"Several massive autocracies have risen up across the world, all demanding nude women from each other."
Advertisement

by Nude East Ireland » Wed Dec 18, 2013 8:34 pm

by Nightkill the Emperor » Wed Dec 18, 2013 8:35 pm
Nat: Night's always in some bizarre state somewhere between "intoxicated enough to kill a hair metal lead singer" and "annoying Mormon missionary sober".
Swith: It's because you're so awesome. God himself refreshes the screen before he types just to see if Nightkill has written anything while he was off somewhere else.

by Nationstatelandsville » Wed Dec 18, 2013 8:35 pm
Nightkill the Emperor wrote:Nationstatelandsville wrote:Pakistan "coming of age" is a very interesting prospect - it was not so long ago that Pakistan was a half-formed idea, an accident that could so easily be erased. It now seems to be settling into the definite status that other "immortal" nations occupy.
To think that a century or two ago the borders which define our world were a collection of feuding villages is strange, to think that this process is still ongoing even stranger. We are a young world.
I read an article noting that the borders of the Middle East could change significantly in our lifetimes, due to the fact the recent ethnic and religious conflicts broiling up there again mean that there could be a border reshaping - but this time by the people who live there, rather than an Englishman who was never entirely sure what an Arab or a Kurd was.

by Constaniana » Wed Dec 18, 2013 8:38 pm

Ameriganastan wrote:I work hard to think of those ludicrous Eric adventure stories, but I don't think I'd have come up with rescuing a three armed alchemist from goblin-monkeys in a million years.
Kudos.

by Nightkill the Emperor » Wed Dec 18, 2013 8:39 pm
Nationstatelandsville wrote:Nightkill the Emperor wrote:I read an article noting that the borders of the Middle East could change significantly in our lifetimes, due to the fact the recent ethnic and religious conflicts broiling up there again mean that there could be a border reshaping - but this time by the people who live there, rather than an Englishman who was never entirely sure what an Arab or a Kurd was.
I really do think that's necessary; as much as I would like everyone to sit down and agree to live for their country regardless of who they are, the borders we tacked onto them are not their countries.
That's what I think is truly wonderful about my own country, but expecting everywhere else to be like that is mad.
Nat: Night's always in some bizarre state somewhere between "intoxicated enough to kill a hair metal lead singer" and "annoying Mormon missionary sober".
Swith: It's because you're so awesome. God himself refreshes the screen before he types just to see if Nightkill has written anything while he was off somewhere else.

by Nightkill the Emperor » Wed Dec 18, 2013 8:40 pm
Nightkill the Emperor wrote:Nationstatelandsville wrote:Pakistan "coming of age" is a very interesting prospect - it was not so long ago that Pakistan was a half-formed idea, an accident that could so easily be erased. It now seems to be settling into the definite status that other "immortal" nations occupy.
To think that a century or two ago the borders which define our world were a collection of feuding villages is strange, to think that this process is still ongoing even stranger. We are a young world.
I read an article noting that the borders of the Middle East could change significantly in our lifetimes, due to the fact the recent ethnic and religious conflicts broiling up there again mean that there could be a border reshaping - but this time by the people who live there, rather than an Englishman who was never entirely sure what an Arab or a Kurd was.
The possibility of good news in the Middle East is almost always dashed by the preponderance of bad actors. The roadblocks to a grand bargain—not the least of which is the surreptitious Saudi funding of al-Qaeda and Wahhabi extremists—are prodigious. But the U.S. can help with clever diplomacy. John Kerry’s State Department has made a strong push for progress in the West Bank talks. The U.S. negotiating team recently added a significant player in David Makovsky, a regional expert who has drawn the most detailed and plausible maps for land swaps between the Israelis and Palestinians. There is speculation that the U.S. will put a comprehensive Middle East peace plan on the table in the summer of 2014, the first since Bill Clinton’s last-minute proposal at Taba in January 2001.
That would be a mistake. The U.S. has lost a great deal of stature because of Bush’s Iraq invasion and Obama’s vacillations. Its public actions in the region have seemed either clunking, neocolonial interventions; naive fantasies about democracy in countries without a substantial middle class; or hollow, unplanned rhetoric and dithering. A better role for the U.S. would be to use its convening power to mediate a deal privately, to nudge the Saudis and the Gulf states toward real economic and security arrangements with the Israelis and to reassure Netanyahu that he is acting in the best long-term interests of his country.
Assad’s survival in 2013 may have opened the door to new diplomatic possibilities in 2014, but the Syrian dictator should not sit easy on his contaminated throne. There is no guarantee that the current Syria will be the country that emerges from this period of upheaval. Already, the Syrian Kurds have joined with their Iraqi cousins in a de facto alliance—and the Iraqi Kurds are now selling oil directly to the Turks in defiance of the Shi‘ite government in Baghdad. The Sunnis of western Iraq and eastern Syria have found common cause as well. The straight-line borders, drawn in the sand by Europeans during World War I, may soon be revised by the people who actually live there. The likely consequence is another generation of turbulence, which will make the need for stable allies all the more important in the region.
Nat: Night's always in some bizarre state somewhere between "intoxicated enough to kill a hair metal lead singer" and "annoying Mormon missionary sober".
Swith: It's because you're so awesome. God himself refreshes the screen before he types just to see if Nightkill has written anything while he was off somewhere else.

