Holy fuck yes.
Advertisement
by Nightkill the Emperor » Sat Aug 31, 2013 11:09 am
Nat: Night's always in some bizarre state somewhere between "intoxicated enough to kill a hair metal lead singer" and "annoying Mormon missionary sober".
Swith: It's because you're so awesome. God himself refreshes the screen before he types just to see if Nightkill has written anything while he was off somewhere else.
by Mavorpen » Sat Aug 31, 2013 11:41 am
by Nightkill the Emperor » Sat Aug 31, 2013 11:51 am
Nat: Night's always in some bizarre state somewhere between "intoxicated enough to kill a hair metal lead singer" and "annoying Mormon missionary sober".
Swith: It's because you're so awesome. God himself refreshes the screen before he types just to see if Nightkill has written anything while he was off somewhere else.
by Nude East Ireland » Sat Aug 31, 2013 12:20 pm
Nightkill the Emperor wrote:If D wasn't useful and Megan's son, there are around ten thousand things Sanchez could probably arrest him for.
by Nightkill the Emperor » Sat Aug 31, 2013 12:24 pm
Nat: Night's always in some bizarre state somewhere between "intoxicated enough to kill a hair metal lead singer" and "annoying Mormon missionary sober".
Swith: It's because you're so awesome. God himself refreshes the screen before he types just to see if Nightkill has written anything while he was off somewhere else.
by Nude East Ireland » Sat Aug 31, 2013 12:24 pm
by Esternial » Sat Aug 31, 2013 12:27 pm
Nightkill the Emperor wrote:I'm waiting on Liri to have some time to post to Alison.
I apologise for the weird ups and downs of the recent plotlines (Paris and Pele), but the various schedules of players involved in this didn't coincide beautifully with my own (Astro's school, Esty's tests, so on).
Hopefully this plot will go much more smoothly.
by Nightkill the Emperor » Sat Aug 31, 2013 12:52 pm
Esternial wrote:Nightkill the Emperor wrote:I'm waiting on Liri to have some time to post to Alison.
I apologise for the weird ups and downs of the recent plotlines (Paris and Pele), but the various schedules of players involved in this didn't coincide beautifully with my own (Astro's school, Esty's tests, so on).
Hopefully this plot will go much more smoothly.
It's not your fault mate.
Rest assured, I will be done within five days. However, I still have a few things to deal with, but at least by the end of next week I'll be able to gather the time to catch up with this.
Nat: Night's always in some bizarre state somewhere between "intoxicated enough to kill a hair metal lead singer" and "annoying Mormon missionary sober".
Swith: It's because you're so awesome. God himself refreshes the screen before he types just to see if Nightkill has written anything while he was off somewhere else.
by Nude East Ireland » Sat Aug 31, 2013 1:17 pm
by Constaniana » Sat Aug 31, 2013 1:25 pm
Ameriganastan wrote:I work hard to think of those ludicrous Eric adventure stories, but I don't think I'd have come up with rescuing a three armed alchemist from goblin-monkeys in a million years.
Kudos.
by Nationstatelandsville » Sat Aug 31, 2013 1:52 pm
by Nightkill the Emperor » Sat Aug 31, 2013 1:53 pm
Nationstatelandsville wrote:Poor John Dee, what have we done to him?
Nat: Night's always in some bizarre state somewhere between "intoxicated enough to kill a hair metal lead singer" and "annoying Mormon missionary sober".
Swith: It's because you're so awesome. God himself refreshes the screen before he types just to see if Nightkill has written anything while he was off somewhere else.
by Nationstatelandsville » Sat Aug 31, 2013 1:54 pm
by Nightkill the Emperor » Sat Aug 31, 2013 1:56 pm
Nat: Night's always in some bizarre state somewhere between "intoxicated enough to kill a hair metal lead singer" and "annoying Mormon missionary sober".
Swith: It's because you're so awesome. God himself refreshes the screen before he types just to see if Nightkill has written anything while he was off somewhere else.
by Nationstatelandsville » Sat Aug 31, 2013 2:00 pm
by Nude East Ireland » Sat Aug 31, 2013 2:02 pm
by Astrolinium » Sat Aug 31, 2013 2:04 pm
by Nightkill the Emperor » Sat Aug 31, 2013 2:04 pm
Nat: Night's always in some bizarre state somewhere between "intoxicated enough to kill a hair metal lead singer" and "annoying Mormon missionary sober".
