I don't mind at all. No probs Hannover. I'm very content with a purely trade agreement. Exceedingly content.


Alright, that works :)

Great!
The meeting will be held in two month in Guatemala City, now that we are all content.
Last edited by Baja California y Sonora on Fri Feb 07, 2014 8:24 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Alleniana
Post Czar
 
Posts: 42864
Founded: Dec 23, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Alleniana » Fri Feb 07, 2014 8:37 pm

Baja California y Sonora wrote:
The Grand Republic of Hannover wrote:
Alright, that works :)

Great!
The meeting will be held in two month in Guatemala City, now that we are all content.

:D

BTW, is anybody gonna post for Santiago Pact? I can make an opening post, but I need to know if an of you are interested. Perhaps a clause about the exact borders to be defined, or annual/biannual/?annual conferences, or prohibiting puppets, colonies, etc. from joining under some circumstances.

User avatar
Baja California y Sonora
Minister
 
Posts: 3050
Founded: Oct 04, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Baja California y Sonora » Fri Feb 07, 2014 8:41 pm

Alleniana wrote:
Baja California y Sonora wrote:Great!
The meeting will be held in two month in Guatemala City, now that we are all content.

:D

BTW, is anybody gonna post for Santiago Pact? I can make an opening post, but I need to know if an of you are interested. Perhaps a clause about the exact borders to be defined, or annual/biannual/?annual conferences, or prohibiting puppets, colonies, etc. from joining under some circumstances.

I was gonna post today, but I didn't know of what.
Also since I assume it is being held in Mexico City?

User avatar
Alleniana
Post Czar
 
Posts: 42864
Founded: Dec 23, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Alleniana » Fri Feb 07, 2014 9:23 pm

Baja California y Sonora wrote:
Alleniana wrote: :D

BTW, is anybody gonna post for Santiago Pact? I can make an opening post, but I need to know if an of you are interested. Perhaps a clause about the exact borders to be defined, or annual/biannual/?annual conferences, or prohibiting puppets, colonies, etc. from joining under some circumstances.

I was gonna post today, but I didn't know of what.
Also since I assume it is being held in Mexico City?

Yes.

User avatar
Seljuq Kyiv
Minister
 
Posts: 3178
Founded: Oct 24, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Seljuq Kyiv » Fri Feb 07, 2014 11:44 pm

Of the Quendi wrote:
Seljuq Kyiv wrote:You're not the only one who incites civil wars for personal gain.

What is this dot you speak of?

There is quite a difference between a great power appealing to an ethnic minority living on its borders with which it has good relations to overthrow a foreign yoke and then assisting its uprising and a tertiary power advancing far beyond the natural boundaries of its territory to involve itself in the affairs of a nation of comparable size which is very geographically isolated from the rest of the world and known for its skill at resisting foreign suppression. For Egypt, already overextended in keeping a colonial empire without any naval tradition of note and from expanding into the Levant and the Horn of Africa to be able to hold Ethiopia is something I consider extremely unlikely.

The dot that borders both Khiva, Bukhara and Russia apart from Afghanistan. It belongs to Bukhara, not Afghanistan.


Certainly. It would have been practical if a regional power allowed a rebellious vassal living on its borders to rebel against his ineffective lord liege who had allowed said regional power to open up plantations on their land.

And it would have been even more practical if the regional power, on top of promising territorial integrity and protection for their respective religious demographic, sold modern arms and artillery, and lent the services of a bishop to a kingmaker who was on good terms with the regional power in exchange for mining rights, plantation rights, factories, the appointment of Princely State-esque advisors, etc. A time may come when this subsidiary alliance lies in tatters, but until then this neighbouring country is indebted to Egypt for the crowning of an Emperor at least.

Province, you mean? Based on my perusing of period maps and geacron, I've deduced that the Oxus was the Emirate of Afghanistan's northern border until Russia pushed it to its modern northern borders in 1886, five years after the British Durand line. But let me know if I have erred.
Last edited by Seljuq Kyiv on Fri Feb 07, 2014 11:57 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Seljuq Kyiv
Minister
 
Posts: 3178
Founded: Oct 24, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Seljuq Kyiv » Sat Feb 08, 2014 12:00 am

MAP UPDATE, NOW HD

Spoke to Phoenix2012. As it turns out, this was what he meant by the secession of Armenia.

User avatar
Alleniana
Post Czar
 
Posts: 42864
Founded: Dec 23, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Alleniana » Sat Feb 08, 2014 12:14 am

Seljuq Kyiv wrote:MAP UPDATE, NOW HD

Spoke to Phoenix2012. As it turns out, this was what he meant by the secession of Armenia.

:clap:
Though, what actually happened to the Gran Chaco? I've got a vested interest in seeing it remains with Bolivia, and I can't find why Paraguay would own it.

