Advertisement

by Waztaskio » Sat Sep 27, 2014 6:44 pm
Paketo wrote:Waztaskio wrote:Japan and South Korea's so called "Military-Cooperation" isn't so stable. Quote from wikipedia:
With the war in Israel, US Depression, and just the general Chinese threat, deterred them from really wanting to protect Korea, as it would lead to a global economic collapse.
but Japan needs allies against china. If the Us is occupied and the south is lost, that leaves only taiwan.

by Paketo » Sat Sep 27, 2014 6:47 pm
Waztaskio wrote:Paketo wrote:
but Japan needs allies against china. If the Us is occupied and the south is lost, that leaves only taiwan.
True, but Japan against a huge China, alone with South Korea, is scary. Japan would how-ever, strengthen relations with Taiwan, and is now trying to get Nuclear Weapons. It is just a huge mess.

by Waztaskio » Sat Sep 27, 2014 6:49 pm
Paketo wrote:Waztaskio wrote:True, but Japan against a huge China, alone with South Korea, is scary. Japan would how-ever, strengthen relations with Taiwan, and is now trying to get Nuclear Weapons. It is just a huge mess.
the would be only against north korea though at the time of intervention which would make japan intervening much more likely. i also think you should add in some things about chinese vietnamese tensions as they have been growing recently

by Paketo » Sat Sep 27, 2014 6:50 pm
The Foreign Minister of the People's Republic of China Yang Jiechi said that China "resolutely" opposes the latest nuclear test conducted by the Democratic People's Republic of Korea.[10][11] The North Korean ambassador to China, Ji Jae Ryong, was personally informed of this position on 12 February 2013 in a meeting with Yang Jiechi.[10]
On 5 May 2013, North Korea "grabbed", according to Jiang Yaxian, a Chinese government official, another Chinese fishing boat in a series of impounding Chinese fishing boats.[1] "North Korea was demanding 600,000 yuan ($97,600) for its safe return, along with its 16 crew."[1

by Mishmahig » Sat Sep 27, 2014 6:52 pm
Paketo wrote:Waz, what if instead China invaded north korea during the war and took total control. from wikipediaThe Foreign Minister of the People's Republic of China Yang Jiechi said that China "resolutely" opposes the latest nuclear test conducted by the Democratic People's Republic of Korea.[10][11] The North Korean ambassador to China, Ji Jae Ryong, was personally informed of this position on 12 February 2013 in a meeting with Yang Jiechi.[10]
On 5 May 2013, North Korea "grabbed", according to Jiang Yaxian, a Chinese government official, another Chinese fishing boat in a series of impounding Chinese fishing boats.[1] "North Korea was demanding 600,000 yuan ($97,600) for its safe return, along with its 16 crew."[1
China could possibly had enough of the North's antics and taken total control

by Waztaskio » Sat Sep 27, 2014 6:53 pm
Paketo wrote:Waz, what if instead China invaded north korea during the war and took total control. from wikipediaThe Foreign Minister of the People's Republic of China Yang Jiechi said that China "resolutely" opposes the latest nuclear test conducted by the Democratic People's Republic of Korea.[10][11] The North Korean ambassador to China, Ji Jae Ryong, was personally informed of this position on 12 February 2013 in a meeting with Yang Jiechi.[10]
On 5 May 2013, North Korea "grabbed", according to Jiang Yaxian, a Chinese government official, another Chinese fishing boat in a series of impounding Chinese fishing boats.[1] "North Korea was demanding 600,000 yuan ($97,600) for its safe return, along with its 16 crew."[1
China could possibly had enough of the North's antics and taken total control. it would set up a bigger chinese threat a bigger flashpoint for another conflict

by Aldelxane » Sat Sep 27, 2014 6:53 pm
Mishmahig wrote:Paketo wrote:Waz, what if instead China invaded north korea during the war and took total control. from wikipedia
China could possibly had enough of the North's antics and taken total control
I'm pretty sure China keeps North Korea around because it causes the US more headaches than it does them. Also, China can then demand concessions for keeping North Korea in check, or negotiating talks or whatnot.

by Paketo » Sat Sep 27, 2014 6:54 pm
Waztaskio wrote:Paketo wrote:Waz, what if instead China invaded north korea during the war and took total control. from wikipedia
China could possibly had enough of the North's antics and taken total control. it would set up a bigger chinese threat a bigger flashpoint for another conflict
That's what I did.

by Paketo » Sat Sep 27, 2014 6:59 pm
Waztaskio wrote:Paketo wrote:
i meant that china intervenes in the North south conflict and just takes over north leaving the south independant.
Nah, it would either be all or nothing. That would completely end the idea, of not having American Influence on China's border, which is just unacceptable for China.

by Waztaskio » Sat Sep 27, 2014 7:03 pm
Paketo wrote:Waztaskio wrote:Nah, it would either be all or nothing. That would completely end the idea, of not having American Influence on China's border, which is just unacceptable for China.
i really can't get behind the rp idea then because the Us has four nation who they would never not support in my opinion South korea, Israel, Australia and New Zealand

by Paketo » Sat Sep 27, 2014 7:06 pm

by Waztaskio » Sat Sep 27, 2014 7:31 pm
Aldelxane wrote:Question: How does China come out unscathed from both a global depression and the popping of its housing bubble?

by Organized States » Sat Sep 27, 2014 7:32 pm

by Aldelxane » Sat Sep 27, 2014 7:33 pm
Waztaskio wrote:Aldelxane wrote:Question: How does China come out unscathed from both a global depression and the popping of its housing bubble?
It dosen't, infact China with the new environmental problems, are actually going to produce problems for the industry. They may actually engage in "Relocation" of Korean's to suit some population needs, but it may be last resort.

by Waztaskio » Sat Sep 27, 2014 7:40 pm
Aldelxane wrote:Waztaskio wrote:It dosen't, infact China with the new environmental problems, are actually going to produce problems for the industry. They may actually engage in "Relocation" of Korean's to suit some population needs, but it may be last resort.
Then why does it still have the ability to participate in lots of wars, when the US literally can't, and have a massive GDP, when it should be hit just as hard as other countries pby the depression?
Edit: From the collapse of the US and South Korean economies alone it'd lose revenue from 20% of its exports and lose 17% of its imports.

by Organized States » Sat Sep 27, 2014 7:41 pm

by Alleniana » Sat Sep 27, 2014 7:42 pm
Organized States wrote:I'm going to start my Dixie Days and Yankee Nights thread.

by Aldelxane » Sat Sep 27, 2014 7:44 pm
Waztaskio wrote:Aldelxane wrote:Then why does it still have the ability to participate in lots of wars, when the US literally can't, and have a massive GDP, when it should be hit just as hard as other countries pby the depression?
Edit: From the collapse of the US and South Korean economies alone it'd lose revenue from 20% of its exports and lose 17% of its imports.
Hence, why I didn't allow it to have a GDP of 22 Trillion, even though it was expanding rapidly. I was planning on having it lose a little more during the RP.

by Bujahla » Sat Sep 27, 2014 7:48 pm
*Huzzah he lives!*
Nah, son. Britain was all like "yo, why my colonies be all uppity an' shit?!" And Lord Durham laid it straight: "they be wantin' legislation with representation, dawg."

by Altito Asmoro » Sat Sep 27, 2014 8:46 pm

by Paketo » Sat Sep 27, 2014 8:49 pm
Altito Asmoro wrote:RP sets in Korea with Russia and Japan fights for Korea (For their own benefits), will it be any good? I will make it a character RP .
Advertisement
Return to Portal to the Multiverse
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement