OOC 1870 RP (Open)

by **The Grand Republic of Hannover** » Wed Jan 01, 2014 8:51 am

Seljuq Kyiv wrote:
The Grand Republic of Hannover wrote:Happy First Wednesday of 2014!

I'm 15 minutes from the first Thursday of Gregorian 2014.

Wow. You live in Asia?

by **Of the Quendi** » Wed Jan 01, 2014 8:59 am

So with Time Alliance dropping out how does people feel about me making a post containing the surrender of Argentina so that I can set up my conference?

by **The Grand Republic of Hannover** » Wed Jan 01, 2014 9:04 am

Of the Quendi wrote:So with Time Alliance dropping out how does people feel about me making a post containing the surrender of Argentina so that I can set up my conference?

Sure. As long as it is a realistic treaty.

by **Seljuq Kyiv** » Wed Jan 01, 2014 9:06 am

Of the Quendi wrote:So with Time Alliance dropping out how does people feel about me making a post containing the surrender of Argentina so that I can set up my conference?

Aye.

by **Of the Quendi** » Wed Jan 01, 2014 9:11 am

The Grand Republic of Hannover wrote:Sure. As long as it is a realistic treaty.

It will be an armistice, the actual terms will be decided at the conference.

by **Dangelia** » Wed Jan 01, 2014 9:12 am

Seljuq Kyiv wrote:
Of the Quendi wrote:So with Time Alliance dropping out how does people feel about me making a post containing the surrender of Argentina so that I can set up my conference?

Aye.

Coronation.

by **The Grand Republic of Hannover** » Wed Jan 01, 2014 9:17 am

Of the Quendi wrote:
The Grand Republic of Hannover wrote:Sure. As long as it is a realistic treaty.

It will be an armistice, the actual terms will be decided at the conference.

Oh ok. Then, I don't have any problem with it

by **Seljuq Kyiv** » Wed Jan 01, 2014 9:18 am

Dangelia wrote:
Seljuq Kyiv wrote:
Aye.

Coronation.

just remembered. heh.

by **Timothia** » Wed Jan 01, 2014 10:14 am

Brissia wrote:
Dangelia wrote:Such as?

Occupation, annexation, putting you into my sphere of influence, making you a protectorate...

Typical Austria...

by **The Grand Republic of Hannover** » Wed Jan 01, 2014 10:16 am

Timothia wrote:
Brissia wrote:Occupation, annexation, putting you into my sphere of influence, making you a protectorate...

Typical Austria...

Indeed

by **Zumreed** » Wed Jan 01, 2014 10:23 am

Thanks for lands, Seljuq. Siam STRONK.

by **The Grand Republic of Hannover** » Wed Jan 01, 2014 10:50 am

Zumreed wrote:Thanks for lands, Seljuq. Siam STRONK.

That reminded me of "Argentina STRONK! RO RO RO RO"

by **Zumreed** » Wed Jan 01, 2014 11:22 am

The Grand Republic of Hannover wrote:
Zumreed wrote:Thanks for lands, Seljuq. Siam STRONK.

That reminded me of "Argentina STRONK! RO RO RO RO"

Ro?

FUS RO DAH

by **The Time Alliance** » Wed Jan 01, 2014 11:24 am

The Grand Republic of Hannover wrote:
Zumreed wrote:Thanks for lands, Seljuq. Siam STRONK.

That reminded me of "Argentina STRONK! RO RO RO RO"

YES!

ARGENTINA STRONKEST COUNTRY! ROGH ROGH ROGH ROGH!!!

by **The Grand Republic of Hannover** » Wed Jan 01, 2014 1:59 pm

The Time Alliance wrote:
The Grand Republic of Hannover wrote:
That reminded me of "Argentina STRONK! RO RO RO RO"

YES!

ARGENTINA STRONKEST COUNTRY! ROGH ROGH ROGH ROGH!!!

viewtopic.php?p=17989842#p17989842 :lol2:

by **Dangelia** » Wed Jan 01, 2014 2:49 pm

The Grand Republic of Hannover wrote:
The Time Alliance wrote:YES!

