They have 15 divisions in Libya.
Advertisement

by Mort the Lemur » Sat May 18, 2013 3:38 pm

by Lunas Legion » Sat May 18, 2013 3:40 pm

by Epraria » Sat May 18, 2013 3:41 pm

by Emilio Aguinaldo » Sat May 18, 2013 3:45 pm
Emilio Aguinaldo wrote:Grab your gun, point it at bad guy, pull trigger.

by Weltbeherrschung » Sat May 18, 2013 7:37 pm

by Tabret » Sat May 18, 2013 7:54 pm
Sovjetia wrote:Tabret wrote:Elements of the 1st Army, CQC divisions, enter into Benghazi and engage in bloody battles with Italian forces. Although efficient, the CQC divisions had suffered considerable losses, ranging from 2,000 to 5,000 men. Italian forces however, are driven outside the city's major areas, as intense artillery bombardment aids in the demoralization of the Italians. Armored columns roll into the city, obliterating Italian defensive structures and wiping out many Italian soldiers, at a cost of 150 G-1s, and 400 damaged G-1s. In total, Italian losses after this operation number to an astounding 100,000, mainly due to the bombardment of the city and the insertion of the CQC units who were trained in urban warfare. Italian soldiers are surrendering to Saudi forces in the hundreds.
A plan for advancing into Italian Libya is made. The 1st Army will travel up the coast, capturing important points and fortifications. avoiding cities and Italian military concenctrations, and blocking the flow of supplies from Italy. This will cut off the Italian army and cause mass-starvation among their ranks.
1. Saudi wouldn't have that many men
2. We have a lot of troops stationed there they have better training and better equipment
3. Italian navy ships would pound your positions near coasts
4. We have better armor then you
5. How did you even get here
All together you have like no chance at success

by Mort the Lemur » Sat May 18, 2013 8:01 pm
Tabret wrote:Sovjetia wrote:1. Saudi wouldn't have that many men
2. We have a lot of troops stationed there they have better training and better equipment
3. Italian navy ships would pound your positions near coasts
4. We have better armor then you
5. How did you even get here
All together you have like no chance at success
Would you please read some bloody history?
http://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/2WWitalyA.htm
1.We have 80, 000. The British in real life annihilated the 1 mlion-man Italian army with a force of 36, 000.
2. Our camel riders have better training than your best troops. Once again, read some bloody history.
3.We've already sent naval escorts who were ordered to engage w8ty enemy ships if attacked.
4. You had 3 armored divisions with the crappiest tanks of the war. Read the goddamn history books. On the other hand, we have a variety of light and heavy tanks and artillery guns, which are engaged in combined operations that have 0roved their effectiveness in real life.
5.Read the IC. I repeated the post which contained the numbers of men Im deploying to Libya two times. It is not my problem if you do not read the IC properly, I've been expanding military industry ever since the start and have expanded the number of men accordingly, as well as having posted the deployment of my forces a while ago.
Not to mention that unlike other players, I'm not godmodding the battles. If I were to do the same, I would have steam rolled through your forces in a fortnight, but I'm being neutral on the matter whenever I'm announcing the results of battles.
The conquest shall continue as planned

by Sovjetia » Sat May 18, 2013 8:09 pm
Tabret wrote:Sovjetia wrote:1. Saudi wouldn't have that many men
2. We have a lot of troops stationed there they have better training and better equipment
3. Italian navy ships would pound your positions near coasts
4. We have better armor then you
5. How did you even get here
All together you have like no chance at success
Would you please read some bloody history?
http://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/2WWitalyA.htm
1.We have 80, 000. The British in real life annihilated the 1 mlion-man Italian army with a force of 36, 000.
2. Our camel riders have better training than your best troops. Once again, read some bloody history.
3.We've already sent naval escorts who were ordered to engage w8ty enemy ships if attacked.
4. You had 3 armored divisions with the crappiest tanks of the war. Read the goddamn history books. On the other hand, we have a variety of light and heavy tanks and artillery guns, which are engaged in combined operations that have 0roved their effectiveness in real life.
5.Read the IC. I repeated the post which contained the numbers of men Im deploying to Libya two times. It is not my problem if you do not read the IC properly, I've been expanding military industry ever since the start and have expanded the number of men accordingly, as well as having posted the deployment of my forces a while ago.
Not to mention that unlike other players, I'm not godmodding the battles. If I were to do the same, I would have steam rolled through your forces in a fortnight, but I'm being neutral on the matter whenever I'm announcing the results of battles.
The conquest shall continue as planned

by Tabret » Sat May 18, 2013 8:22 pm
Sovjetia wrote:Tabret wrote:
Would you please read some bloody history?
http://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/2WWitalyA.htm
1.We have 80, 000. The British in real life annihilated the 1 mlion-man Italian army with a force of 36, 000.
2. Our camel riders have better training than your best troops. Once again, read some bloody history.
3.We've already sent naval escorts who were ordered to engage w8ty enemy ships if attacked.
4. You had 3 armored divisions with the crappiest tanks of the war. Read the goddamn history books. On the other hand, we have a variety of light and heavy tanks and artillery guns, which are engaged in combined operations that have 0roved their effectiveness in real life.
5.Read the IC. I repeated the post which contained the numbers of men Im deploying to Libya two times. It is not my problem if you do not read the IC properly, I've been expanding military industry ever since the start and have expanded the number of men accordingly, as well as having posted the deployment of my forces a while ago.
Not to mention that unlike other players, I'm not godmodding the battles. If I were to do the same, I would have steam rolled through your forces in a fortnight, but I'm being neutral on the matter whenever I'm announcing the results of battles.
The conquest shall continue as planned
1. Your not the British
2. How would you train 80,000 Saudis when most of your nation is desert
3. Though they would be quickly wiped out or rendered inaffective due to the fact your navy is a stone compared to the Italian boulder
4. I sent more men there awhile ago in the IC and correction our tanks are way better then your Saudi crap I still don't understand how you get so many tanks if this is meant to be MORE REALISTIC
5. Ok then

by Sovjetia » Sat May 18, 2013 8:27 pm
Tabret wrote:Sovjetia wrote:1. Your not the British
2. How would you train 80,000 Saudis when most of your nation is desert
3. Though they would be quickly wiped out or rendered inaffective due to the fact your navy is a stone compared to the Italian boulder
4. I sent more men there awhile ago in the IC and correction our tanks are way better then your Saudi crap I still don't understand how you get so many tanks if this is meant to be MORE REALISTIC
5. Ok then
1. The British have sent an accompanying division, read the IC.
2.You've got to be kidding me. READ THE IC
3. Your ships have almost non-existent AA defenses, and our aircraft can easily many of your ships. Our kamikaze ships would also destroy your heavy ships.
4. Read the goddamn link I posted, it says it all over there. Our tanks are way better than yours. For the SECOND time, we have begun industrialising our country since the beginning of the game
My forces got there thru Egypt, as permission was granted by the British.
Period.

by Mort the Lemur » Sat May 18, 2013 8:30 pm
Tabret wrote:Sovjetia wrote:1. Your not the British
2. How would you train 80,000 Saudis when most of your nation is desert
3. Though they would be quickly wiped out or rendered inaffective due to the fact your navy is a stone compared to the Italian boulder
4. I sent more men there awhile ago in the IC and correction our tanks are way better then your Saudi crap I still don't understand how you get so many tanks if this is meant to be MORE REALISTIC
5. Ok then
1. The British have sent an accompanying division, read the IC.
2.You've got to be kidding me. READ THE IC
3. Your ships have almost non-existent AA defenses, and our aircraft can easily many of your ships. Our kamikaze ships would also destroy your heavy ships.
4. Read the goddamn link I posted, it says it all over there. Our tanks are way better than yours. For the SECOND time, we have begun industrialising our country since the beginning of the game
My forces got there thru Egypt, as permission was granted by the British.
Period.

by Tabret » Sat May 18, 2013 8:33 pm
Sovjetia wrote:Tabret wrote:
1. The British have sent an accompanying division, read the IC.
2.You've got to be kidding me. READ THE IC
3. Your ships have almost non-existent AA defenses, and our aircraft can easily many of your ships. Our kamikaze ships would also destroy your heavy ships.
4. Read the goddamn link I posted, it says it all over there. Our tanks are way better than yours. For the SECOND time, we have begun industrialising our country since the beginning of the game
My forces got there thru Egypt, as permission was granted by the British.
Period.
As OP said Realistic

by Unified states of North China » Sat May 18, 2013 8:33 pm
Tabret wrote:Sovjetia wrote:1. Your not the British
2. How would you train 80,000 Saudis when most of your nation is desert
3. Though they would be quickly wiped out or rendered inaffective due to the fact your navy is a stone compared to the Italian boulder
4. I sent more men there awhile ago in the IC and correction our tanks are way better then your Saudi crap I still don't understand how you get so many tanks if this is meant to be MORE REALISTIC
5. Ok then
1. The British have sent an accompanying division, read the IC.
2.You've got to be kidding me. READ THE IC
3. Your ships have almost non-existent AA defenses, and our aircraft can easily many of your ships. Our kamikaze ships would also destroy your heavy ships.
4. Read the goddamn link I posted, it says it all over there. Our tanks are way better than yours. For the SECOND time, we have begun industrialising our country since the beginning of the game
My forces got there thru Egypt, as permission was granted by the British.
Period.

by Sovjetia » Sat May 18, 2013 8:34 pm
Mort the Lemur wrote:Tabret wrote:
1. The British have sent an accompanying division, read the IC.
2.You've got to be kidding me. READ THE IC
3. Your ships have almost non-existent AA defenses, and our aircraft can easily many of your ships. Our kamikaze ships would also destroy your heavy ships.
4. Read the goddamn link I posted, it says it all over there. Our tanks are way better than yours. For the SECOND time, we have begun industrialising our country since the beginning of the game
My forces got there thru Egypt, as permission was granted by the British.
Period.
I can contest number three, but only that. Most ships of tht time are very aircraftphobic, so they should have AA.