by Nationstatelandsville » Wed Dec 18, 2013 8:42 pm
Nightkill the Emperor wrote:Nationstatelandsville wrote:I really do think that's necessary; as much as I would like everyone to sit down and agree to live for their country regardless of who they are, the borders we tacked onto them are not their countries.
That's what I think is truly wonderful about my own country, but expecting everywhere else to be like that is mad.
I like the idea of diversity in a country to keep it from becoming too closed in, but it doesn't work everywhere.

by Nightkill the Emperor » Wed Dec 18, 2013 8:44 pm
Nationstatelandsville wrote:Nightkill the Emperor wrote:I like the idea of diversity in a country to keep it from becoming too closed in, but it doesn't work everywhere.
From the obviously very little I know of it, it seems India is taking on something of a similar philosophy as the United States - unwillingly, but that's to be expected.
Nat: Night's always in some bizarre state somewhere between "intoxicated enough to kill a hair metal lead singer" and "annoying Mormon missionary sober".
Swith: It's because you're so awesome. God himself refreshes the screen before he types just to see if Nightkill has written anything while he was off somewhere else.

by Nightkill the Emperor » Wed Dec 18, 2013 8:45 pm
Nightkill the Emperor wrote:Nightkill the Emperor wrote:I read an article noting that the borders of the Middle East could change significantly in our lifetimes, due to the fact the recent ethnic and religious conflicts broiling up there again mean that there could be a border reshaping - but this time by the people who live there, rather than an Englishman who was never entirely sure what an Arab or a Kurd was.
http://poy.time.com/2013/12/11/runner-u ... al-tyrant/
This is not the article, but it's a close English equal in a small area.The possibility of good news in the Middle East is almost always dashed by the preponderance of bad actors. The roadblocks to a grand bargain—not the least of which is the surreptitious Saudi funding of al-Qaeda and Wahhabi extremists—are prodigious. But the U.S. can help with clever diplomacy. John Kerry’s State Department has made a strong push for progress in the West Bank talks. The U.S. negotiating team recently added a significant player in David Makovsky, a regional expert who has drawn the most detailed and plausible maps for land swaps between the Israelis and Palestinians. There is speculation that the U.S. will put a comprehensive Middle East peace plan on the table in the summer of 2014, the first since Bill Clinton’s last-minute proposal at Taba in January 2001.
That would be a mistake. The U.S. has lost a great deal of stature because of Bush’s Iraq invasion and Obama’s vacillations. Its public actions in the region have seemed either clunking, neocolonial interventions; naive fantasies about democracy in countries without a substantial middle class; or hollow, unplanned rhetoric and dithering. A better role for the U.S. would be to use its convening power to mediate a deal privately, to nudge the Saudis and the Gulf states toward real economic and security arrangements with the Israelis and to reassure Netanyahu that he is acting in the best long-term interests of his country.
Assad’s survival in 2013 may have opened the door to new diplomatic possibilities in 2014, but the Syrian dictator should not sit easy on his contaminated throne. There is no guarantee that the current Syria will be the country that emerges from this period of upheaval. Already, the Syrian Kurds have joined with their Iraqi cousins in a de facto alliance—and the Iraqi Kurds are now selling oil directly to the Turks in defiance of the Shi‘ite government in Baghdad. The Sunnis of western Iraq and eastern Syria have found common cause as well. The straight-line borders, drawn in the sand by Europeans during World War I, may soon be revised by the people who actually live there. The likely consequence is another generation of turbulence, which will make the need for stable allies all the more important in the region.
Nat: Night's always in some bizarre state somewhere between "intoxicated enough to kill a hair metal lead singer" and "annoying Mormon missionary sober".
Swith: It's because you're so awesome. God himself refreshes the screen before he types just to see if Nightkill has written anything while he was off somewhere else.