ARGENTINA STRONKEST COUNTRY! ROGH ROGH ROGH ROGH!!!

viewtopic.php?p=17989842#p17989842

Hmmm,... no ones made a polandball including Albania.

by **The Grand Republic of Hannover** » Wed Jan 01, 2014 2:58 pm

Dangelia wrote:
The Grand Republic of Hannover wrote:
viewtopic.php?p=17989842#p17989842

Hmmm,... no ones made a polandball including Albania.

Talk to Allen. He is the Polandball guy

by **The Time Alliance** » Wed Jan 01, 2014 3:51 pm

The Grand Republic of Hannover wrote:
Dangelia wrote:Hmmm,... no ones made a polandball including Albania.

Talk to Allen. He is the Polandball guy

I think we should make Polandball comic for each country. For their history.

by **The Grand Republic of Hannover** » Wed Jan 01, 2014 3:56 pm

The Time Alliance wrote:
The Grand Republic of Hannover wrote:
Talk to Allen. He is the Polandball guy

I think we should make Polandball comic for each country. For their history.

Haha. If you pay Allen, sure, because I don't think he has time to do all that work

by **Alleniana** » Thu Jan 02, 2014 12:26 am

I have forgotten, what was the situation on French Cochinchina? As far as I can tell, Siam and Egypt were squabbling over it, and then they split it.

by **The Grand Republic of Hannover** » Thu Jan 02, 2014 12:42 am

Alleniana wrote::p
I have forgotten, what was the situation on French Cochinchina? As far as I can tell, Siam and Egypt were squabbling over it, and then they split it.

Polandball artist :hug:

by **Zumreed** » Thu Jan 02, 2014 12:52 am

Alleniana wrote::p
I have forgotten, what was the situation on French Cochinchina? As far as I can tell, Siam and Egypt were squabbling over it, and then they split it.

There's two angles to the story;

1. Egypt was promised France's colonies in SE-Asia by Austriam for it's part in the downfall of France. However, they are unable to take control of Cambodia because of Siam's invasion.
2. Siam decided to invade Cambodia and take over the French colonies while France was distracted. They managed to defeat the small French force in Cambodia and were about to take Cochinchina, but the Egyptians arrived first.

by **Alleniana** » Thu Jan 02, 2014 12:56 am

Zumreed wrote:
Alleniana wrote::p
I have forgotten, what was the situation on French Cochinchina? As far as I can tell, Siam and Egypt were squabbling over it, and then they split it.

There's two angles to the story;

1. Egypt was promised France's colonies in SE-Asia by Austriam for it's part in the downfall of France. However, they are unable to take control of Cambodia because of Siam's invasion.
2. Siam decided to invade Cambodia and take over the French colonies while France was distracted. They managed to defeat the small French force in Cambodia and were about to take Cochinchina, but the Egyptians arrived first.

SO, who owns it now?

The Grand Republic of Hannover wrote:
Alleniana wrote::p
I have forgotten, what was the situation on French Cochinchina? As far as I can tell, Siam and Egypt were squabbling over it, and then they split it.

Polandball artist

by **Seljuq Kyiv** » Thu Jan 02, 2014 1:03 am

Alleniana wrote::p
I have forgotten, what was the situation on French Cochinchina? As far as I can tell, Siam and Egypt were squabbling over it, and then they split it.

*Indochina

Is now split between Egyptian Cochinchina and Siamese Cambodia. Huzzah.

by **The Grand Republic of Hannover** » Thu Jan 02, 2014 1:06 am

Zumreed wrote:
Alleniana wrote::p
I have forgotten, what was the situation on French Cochinchina? As far as I can tell, Siam and Egypt were squabbling over it, and then they split it.

There's two angles to the story;

1. Egypt was promised France's colonies in SE-Asia by Austriam for it's part in the downfall of France. However, they are unable to take control of Cambodia because of Siam's invasion.
2. Siam decided to invade Cambodia and take over the French colonies while France was distracted. They managed to defeat the small French force in Cambodia and were about to take Cochinchina, but the Egyptians arrived first.

1870 Soup opera

OOC 1870 RP (Open)

Who is online