Swith: It's because you're so awesome. God himself refreshes the screen before he types just to see if Nightkill has written anything while he was off somewhere else.
by Nude East Ireland » Sat Aug 31, 2013 2:08 pm
by Nude East Ireland » Sat Aug 31, 2013 2:21 pm
by Liriena » Sat Aug 31, 2013 5:21 pm
I am: A pansexual, pantheist, green socialist An aspiring writer and journalist | Political compass stuff: Economic Left/Right: -8.13 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.92 For: Grassroots democracy, workers' self-management, humanitarianism, pacifism, pluralism, environmentalism, interculturalism, indigenous rights, minority rights, LGBT+ rights, feminism, optimism Against: Nationalism, authoritarianism, fascism, conservatism, populism, violence, ethnocentrism, racism, sexism, religious bigotry, anti-LGBT+ bigotry, death penalty, neoliberalism, tribalism, cynicism ⚧Copy and paste this in your sig if you passed biology and know gender and sex aren't the same thing.⚧ |
by Esternial » Sat Aug 31, 2013 5:24 pm
Liriena wrote:While I get my IC shit together and write a post...
Nat, can I ask for your opinion on a certain literary matter?
Imagine you have two characters.
One is the designated protagonist, the other is a companion. The protagonist is not particularly flat or dull, and his overall character arch is a fundamental part of the plot, but he is also not that complex or interesting. In fact, in the very beginning he's a bit on the ignorant and offensive side.
The other character, the companion, is as three-dimensional as it gets. He has countless intricacies to his personality and background, and he is a bit on the unique side. You personally enjoy writing about this character. You enjoy writing about his actions, his quirks and his dialogue. However, his character arch does not necessarily fit the overall plot or its themes. In fact, a part of this character's arch would render a central theme of the plot irrelevant, and his evolution is not as radical as the protagonist's.
Would you dump the original protagonist and make the companion the new protagonist?
by Nationstatelandsville » Sat Aug 31, 2013 5:26 pm
Liriena wrote:While I get my IC shit together and write a post...
Nat, can I ask for your opinion on a certain literary matter?
Imagine you have two characters.
One is the designated protagonist, the other is a companion. The protagonist is not particularly flat or dull, and his overall character arch is a fundamental part of the plot, but he is also not that complex or interesting. In fact, in the very beginning he's a bit on the ignorant and offensive side.
The other character, the companion, is as three-dimensional as it gets. He has countless intricacies to his personality and background, and he is a bit on the unique side. You personally enjoy writing about this character. You enjoy writing about his actions, his quirks and his dialogue. However, his character arch does not necessarily fit the overall plot or its themes. In fact, a part of this character's arch would render a central theme of the plot irrelevant, and his evolution is not as radical as the protagonist's.
Would you dump the original protagonist and make the companion the new protagonist?
by Liriena » Sat Aug 31, 2013 5:31 pm
Esternial wrote:Yup. Writing should be done for your enjoyment, so forcing yourself to painfully watch your most favourite character pass as a mere sidekick is just sheer mental masochism.
Fellate your mind. Protagonise that companion.
Nationstatelandsville wrote:Personally, though I can't guarantee results because I am unfamiliar with the work, it sounds like an Ahab/Watson kind of situation would work.
To elaborate - tell the story from the protagonist's point-of-view, but focusing on the companion. No one gives a fuck what Watson does, but telling the story from his viewpoint lets us see Holmes as others do and keeps him mysterious.
That is, unless you don't want the companion to be mysterious, at which point... well, I would have to read it, really. But don't force yourself into doing something because of any plans, or on my word.
I am: A pansexual, pantheist, green socialist An aspiring writer and journalist | Political compass stuff: Economic Left/Right: -8.13 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.92 For: Grassroots democracy, workers' self-management, humanitarianism, pacifism, pluralism, environmentalism, interculturalism, indigenous rights, minority rights, LGBT+ rights, feminism, optimism Against: Nationalism, authoritarianism, fascism, conservatism, populism, violence, ethnocentrism, racism, sexism, religious bigotry, anti-LGBT+ bigotry, death penalty, neoliberalism, tribalism, cynicism ⚧Copy and paste this in your sig if you passed biology and know gender and sex aren't the same thing.⚧ |
Advertisement
Return to Portal to the Multiverse
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement