American Civil War [Reboot/ Open Sign Up]

[Great Nepal]

Development of technology to take over another nation takes decades of sustained investment. It hasn't been decades since start of RP.


How is this relevant at all?


Okay go on, how exactly do these work?

Building more of what they have is not "Decades of work"
America battleships in WW2, for example

And this is relevant to development of war TECHNOLOGY how?

If you shoot down a Nuclear weapon, it goes BOOM

And that is relevant to Non nuclear EMP how?

And there are three ways,
Explode on impact, Nuclear weapons do this
Constant, but not infinite
Infinite, which actually isn't infinite, but it lasts a long time, and this happens with Nuclear Fusion. In other words, stars

You still haven't explained how exactly do these work.

[Marsisian]

So, what US lands are not taken?

[Roski]

Building more of what they have is not "Decades of work"
America battleships in WW2, for example

And this is relevant to development of war TECHNOLOGY how?

If you shoot down a Nuclear weapon, it goes BOOM

And that is relevant to Non nuclear EMP how?

And there are three ways,
Explode on impact, Nuclear weapons do this
Constant, but not infinite
Infinite, which actually isn't infinite, but it lasts a long time, and this happens with Nuclear Fusion. In other words, stars

You still haven't explained how exactly do these work.

1: Same concept. Exact same concept
2: Same concept, exact same concept
3: That is the three types. Mine is explode on contact. Oh look, that means "When coming into physical contact with another object, minus its own casing, or hit by another object, the "starting object" detonates"

[Great Nepal]

So, what US lands are not taken?

Idaho, Montana, Wyoming, Dakota(s), Nebraska, Kansas,Oklahoma, Lousina, Alaska...

[Marsisian]

So, what US lands are not taken?

Idaho, Montana, Wyoming, Dakota(s), Nebraska, Kansas,Oklahoma, Lousina, Alaska...

Alaska. Definitely Alaska. I RESERVE ALASKA!

[Roski]

So, what US lands are not taken?

Idaho, Montana, Wyoming, Dakota(s), Nebraska, Kansas,Oklahoma, Lousina, Alaska...

I wouldn't take Alaska if I were you though, the Russians are scheming

[Marsisian]

Idaho, Montana, Wyoming, Dakota(s), Nebraska, Kansas,Oklahoma, Lousina, Alaska...

I wouldn't take Alaska if I were you though, the Russians are scheming

Too late.

[Roski]

I wouldn't take Alaska if I were you though, the Russians are scheming

Too late.

Well, the Russians are going to buttfuck you, and now Russia is the most powerful military force in the world

[Great Nepal]

And this is relevant to development of war TECHNOLOGY how?


And that is relevant to Non nuclear EMP how?


You still haven't explained how exactly do these work.

1: Same concept. Exact same concept
2: Same concept, exact same concept
3: That is the three types. Mine is explode on contact. Oh look, that means "When coming into physical contact with another object, minus its own casing, or hit by another object, the "starting object" detonates"

1. Developing technology is not the same as producing battleships.
2. Except Non nuclear EMP (modern) requires the device to be intact.
3. Again, Non nuclear EMP requires device to fly intact; kinda hard to do when the device detonates.

[Marsisian]

Too late.

Well, the Russians are going to buttfuck you, and now Russia is the most powerful military force in the world

Shitzer. Well, no Alaska.

[Marsisian]

Wait, we can play as other nations?

[Great Nepal]

Wait, we can play as other nations?

Yes. A lot of world is open. Mexico would be cool, so would India...

[Roski]

Wait, we can play as other nations?

Yes. A lot of world is open. Mexico would be cool, so would India...

India is third now in power

[Roski]

1: Same concept. Exact same concept
2: Same concept, exact same concept
3: That is the three types. Mine is explode on contact. Oh look, that means "When coming into physical contact with another object, minus its own casing, or hit by another object, the "starting object" detonates"

1. Developing technology is not the same as producing battleships.
2. Except Non nuclear EMP (modern) requires the device to be intact.
3. Again, Non nuclear EMP requires device to fly intact; kinda hard to do when the device detonates.

I added more destroyers and I am building a supercarrier... no one said NEW TECH... MORE TECH
2: Not always
3: Again, not always

[Marsisian]

Wait, we can play as other nations?

Yes. A lot of world is open. Mexico would be cool, so would India...

I'll take....Mexico? Wait....either Mexico or Ukraine. Because I want to stand up to the Russians.

[Roski]

Yes. A lot of world is open. Mexico would be cool, so would India...

