NEW 2030 RP (OOC/SIGN UPS) (OPEN)

by **The New Sea Territory** » Thu Jan 17, 2013 9:02 am

Pragia wrote:
The New Sea Territory wrote:
I actually want to do this.
Yep...Ok, Does anyone object to three new rules:

1. The Roaming Satirist can not be killed unless the world goes to nuclear war.

2. The Roaming Satirist is allowed to travel anywhere, disrespect anything, and generally F--k up anyone's day on the IC. (In-Character, of course.)

3. The Roaming Satirist is the OP's In-game representation.

I like this plan
But could he just not like assassinate leaders and stuff

Of course. He really just voices his opinion and does nothing.
Would be funny though.

by **Bering** » Thu Jan 17, 2013 9:30 am

I say we should still have the UN, simply because it is easier (and a bit more fun) if we add in a separate thread for the UN (2030 RP: UN) and use it to condemn nations, discus peace, and vote on things without clogging up the main page,
just my Opinion, but when we had one on General Nations it made the game a lot more interesting and fun

by **Saint Clarke** » Thu Jan 17, 2013 10:18 am

Bering wrote:I say we should still have the UN, simply because it is easier (and a bit more fun) if we add in a separate thread for the UN (2030 RP: UN) and use it to condemn nations, discus peace, and vote on things without clogging up the main page,
just my Opinion, but when we had one on General Nations it made the game a lot more interesting and fun

I'd say no on the UN thingy. We'd never use it and it wouldn't have any effect, as we'd be to occupied doing other things

by **Pragia** » Thu Jan 17, 2013 10:20 am

No to un

by **The New Sea Territory** » Thu Jan 17, 2013 12:47 pm

If you guys will come together in-game, put in RP Money to it and all that, I'll set one up. But you have to agree on it.

I expect a LOT of funding for this. If you start to support it, when I see it has enough (not too much, but a lot) funding, I'll start it.

by **Bojikami** » Thu Jan 17, 2013 12:52 pm

Heyya

by **Confederate States 0f America** » Thu Jan 17, 2013 12:52 pm

I'd say no to the UN. The African Union has also collapsed and their collapse is more beneficial to the DRC.

by **Pragia** » Thu Jan 17, 2013 3:59 pm

I'm waiting for the first big nation to make a true power play in the pacific so I could try my hand at interventionalism, no Korea does not count, seeing as I can't fight either side. Im thinking of backing a capitalist resistance in Mexico...

by **The Empire of Pretantia** » Thu Jan 17, 2013 4:01 pm

Pragia wrote:I'm waiting for the first big nation to make a true power play in the pacific so I could try my hand at interventionalism, no Korea does not count, seeing as I can't fight either side. Im thinking of backing a capitalist resistance in Mexico...

I'll be going to Mexic after I resolve Korean defense.

by **Pragia** » Thu Jan 17, 2013 4:03 pm

Grrrr... Personal Morality preventing me from attacking NK and breaking deal with china

by **The Empire of Pretantia** » Thu Jan 17, 2013 4:05 pm

Pragia wrote:Grrrr... Personal Morality preventing me from attacking NK and breaking deal with china

I'll have to convince China to lose the leech too.

by **New high charity 24** » Thu Jan 17, 2013 6:50 pm

NS Name- New High Charity 24
Country- The Socialist Republic of Poland
Ideology- Marxist-Leninist Communism
Military Strength(Use modern number)- 1,000,000?
Availability- 'Always available', except when I am at school.
2 RP Samples- Look a role play example!

by **The New Sea Territory** » Fri Jan 18, 2013 7:35 am

New high charity 24 wrote:NS Name- New High Charity 24
Country- The Socialist Republic of Poland
Ideology- Marxist-Leninist Communism
Military Strength(Use modern number)- 1,000,000?
Availability- 'Always available', except when I am at school.
2 RP Samples- Look a role play example!