by Unified states of North China » Sat May 18, 2013 8:36 pm
Sovjetia wrote:Mort the Lemur wrote:I can contest number three, but only that. Most ships of tht time are very aircraftphobic, so they should have AA.
This RP is meant to be more Realistic in 1939 does anyone think Arabia can have 80,000 well trained soldiers a decent Air Force Tank force and navy also defeating the Italians out of Libya I sure don't think so unless something dramatic happened before 39

by Tabret » Sat May 18, 2013 8:36 pm
Mort the Lemur wrote:Tabret wrote:
1. The British have sent an accompanying division, read the IC.
2.You've got to be kidding me. READ THE IC
3. Your ships have almost non-existent AA defenses, and our aircraft can easily many of your ships. Our kamikaze ships would also destroy your heavy ships.
4. Read the goddamn link I posted, it says it all over there. Our tanks are way better than yours. For the SECOND time, we have begun industrialising our country since the beginning of the game
My forces got there thru Egypt, as permission was granted by the British.
Period.
I can contest number three, but only that. Most ships of tht time are very aircraftphobic, so they should have AA.

by Unified states of North China » Sat May 18, 2013 8:40 pm

by Tabret » Sat May 18, 2013 8:42 pm
Sovjetia wrote:Mort the Lemur wrote:I can contest number three, but only that. Most ships of tht time are very aircraftphobic, so they should have AA.
This RP is meant to be more Realistic in 1939 does anyone think Arabia can have 80,000 well trained soldiers a decent Air Force Tank force and navy also defeating the Italians out of Libya I sure don't think so unless something dramatic happened before 39

by Sovjetia » Sat May 18, 2013 8:47 pm
Tabret wrote:Sovjetia wrote:This RP is meant to be more Realistic in 1939 does anyone think Arabia can have 80,000 well trained soldiers a decent Air Force Tank force and navy also defeating the Italians out of Libya I sure don't think so unless something dramatic happened before 39
Its 1941 now. And read the IC for that
The depression affected consumer goods industries mainly and S.A was not deeply affected by it.

by Mort the Lemur » Sat May 18, 2013 10:18 pm
Sovjetia wrote:Tabret wrote:
Its 1941 now. And read the IC for that
The depression affected consumer goods industries mainly and S.A was not deeply affected by it.
Still you can't modernize a nation in 2 years and be stable enough to fight a war without total collapse and another thing is the depression though Saudi has oil doesn't mean it's gonna be the riches nation and be able to build a navy airforce tank force from scratch then go fight a costly war against a much stronger enemy

by Alleniana » Sat May 18, 2013 10:28 pm

by Mort the Lemur » Sat May 18, 2013 10:33 pm
Alleniana wrote:Blahdy hell
Saudi Arabia, although I agree with some of your points, you cannot just steamroll all the Italian forces in Libya. You must give the Italian player a chance to respond.
Listen:
For those of you who say that SA is modernized, it is not. It is on the way, but you cannot just suddenly modernize in that amount of time, otherwise, someone would've already done so.
No offensive military is that is outside the borders of a country may be more than 1% of that country's military except under special circumstances (like you are Sparta and you're invading Athens who have already captured Sparta)
Final Rulings
All conflicts in Libya and South America must be redone, and they will keep being redone until they are satisfactorily ungodmoddy.
Also, the tank numbers are absurd. Even today, the USA only has about 8,000 tanks in total. Calculate as if for each 50,000 people, one tank may be built, although this is still quite high. Less industrialized countries (like Saudi Arabia or Mexico) will likely have around 1 tank for 100,000 people. Also, around 33% of all tanks will be in repair, refuel and things like that at any one time.

by Alleniana » Sat May 18, 2013 11:08 pm
Mort the Lemur wrote:Alleniana wrote:Blahdy hell
Saudi Arabia, although I agree with some of your points, you cannot just steamroll all the Italian forces in Libya. You must give the Italian player a chance to respond.
Listen:
For those of you who say that SA is modernized, it is not. It is on the way, but you cannot just suddenly modernize in that amount of time, otherwise, someone would've already done so.
No offensive military is that is outside the borders of a country may be more than 1% of that country's military except under special circumstances (like you are Sparta and you're invading Athens who have already captured Sparta)
Final Rulings
All conflicts in Libya and South America must be redone, and they will keep being redone until they are satisfactorily ungodmoddy.
Also, the tank numbers are absurd. Even today, the USA only has about 8,000 tanks in total. Calculate as if for each 50,000 people, one tank may be built, although this is still quite high. Less industrialized countries (like Saudi Arabia or Mexico) will likely have around 1 tank for 100,000 people. Also, around 33% of all tanks will be in repair, refuel and things like that at any one time.
The question still stand, how many planes and tnks do I need to destroy to en the god damn argument.

by Mort the Lemur » Sun May 19, 2013 1:09 am

by Alleniana » Sun May 19, 2013 1:15 am
Advertisement
Return to Portal to the Multiverse
Users browsing this forum: Bentus, Great Confederacy of Commonwealth States, Ovstylap, Pentapolitan Kyrene, Segmentia, The corporate states of Astavar, The Epic Notepad of GrangerAirstrike, Wanchun
Advertisement