I'll take....Mexico? Wait....either Mexico or Ukraine. Because I want to stand up to the Russians.

Take India, they can just overwhelm them, since there is not a Nuclear threat

[Marsisian]

I'll take....Mexico? Wait....either Mexico or Ukraine. Because I want to stand up to the Russians.

Take India, they can just overwhelm them, since there is not a Nuclear threat

India...ok. I reserve India!

[Great Nepal]

I added more destroyers and I am building a supercarrier... no one said NEW TECH... MORE TECH
2: Not always
3: Again, not always

1. Technology by definition "the application of scientific knowledge for practical purposes, especially in industry" requires research. Producing more of same stuff is manufacturing not technology.
2&3. Show me one modern research at or above prototype stage which shows otherwise.

[Roski]

I added more destroyers and I am building a supercarrier... no one said NEW TECH... MORE TECH
2: Not always
3: Again, not always

1. Technology by definition "the application of scientific knowledge for practical purposes, especially in industry" requires research. Producing more of same stuff is manufacturing not technology.
2&3. Show me one modern research at or above prototype stage which shows otherwise.

The range of NNEMP weapons (non-nuclear electromagnetic pulse bombs) is much less than nuclear EMP. Nearly all NNEMP devices used as weapons require chemical explosives as their initial energy source, producing only 10−6 (one millionth) the energy of nuclear explosives of similar weight.[4] The electromagnetic pulse from NNEMP weapons must come from within the weapon, while nuclear weapons generate EMP as a secondary effect.[5] These facts limit the range of NNEMP weapons, but allow finer target discrimination. The effect of small e-bombs has proven to be sufficient for certain terrorist or military operations. Examples of such operations include the destruction of electronic control systems critical to the operation of many ground vehicles and aircraft.[6]

If I produce tech, its still tech. Maybe fix that mate?

[Kolmya]

Can we switch factions

[Great Nepal]

1. Technology by definition "the application of scientific knowledge for practical purposes, especially in industry" requires research. Producing more of same stuff is manufacturing not technology.
2&3. Show me one modern research at or above prototype stage which shows otherwise.

The range of NNEMP weapons (non-nuclear electromagnetic pulse bombs) is much less than nuclear EMP. Nearly all NNEMP devices used as weapons require chemical explosives as their initial energy source, producing only 10−6 (one millionth) the energy of nuclear explosives of similar weight.[4] The electromagnetic pulse from NNEMP weapons must come from within the weapon, while nuclear weapons generate EMP as a secondary effect.[5] These facts limit the range of NNEMP weapons, but allow finer target discrimination. The effect of small e-bombs has proven to be sufficient for certain terrorist or military operations. Examples of such operations include the destruction of electronic control systems critical to the operation of many ground vehicles and aircraft.[6]

If I produce tech, its still tech. Maybe fix that mate?

Again, show me one which has been produced and tested like CHAMP.

[Great Nepal]

Can we switch factions

You already switched, why again?

[Eastern Denmark]

Well by declaring war on Canada, you might be declare war on Washington and I

[Scocialist Provinces]

NS Name: The Constitutional Empire of Socialist Provinces
Nation Name: Sweden
Capital City: Stockholm
Government Type: Kingdom
Head of State: King Carl XVI Gustaf
Head of Government (if different): Prime Minister Fredrik Reinfeldt
Claimed Nation: Sweden
Population: 9 633 490
Military Size: 25, 000
National Flag:

Any specific goal(s): Further encourage the EU to bring peace to it's largest trade partner through military intervention. Swedish economy on the verge of falter, russian pressures increasing tension
Link to Wikipedia page for your nation: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sweden
Link to Wikipedia page for your nation's military: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swedish_Armed_Forces
RP Example: viewtopic.php?f=5&t=271045

[Great Nepal]

NS Name: The Constitutional Empire of Socialist Provinces
Nation Name: Sweden
Capital City: Stockholm
Government Type: Kingdom
Head of State: King Carl XVI Gustaf
Head of Government (if different): Prime Minister Fredrik Reinfeldt
Claimed Nation: Sweden
Population: 9 633 490
Military Size: 25, 000
National Flag:

(Image)

Any specific goal(s): Further encourage the EU to bring peace to it's largest trade partner through military intervention. Swedish economy on the verge of falter, russian pressures increasing tension
Link to Wikipedia page for your nation: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sweden
Link to Wikipedia page for your nation's military: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swedish_Armed_Forces
RP Example: viewtopic.php?f=5&t=271045

Welcome on board.