Other things; Romania has no coast?
The province that is the northernmost of Armenia; is that right? I know it doesn't belong to Turkey today.
RUssia owns Hawaii?!
What is that French land in China, in the south?
A bit of land on South Georgia/Sandwich is uncolored
As Britain, I claimed the central Namibian province too, and settled it

But very good map :bow:

User avatar
Seljuq Kyiv
Minister
 
Posts: 3178
Founded: Oct 24, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Seljuq Kyiv » Sat Feb 08, 2014 12:37 am

Alleniana wrote:
Seljuq Kyiv wrote:MAP UPDATE, NOW HD

Spoke to Phoenix2012. As it turns out, this was what he meant by the secession of Armenia.

:clap:
Though, what actually happened to the Gran Chaco? I've got a vested interest in seeing it remains with Bolivia, and I can't find why Paraguay would own it.

Other things; Romania has no coast?
The province that is the northernmost of Armenia; is that right? I know it doesn't belong to Turkey today.
RUssia owns Hawaii?!
What is that French land in China, in the south?
A bit of land on South Georgia/Sandwich is uncolored
As Britain, I claimed the central Namibian province too, and settled it

But very good map :bow:


In that case, I will need Gibberan and Quendi to clarify the current borders of Paraguay, Urugay and Argentina.

Will amend.
Yellow between Russia and Turkey is Armenia.
No. The colours are similar.
Egyptian Guangzhouwan.
Not important.
Will amend.

User avatar
Alleniana
Post Czar
 
Posts: 42864
Founded: Dec 23, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Alleniana » Sat Feb 08, 2014 12:40 am

Seljuq Kyiv wrote:
Alleniana wrote: :clap:
Though, what actually happened to the Gran Chaco? I've got a vested interest in seeing it remains with Bolivia, and I can't find why Paraguay would own it.

Other things; Romania has no coast?
The province that is the northernmost of Armenia; is that right? I know it doesn't belong to Turkey today.
RUssia owns Hawaii?!
What is that French land in China, in the south?
A bit of land on South Georgia/Sandwich is uncolored
As Britain, I claimed the central Namibian province too, and settled it

But very good map :bow:


In that case, I will need Gibberan and Quendi to clarify the current borders of Paraguay, Urugay and Argentina.

Will amend.
Yellow between Russia and Turkey is Armenia.
No. The colours are similar.
Egyptian Guangzhouwan.
Not important.
Will amend.

It was Bolivian in 1870; if either Russia, USA, Paraguay, Argentina or anyone else has invaded Bolivia, I've not heard about it, after looking through the IC.

I know; was that province Ottoman or Russian in 1870?
Oh, alright
Guangzhouwan is further south; I should know, my mum's relatives are from Zhanjiang.
edit:
also, Guangzhouwan was only acquired in 1898 or something.
BTW, you still interested in NI?
Last edited by Alleniana on Sat Feb 08, 2014 12:41 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Zumreed
Minister
 
Posts: 2981
Founded: May 19, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Zumreed » Sat Feb 08, 2014 12:46 am

Seljuq Kyiv wrote:MAP UPDATE, NOW HD

Spoke to Phoenix2012. As it turns out, this was what he meant by the secession of Armenia.

WTF I'M NOT EVEN ON HERE
National Anthem: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jP1C9AsARNo

Economic Left/Right: -4.25
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -1.79

User avatar
Kryskov
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8116
Founded: Oct 26, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Kryskov » Sat Feb 08, 2014 12:47 am

Seljuq Kyiv wrote:MAP UPDATE, NOW HD

Spoke to Phoenix2012. As it turns out, this was what he meant by the secession of Armenia.

I bought all French island colonies, including Madagascar.

User avatar
Seljuq Kyiv
Minister
 
Posts: 3178
Founded: Oct 24, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Seljuq Kyiv » Sat Feb 08, 2014 2:18 am

Kryskov wrote:
Seljuq Kyiv wrote:MAP UPDATE, NOW HD

Spoke to Phoenix2012. As it turns out, this was what he meant by the secession of Armenia.

I bought all French island colonies, including Madagascar.


Madagascar was already a British protectorate to begin with, courtesy of Alleniana. Do you have New Caledonia as well?

France bought Cuba from Spain.

User avatar
Seljuq Kyiv
Minister
 
Posts: 3178
Founded: Oct 24, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Seljuq Kyiv » Sat Feb 08, 2014 2:20 am

Zumreed wrote:
Seljuq Kyiv wrote:MAP UPDATE, NOW HD

Spoke to Phoenix2012. As it turns out, this was what he meant by the secession of Armenia.

WTF I'M NOT EVEN ON HERE


What do you call that White Elephant in SEA then? :lol:

EDIT: By the way, has any nation actually recognised Armenia yet?
Last edited by Seljuq Kyiv on Sat Feb 08, 2014 2:44 am, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
Of the Quendi
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15363
Founded: Mar 18, 2010
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Of the Quendi » Sat Feb 08, 2014 3:09 am

Kiruri wrote:The revolution in Russia could have happened in 1905 :p granted, I can't do much now, but if I survive, in time I could. As for AH, not unless I appease those minorities. I'll have to reform and modernize, strip the Sunni of their higher privileges, and end discrimination, perhaps establish a constitutional monarchy. The Austrian's are far less united than the Ottomans. Centuries of rule must have brought up some sort of favorable sentiment.

It could, but it couldn't be incited by the Ottomans. Even during WWI the Germans couldn't actually incite the communist revolution, they could just give Lenin some money and put him on a train when the Russian people on their own had already begun the revolution. Only in Poland did Prussia have some success inciting revolution. Inciting a nationalist revolt is far easier than some major political upheaval.

But I suppose the Ottoman's could try to incite rebellion in Azerbaijian, and as I mentioned Yaqub Beg is probably dying to take on the Russian Empire.
Lunas Legion wrote:Myself, Austria, Egypt, Albania, possibily Greece.

Wow, you certainly make it very difficult for me to contemplate moving beyond the Russo-Prusso alliance towards a Franco-Prussian one. France partitioning the Ottoman Empire is hardly possible. Beyond maybe taking some of the African bits I don't see any places where France would be an obvious colonizer, certainly none that isn't likely to annoy the British. In any case Russia will reject such a partitioning and ally with Prussia against the ones conducting it. After five years of exhausting the Ottomans and decades of plotting their downfall (against French opposition) Russia shall not be beaten right before the finish line.
Alleniana wrote:You are talking about the Balkans here; a Siamese butterfly could cause revolution there.

Revolution in the Balkans will be nationalist in nature and will not butterfly into existence Anarchist or Communist risings in Russia. At best it will butterfly some Polish nationalist sentiment but even that is not likely to happen on a wide scale. The only thing Slavic nationalist risings on the Ottoman Balkans is really likely to butterfly is Slavic nationalist risings in the Austro-Hungarian Balkans and maybe a strengthening of an ultra-nationalist Pan-Slav movement in Russia.
Alleniana wrote:The roster has Norway and Denmark under Russia, Pope under France, etc. Eh?

I consider neither Denmark nor Norway puppet states. They where liberated by Russia and the Norwegian monarch was a Dane picked by Russia but other than that they are fully independent, though presumably quite Russophilic I imagine.

As for the Papal States if they still exist surely they are fully independent but relying on outside military support to maintain their sovereignty. I am not sure that a Bourbon Kingdom of France would be as eager as a Bonaparte Empire of France to maintain a garrison in the Papal States though and maybe the Papal States will have to rely on both France and Austria.

Seljuq Kyiv wrote:Certainly. It would have been practical if a regional power allowed a rebellious vassal living on its borders to rebel against his ineffective lord liege who had allowed said regional power to open up plantations on their land.

And it would have been even more practical if the regional power, on top of promising territorial integrity and protection for their respective religious demographic, sold modern arms and artillery, and lent the services of a bishop to a kingmaker who was on good terms with the regional power in exchange for mining rights, plantation rights, factories, the appointment of Princely State-esque advisors, etc. A time may come when this subsidiary alliance lies in tatters, but until then this neighbouring country is indebted to Egypt for the crowning of an Emperor at least.

Province, you mean? Based on my perusing of period maps and geacron, I've deduced that the Oxus was the Emirate of Afghanistan's northern border until Russia pushed it to its modern northern borders in 1886, five years after the British Durand line. But let me know if I have erred.

If what we are talking about is Egyptian businesses investing in Ethiopia I have no problem. But the assumption that Ethiopia can be a second Sudan I take exception to. It is both too powerful, too far away, and too geographically isolated to be ruled by Egypt. And if you have installed Menelik II as the ruler I am sure he will be happy to go Adwa on your ass to prove that.

I have had difficulties ascertaining the borders of Afghanistan in 1870. I found one map of Central Asia that depicted Bukhara holding territories now Afghan but on the other hand Afghanistan seceded lands south of Oxus in 1885 (but the northern border of Afghanistan is Oxus) so to me its a bit difficult to figure out what the borders are. Whatever they was I had Bukhara invade in the timeskip and though the invasion was largely unsuccessful and recalled the secession of some Afghan territories (like the south of Oxus territory given Russian in 1885) would have been likely.

Seljuq Kyiv wrote:MAP UPDATE, NOW HD

Spoke to Phoenix2012. As it turns out, this was what he meant by the secession of Armenia.

