Bezombia wrote:Themiclesia wrote:I see no objection against this. Confucius himself said that there is no private property in the ideal world, because there would be so much of everything to the effect that, for the most part, there is no need to keep things private. There should be no borders, no government, and no conflicts. I think this agrees with the ideal of the Internationale.
That's not necessarily what Marx was talking about.
What the concept of dialectal idealism means is that a person will always apply their own past experiences when trying to determine the meaning or cause of events or facts. Because everyone's life experiences are different, this can lead to radically different interpretations. Eventually these interpretations are shared by people, and a political ideology is formed.
The root concept here being that ideals are invariably tied to historical events.
I see again no logical faults. Confucius's argument was to pursue the best for everybody; he realizes that individuals have divergent wishes and realizing all of them will sometimes be contradictory, such as realizing Verdum's expressed wish for the destruction of 99% of mankind.
