Monfrox wrote:Very well then. My previous edit still stands, though.
You threatened a messenger that was not otherwise causing harm. He would've been gone, but YOU went up to him and wouldn't let him leave, then laid hands on him and said threatening things with a sadistic smile. You're the aggressor here. He was simply defending himself.
Then you shot him (a person with diplomatic immunity), which is justification for retaliation. Again, YOU are the aggressor. They may have been blanks, but no one is going to know that. If you were to fire blanks at an official, do you think that'll end well for you, even if they were blanks?
No, you'd be gunned down by security guards who simply see someone firing on an important person for no reason.
Now of course, this all begs the greater question of: Swith shot you, why are you blaming me?





X10000000