New Aksarben wrote:Alleniana wrote:Several strong emperors, because in a single battle stuff changes. e.g., Battle of Britain. A single battle. It could've lost or won WW2 resulting in a possible Nazi Europe, even Nazi controlled massive empire. A single battle. In this, the Roman army got lucky, smashed the German faces in and went on with their business.
still.... The emperor wouldn't have changed the generals. the generals were the ones that actually did the fighting not the Emperor.
Yeah...I didn't say he did. Luck is often very influential in battles, if Napoleon had acted a few hours earlier at Waterloo, he would've likely won. There are asteroids where a couple of metres difference is the difference between striking New York city and whizzing past the moon. The Romans got lucky and the Germans got screwed over.


