The Fall of Empires [AltHis/OOC/Open]

by **Vehemia** » Fri Aug 16, 2013 10:03 pm

Soviet Ruk-Tsan wrote:Is there a final decision on Russia?

I like a two state solution seeing as a unified Russia is probably unlikely anyway seeing as it would have been one of the main battlefields of the Great War. I think one of you can take the Novgorod Republic area and the other the Golden Horde area.

Zagornias wrote:What month are we starting in?

January 1500 I suppose.

by **Kryskov** » Fri Aug 16, 2013 10:04 pm

Zagornias wrote:What month are we starting in?

Ianuarius

by **Soviet Ruk-Tsan** » Fri Aug 16, 2013 10:05 pm

Vehemia wrote:
Soviet Ruk-Tsan wrote:Is there a final decision on Russia?

I like a two state solution seeing as a unified Russia is probably unlikely anyway seeing as it would have been one of the main battlefields of the Great War. I think one of you can take the Novgorod Republic area and the other the Golden Horde area.

Zagornias wrote:What month are we starting in?

January 1500 I suppose.

Ok, so where's the split? Urals? One of the previous maps?

by **Vehemia** » Fri Aug 16, 2013 10:07 pm

Soviet Ruk-Tsan wrote:
Vehemia wrote:
I like a two state solution seeing as a unified Russia is probably unlikely anyway seeing as it would have been one of the main battlefields of the Great War. I think one of you can take the Novgorod Republic area and the other the Golden Horde area.

January 1500 I suppose.

Ok, so where's the split? Urals? One of the previous maps?

Well someone would get roughly this and the other would get the land north of it. Unless you'd prefer an east-west split.

by **Kryskov** » Fri Aug 16, 2013 10:07 pm

Hey...I don't like this official map...hello?

by **Vehemia** » Fri Aug 16, 2013 10:08 pm

Kryskov wrote:Hey...I don't like this official map...hello?

We could go with the other one then, it doesn't matter too much to me.

by **Soviet Ruk-Tsan** » Fri Aug 16, 2013 10:09 pm

Well, a large portion of that belongs to either the Ukraine or Central Asian guy. Looking at the Urals as a natural barrier, I think that could be a good splitting point.

by **Kryskov** » Fri Aug 16, 2013 10:09 pm

Vehemia wrote:
Kryskov wrote:Hey...I don't like this official map...hello?

We could go with the other one then, it doesn't matter too much to me.

It's just that I am loosing more French land than was ever seriously proposed.

by **Alleniana** » Fri Aug 16, 2013 10:14 pm

Zagornias wrote:
Alleniana wrote:Is Germany allied with anyone?

Aint nobody gon' fuk with my bestie.

I assume that means you're allied :ugeek:

by **Zagornias** » Fri Aug 16, 2013 10:15 pm

Alleniana wrote:
Zagornias wrote:Aint nobody gon' fuk with my bestie.

I assume that means you're allied

We're not technically allied.

by **Alleniana** » Fri Aug 16, 2013 10:16 pm

Zagornias wrote:
Alleniana wrote:I assume that means you're allied

We're not technically allied.

So...
If I attacked Germany, would you help them?

by **The Holy Dominion of Inesea** » Fri Aug 16, 2013 10:16 pm

The IC is up. Wheres Saint Kitten?

by **Alleniana** » Fri Aug 16, 2013 10:16 pm

The Holy Dominion of Inesea wrote:The IC is up. Wheres Saint Kitten?

No eye deer.

by **Vehemia** » Fri Aug 16, 2013 10:17 pm

Kryskov wrote:
Vehemia wrote:
We could go with the other one then, it doesn't matter too much to me.

It's just that I am losing more French land than was ever seriously proposed.

They look pretty much the same to me, but I'm fine with the Vic II map.

by **Vehemia** » Fri Aug 16, 2013 10:17 pm

Soviet Ruk-Tsan wrote:Well, a large portion of that belongs to either the Ukraine or Central Asian guy. Looking at the Urals as a natural barrier, I think that could be a good splitting point.

Sure, do you want the west or east?

by **Parhe** » Fri Aug 16, 2013 10:18 pm

"Running Water"? -_-

by **Zagornias** » Fri Aug 16, 2013 10:18 pm

Alleniana wrote:
Zagornias wrote:We're not technically allied.

So...
If I attacked Germany, would you help them?

I sure would.

I don't see why you want Holstein and Lubeck.

by **Kryskov** » Fri Aug 16, 2013 10:18 pm

Vehemia wrote:
They look pretty much the same to me, but I'm fine with the Vic II map.

No...

I'm just asking it to be edited. I like it. It makes things more moldable.

by **Soviet Ruk-Tsan** » Fri Aug 16, 2013 10:20 pm

Vehemia wrote:
Soviet Ruk-Tsan wrote:Well, a large portion of that belongs to either the Ukraine or Central Asian guy. Looking at the Urals as a natural barrier, I think that could be a good splitting point.

Sure, do you want the west or east?

West.

by **Vehemia** » Fri Aug 16, 2013 10:21 pm

Soviet Ruk-Tsan wrote:
Vehemia wrote:
Sure, do you want the west or east?

West.

I assume he will as well, that's why I preferred the North-South split.

by **Soviet Ruk-Tsan** » Fri Aug 16, 2013 10:23 pm

Well I'll wait and see Krintz's take on things before anything.

by **Parhe** » Fri Aug 16, 2013 10:23 pm

Soviet Ruk-Tsan wrote:
Vehemia wrote:
Sure, do you want the west or east?

West.

Keeping in mind that all your neighbors will have better technology than your nation except Persia?

by **Alleniana** » Fri Aug 16, 2013 10:23 pm

Zagornias wrote:
Alleniana wrote:So...
If I attacked Germany, would you help them?

I sure would.

I don't see why you want Holstein and Lubeck.

They're useful to me; my most core lands are Denmark, Sweden and Norway, and at the moment, Holstein, Schleswig and Lubeck are the only things stopping me from being the only person with Baltic access, from linking my circle around the Baltic for transport purposes, and from cushioning my only vulnerable core area.

by **Irrelevance (Ancient)** » Fri Aug 16, 2013 10:23 pm

Parhe wrote:
Soviet Ruk-Tsan wrote:West.

Keeping in mind that all your neighbors will have better technology than your nation except Persia?

Probably except me as well, I am just Goths after all, even with centuries of Roman influence.

by **Alleniana** » Fri Aug 16, 2013 10:24 pm

I seem to be one of the only countries not in a former Roman or Mongol area...