Hmm, that sounds fairly retrospective, that territory doesn't even include the Lake Van and would have never been accepted by the Armenians. Well anyway I doubt the war would confine itself to that region, and should it I suppose it is less territory to influence.

Also the Dalian area (tip of the Liadong Peninsula) is Russian not Japanese. I have a naval base there.
Seljuq Kyiv wrote:
Alleniana wrote:As Britain, I claimed the central Namibian province too, and settled it


In that case, I will need Gibberan and Quendi to clarify the current borders of Paraguay, Urugay and Argentina.

Will amend.

About Paraguay I believe it received its RL borders but its Gibberan's call.

As for Namibia Sweden also began colonizing it so at least some of it is disputed unless the UK agreed to the Afghanistan as a Russian protectorate deal in which case I forced the Swedes to back down in exchange for some lesser colony.
Last edited by Of the Quendi on Sat Feb 08, 2014 3:37 am, edited 1 time in total.
Nation RP name
Arda i Eruhíni (short form)
Alcarinqua ar Meneldëa Arda i Eruhíni i sé Amanaranyë ar Aramanaranyë (long form)

User avatar
Alleniana
Post Czar
 
Posts: 42864
Founded: Dec 23, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Alleniana » Sat Feb 08, 2014 3:16 am

Of the Quendi wrote:shnip

No, indeed, but my point is that no matter what anyone does in the Balkans, instability is impossible to avoid. It's the Balkans.

Yeah, that's along the lines of what I thought. I didn't think it would really work ICly.

As for Paraguay, receiving its RL borders requires expanding into Bolivia. That's my main bone to pick; Paraguay invading Bolivia would be a foregone conclusion should neither side have allies, considering both's wartorn state.
Seljuq Kyiv wrote:
Kryskov wrote:I bought all French island colonies, including Madagascar.


Madagascar was already a British protectorate to begin with, courtesy of Alleniana. Do you have New Caledonia as well?

France bought Cuba from Spain.

Huuuh?
I didn't do that.
Last edited by Alleniana on Sat Feb 08, 2014 3:18 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Great Kleomentia
Minister
 
Posts: 3499
Founded: Aug 10, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Great Kleomentia » Sat Feb 08, 2014 3:39 am

There seems to be a dilemma as to who a best ally would be for me in case of a war with the Ottomans. If i ally with Austria then they will probably take over Bosnia and i wouldn't achieve my goal of liberation. So i think thats not gonna happen. So after thinking it through a bit i will write a post proposing an alliance with Russia, Albania and Egypt. That is if ya'll guys are up for that.
@Ottomans
Dont be a baby. Theres still a lot you can do. You can hold your ground and reduce the damage you take in case a war strikes out. You could later reform, strengthen yourself and try and take back some of your land.
hue

User avatar
Alleniana
Post Czar
 
Posts: 42864
Founded: Dec 23, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Alleniana » Sat Feb 08, 2014 3:41 am

Great Kleomentia wrote:There seems to be a dilemma as to who a best ally would be for me in case of a war with the Ottomans. If i ally with Austria then they will probably take over Bosnia and i wouldn't achieve my goal of liberation. So i think thats not gonna happen. So after thinking it through a bit i will write a post proposing an alliance with Russia, Albania and Egypt. That is if ya'll guys are up for that.
@Ottomans
Dont be a baby. Theres still a lot you can do. You can hold your ground and reduce the damage you take in case a war strikes out. You could later reform, strengthen yourself and try and take back some of your land.

Ally with Chile.
*nod*

User avatar
Lunas Legion
Post Czar
 
Posts: 30809
Founded: Jan 21, 2013
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby Lunas Legion » Sat Feb 08, 2014 3:43 am

Great Kleomentia wrote:There seems to be a dilemma as to who a best ally would be for me in case of a war with the Ottomans. If i ally with Austria then they will probably take over Bosnia and i wouldn't achieve my goal of liberation. So i think thats not gonna happen. So after thinking it through a bit i will write a post proposing an alliance with Russia, Albania and Egypt. That is if ya'll guys are up for that.
@Ottomans
Dont be a baby. Theres still a lot you can do. You can hold your ground and reduce the damage you take in case a war strikes out. You could later reform, strengthen yourself and try and take back some of your land.


That's what I suggested. More 'amputations', as such.
Last edited by William Slim Wed Dec 14 1970 10:35 pm, edited 35 times in total.

Confirmed member of Kyloominati, Destroyers of Worlds Membership can be applied for here

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to Portal to the Multiverse

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bentus, Benuty, Ovstylap, Sarolandia, Sinyal, The Epic Notepad of GrangerAirstrike

Advertisement

Remove ads