by Nationstatelandsville » Wed Dec 18, 2013 8:47 pm
Nightkill the Emperor wrote:Nightkill the Emperor wrote:http://poy.time.com/2013/12/11/runner-u ... al-tyrant/
This is not the article, but it's a close English equal in a small area.
The sort of (self-admitted) fantasy TIME mentions in the article of the Israelis becoming recognised by the Arab League and becoming full partners in the Middle East would totally fuck with so many people's viewpoints.

by Nightkill the Emperor » Wed Dec 18, 2013 8:48 pm
Nationstatelandsville wrote:Nightkill the Emperor wrote:The sort of (self-admitted) fantasy TIME mentions in the article of the Israelis becoming recognised by the Arab League and becoming full partners in the Middle East would totally fuck with so many people's viewpoints.
Israel is seven kinds of fucked, and they seem to want to drag everyone else down with them.
Nat: Night's always in some bizarre state somewhere between "intoxicated enough to kill a hair metal lead singer" and "annoying Mormon missionary sober".
Swith: It's because you're so awesome. God himself refreshes the screen before he types just to see if Nightkill has written anything while he was off somewhere else.

by Nightkill the Emperor » Wed Dec 18, 2013 8:49 pm
Nat: Night's always in some bizarre state somewhere between "intoxicated enough to kill a hair metal lead singer" and "annoying Mormon missionary sober".
Swith: It's because you're so awesome. God himself refreshes the screen before he types just to see if Nightkill has written anything while he was off somewhere else.

by Nationstatelandsville » Wed Dec 18, 2013 8:51 pm

by Nightkill the Emperor » Wed Dec 18, 2013 9:10 pm
Nat: Night's always in some bizarre state somewhere between "intoxicated enough to kill a hair metal lead singer" and "annoying Mormon missionary sober".
Swith: It's because you're so awesome. God himself refreshes the screen before he types just to see if Nightkill has written anything while he was off somewhere else.

by Zarkenis Ultima » Wed Dec 18, 2013 9:31 pm

by Astrolinium » Wed Dec 18, 2013 9:32 pm
Zarkenis Ultima wrote:Meep.

by Nightkill the Emperor » Wed Dec 18, 2013 9:32 pm
Zarkenis Ultima wrote:Meep.
Nat: Night's always in some bizarre state somewhere between "intoxicated enough to kill a hair metal lead singer" and "annoying Mormon missionary sober".
Swith: It's because you're so awesome. God himself refreshes the screen before he types just to see if Nightkill has written anything while he was off somewhere else.

by Zarkenis Ultima » Wed Dec 18, 2013 9:33 pm

by Nationstatelandsville » Wed Dec 18, 2013 9:38 pm

by Astrolinium » Wed Dec 18, 2013 9:39 pm

by Zarkenis Ultima » Wed Dec 18, 2013 9:40 pm

by Constaniana » Wed Dec 18, 2013 9:40 pm
Ameriganastan wrote:I work hard to think of those ludicrous Eric adventure stories, but I don't think I'd have come up with rescuing a three armed alchemist from goblin-monkeys in a million years.
Kudos.

by Zarkenis Ultima » Wed Dec 18, 2013 9:41 pm

by Individuality-ness » Wed Dec 18, 2013 9:42 pm

by Nationstatelandsville » Wed Dec 18, 2013 9:43 pm
Advertisement
Return to Portal to the Multiverse
Users browsing this forum: Dragos Bee, Great Confederacy of Commonwealth States, Luminesa, Tracian Empire
Advertisement