Nothing just looking through all the nations on the map to see what I still have to change or erase and such.
Advertisement

by Parhe » Mon Oct 14, 2013 7:21 pm

by Baja California y Sonora » Mon Oct 14, 2013 7:22 pm

by Vredlandia » Mon Oct 14, 2013 7:23 pm
Parhe wrote:Nothing just looking through all the nations on the map to see what I still have to change or erase and such.

by Parhe » Mon Oct 14, 2013 7:26 pm
JK, maybe >.>
by Vairikai Sari » Mon Oct 14, 2013 7:29 pm

by Sauritican » Mon Oct 14, 2013 7:29 pm
Vairikai Sari wrote:So no one likes the idea of Jerusalem for the olympics? ok.
that's interesting
by Vairikai Sari » Mon Oct 14, 2013 7:30 pm

by Sauritican » Mon Oct 14, 2013 7:31 pm

by Dires » Mon Oct 14, 2013 7:32 pm

by Parhe » Mon Oct 14, 2013 7:33 pm

by Vairikai Sari » Mon Oct 14, 2013 7:35 pm
Parhe wrote:Well if the location has to be a Republic/Democracy then I suppose the choices are Iran, Germany, Anatolia, Japan, Philippines, Malay. Possibilities being Cuba, Argentina, Bulgaria, India, and New Zealand. Those five are the only non application reservations so far. Well also there was the guy that applied for "Northeastern Africa" but that was a ridiculous claim and then I saw he applied for the exact same thing on another rp today. Also the guy that claimed "Mexico, Chile, Bolivia" for some reason. He hasn't posted really since so I telegramed him about it.

by Dires » Mon Oct 14, 2013 7:35 pm
Parhe wrote:Well if the location has to be a Republic/Democracy then I suppose the choices are Iran, Germany, Anatolia, Japan, Philippines, Malay. Possibilities being Cuba, Argentina, Bulgaria, India, and New Zealand. Those five are the only non application reservations so far. Well also there was the guy that applied for "Northeastern Africa" but that was a ridiculous claim and then I saw he applied for the exact same thing on another rp today. Also the guy that claimed "Mexico, Chile, Bolivia" for some reason. He hasn't posted really since so I telegramed him about it.

by The imperial canadian dutchy » Mon Oct 14, 2013 7:36 pm
Dires wrote:The imperial canadian dutchy wrote:
1its rome
2 We have fixed its gypsy problem
3 Metropolis
4 Historical
5 Cultural hub of the west.
6 one of the lgs of civilization in the west
Well, China is the largest civilization of the east, cultural and economic hub of the east, healthy integration of minorities into Han Chinese majority, larger metropolis, It's Beijing, it has two nations holding jurisdiction in it.

by Sauritican » Mon Oct 14, 2013 7:36 pm
Parhe wrote:Well if the location has to be a Republic/Democracy then I suppose the choices are Iran, Germany, Anatolia, Japan, Philippines, Malay. Possibilities being Cuba, Argentina, Bulgaria, India, and New Zealand. Those five are the only non application reservations so far. Well also there was the guy that applied for "Northeastern Africa" but that was a ridiculous claim and then I saw he applied for the exact same thing on another rp today. Also the guy that claimed "Mexico, Chile, Bolivia" for some reason. He hasn't posted really since so I telegramed him about it.

by Arkorrnia » Mon Oct 14, 2013 7:37 pm
Dires wrote:The imperial canadian dutchy wrote:
1its rome
2 We have fixed its gypsy problem
3 Metropolis
4 Historical
5 Cultural hub of the west.
6 one of the lgs of civilization in the west
Well, China is the largest civilization of the east, cultural and economic hub of the east, healthy integration of minorities into Han Chinese majority, larger metropolis, It's Beijing, it has two nations holding jurisdiction in it.

by Vairikai Sari » Mon Oct 14, 2013 7:37 pm
Dires wrote:Parhe wrote:Well if the location has to be a Republic/Democracy then I suppose the choices are Iran, Germany, Anatolia, Japan, Philippines, Malay. Possibilities being Cuba, Argentina, Bulgaria, India, and New Zealand. Those five are the only non application reservations so far. Well also there was the guy that applied for "Northeastern Africa" but that was a ridiculous claim and then I saw he applied for the exact same thing on another rp today. Also the guy that claimed "Mexico, Chile, Bolivia" for some reason. He hasn't posted really since so I telegramed him about it.
Hey, I'm a Constitutional Monarchy- We have a pretty powerful senate....just saying. I support Japanese Beijing as the location.

by Parhe » Mon Oct 14, 2013 7:39 pm
Parhe wrote:Well if the location has to be a Republic/Democracy then I suppose the choices are Iran, Germany, Anatolia, Japan, Philippines, Malay. Possibilities being Cuba, Argentina, Bulgaria, India, and New Zealand. Those five are the only non application reservations so far. Well also there was the guy that applied for "Northeastern Africa" but that was a ridiculous claim and then I saw he applied for the exact same thing on another rp today. Also the guy that claimed "Mexico, Chile, Bolivia" for some reason. He hasn't posted really since so I telegramed him about it.

by The imperial canadian dutchy » Mon Oct 14, 2013 7:40 pm
Parhe wrote:Well if the location has to be a Republic/Democracy then I suppose the choices are Iran, Germany, Anatolia, Japan, Philippines, Malay. Possibilities being Cuba, Argentina, Bulgaria, India, and New Zealand. Those five are the only non application reservations so far. Well also there was the guy that applied for "Northeastern Africa" but that was a ridiculous claim and then I saw he applied for the exact same thing on another rp today. Also the guy that claimed "Mexico, Chile, Bolivia" for some reason. He hasn't posted really since so I telegramed him about it.

by Dires » Mon Oct 14, 2013 7:41 pm
The imperial canadian dutchy wrote:Dires wrote:
Well, China is the largest civilization of the east, cultural and economic hub of the east, healthy integration of minorities into Han Chinese majority, larger metropolis, It's Beijing, it has two nations holding jurisdiction in it.
same vatican City and Italy

by Dires » Mon Oct 14, 2013 7:41 pm
Parhe wrote:Parhe wrote:Well if the location has to be a Republic/Democracy then I suppose the choices are Iran, Germany, Anatolia, Japan, Philippines, Malay. Possibilities being Cuba, Argentina, Bulgaria, India, and New Zealand. Those five are the only non application reservations so far. Well also there was the guy that applied for "Northeastern Africa" but that was a ridiculous claim and then I saw he applied for the exact same thing on another rp today. Also the guy that claimed "Mexico, Chile, Bolivia" for some reason. He hasn't posted really since so I telegramed him about it.
Well anyway more on those listed. I doubt both Germany and Japan simple because both nations were on the losing side of the last world war, and the latter right afterwards invaded another nation. Iran was a seemingly unpopular monarchy until three and a half decades ago, as was Anatolia a bit over four and a half decades ago. The Philippines and Malay were both colonies until halfway through the last century. I suppose it depends on largely when this UN body was formed, if there was one, and possibly what the future nations, as in nations without applications yet, are like.
Also here.

by Parhe » Mon Oct 14, 2013 7:42 pm
Dires wrote:The imperial canadian dutchy wrote:
same vatican City and Italy
Not the same, you are of the same culture. Japan and Chinese much more different. Besides, Vatican has should no political power. The very fact that you do have Vatican city already means you shouldn't have the UN there, inappropriate- lending Rome too much power. And like I said, China+Japan matches all your other arguments, if not surpassing them.

by Dires » Mon Oct 14, 2013 7:42 pm
Dires wrote:Parhe wrote:Well anyway more on those listed. I doubt both Germany and Japan simple because both nations were on the losing side of the last world war, and the latter right afterwards invaded another nation. Iran was a seemingly unpopular monarchy until three and a half decades ago, as was Anatolia a bit over four and a half decades ago. The Philippines and Malay were both colonies until halfway through the last century. I suppose it depends on largely when this UN body was formed, if there was one, and possibly what the future nations, as in nations without applications yet, are like.
Also here.
Beijing is different because it is jointly controlled by China and Japan.

by Dires » Mon Oct 14, 2013 7:43 pm
Parhe wrote:Dires wrote:
Not the same, you are of the same culture. Japan and Chinese much more different. Besides, Vatican has should no political power. The very fact that you do have Vatican city already means you shouldn't have the UN there, inappropriate- lending Rome too much power. And like I said, China+Japan matches all your other arguments, if not surpassing them.
I wouldn't support it being in a nation that was in the losing side of WW2, which also later invaded another nation for no reason right after WW2.

by Parhe » Mon Oct 14, 2013 7:44 pm
Dires wrote:Parhe wrote:Well anyway more on those listed. I doubt both Germany and Japan simple because both nations were on the losing side of the last world war, and the latter right afterwards invaded another nation. Iran was a seemingly unpopular monarchy until three and a half decades ago, as was Anatolia a bit over four and a half decades ago. The Philippines and Malay were both colonies until halfway through the last century. I suppose it depends on largely when this UN body was formed, if there was one, and possibly what the future nations, as in nations without applications yet, are like.
Also here.
Beijing is different because it is jointly controlled by China and Japan.
Advertisement
Return to Portal to the Multiverse
Users browsing this forum: Honghai, Novovaritsya
Advertisement