Er....no. Way to many communists already. Maybe a democracy?

by **Pragia** » Fri Jan 18, 2013 8:11 am

The New Sea Territory wrote:
New high charity 24 wrote:NS Name- New High Charity 24
Country- The Socialist Republic of Poland
Ideology- Marxist-Leninist Communism
Military Strength(Use modern number)- 1,000,000?
Availability- 'Always available', except when I am at school.
2 RP Samples- Look a role play example!

Er....no. Way to many communists already. Maybe a democracy?

Let them in.
*Ques transformers music*
I'll TAKE THEM ALL ON!

by **Bering** » Fri Jan 18, 2013 8:43 am

The New Sea Territory wrote:
New high charity 24 wrote:NS Name- New High Charity 24
Country- The Socialist Republic of Poland
Ideology- Marxist-Leninist Communism
Military Strength(Use modern number)- 1,000,000?
Availability- 'Always available', except when I am at school.
2 RP Samples- Look a role play example!

Er....no. Way to many communists already. Maybe a democracy?

how about we meet in the middle and say Socialist Democracy?
I mean all that would be accomplished from making him neutral is a name change, he will most likely still act like he would if he were left, he would just throw in a conservative party and call it a day

by **The Empire of Pretantia** » Fri Jan 18, 2013 8:44 am

Bering wrote:
The New Sea Territory wrote:
Er....no. Way to many communists already. Maybe a democracy?

how about we meet in the middle and say Socialist Democracy?
I mean all that would be accomplished from making him neutral is a name change, he will most likely still act like he would if he were left, he would just throw in a conservative party and call it a day

Let's go a little further and make it a social democracy!

by **Bering** » Fri Jan 18, 2013 8:50 am

The Empire of Pretantia wrote:
Bering wrote:how about we meet in the middle and say Socialist Democracy?
I mean all that would be accomplished from making him neutral is a name change, he will most likely still act like he would if he were left, he would just throw in a conservative party and call it a day

Let's go a little further and make it a social democracy!

fine, we can let him decide when he gets back

by **The Empire of Pretantia** » Fri Jan 18, 2013 8:51 am

Bering wrote:
The Empire of Pretantia wrote:Let's go a little further and make it a social democracy!

fine, we can let him decide when he gets back

Why stop there? Why not by an Anarchy?

by **Bering** » Fri Jan 18, 2013 8:55 am

The Empire of Pretantia wrote:
Bering wrote:fine, we can let him decide when he gets back

Why stop there? Why not by an Anarchy?

which way are we going now?

by **The Empire of Pretantia** » Fri Jan 18, 2013 8:58 am

Bering wrote:
The Empire of Pretantia wrote:Why stop there? Why not by an Anarchy?

which way are we going now?

First we were communist, then we were socialist democracy, then we were social democracy, then we were anarchy.

by **Bering** » Fri Jan 18, 2013 9:04 am

The Empire of Pretantia wrote:
Bering wrote:which way are we going now?

First we were communist, then we were socialist democracy, then we were social democracy, then we were anarchy.

I got that, but how the hell do you go from Social Democracy to Anarchy?

by **The Empire of Pretantia** » Fri Jan 18, 2013 9:10 am

Bering wrote:
The Empire of Pretantia wrote:First we were communist, then we were socialist democracy, then we were social democracy, then we were anarchy.

I got that, but how the hell do you go from Social Democracy to Anarchy?

I got bored.

by **Bering** » Fri Jan 18, 2013 9:14 am

The Empire of Pretantia wrote:
Bering wrote:I got that, but how the hell do you go from Social Democracy to Anarchy?

I got bored.

okay, well then to continue the pattern,
Lets take it further and go Monarchy!

by **The Empire of Pretantia** » Fri Jan 18, 2013 9:16 am

Bering wrote:
The Empire of Pretantia wrote:I got bored.

okay, well then to continue the pattern,
Lets take it further and go Monarchy!

Absolute!

by **Bering** » Fri Jan 18, 2013 9:27 am

The Empire of Pretantia wrote:
Bering wrote:okay, well then to continue the pattern,
Lets take it further and go Monarchy!

Absolute!

Unitary Republic!

NEW 2030 RP (OOC/SIGN UPS) (OPEN)

Who is online